Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Is Ukraine about to have a war?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Is Ukraine about to have a war?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 10:59
  #13841 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,174
Received 281 Likes on 158 Posts
Originally Posted by _Agrajag_
Not how it works. Look at other joint ventures. Even a minor partner can own critical IP that controls how the bit of kit gets used. Daft example, but the UK nuclear deterrent wasn't wholly under UK control. There was a lot of US IP in most of the weapons that meant the US called the shots on what the UK could or could not do.

We are seeing Germany refusing to allow other countries send their Leopards to Ukraine. What's to stop Germany refusing to allow the UK to send any kit with a German IP turret somewhere it doesn't want to?
(Oberndorf, I believe).
The mistake re UK nuclear weapons has already been pointed out: here is another example. In 2013 Saudi wanted to order 800 Leopard 2 tanks - an enormous order. This was refused on political grounds and the Saudis bought M1A1/2 instead. Both of these tanks use the 120 mm cannon which is built under a license from Rheinmetall. Either the German government doesn't care when the component is much less obviously "German " than a complete tank ( not many newspaper reader will know/care about the origin of the cannon ) or "free use " was part of the license contract,

Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 11:04
  #13842 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,174
Received 281 Likes on 158 Posts
F16's seen as being of little importance ?

It puzzles me somewhat that the agreed supply of F16's from NL is being noted with a sort of "yeah, ok" and nothing more. I would have thought this significantly more important than the tank question.
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 11:18
  #13843 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 775
Received 570 Likes on 209 Posts
Originally Posted by sheikhthecamel
Curious: do you think there is the required political will amongst the Western allies to support UKR re-taking Crimea?
I mean "we" effectively turned a blind eye for 8yrs, so what's the political calculus that justifies a roll-back on this stance? And will it wash with the electorate who may settle for a de-minimis "victory" of pre- Feb 2022 borders?
Given the gyrations of the French and Germans governments to do the minimum possible, I have serious reservations that re-taking Crimea will get the support needed.
The annexation of Crimea by Russia has never been recognised by the UN or in many other countries and resulted in sanctions being applied. How long that status quo would have remained is now a moot point because Putin's adventurism has inadvertently put it under direct threat. As others have pointed out, the continued Russian occupation of Crimea would be a loaded gun pointing at Kiev, so if Western support for Ukraine puts them in a position to force the Russians out they will probably do it. By their actions (or lack of them) Germany and France are making themselves irrelevant.
Video Mixdown is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 11:28
  #13844 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,037
Received 2,910 Likes on 1,247 Posts
Originally Posted by sheikhthecamel
Curious: do you think there is the required political will amongst the Western allies to support UKR re-taking Crimea?
I mean "we" effectively turned a blind eye for 8yrs, so what's the political calculus that justifies a roll-back on this stance? And will it wash with the electorate who may settle for a de-minimis "victory" of pre- Feb 2022 borders?

Given the gyrations of the French and Germans governments to do the minimum possible, I have serious reservations that re-taking Crimea will get the support needed.
I don't know, but can you see any other way of ending the conflict?, if Russia is allowed to retain those post 2014 lands then they will have the ability to relaunch an attack when they have suitably rearmed and at the time of their choosing. Without the bridge, the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov coast Line and its ports the opportunity to bring in troops from Russsia will be limited to the land borders thus making Ukraine far more able to defend themselves, They could rip up all the rail routes and road routes along the border making any future incursions difficult to sustain.
The problem with the Pre Feb 2022 borders is Ukraines Oil, Gas and mineral wealth is in those areas you describe along with the offshore fields. Why would Ukraine ever agree to give those up along with their lands, especially after the cost in Ukrainian lives in the likes of Mariupol.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 12:21
  #13845 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,698
Received 933 Likes on 552 Posts
Originally Posted by wondering
Realistically, how long can UKR withstand RU? Even with all the Western support it can get and a kill ratio of 3:1 (which I reckon is too optimistic) I am afraid RU will wear down UKR eventually. Maybe not this year or even next year. UKR is at a huge disadvantage when it comes to manpower. What must happen to give UKR the edge it needs to defeat RU?

