Is Ukraine about to have a war?
I can't post a link, but well worth watching BBC Newsnight's Victoria Derbyshire interview with the Russian ambassador to UK Andrei Kelin last night. Some of the evidence of Russian soldiers' abuse she presented to him was quite shocking, met with the usual evasion and denials. Hard to believe he lives in Britain and watches our news!
Uk is sending 3 seakings to Ukraine. Crews have already been trained and first is in country.
Not sure what weapons capability they have if any, but guess they would support or casevac
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-63725431
Not sure what weapons capability they have if any, but guess they would support or casevac
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-63725431
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes
on
1,252 Posts
And tucked away at Cosford 
I won't mention the bad practice of dumping parts on the floor instead of getting a rack to put them on, ohhh, just like the empty one next to it..... oops I just did.
I won't mention the bad practice of dumping parts on the floor instead of getting a rack to put them on, ohhh, just like the empty one next to it..... oops I just did.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes
on
1,252 Posts
Heliops appear to have lots of them and spares, I take it they generated three of these.
https://helioperations.co/somerton
https://helioperations.co/somerton
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
“Nonetheless, more mobilisation will soon be needed because the currently mobilised are being used up rapidly.
"Obviously, the current [mobilised] will run out, more people will be needed, according to our calculations, by as soon as the end of winter", says Verstka's source.“
"Obviously, the current [mobilised] will run out, more people will be needed, according to our calculations, by as soon as the end of winter", says Verstka's source.“
As to train8ng up new instructors, good luck with that - unless they’ve got a zombie recruitment programme…
Russia is planning a second wave of partial mobilisation over the winter of 2022/23 but lacks the capacity for a general mobilisation, according to the independent Russian news website Verstka…..
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...451083776.html
Only half a speed-brake
A bit of coherent talk from Twitter, is it?
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...045861890.html
(military aviation + Ukraine conflict content)
https://twitter.com/LivFaustDieJung/status/1595206514045861890
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...045861890.html
(military aviation + Ukraine conflict content)
https://twitter.com/LivFaustDieJung/status/1595206514045861890
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thing that REALLY worries me is when the damage to Ukrainian infrastructure becomes so great that Ukraine has to consider taking major action outside its borders. There is some evidence that they may have been making small attacks, sabotaging facilities in Russia, but no positive proof that this hasn't been done by Russians that are opposed to the war. Kyiv is now without power, Russia having just knocked it out.
Russia seems to believe that they can get Ukraine to stop opposing their invasion by doing this. My reading of the runes is that Ukraine will do no such thing, every time Russia ramps up attacks it just seems to make Ukraine even more determined. I fear that, sooner or later, there will be a Ukrainian attack on a major Russian city. I think it's naive to assume that Ukraine isn't busy developing and building long range weapons with the capability to do this. Until now they've stuck firmly to a policy of just defending their own sovereign territory, but how long is that policy going to hold out?
I'm sure that a fair bit of the aid being given to Ukraine is dependent on assurances that Ukraine will not escalate their defence efforts beyond their own borders, but if the situation becomes desperate enough this winter, then who knows what they will do?
Russia seems to believe that they can get Ukraine to stop opposing their invasion by doing this. My reading of the runes is that Ukraine will do no such thing, every time Russia ramps up attacks it just seems to make Ukraine even more determined. I fear that, sooner or later, there will be a Ukrainian attack on a major Russian city. I think it's naive to assume that Ukraine isn't busy developing and building long range weapons with the capability to do this. Until now they've stuck firmly to a policy of just defending their own sovereign territory, but how long is that policy going to hold out?
I'm sure that a fair bit of the aid being given to Ukraine is dependent on assurances that Ukraine will not escalate their defence efforts beyond their own borders, but if the situation becomes desperate enough this winter, then who knows what they will do?
Last edited by Old_Slartibartfast; 23rd Nov 2022 at 12:22. Reason: typo
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
BREAKING: EU parliament votes in favour of labelling Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism
Do we let Putin destroy Ukraine or do we show some ball$ and provide Ukraine with the means to hit Russian infrastructure?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes
on
1,252 Posts
Ukraine needs to win in Ukraine, against the invader, they don't need to be attacking Russian civilians, after all the Russians have already a much worse issue, they have to wake up and look at themselves in the mirror for the next few generations, and know that what looks back is the cause of the failure of their nation, and of what will soon be a distant memory, the Russian Federation. They have no one else to blame.
Just to be clear, I wasn't suggesting attacking Russian civilians as such, but their infrastructure. Granted, there may unfortunately be civilian casualties among the personnel.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes
on
1,252 Posts
I would imagine hitting Russian substations etc would cause them more grief that Ukraine, at least Ukraine has the west to supply parts for the damaged sub stations. I would imagine a lot of the russian stuff is western supplied.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes
on
64 Posts
Thanks, EU ... a small step forward in recognising the reality.
Now, can we see more sanctions to seriously cripple Putin's evil regime? No, not just the oligarchs: I'm talking about total isolation from ANYTHING that could benefit the RU. Can more be done?
Now, can we see more sanctions to seriously cripple Putin's evil regime? No, not just the oligarchs: I'm talking about total isolation from ANYTHING that could benefit the RU. Can more be done?
The more I read about the strikes on Ukraine's energy infrastructure with winter upon them, the more I think that the time is fast approaching for physical NATO intervention. A terrorist state as declared by the European Parliament, endless war crimes and the now suffering of innocent millions throughout the winter. Get Ukraine into NATO and blast Putin and his rotten regime out of their country. Missed opportunity with the stray missile, but the time to stop pussy-footing has arrived.
