Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways vs. BASSA (Airline Staff Only)

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways vs. BASSA (Airline Staff Only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th May 2010, 22:58
  #2341 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You seasoned observers with a memory will recall how we have previously been told at various times that this strike has been about;
  1. Imposition
  2. New Fleet
  3. 'Just to send WW a message'
  4. To break BASSA
  5. Re-instatement of ST
Looks like we can now add to the list 'Re-instatement of Duncan Holley'.

But that is to overlook the fact that Mr Holley (like us all) is simply a bit player. Whether he stays, becomes a UNITE official or applies to be the next Pope is absolutely immaterial. None of us including Duncan Holley or Willie Walsh are indispensable. The key is the long-term success of BA as that is what will benefit us all the most.

Mr Holley forgot the cardinal rule that "if you're going to swim with sharks, don't bleed". He thought he was above the law and could quite happily create chaos for tens of thousands of passengers and jeopardise the careers of all his colleagues with free abandon. What he presided over has gone way beyond an employees legal right to withdraw labour, his leadership made the fight vindictive, divisive and personal but without an objective (except the implicit removal of WW by the Board).

With or without Duncan Holley, BA will survive. He has gone and that's it. Whilst I feel sorry that one of my colleagues has lost a career he probably deeply loved I cannot forgive him for his strategic mishandling and poor judgement throughout this debacle. Has anything his leadership attempted to achieve in the last 18 months actually improved the situation for his rank and file members? No. Many have lost pay, ST and are now likely to have to concede T&Cs worse than those originally tabled. I therefore can only conclude that BASSA members will be better off without this man as their head.

Over on other forums there maybe tears shed by and for Mr Holley, but in a few weeks time he will be yesterday's man. What is important however is that rank and file members get the union support they deserve. Success is not measured in rhetoric, bravado or intimidation it is measured in pay cheques and the atmosphere at work.

So please don't ask me to contribute to his leaving present. They'll be no mourning in this corner for a man who achieved nothing beneficial.

Last edited by demomonkey; 6th May 2010 at 23:09.
demomonkey is offline  
Old 6th May 2010, 23:06
  #2342 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by demomonkey
BA will survive
We can agree on something!
Litebulbs is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 09:30
  #2343 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It appears to be highly likely that this online ballot will lead to more IA. So what happens next? I'm sorry if that sounds like a stupid question but BA and BASSA appear to be at a stalemate with neither side seemingly willing or able to back down without losing all credibility and setting a precedent for the future. So what if we get to the 12th June with no resolution? Can BASSA legally call another Ballot on some other grounds? Or are BA likely to invoke SOSR before that happens?
The way I understand it is the 90 day SOSR can be invoked at any time on any department. However after 12 weeks (Sometime in June) from start of industrial action the company are within their rights to sack anyone still involved in industrial action provided meaningful negotiations have taken place.
BA have taken part in meaningful negotiations and even offered re instatement of staff travel.
Whether the company will take such drastic action is unclear but this can't go on forever and June is getting very close..
cheeky chappy is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 09:44
  #2344 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sussex
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard on Sky that the proposal has been turned down.
BentleyH is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 09:44
  #2345 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in between
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any news from Bassa high command?
Dutchjock is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 10:04
  #2346 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard on Sky that the proposal has been turned down.
Not desperately surprised to be honest. What I'd be most interested in is to see the turnout. How many people voted overall?

We suspected that a great number of people had left BASSA which would suggest that proportionally more militants will probably have voted.

So, anyone with the numbers?
Human Factor is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 10:07
  #2347 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: west
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Unite union said thousands had voted and there had been an 81% majority against the proposals offered against a 71% turnout.
From BBC website
tocamak is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 10:18
  #2348 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only real weapon that BASSA have left is strike action. This has already proven to be of limited use and has achieved loss of ST and allowances, oh and offers from BA that are ever reducing. So all that really remains to see is how united BASSA really are - do thay have the confidence to call a long strike to flush out those who do support them and those who just talk the talk.

What weapons BA still has available and is prepared to use remains a mystery but there are some big guns available - some made public and accepted as legal and legitimate by BASSA's own barrister.

Bad times ahead for our customers and ultimately for all the crew that have not been involved is this grotesque act of self mutilation by BASSA.
Juan Tugoh is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 10:29
  #2349 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Unite union said thousands had voted and there had been an 81% majority against the proposals offered against a 71% turnout.

From BBC website
Thanks, but is it 71% of 10000, 71% of 5000? I'd be interested to know. Actually, knowing BASSA's history of this sort of thing, they'll probably be interested to know themselves.....
Human Factor is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 10:37
  #2350 (permalink)  
Junior trash
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, knowing BASSA's history of this sort of thing, they'll probably be interested to know themselves.....
I dont think BASSA do know. They have said that they probably cant announce dates til monday as today is the day they get the payroll deduction list from BA. Which seems a tacit admission that they've lost a few but dont know who or how many they are.
Hotel Mode is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 10:44
  #2351 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, knowing BASSA's history of this sort of thing, they'll probably be interested to know themselves...