Imho, RU aggression will not end by outside pressure. No matter how horrific its own losses. Vlad will just keep going unless he is stopped by internal pressure which isn't seen anywhere at this stage.
The will to continue the fight is the pivotal point. Ukraine really now has no choice, whereas the cost for Russia can be become intolerable and the political will to continue may then fail. Logically, N Vietnam could never have succeeded against the might of the US if you just assessed it in terms of numbers and kit.
Ninthace is online now  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 12:30
  #13846 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: The Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,713
Received 287 Likes on 130 Posts
Originally Posted by jolihokistix
Reminds me of the new paperback, "Tanks for Ukraine", by Hugo First.
We saw what you did there. .
T28B is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by T28B:
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 14:54
  #13847 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: (ex)Sandpit currently more temperate
Posts: 56
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
I don't know, but can you see any other way of ending the conflict?, if Russia is allowed to retain those post 2014 lands then they will have the ability to relaunch an attack when they have suitably rearmed and at the time of their choosing. .....
A military victory with Ukranian's "ejecting the Russian forces" seems far over the horizon: Mark Miley - chairman of Joint Chief of Staff said just a few days ago that it would be "very, very difficult" for Ukraine to take back control of all occupied territory this year. Next year then? The year after? I don't think Ukraine will enjoy indefinite and unconditional support, so its in backers interest that the conflict ends quickly; in timescales that may be incompatible with a military victory. And even if that eventuated, would it guarantee no future Russian aggression, or just continued low(er) intensity conflict around restored borders?

Another option is a obviously a negotiated settlement ... that isn't a Russian ruse to pause and rebuild. For a good-faith negotiation the core demands of one side have to materially change. Current prospects for that seem rather thin. Unless ....

.... there is a Russian implosion; social and/or economic, and with the "consent" of Putin's associate, who see more to gain from letting it pan-out than trying to stop it.

This last option is - IMHO - the most likely end to the conflict, as it could meet the pre-conditions for that negotiated settlement mentioned above, depending on what the immediate post-Putin Russia looks like. Whether this could lead to Crimea returning to Ukranian control I have no idea. I do however think that lasting peace will only come with some security guarantees for Ukraine, if not NATO membership. But as always, trying to foresee politically driven decisions is a fools errand...
sheikhthecamel is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 16:15
  #13848 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mostly in my own imagination
Posts: 477
Received 312 Likes on 146 Posts
Originally Posted by henra
There is an important difference: Ukraine is defending its Existance. Russia is 'only' trying to expand it's turf.
Also it's a home game for Ukraine and an away match for Russia with all the advantages and disadvantages that entails
Sue Vêtements is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 16:43
  #13849 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,333
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
USA is offering tanks from their stocks to those countries willing to free the Leopards.
​​​​​​​https://twitter.com/NOELreports/stat...DTzeSKmfEsAAAA
The article highlights one thing which does maybe not really help pushing Scholz to deliver the tanks. Industry representatives are concerned that the prospect of them being replaced with Abrams means that KMW/Rheinmetall and their products will be driven out of these countries with little hope to keep the foothold in these markets for future tank sales once the Countries have switched Training, Maintenenance and Spare Parts stocks to the US model.. So agreeing to give away the Leopards damages the German Arms manufacturers. That said, not letting them giving them away will also hurt them. Between a Rock and a hard place. It's a kind of a poisoned offering (not giving them to Ukraine, but readily giving them to Finland, Poland, Spain) and may explain somewhat heated discussions. Still doesn't excuse the blocking by Scholz. But might rather contribute than discourage him from blocking.

