Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways vs. BASSA (Airline Staff Only)

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways vs. BASSA (Airline Staff Only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th May 2010, 20:14
  #2421 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pembrokeshire UK
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
seats4takeoff, Tiramisu
Sorry no tar throwing meant, I lost my sense of humour for a while. Yes there have been lots of very brave crew who came to work despite the intimidation. Wish I could have been there to support you all.
vee-tail-1 is offline  
Old 8th May 2010, 21:21
  #2422 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I for one hope that WW and BA will be able to weed out the wheat from the chaff and ensure that it is only strikers that get offered the 90-day 'take it or leave it' option.

As I understand matters the concept of LIFO is still acceptable when looking at the order of redundancies (or even SOSR), but with the modern slant of also using such matters as 'sickness' (or not real sickness!!), discipline record, time-keeping etc. Surely it would be completely possible, and legal, to ensure that any formula used by BA would be able to treat the strikers in the 'proper' manner!

Non-strikers would be deemed to have many positives, but strikers would be deemed to be what most of us consider them to be - pariahs intent on themselves, themselves and nothing but themselves!!

I really, really hope that those who have had the courage to go against the militant and selfish bassa lemmings get treated MUCH better than those selfish individuals who wish us all to sacrifise - but not them.

Come on Willie's lawyers - find a way to reward those who deserve reward, but most certainly ensure that the strikers get what they deserve - a P45 and no reference!!!!!!!!!!
Sporran is offline  
Old 8th May 2010, 21:32
  #2423 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: london
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the upside

Not wishing to downplay the seriousness of the impact of another strike (so soon after the last ones, and the ongoing ash crises), be it 10 days, 20 days or whatever, if i had to find an upside somewhere, after it is all over (whenever that will be), BA will have the most multi-skilled, crisis ready staff groups of any airline.

In my team of 12, between us we are now trained as VCC, WDC phone re-bookers, and now, thanks to Volcanic Ash, but sure to come in useful for strike times, Customer relations reps.

Its a small silver cloud, but i have to find one somewhere.
BAAlltheway is offline  
Old 8th May 2010, 21:46
  #2424 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: M3 usually!
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I don't understand is how the former Branch Secretary can still retain his position in BASSA. In my many years with BA, historically the role of the Branch Secretary has always been undertaken by current BA cabin crew.
I think it is one of the roles that can be salaried by the Union members dues so does not have to be an employee. If you remember in the 1997 strike, another of the BASSA leadership (the Chairman I think) got sacked for fighting by the mid-fleet maildrops, exchanging punches with a CC89 rep! On that occasion as well, the individual was employed by the union afterwards. Where is he now I wonder?
ottergirl is offline  
Old 8th May 2010, 21:47
  #2425 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Coast UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All this talk of a "vote" mystifies me. It is no more and no less than a straw poll and there was no legal requirement for it to have taken place. It is not moderated or audited (as paper ballots are) and so BASSA can announce whatever results they choose. I guess its FYI only and just part of some low level PR exercise. Its a real shame that the media doesn't see it for what it is.

There are 2000 fewer BASSA subscriptions being deducted from payroll (recently confirmed by WW at his forum) so this further weakens the maths methinks.
ForwardGalley is offline  
Old 8th May 2010, 21:50
  #2426 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: York
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sporran:

There seems to be some mis-understanding here. BA can give 90 days notice of compulsory redundancy to all CC NOW!

What BA may possibly be working towards is a position in which they can give 30 days pay (in lieu of notice) to any 'strikers' as of the 12th June!

HTH

PS: FG the most recent 'online poll' may simply have been a device to kick the dispute into the long grass until after the election. Pure and simple!
4468 is offline  
Old 8th May 2010, 22:13
  #2427 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the upside

BAAlltheway,

My thoughts exactly. When the volcano blew in a big way on 14 April, the Waterside Disruption Centre was reactivated the next morning. This was possible only because BA was in a state of readiness for another strike.

Furthermore, several of the rebookers were able to hit the ground running as they had cut their teeth during the strikes.

As for VCC: in my department, I personally know three who have been trained and I am aware that several others have also been trained.

I also know some of the people who have manned the cabin crew helpline.