Last edited by Confusious; 23rd Nov 2022 at 18:36.
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The more I read about the strikes on Ukraine's energy infrastructure with winter upon them, the more I think that the time is fast approaching for physical NATO intervention. A terrorist state as declared by the European Parliament, endless war crimes and the now suffering of innocent millions throughout the winter. Get Ukraine into NATO and blast Putin and his rotten regime out of their country. Missed opportunity with the stray missile, but the time no stop pussy-footing has arrived.
Much as I've been very reluctant for the West to get involved in yet another conflict on foreign soil, I am seriously worried that this view is going to gain more traction over the coming weeks and months. It frankly terrifies me if it were to happen, as our (as in the West's) track record of engaging in military action in foreign lands isn't exactly a glowing recommendation for the idea.
The multibillion dollar question is knowing how Russia might react if the West were to directly intervene, or even just give Ukraine longer range weapons that could strike deep within Russia. I frankly do not trust any of our assessments of Russian capability, as the past 9 months have proved, beyond doubt, that every one of our assessments has been completely wrong. If we can have been so wrong about their military capability, what else have we seriously misjudged about Russia?
The major fear is that the madmen in the Kremlin may choose to do the unthinkable, and use their nuclear weapons. Some assessments of the remaining Russian weapon capability are suggesting that they have few conventional long range missiles left, and at least two reports suggest that long range missiles that landed in Ukraine, but had no warheads, were dummy nukes, perhaps fired as decoys, perhaps fired out of desperation. This war is evolving into a massively more serious phase now, with Russia under severe sanctions, with badly depleted and poorly trained and equipped land forces, having been declared a terrorist state and having expended most of its warstock of reasonably capable conventional weapons. There has to be a risk that the Kremlin may decide they have nothing to lose by using tactical nukes, and that could well be precipitated by the West upping the ante and taking more direct action.
I would not like having to sit around a table in whatever sort of decision conference decides on these things, it seems an almost intractable problem, with no good outcomes.
Much as I've been very reluctant for the West to get involved in yet another conflict on foreign soil, I am seriously worried that this view is going to gain more traction over the coming weeks and months.
Absolutely, and I'm one of them. I'm getting to the point where I'm thinking that if Russia wants a real war (and they are certainly looking for one now) then let's show them we are prepared to give them one. That in itself may convince Putin's mates that it's time to call it a day.
Absolutely, and I'm one of them. I'm getting to the point where I'm thinking that if Russia wants a real war (and they are certainly looking for one now) then let's show them we are prepared to give them one. That in itself may convince Putin's mates that it's time to call it a day.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Russia remaking the Godfather…. Badly…
Prigozhin sent the European Parliament a sledgehammer in a violin case with an engraved logo of"Wagner" and traces of "blood" on the handle.
This is the Putin's world, that Ukrainians are fighting alone, giving their lives to stop.
Prigozhin sent the European Parliament a sledgehammer in a violin case with an engraved logo of"Wagner" and traces of "blood" on the handle.
This is the Putin's world, that Ukrainians are fighting alone, giving their lives to stop.
It seems an incredible contradiction to me that it is deemed 'acceptable' for Ruzzia to destroy the power, food and water supplies, housing etc all over a nation but for that nation to respond by damaging any infrastructure in Ruzzia it is thought beyond the pale and called escalatory and antagonistic!
What a ridiculously one-sided imbalance.
As to the SeaKings...WTF does Ukraine need antisubmarine helos for? OK, it would be nice to neutralise the Kilos in the Black Sea but that isn't going to happen with three land-based sonar encumbered Mk5s and no highly skilled A/S crews to operate them, leave alone the necessary ordinance to finish the job. But as the BBC's article depicts Junglies...It seems unlikely that the 'journalists' who scribbled this garbage have a clue of what they speak (do they ever?) so I don't think we're much the wiser. A flight of Mk4s might well be useful up to a point, but are there really not enough familiar and easily supported Mil8s around in Europe to do the job without encumbering Ukraine with an entirely seperate logistics organisation running a mere 3 SeaKings? Gibe them 30 (as if!) and it might make sense, but three?
Come on, MoD, surely we can do better than that? Where are all the Mk4s?
Sounds like unnecessary over complication to me as described, but then again maybe it isn't as the fact-free goons in the meeja have 'described' it...
What a ridiculously one-sided imbalance.
As to the SeaKings...WTF does Ukraine need antisubmarine helos for? OK, it would be nice to neutralise the Kilos in the Black Sea but that isn't going to happen with three land-based sonar encumbered Mk5s and no highly skilled A/S crews to operate them, leave alone the necessary ordinance to finish the job. But as the BBC's article depicts Junglies...It seems unlikely that the 'journalists' who scribbled this garbage have a clue of what they speak (do they ever?) so I don't think we're much the wiser. A flight of Mk4s might well be useful up to a point, but are there really not enough familiar and easily supported Mil8s around in Europe to do the job without encumbering Ukraine with an entirely seperate logistics organisation running a mere 3 SeaKings? Gibe them 30 (as if!) and it might make sense, but three?
Come on, MoD, surely we can do better than that? Where are all the Mk4s?
Sounds like unnecessary over complication to me as described, but then again maybe it isn't as the fact-free goons in the meeja have 'described' it...
Last edited by meleagertoo; 23rd Nov 2022 at 19:44.