From the artocle:
<Dann kam der russische Überfall auf die Ukraine, und plötzlich erkannten nicht nur die deutsche Bundeswehr, sondern auch andere westliche Streitkräfte, dass sie ihre Kapazitäten zu stark abgebaut hatten. Wenn sie ihre ohnehin zu wenigen Kampfpanzer nun an die Ukraine abgeben sollen, brauchen sie Ersatz. Nicht irgendwann, bis die deutsche Panzerindustrie liefern kann, sondern sofort. Niemand will blank dastehen, wie es der deutsche Heeresinspekteur bei Kriegsausbruch am 24. Februar 2022 für die Bundeswehr beklagte.
Die Wahl eines Panzermodells ist eine langfristige Bindung. Die Ausbildung und das Training der Soldaten, die Infrastruktur für Wartung und Reparatur, die Versorgung mit Ersatzteilen – das alles lässt sich nicht von heute auf morgen von einem Panzertyp auf den anderen umstellen. Wer einmal im Geschäft ist, bleibt auf Jahrzehnte. Im Umkehrschluss: Wer einmal aus dem Geschäft ist, bleibt für lange Zeit draussen.. >

<Then came the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and suddenly not only the German Bundeswehr but also other Western armed forces realized that they had reduced their capacities too much. If they are now to hand over their already too few battle tanks to Ukraine, they need replacements. Not at some point until the German tank industry can deliver, but immediately. No one wants to be left empty-handed, as the German Army Inspector lamented for the Bundeswehr when war broke out on February 24, 2022.

The choice of a tank model is a long-term commitment. The education and training of soldiers, the infrastructure for maintenance and repair, the supply of spare parts - all this cannot be switched from one type of tank to another overnight. Once you're in the business, you stay in it for decades. Conversely: Once you're out of business, you stay out for a long time....>
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
In the bigger scheme of things this is still very short sighted. The damage regarding the reputation being done now is much bigger than maybe buying in future more Leo3 than the bare minimum needed (1000 instead of 300) and then giving them to other Countries for competitive prices. With a higher production volume the manufacturers could set up much more efficient serial production instead of the individual manufactory work they are created in today. The Leopard 2 being used across Europe almost all are built based on the Chassis of the 2125 Leopard 2 once built for the German Army in series production back in the day.

Last edited by henra; 23rd Jan 2023 at 17:11.
henra is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 17:54
  #13850 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,037
Received 2,910 Likes on 1,247 Posts
Originally Posted by henra
The article highlights one thing which does maybe not really help pushing Scholz to deliver the tanks. Industry representatives are concerned that the prospect of them being replaced with Abrams means that KMW/Rheinmetall and their products will be driven out of these countries with little hope to keep the foothold in these markets for future tank sales once the Countries have switched Training, Maintenenance and Spare Parts stocks to the US model.. So agreeing to give away the Leopards damages the German Arms manufacturers. That said, not letting them giving them away will also hurt them. Between a Rock and a hard place. It's a kind of a poisoned offering (not giving them to Ukraine, but readily giving them to Finland, Poland, Spain) and may explain somewhat heated discussions. Still doesn't excuse the blocking by Scholz. But might rather contribute than discourage him from blocking.

From the artocle:

In the bigger scheme of things this is still very short sighted. The damage regarding the reputation being done now is much bigger than maybe buying in future more Leo3 than the bare minimum needed (1000 instead of 300) and then giving them to other Countries for competitive prices. With a higher production volume the manufacturers could set up much more efficient serial production instead of the individual manufactory work they are created in today. The Leopard 2 being used across Europe almost all are built based on the Chassis of the 2125 Leopard 2 once built for the German Army in series production back in the day.
As they are currently developing the latest Leo version it would make sense to put the hulls back into production assuming they can, after all tanks for the last thirty odd years is more or less the same items regurgitated into the latest mark, even the T90 is simply a T 72 with added bling and a new number to flog it to Foreign Countries. Snazzy new names flogs the old dog with new looks but under its skirts it’s still a T72.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 19:32
  #13851 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 314
Received 256 Likes on 51 Posts
The Russians see Sevastopol as theirs and have a large Naval contingent there.
It would be very very difficult for Ukraine to capture unless there is a Russian capitulation along the who front which seems unlikely unless there is the removal of Putin and his pals.
The bigger concern would be the tactical use of a bucket of sunshine as a warning.
If Sevastopol is in imminent danger of falling then the Russians would likely have been pushed back over the border along the front, and without knowing the full US ultimatum, (most likely they will only attack Russian positions in Ukraine), then the Russians have less to loose and are safe over the border.

