Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Dec 2009, 22:58
  #6421 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bucks
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4468

I genuinely have many friends who are pilots like yourself - and in all honesty the vast majority have sympathy with what has gone on - on this forum you tend to get extremes - in fact when you look at this rationally - on here you get some pilots who quite clearly have a lot of anger and venom to spit out against Cabin Crew, exactly the same as BASSA or CF against Pilots or BA etc

You have Glamgirl, Tiramisu and Hiflyer14 who put across their point - one might say at another extreme to some of their Cabin Crew colleagues - however they have a passion and genuine belief in what they are saying - however that is life and they, or we on the other side of the fence, should all be able to have a balanced point of view and be able to put that across - what tends to happen though is that emotions get in the way and it all goes a bit 'Pete Tong'.

I genuinely believe that Flight Crew colleagues earn their worth, because that is the contract they where offered. Similarly I believe that Cabin Crew earn their worth because that is the contract they where offered - where it goes wrong is a management who are totally out of touch with their workforce and who have utterly failed to engage their employees in the needs of the business - listen to the political commentators out there and they now are saying to a man that British Airways is failing spectacularly in its Industrial/Employee relationships
A Lurker is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:00
  #6422 (permalink)  
DP.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
romans

on a final point I do wonder what Easyjet CEO makes x month
£590,000pa and a £265,000 bonus in the last financial year.

Last edited by DP.; 19th Dec 2009 at 23:19.
DP. is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:01
  #6423 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by A Lurker
listen to the political commentators out there and they now are saying to a man that British Airways is failing spectacularly in its Industrial/Employee relationships
If within BA two stakeholders are failing to find common ground that is a problem. For both sides. How can it be the sole responsibility of the employer to manage the relationship? Is that how your personal relationships work? Of course not. It takes two to tango.

And again: interested in your opinion regarding my post 4 or 5 up.
henkybaby is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:01
  #6424 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lurker,

You know - I agree with pretty much every word you've written there. If I may, I'd suggest that the last sentence needs embellishment to make your statement perfect. The employee/employer relationship in BA is dysfunctional in two directions. The blame lies squarely at the feet of both management and the union I feel.
MrBunker is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:02
  #6425 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bucks
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Bunker

I concur 100%
A Lurker is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:04
  #6426 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by A Lurker
I concur 100%
Glad we got that settled.
henkybaby is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:04
  #6427 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Posted by A Lurker
I genuinely believe that Flight Crew colleagues earn their worth, because that is the contract they where offered. Similarly I believe that Cabin Crew earn their worth because that is the contract they where offered
OMG A Lurker, I agree with you!
Tiramisu is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:07
  #6428 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bucks
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tiramisu

This could be the start of something

Do you drink red wine
A Lurker is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:07
  #6429 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will we actually reach consensus before page 500?
henkybaby is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:13
  #6430 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lurker,
Only if it's a Chateau Petrus!
Only joking!
Tiramisu is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:15
  #6431 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bucks
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only if it's a Chateau Petrus!
Only joking!
See I KNEW you shorthaul birds where on way over market rate
A Lurker is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:15
  #6432 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am off to bed. Tomorrow is the ast day before a 5 month sabbatical. Traveling the world with a lot of flights on BA. I hope to see happy faces in the seats and in the galley.

Cheers for now!
henkybaby is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:16
  #6433 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: York
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WWW and A Lurker, I am really very sad that you haven't felt able to respond to the points in my Post 6476. Genuinely very sad.

AL, you said:
What will your view be if BA lose the court case in February?
In view of the recent court cases between Unite, and BA, I imagine it is extremely unlikely that BA will lose. You yourself have used the word 'agreement', not contract! However in the unlikely event that Unite were to prevail, I think it's a given that new crew will be immediately recruited to 'New Fleet'. BA have absolutely no other choice! Very quickly, large proportions of them will start to crew the HKG, SIN, BKK, SYD, NRT etc. (just as the temps did) Once the A380 arrives there will be promotions on to New Fleet to crew them. There will be no shortage of volunteers.