Unbelievable incompetence...how do they know the percentages, but not the numbers??
gr8tballsoffire is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 10:52
  #2352 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They will know the percentage of those that voted, but not the percentage of members who voted to reject the offer. They are probably not really interested either as it would only show a reduced mandate - ie anyone who did not vote to reject would be counted as one who voted to accept - its in the way the question is asked.
Juan Tugoh is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 11:27
  #2353 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on boeings finest
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA have already done the math the rough figure of those cabin crew that voted to reject this deal is the same as those that decided to vote for strike action the last time round. We all saw the turn out on strike days.(BASSA own figures are 2000-3000 crew actually went on strike) This time the company are even better prepared for what BASSA have to throw at them.

Some cabin crew are still confusing 81% of cabin crew with 81% of BASSA members the two figures are very different.

As with the case back in November BASSA are unaware of the actual membership numbers until the company give the the list of payroll deductions sometime today.
Pornpants1 is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 12:03
  #2354 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sussex
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PP I think times have changes re knowing membership figures and this latest poll was as accurate as it can get. Amicus are now working closely with Bassa so it was a joint poll. Of course they know who voted yes and no, why not? Unlike the similar BA version at least one could decide which way to vote.
Juan Odeboyse is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 12:37
  #2355 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maths

When I woz at school, 81% x 71% = 58%. Hardly overwhelming, but not a 'hung Parliament'!

Hard to believe that more than 1 in 2 still don't get it.
Doors To Manuel is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 12:38
  #2356 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: M3 usually!
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I find interesting is that BA have not countered this announcement with the numbers of cabin crew who took part in their own on-line ballot. I had suspected that the whole point of the ballot of non-union crew was to show that overall the majority of crew had voted to accept it - so maybe they didn't. Many people were put off by the BA ballot only having a 'YES' option.

It'll be a long weekend waiting for the next installment from UNITE.
ottergirl is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 12:44
  #2357 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: row 8
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am truly surprised that there are so many ignorant BA cabin crew out there voting again for strike action.

The latest deal is a good and fair one. Much better to have a monthly amount added to your salary than variable allowances.

And as for working with one less crew member, you already have one of the easiest jobs in the world. What's not to like? And if you don't like it, then buzz off and find employment more to your liking.

As for the withdrawal of your travel priveleges? You can't say you weren't warned!!
wapses is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 13:21
  #2358 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am truly surprised that there are so many ignorant BA cabin crew out there voting again for strike action.
Many of them still do not know what the Monthly Travel Payment is and it doesn't really matter.
That's because what BASSA says is gospel. So BASSA says 'jump over a cliff' then you must jump over a cliff!!!

What I don't understand is how the former Branch Secretary can still retain his position in BASSA. In my many years with BA, historically the role of the Branch Secretary has always been undertaken by current BA cabin crew.

I'm BA cabin crew and the above are my personal opinions and not my employer's.
Tiramisu is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 14:52
  #2359 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on boeings finest
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Juan Odeboyse

I do like the way you try and undermine the factual information I try to post

PP I think times have changes re knowing membership figures and this latest poll was as accurate as it can get. Amicus are now working closely with Bassa so it was a joint poll.
The information I posted regarding actual membership numbers is not some wild guess, it came from BASSA itself I have paraphrased it below just in case you are no longer a member

This is because when informing BA of strike dates they have to by law inform the company how many crew will be asked to participate in the action. Those figures are obtained by the payroll deduction information that is provided on a monthly basis by the pay office
But lets think about it.......

BASSA have circa 10,000 members, it is more than likely less than this figure, but 10, 000 makes the math easier

7100 decided to vote on the online poll and 81% rejected the offer thats 5751 crew, almost the same amount who voted for strike action back in February.

BA have circa 13000 crew and 3400 VCC and temps combined, how effective do you think strike action will be?

My hope is that BASSA go for the 20 days as this should bring issues to a head fairly quickly However what cabin crew should be asking is how prepared are BASSA for June 12th when the company can sack all the strikers??

It seems no one wants to ask or answer that question.
Pornpants1 is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 15:34
  #2360 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LHR
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pornpants1

However what cabin crew should be asking is how prepared are BASSA for June 12th when the company can sack all the strikers??

It seems no one wants to ask or answer that question.
Seems you are getting confused

The date you are on about is when the 12 week strike mandate expires -when the mandate expires there is no legal protection from striking - UNITE will then have to re-ballot to carry on with industrial action that is all that date means.

It is not a date when BA can just 'sack' the strikers - and we all know he can issue a 90 day notice whenever he wants - best you check on your 'factual' information
wwcrewmember is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.