Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Is Ukraine about to have a war?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Is Ukraine about to have a war?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 20:00
  #3921 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,076
Received 2,942 Likes on 1,253 Posts
NutLoose is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 20:31
  #3922 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DIBO
Why don't you as simply say "stop the war"...
I was just explaining beamers short addition to a preceding post. Chill.
(bumped into an old colleague on Friday, his mother lives in Bucha)

FlightDetent is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 21:05
  #3923 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Russian Air Force Su-35S

TEEEJ is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 21:07
  #3924 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
That's a pretty good idea. I don't know if it's something traditional military would consider.
Been around for Ages, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taregh-class_speedboat

Not that effective against a real Warship, Passive Sonar will here the boats coming. Radar will see boats coming. IR / Visual Lookouts can see the boats coming. ESM will pick up any comms chat or Drone transmissions. Ship can run away almost as fast the the boats can go and Main Gun out ranges the ATGM by a large margin as does Radar / Visual command guided SAM/SSM systems. Note I added Drones to the mix as I would open the attack with a drone strike on the ship's main guns. However the Ships ECM most likely would defeat that.
MAINJAFAD is online now  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 21:08
  #3925 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Oxfordshire
Posts: 39
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by FlightDetent
I was just explaining beamers short addition to a preceding post. Chill.
(bumped into an old colleague on Friday, his mother lives in Bucha)
'Lives' - hopefully
eko4me is online now  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 21:43
  #3926 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,076
Received 2,942 Likes on 1,253 Posts
Germany looking at purchasing a missile defence system

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...em-2022-04-02/

BERLIN, April 2 (Reuters) - Berlin is considering buying a missile defence system from Israel or the United States to defend against threats including Russian Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad, German weekly Welt am Sonntag reported on Saturday.

The Iskander missiles can reach almost all of western Europe and there is no missile shield in place to protect against this threat, Germany's chief of defence Eberhard Zorn told Welt am Sonntag in an interview published on Saturday.

"The Israelis and the Americans possess such systems. Which one do we prefer? Will we manage to establish an overall (missile defence) system in NATO? These are the questions we need to answer now," Zorn said.

He did not specify the names of the systems but was most likely referring to Arrow 3 built by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) (ISRAI.UL) and the U.S. system THAAD produced by Raytheon (RTX.N).
NutLoose is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 21:53
  #3927 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,180
Received 286 Likes on 160 Posts

"Naturally, our armed forces will view them as a legitimate target if those supplies get through the Ukrainian border."


For me this is so obvious that I don't understand why anybody is reporting this . Of course there is no special "guardianship" hovering over such weapons; Simply more talk for talk's sake ?
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 22:06
  #3928 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,257
Received 168 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by Imagegear
Having had over a number of years experienced the attitudes of ordinary Russians. It seems that to me that when they come to visit one's country either as a visitor or on business, one is left with the perception that they already "own" your country by their vulgar and arrogant attitude to the citizens, they just have not decided to invade, or annex it yet.

This does not bode well for any future rapprochement.

IG
Imagegear
I think relationships have been poisoned with this for many years indeed sadly probably for my lifetime at age 61, but I hope not. Time for bead as it has been a long day flying.

Cheers
Mr Mac
Mr Mac is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 22:29
  #3929 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Usertim
I am in total agreement with Nutloose. Thinking of all the wars we got involved in over the last 40 years, and for much less evidence or cause or national interest, there stands no reason to deny UKR all the aid they need, of whatever kind. Especially giving stuff ( trade).

I cannot understand the reluctance to face up to Pootins nuclear blackmail, it cannot stand, or will set a tone for the next 50 years of international 'nuclear gunboat' diplomacy and encourage proliferation in many countries.
That ship has sailed, after Qaddafi no ruler in his right mind would ever give up their nuclear capability.
Putin is just showing all of us the bleak truth that behind the nuclear shield, the direst activities may go on.