I am absolutely convinced there is a way out of this hole by negotiation. But your union won't!

I'm afraid in recent days, you have had a glimpse of Christmas Future.

Now shall we talk?
4468 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:19
  #6434 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bucks
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4468

I would take a 4% pay cut all day long
A Lurker is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:23
  #6435 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: York
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming your reps agree, then I reckon you can stop New Fleet in it's tracks! (Just as an aside, were you ever asked what you preferred?) The only reason I ask, is that pilots were. Not trying to be 'clever', just trying to illustrate a difference. That's all.
4468 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:29
  #6436 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 4468
Assuming your reps agree, then I reckon you can stop New Fleet in it's tracks!
No, don't think so. Newfleet is also about the pension fund etc. It is common practice for organizations to create these new workforces. Ironically 'Old Fleet' needs newfleet to become reality in order to secure their pensions and most of their benefits.

The people recently fired from GlobeSpan or Air Lingus need newfleet in order to get a new job. BA can create more positions under newfleet.

It really could almost be interpreted as a win-win.

I can understand the fear of Old Fleet that newfleet will start passing them left and right for promotions and that Old Fleeters will be chased out of the company. That is something you could easily prevent with good and proper agreements with BA management.

Ok, really going now!
henkybaby is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:31
  #6437 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See I KNEW you shorthaul birds where on way over market rate

A Lurker
Not us CSDs, we have been sent to coventry by being confined to Band 4 767s till eternity!
Tiramisu is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:33
  #6438 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi 4468,
reading your post u don't sound like a nasty piece of work.
I always welcome a debate as long as it is constructive and people don't start offending people.
Yes, you are right. BASSA did walk out on a negotiation, simply because they went to negotiate not to watch a slide show.
We as cabin crew, including our BASSA reps, have to take a mandatory class called ' In touch'. I don't believe you pilots have to do that but the class is all about the state of the industry and the financial state of the airline. BASSA did not need to take the class again as this would simply delay the negotiation process.

Virtually all other staff groups have agreed permanent changes
.
What departments are you refering to? I have several friends who work on the ground and they have not reached any agreement yet.

I ask you: Would you prefer a permanent 4% pay cut for all
Yes, I personally would . As long as I would get the same share that you will be getting.

As far as the new fleet, let me ask you this.
You were prepared to go on strike because the company wanted to employ pilots in another Country.
How would you feel if the company tomorrow told you they needed to save more money and the only way to do it would be the create a new fleet of pilots based at Heathrow under a different seniority list and T&C?
Can you honestly say that BALPA would simply say, sure not problem?


Start to think about how new joiners could be employed on rates of pay that are more realistic, without threatening your incomes. It must be possible
.
Would you feel the same if the company started employing new pilots on a more realistic rate?

Of course, in order to do that, your representatives have to be at the table. You know as well as I do, that it was BASSA that decided 'no negotiation' was their policy. Was that your choice? I understand there was a show of hands
It takes two to tango. You can not negotiate when you have no one to negotiate with. Did you know that the talks were suspended soon after the judge decision? and this time it wasn't BASSA that walked away.
Let's us talk without pre-condition or prejudice, and see were we can get?
Maybe we can start something here
Totally agree with you on this one? but I think it is not CC you need to tell that.
romans44 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:33
  #6439 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: York
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
henkybaby

New joiners already join on BARP. 'New Fleet' really means new T&Cs. I suspect that after the inevitable negotiations, those new T&Cs will be tempered, if not eliminated.

BA can get what it wants without NF, though that is the 'cosh'!
4468 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 23:35
  #6440 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bucks
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
henkybaby

Mate - if only you knew - any crew joining after 2003 (I think) are on ANOTHER totally different scheme - a money purchase whatever.

The pension fiasco will sink BA - not the Cabin Crew
A Lurker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.