The bottom line is that BA now has a range of volunteers which would have been unthinkable less than a year ago.
Caribbean Boy is offline  
Old 8th May 2010, 22:53
  #2428 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sporran

Are you suggesting that a group of employees should be punished because they do not agree with your opinion? As of yet, they have done nothing wrong.
Litebulbs is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 07:58
  #2429 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sussex
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tiramisu wrote:

Please don't worry, the posters here are not referring to the likes of you and me and many other cabin crew who backed BA and came to work. The references here are to the militant minority. The strike was a washout previously and it will be again. As for the intimidation, I refuse to tolerate it and BA were and are extremely supportive. It's zero tolerance to anyone who dares intimidate or harass anyone who chooses to come to work.

I am not 'militant' but will be going on strike when asked to do. From where I stand the bullying and harassment is only happening in one direction which in turn has hardened the resolve of many CC I know. As for the previous strike being a '"washout"....we will have to disagree on that idea, but I suppose if you believe all that comes out of the BA spin machine you will think that.
Juan Odeboyse is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 08:04
  #2430 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sussex
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
seats4takeoff wrote:

"I will be coming in if there is a strike as I do not believe in my union , like many of us ... so again please please dont tar us all... many of us are hard working , good crew who will be in during a strike despite the intimidation we may suffer .... its not only Pilots , engineers, Ground Crew .. its the hard working honest Crew that will be in too"

That choice is for you....but have you wondered why WW wants as part of the agreement a deal that no legal action is taken by any in the future over the ST issue. Also are you aware of just what the redployment clause entails for your future. Just 2 points to consider apart from the many other issues ongoing.

And as for intimidation, I feel that is more within your head than hard fact....
Juan Odeboyse is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 08:07
  #2431 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As for the previous strike being a '"washout"....we will have to disagree on that idea, but I suppose if you believe all that comes out of the BA spin machine you will think that.
I don't need to believe the BA spin machine, I just need to look at my logbook and read the number of flights that didn't get cancelled when the most important part of BA (BASSA's words not mine) walked out on their 'crippling' strike.

The CRC was full, the flights were busy and my roster over BOTH strikes was impacted very little.

But then that comes when you believe the BASSA spin machine as well.

I firmly believe that the company have got this in grip, BASSA however have lost touch with reality.

Unite want closure, sadly after the Pensions debate when Unite forced BASSA's hand BASSA demanded a change in the rules. Now only BASSA may call off the dispute. As they have lost sight of the original causes and only seem to want to concentrate on protecting their mates and demanding back 'perks' they are willing to throw the members to the lions for it.

Shame really as the vast majority of CC are good, well meaning and intelligent people who can see what is happening hence they broke the strike.

Time for BASSA to be put mercifully out of its own misery.
Wirbelsturm is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 08:08
  #2432 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sussex
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Top Bunk wrote:

"As you say though, I think a stitch-up is more likely, with stories of fat-cat union leaders, £460,000 houses, 20 hours flying in the last 12 months, £42,000 salary plus Unite union pay featuring heavily in any printed articles"

Now I wonder where you got those facts from....maybe the same papers that were quoted in the previous post to yours by LD12896.

Ha! Just carry on believing what YOU want to....and maybe listen to the interview on Tuesday and maybe you will learn one or two new facts to chew on.
Juan Odeboyse is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 08:11
  #2433 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sussex
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahem Wrbelestrum...I do not belong to Bassa but am very supportive of UNITE and its intended actions.
Juan Odeboyse is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 08:53
  #2434 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lalaland
Age: 55
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Juan Odeboyse
From where I stand the bullying and harassment is only happening in one direction
How True!

Currently in a longhaul destination - the militant minority members of the crew have whipped the rest of the crew into a pilot hating frenzy. They now refuse to sit, talk, eat or take a drink from the pilots, I have also been sent to Coventry for going out eating with flight deck.

This unacceptable behaviour by the militant minority needs to be stamped out.