Separately, we should be very slow to embrace the concept of 'a people's war' in Ukraine. The Russian troops are poorly led at best (afaik there is no discernible commander for the operation other than Putin, below him the command structure is fragmented), as well as inadequately trained and badly briefed. Such soldiers, thrown into a fight where every house can conceal a lethal threat will become very trigger happy. Add to this a few instances of seeing squad members die in civilian attacks and atrocities quickly become the norm. Ukraine will suffer a Thirty Years War type disaster as this war drags on.
etudiant is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 22:48
  #3930 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Washington.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,078
Received 151 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by admikar
How many of you want to bet that, at most, two years after all this is done there will be business as usual?
Capitalism has no room for morality. What is happening in Ukraine is bad, but so is in Palestine (by Israel), Pakistan, China, ME and West is conducting business with them without a hitch.
China needs resources for their own economy and they are getting all those African and S. American sources under their own control. West will need to deal with Russia again.
No political system has “room for morality”, it’s a universal attribute of political systems to give priority to their own sense of objectives. It’s up to the people of each nation to continue to care about what is happening in Ukraine and to pressure their governments to act as they desire.
GlobalNav is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 23:33
  #3931 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,180
Received 286 Likes on 160 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
Ukraine will suffer a Thirty Years War type disaster as this war drags on.
I don't really know what you are referring o there, but I can't see how Russia could sustain a turbo-charged equivalent to the to the WW2 French Resistance. It would decimate ( real meaning ) their army.
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 23:49
  #3932 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
"Simply more talk for talk's sake ?
Speaking of which....

Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
That apart, it would breach the NATO treaty which would inevitably lead to open conflict between members and give comfort to the Russians. It could lead to the break-up of the alliance;
Which particular treaty would it breach?
​​​​https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive...exts_17120.htm

Oh and....

Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
Is there such a thing as land-launched Harpoon ? I couldn't find it on wiki.
With all due respect, you didn't look very hard.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harpoon_(missile)
"The regular Harpoon uses active radar homing and flies just above the water to evade defenses. The missile can be launched from:
......
Coastal defense batteries, from which it would be fired with a solid-fuel rocket booster."
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2022, 23:58
  #3933 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
I don't really know what you are referring o there, but I can't see how Russia could sustain a turbo-charged equivalent to the to the WW2 French Resistance. It would decimate ( real meaning ) their army.
The reported killing of all men of military age in some of the Russian occupied towns is behavior reminiscent of the 30 Years War, In both cases, the armies would or could not differentiate between combatants and civilians.
The treatment of Chechnya would be the Russian model for managing a WW2 style Resistance effort.
etudiant is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2022, 00:35
  #3934 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,076
Received 2,942 Likes on 1,253 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
That ship has sailed, after Qaddafi no ruler in his right mind would ever give up their nuclear capability.
Putin is just showing all of us the bleak truth that behind the nuclear shield, the direst activities may go on.

Separately, we should be very slow to embrace the concept of 'a people's war' in Ukraine. The Russian troops are poorly led at best (afaik there is no discernible commander for the operation other than Putin, below him the command structure is fragmented), as well as inadequately trained and badly briefed. Such soldiers, thrown into a fight where every house can conceal a lethal threat will become very trigger happy. Add to this a few instances of seeing squad members die in civilian attacks and atrocities quickly become the norm. Ukraine will suffer a Thirty Years War type disaster as this war drags on.
Who is to say his nuclear weaponary is any better, they have said some of his high tech weapons used so far had a failure rate of 65% heck the west wouldn’t need to retaliate at that rate, they would nuke themselves.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2022, 00:51
  #3935 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Who is to say his nuclear weaponary is any better, they have said some of his high tech weapons used so far had a failure rate of 65% heck the west wouldn’t need to retaliate at that rate, they would nuke themselves.
The Russians have had an Iskander Missile go rogue, It landed not far away from that Oil Depot in Russia got attacked. Somebody manged to geolocate the impact point.
MAINJAFAD is online now  
Old 4th Apr 2022, 01:14
  #3936 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by The Helpful Stacker
Speaking of which....


Which particular treaty would it breach?
​​​​https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive...exts_17120.htm

Oh and....

With all due respect, you didn't look very hard.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harpoon_(missile)
"The regular Harpoon uses active radar homing and flies just above the water to evade defenses. The missile can be launched from:
......
Coastal defense batteries, from which it would be fired with a solid-fuel rocket booster."
As far as I'm aware, only the Danes used it in that role and they binned it in 2003, Taiwan is getting a land based version but I don't think its operational yet. The Argentinians managed to put a couple of Exocets on to a trailer and jury-rig a fire control system for it during the Falklands, however if you want to kill the Russian warship with the thing you will have to unload quite a few missiles at it to get past its defences.
MAINJAFAD is online now  
Old 4th Apr 2022, 01:27
  #3937 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Count of Monte Bisto
Who in their right mind is going to rely on supplies of Russian oil and gas ever again?
The EU, the UK and others ...