Putting the UN in there may help a little, but I suspect very few countries will agree to send peacekeepers and it will turn into a counter insurgency mess.
Spunky Monkey is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 19:38
  #13852 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,037
Received 2,910 Likes on 1,247 Posts
Originally Posted by Spunky Monkey
The Russians see Sevastopol as theirs and have a large Naval contingent there.
It would be very very difficult for Ukraine to capture unless there is a Russian capitulation along the who front which seems unlikely unless there is the removal of Putin and his pals.
The bigger concern would be the tactical use of a bucket of sunshine as a warning.
If Sevastopol is in imminent danger of falling then the Russians would likely have been pushed back over the border along the front, and without knowing the full US ultimatum, (most likely they will only attack Russian positions in Ukraine), then the Russians have less to loose and are safe over the border.

Putting the UN in there may help a little, but I suspect very few countries will agree to send peacekeepers and it will turn into a counter insurgency mess.
I thought global warming had rendered the need for a warm water port a moot point as Russia now has ports that no longer freeze up in the Black Sea. Sevastopol was only rented to Russia.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 19:43
  #13853 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,704
Received 348 Likes on 119 Posts
There is only one aggressor in this war and it is Russia.
There is only one country that has invaded and occupied the soil of internationally recognised, sovereign country. That invader is Russia.
Crimea is Ukraine.
If Russia by some chance is announced the winner and Crimea (or any part of Ukraine) recognized as part of Russia, the WW3 is much closer than it will ever be in the case of Ukraine getting to rule its own territory. Russian ambitions do not restrict to Ukraine, just hear what all the former Warsow pact countries have to say and what Russia says of those. What if Russia wins and they start thinking that "wow, all those NATO countries fed Ukraine and still they lost, they must be exhausted by now, now is the time to take the Baltics/Suwalki gap/Poland/Åland islands/Finland/whatever."

What comes to the proposal of replacing Leos with Abrams one to one for countries donating Leos to Ukraine even though Germans wouldn't agree on it: who cares what German arms manufacturers or German government thinks afterwards. The Leos are long gone to Ukraine by then with spares and everything including spare tanks to cannibalize. It's game over for German MBT business at that point once all the customers have turned to something else, and for a reason.

Maybe UK or French MBT business will bloom then, who knows.
Beamr is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 20:01
  #13854 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,333
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Beamr
What comes to the proposal of replacing Leos with Abrams one to one for countries donating Leos to Ukraine even though Germans wouldn't agree on it: who cares what German arms manufacturers or German government thinks afterwards.
I'm not sure the US would be willing to do this. They could probably then wave good bye to their own clauses. Which they consider very important. If Poland does it on their own they might not obect. But to atcively encourage to circumvent these almost holy (to themselves) agreements? I slightly doubt it.
Maybe UK or French MBT business will bloom then, who knows.

Dream on ;-)
Seriously: The French are apparently pondering to get out of MGCS and run Leclerc until they rust away (2060+). UK has largely gotten rid of its own tank manufacturers already.
Next Generation MBT with unmanned turrets currently under actual development are basically MGCS/Leopard 3, Rheinmetall KF51 and Abrams X (leaving Armata aside).
Under actual development with a bigger caliber gun (130 or 140mm, respectively with up to 50% higher muzzle energy) are only Leo3/MGCS and KF51.


Last edited by henra; 23rd Jan 2023 at 20:15.
henra is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 20:15
  #13855 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,704
Received 348 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by henra
I'm not sure the US would be willing to do this. They could probably then wave good bye to their own clauses. Which they consider very important. If Poland does it on their own they might not obect. But to atcively encourage to circumvent these almost holy (to themselves) agreements? I slightly doubt it.
I understand your point, but the longer this current situation goes on the more urgent it will be to provide UKR western MBT's, and the best option in numbers is Leo due to training/spares/logistics (and the turbine engine dispute).
If the west is going to support Ukraine till the end, the MBT's will be needed and if Germans are stubborn something has to be done without them.