Last edited by Meal Chucker; 9th May 2010 at 09:03.
Meal Chucker is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 09:03
  #2435 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hindhead
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm really at a loss to understand where we go from here. BA lost £1billion last year and are expected to lose £600million this year. We are facing a crisis with our pension funds and a volcano.
CC were asked to make some savings along with other groups who agreed. My salary is down approx 10% from last year, even though I have moved up a pay point.
BASSA were unable for historic reasons to negotiate effectively so BA were eventually forced to remove a crew member from most longhaul flights, and 2 off some, the CSD had to work in the Club cabin, which most were doing anyway. This has not impacted to any great extent on Customer service, which anyway is BA's concern, not BASSA's.
CC have been offered a new deal, which I believe has 3 years of pay rises in line with RPI and a monthly travel payment to replace the existing unfair box payment system.
BASSA also want crew members on disciplinaries after allegedly intimidating other staff reinstated and ST reinstated. BA will not move on these points, partly because other staff who are taking the pain now and didn't strike would be incensed.
So where do we go now?
malcolmf is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 09:06
  #2436 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK JO

"As you say though, I think a stitch-up is more likely, with stories of fat-cat union leaders, £460,000 houses, 20 hours flying in the last 12 months, £42,000 salary plus Unite union pay featuring heavily in any printed articles"

Now I wonder where you got those facts from....maybe the same papers that were quoted in the previous post to yours by LD12896.
.... tell us which of the above reported facts are incorrect.

The point I was making is that when you put your head above the parapet and into the media spotlight, they don't necessarily ask the questions of your choice / report the 'facts' you want / stick to the agenda of your choosing. They all have their own political agenda as determined by their owners and their readership / viewer profile.

DH will not control the output in the press, and possibly only a little more so on a radio show (where the interviewer has no knowledge or interest in the subject and doesn't ask probing questions).

He would be better sticking to doing a interview with Socialist Worker if he wants sympathy, I predict that there will be little elsewhere.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 09:15
  #2437 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Age: 56
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Juan, I wish you well!
And if continued striking is what you perceive as the right thing to do I will not stand in your way.
On the other hand you can not blame the majority of crew who have seen sense and are coming to work!
(and yes, over 60% is the majority, even though you still like to delude yourself with propaganda stating otherwise)
And perhaps you can't blame BA for taking decisive measures against people who seem so selfishly hell bend on getting their own way at ANY price.
Past negotiation attempts have proven that BA could hand us a blank cheque and BASSA would still find loopholes in it.
I worked during both strikes, I worked on 747's with full service and no VCC's. I saw CRC full at 7.30 in the morning, only to see a BASSA SMS that same evening claiming only 26 people had reported for work
However I doubt very much BA will let you continue much longer with this selfish path of destruction.
Something that BASSA and CC89 seem so very intend on.
I know, you are not in BASSA, so it's CC89 then.
Even though their members used be known as the less hardline and more intelligent.
Time seems to change everything.
flyingsoldier1993 is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 09:27
  #2438 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Between a rock & a hard place.
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
I worked during both strikes too, but I noticed, frequently, that BA.com was a sea of red when studying departures from LHR. The crew room was busy, but there were alot of non-crew in there plus a surplus of pilots.

I commute home with another airline and whilst awaiting to depart I noted just how quiet LHR was. Indeed, it was a first, when my aircraft pushed back and taxied directly to take off. I arrived home early, before schedule!

Both sides spin, thats the game, and fools are the ones who take the word of just one side. As none striker who was there I would say the strike had an impact at LHR. Unfortunately Walsh & Co cannot admit this.
PC767 is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 09:42
  #2439 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't recall Walsh ever saying the strike hadn't had an impact. He did say that BA managed to carry over 70% of booked passengers, which is a crystal clear admission that 30% weren't carried. The cancellation boards were indeed a sea of red, but the vast majority of the cancelled flights were short haul, which is disproportionately affected by strike action (one crew doesn't show, 3 flights cancelled on EF as opposed to one on WW). Almost all 777 flights got away last time, and BA had VCC to spare because they weren't 747 trained. Now they are 747 trained, they can serve hot meals, they'll have yet more full time crew reporting as they are sick of the strike and probably can't avoid it through a fluke of rostering and they've had even more time to plan their response. The strike was ineffective last time. It'll be a flop this time!
Hand Solo is offline  
Old 9th May 2010, 09:44
  #2440 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Meal Chucker

Currently in a longhaul destination - the militant minority members of the crew have whipped the rest of the crew into a pilot hating frenzy. They now refuse to sit, talk, eat or take a drink from the pilots.
Have no fear, most BA pilots have had enough conversations with your colleagues to know it's very very, difficult to be seen to "break ranks", so to speak, when downroute...



I have also been sent to Coventry for going out eating with flight deck.
Well, if you want to take it further that act in itself is in contravention of EG102.
wiggy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.