Originally Posted by Count of Monte Bisto
The harsh reality is that all the people with the big oil reserves are people with an extremely shady human rights record.
Yes - the record of #3 on the list of "The World’s Largest Oil Reserves By Country" is particularly egregious on that score, isn't it.[/sarcasm]

Originally Posted by Count of Monte Bisto
We can whine all we want, and with good reason, but the bottom line is that the UK (and less publicly several others) have had to go cap in hand to Saudi Arabia to secure oil supplies.
While MbS no doubt relishes the recent turn of events, let's see how long he gets to enjoy his moment in the sun.
.
EddyCurr is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2022, 01:34
  #3938 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by MAINJAFAD
As far as I'm aware, only the Danes used it in that role and they binned it in 2003, Taiwan is getting a land based version but I don't think its operational yet.
The question I was responding to was...

Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
Is there such a thing as land-launched Harpoon ? I couldn't find it on wiki.
So the answer is "yes, there is such a thing".
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2022, 05:58
  #3939 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,709
Received 349 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by DIBO
Why don't you as simply say "stop the war"...
As if RF gas and oil can be replaced overnight.... Refineries and the associated logistic infrastructure are build with a specific crude mix in mind, and the RF crude oil is an important - not so easy replaceable - component of this mix in many EU refineries. And flows of RF finished oil products are also an important part of the oil import/export balance in EU. We will face structural shortages of diesel (possibly also JA1?) in the EU if we cut off RF exports. So defending the EU with a future structural shortage in diesel, JA1, etc?? We have been conned by our leaders into being much to dependent on RF fossil energy from a military & economical strategic point of view...
Edit: and the Baltics that made this decision, were preparing this aleady looooong time before the war...
I know just about nothing about oil refinging. But an interested individual can google up information on the subject like depending on the refinery type it may be able to use almost any Crude oil type available. Apparently a coker refinery can use almost any crude oil available in the market. More importantly and being informative for an amateur like myself there are lists of refineries that have already stopped making new deals with the russkies: https://www.reuters.com/business/ene...il-2022-03-21/
Those refineries will make it up with something else then, they will not just shut down the refinery.

Why am I asking to shut down the pipelines: Shutting the russian oil and gas pipelines will be painful yes, but that is the fastest way to influence without going to war. 60% of Russian exports and 40% of GDP is of oil and gas. Cut that out and they will run out of money very very fast.
In 2014 the drop in oil price caused the Russian economy to plummet. Add that to the other sanctions currently and see what happens...

Originally Posted by investopedia
The 2014 oil price collapse badly hurt Russia's economy. Between June and December 2014, the Russian ruble declined in value by 59% relative to the U.S. dollar, fueling inflation that forced the Russian central bank to raise interest rates as high as 17%. By 2015, Russia, along with neighboring Ukraine, had the lowest purchasing power parity (PPP) relative to the U.S. of any country in the world. Declining PPP lowers living standards, as imported goods become more expensive.
https://www.reuters.com/business/ene...il-2022-03-21/
The issue is that in 2014 the oil price went down to around $40 per barrel. Now the russians are selling their crude oli with a discont at $70 per barrel. That is a level that makes them loads of cash. So either make the price plummet or cut the pipelines, Which one is manageable by the European countries? There really is only one option and it is shutting down the pipelines, it will in any case be cheaper than having a war raging through central Europe.
Now add the shutdown of gas pipes and we are starting to talk of something meaningful. A combined impact, like a Javelin, first blow breaks the tanks reactive armor and the second blows the turret off.
Beamr is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2022, 06:18
  #3940 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: back out to Grasse
Posts: 557
Received 28 Likes on 12 Posts
Here we go, should say hit by a "Neptune": missile, damage not yet known, the ship is probably "Admiral Essen", picture below:





Last edited by Imagegear; 4th Apr 2022 at 06:33.
Imagegear is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.