And then comes the question of aircrafts as Migs and SU's will need replacement eventually. F16's or some other FJ. What puzzles me is the lack of discussion on that topic though, NL said they'd be happy to provide Vipers, US says why not, end of discussion. What's going on?
Beamr is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 20:32
  #13856 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,257
Received 167 Likes on 102 Posts
Originally Posted by Beamr
I understand your point, but the longer this current situation goes on the more urgent it will be to provide UKR western MBT's, and the best option in numbers is Leo due to training/spares/logistics (and the turbine engine dispute).
If the west is going to support Ukraine till the end, the MBT's will be needed and if Germans are stubborn something has to be done without them.

And then comes the question of aircrafts as Migs and SU's will need replacement eventually. F16's or some other FJ. What puzzles me is the lack of discussion on that topic though, NL said they'd be happy to provide Vipers, US says why not, end of discussion. What's going on?
Beamr
No chance of UK made MBT, it will be an Abraham or Lep 3, we can’t even make a decent APC given current kit assembly one’s issues .

I think you need to understand German politics more as they are not just sending, or Green lighting 14 old Challengers, the ones being sent are not ones that were going to be upgraded. We are talking about a country that invaded Russia with tanks and many of them. If Germany Green lights the re export of Lep 2 there is a potential for many tanks again rolling on the Steppes. If you don’t understand the optics of that in Germany or Russia you do not understand the issues at play.
I am pretty sure Germany will be making tanks for quite awhile yet.

Cheers
Mr Mac
Mr Mac is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 21:05
  #13857 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,704
Received 348 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Mac
Beamr
No chance of UK made MBT, it will be an Abraham or Lep 3, we can’t even make a decent APC given current kit assembly one’s issues .

I think you need to understand German politics more as they are not just sending, or Green lighting 14 old Challengers, the ones being sent are not ones that were going to be upgraded. We are talking about a country that invaded Russia with tanks and many of them. If Germany Green lights the re export of Lep 2 there is a potential for many tanks again rolling on the Steppes. If you don’t understand the optics of that in Germany or Russia you do not understand the issues at play.
I am pretty sure Germany will be making tanks for quite awhile yet.

Cheers
Mr Mac
Well, since we are picking that old fight up again, I do understand the optics of a lot of T34's rolling west through Karelian ishtmus without being invited. And to Katyn. And to Tallinn. And just like Russians today send Siberian people to Ukraine to die, they sent an Ukrainian division to die in Finland as they don't care for others (racial, ethnic, nationality, if not Russian then considered lower people).

Germany already sent Marders and no one bats an eye. Putin couldn't care less which MBT's are fielded, they are still fighting NATO and nazis in their propaganda.
Germany isn't the one Russkies are picking in their propaganda but the US. They want to be amongst the big guys, China and US. They don't compare themselves to any old "US lapdog", it doesn't fit the great Russian Mir thinking.
Beamr is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 21:39
  #13858 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,141
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
We are talking about a country that invaded Russia with tanks and many of them. If Germany Green lights the re export of Lep 2 there is a potential for many tanks again rolling on the Steppes.
How long ago did the 3rd Reich Germany invade the USSR (including Ukraine), and did far fewer rapes and murders in Ukraine than the USSR when they came back the other way?

How long ago (a clue, it's rather more recently) since Russia/the USSR murdered Hungarian and Czech civilians who wanted minor changes towards a more democratic form of government?

Who (except in Putin's perverted mind and propaganda) believes there is the slightest potential for European tanks rolling across the steppes?

I know there can be more than one point of view, but to be respected a point of view needs some basis in reality.

Last edited by Fitter2; 23rd Jan 2023 at 22:43.
Fitter2 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Fitter2:
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 22:20
  #13859 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,956
Received 861 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by Fitter2
Who (except in Putin's perverted mind and propaganda) believes there is the slightest potential for European tanks rolling across the steppes?.
Not even Putin believes Putin. If he did, he would have de-escalated given the provocation he poses.
fdr is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 22:23
  #13860 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,037
Received 2,910 Likes on 1,247 Posts
Crikey.. I wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of that lot.

NutLoose is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.