Is Ukraine about to have a war?
You would think something as simple as a net type curtain slung between some scaffolding towers would protect the substations, the suicide drones are flying from one direction so you can position the screen to cover that direction and the curtain should catch the drone in its dive before it strikes the target. They all seem to rely on basic GPS and they must have a set glidepath to the target, so the angle should be able to be worked out and a screen erected accordingly.
I'd wager this has set in motion lots of 'studies' here in the west.
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd also wager that there are a lot of threat assessments regarding Russia that have been hastily re-written over the past few months. I've been well out of the loop for twelve years, but the last time I went to a RUSI conference that was discussing the potential threats Russia posed (would have been around 2008 or 2009) the capability of their air force and land forces were definitely considered to be significantly better than has been borne out by the war in Ukraine. Medium range missiles seem to be just about the only threat that might have been assessed reasonably accurately, I think.
The impression I have is that we (as in the West) paid too much heed to weapon and platform technical capability, and far too little heed to Russia's ability to effectively deploy their military capability. Ukraine has undoubtedly performed massively better than most in the West would have expected, but there seems little doubt that this has been aided by the incompetence of even some supposedly highly capable Russian forces (like the air assault force at Hostomel). Clearly, Russian logistic support seems to be poor, bordering on non-existent in some areas, which has aided and abetted Ukrainian forces.
I'd also question the decision made by Russia to initiate this war with a ground forces attack with limited top cover. The tactics seem to have been deeply flawed, and very different to those that I think Western countries might adopt. Before starting the ground forces attack against Iraq, for example, there was the "shock and awe" air and missile attack that both knocked out a fair bit of Iraq's air defences and must have played a significant part in putting the fear of god into their ground forces. We didn't see much of that from Russia at the beginning of this war, yet from what's been happening over the past few weeks it seems clear that Russia had the capability to do that.
I believe that the study of this war is going to be a set piece in military colleges around the world for years to come.
The apparent commitment not to allow attacks on Russian territory should be reassessed. Wouldn’t the Russian power grid be at least as vulnerable?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,073
Received 2,942 Likes
on
1,253 Posts
Already on the way tank wise according to this, though I cannot fathom what the heck the navy have to do with it.. pun intended
https://worldnewsera.com/news/uk/roy...-x-ray-vision/
Another thought re the substations, stack freight containers around them to form a wall.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Only occasionally above FL50
Age: 71
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
Already on the way tank wise according to this, though I cannot fathom what the heck the navy have to do with it.. pun intended
https://worldnewsera.com/news/uk/roy...-x-ray-vision/
Another thought re the substations, stack freight containers around them to form a wall.
https://worldnewsera.com/news/uk/roy...-x-ray-vision/
Another thought re the substations, stack freight containers around them to form a wall.
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thinking back to Iraq, wasn't one of the major targets during the first phase of Desert Storm civilian infrastructure, including power generation and sub-stations?
I remember the crew room TV showing those initial "shock and awe" attacks and I'm sure a fair number of the non-military targets were power distribution. Long time ago now, though, and we were very busy at the time (on trials unconnected with that operation) so I was just diving in for a coffee before heading back out to the range. For some reason I have a vivid memory from that time that is almost a series of still photos of that part of the GW1.
I remember the crew room TV showing those initial "shock and awe" attacks and I'm sure a fair number of the non-military targets were power distribution. Long time ago now, though, and we were very busy at the time (on trials unconnected with that operation) so I was just diving in for a coffee before heading back out to the range. For some reason I have a vivid memory from that time that is almost a series of still photos of that part of the GW1.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,814
Received 141 Likes
on
65 Posts
IIRC ffrom my AFOPS posture, a lot of the targets were Mil comms and supporting (power) infrastructure. A subtle difference to RF attacks on … pure civil power.
`Yes, Civil power is an illegal target UNLESS there is a definite and concrete military advantage to attacking it.
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wasn't this the case in GW1? I believe (but stand to be corrected) that a fair bit of Iraq's C2 was located in, or very near, civilian infrastructure, and was using civilian power, so became a legitimate target. Not so sure about the TV and radio transmission towers that were taken out, but doing that has been a feature of war since WWII.
Wasn't this the case in GW1? I believe (but stand to be corrected) that a fair bit of Iraq's C2 was located in, or very near, civilian infrastructure, and was using civilian power, so became a legitimate target. Not so sure about the TV and radio transmission towers that were taken out, but doing that has been a feature of war since WWII.
Guest
While I agree, you are forgetting that most countries would have the ability to strike back with similar or greater effect.
Guest
We have just given Sea Kings to Ukraine. How long before the west has run out of old kit and has to start donating new stuff? Or does the west have a plentiful supply of military tat (for wont of a better phrase).
Just a nuance on that: I’m sure Ukraine has the ability to strike back but not the “permission”. I think they should be given that permission now, using any kit they have or have been given by western countries. Why should they continue to fight with one arm tied behind their backs ?
Mk4 or SAR SeaKings are hardly 'tat' in a context that requires troop mobilty, forward supply or casevac. They may be old tech but they're reliable and capable in their role, hardly different from the comparable Mil8 etc both sides are already using.
Just a few more. Surely we have a couple of squadrons of Junglies in mothball at Colerne or wherever?
They served us well for decades - and how? - but can't we dig them out now for a final blaze of glory?
Just a few more. Surely we have a couple of squadrons of Junglies in mothball at Colerne or wherever?
They served us well for decades - and how? - but can't we dig them out now for a final blaze of glory?
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mostly in my own imagination
Posts: 477
Received 337 Likes
on
155 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good point, but it was pretty contentious, I believe. Mind you the Nazi's bombed the civilian populations of the UK, and we did the same in Germany.
My uncle was a bomb aimer in the second wave over Dresden. He never recovered from seeing that firestorm. He was invalided out of the RAF because he was mentally unfit to fly after that. For some reason the psychological impact of that raid stopped him from being able to write, as well as giving him a speech impediment. He spent the last 15 years of his life shut in his bedroom, with the curtains drawn, unable to cope with the outside world.
In this case there is little or no ambiguity. Just at the onset of winter, these attacks are direct and satisfying punishment on the civilian population. With luck there may be a military spin-off too, but that is secondary for the Russian command and fan base.
Substations supporting RF logistics are a legitimate military target, but can AFU target them? Permission from its suppliers and capability are the questions.
Transmission corridors may be an easier target. In GWII and possibly GWI, missiles draped conductors across the power lines tripping breakers. The line is u/s until it's cleaned up.
As long as conductors are being draped frequently, the line crews can't keep up.
Transmission corridors may be an easier target. In GWII and possibly GWI, missiles draped conductors across the power lines tripping breakers. The line is u/s until it's cleaned up.
As long as conductors are being draped frequently, the line crews can't keep up.