Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Is Ukraine about to have a war?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Is Ukraine about to have a war?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2023, 09:14
  #14161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,937 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Originally Posted by Wokkafans

That does not mean he won't backfill those Countries that do though...
NutLoose is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 10:00
  #14162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,937 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Russia's, claims


When you look at these figures listed above remember in Dec 2021 the Ukrainian airforce had

Unlike its Russian counterpart, Ukrainian Army Aviation is a separate branch and not part of the air force. It relies almost exclusively on older versions of the Mi-8 and Mi-24, with around 50 Hips and 30 or more Mi-24s currently active.
Plus say half a dozen Puma, So allowing for the above shoot downs of 205 reported, that still leaves 110 or so that have either been donated or micraculously appeared, especially since they are still operating all types in theatre.

Ukraine’s airpower might seem entirely mismatched. While Western sources credit the Ukrainian Air Force, or PS, as being Europe’s seventh-largest air force, this still amounts to approximately 200 aircraft of all types
So "586" aircraft shot down out of 200 aircraft just prewar and of course a lot are still operating.. so even allowing for the odd Mig 29 delivered, those figures are wildly adrift, which casts a heck of a lot of fantasy on the other figures posted.

Details of types before the war from
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...orces-stack-up

Last edited by NutLoose; 31st Jan 2023 at 11:56.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 10:09
  #14163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,961
Received 150 Likes on 90 Posts
Ive seen some pro-Russian threads, almost a mirror image of the Ukrainian ones.

The Russian ones do not even try to be logical as they are preaching to the chained choir, so factual detail, credibility etc., are really not important.
jolihokistix is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 11:07
  #14164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 55
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to laugh😂👨🏼‍✈️

This is what passes for news nowadays.President Biden has said the US will not give Ukraine any F-16 fighter jets.

It comes after Ukrainian officials stepped up calls for allies to donate advanced warplanes so they can control their airspace.

They are currently using old Soviet-era jets.

Mr Biden responded "no" when asked by a reporter if he would send F-16s

There are concerns sending such technology could escalate the conflict and be viewed by Russia as NATO countries entering the war by proxy.

However, Britain's defence secretary said he's keeping an open mind about joining any future coalition supplying jets.

Ben Wallace told parliament there was a track record of countries saying they would not send arms and then relenting.

So there you have it, in the unlikely event that the RAF have any spare aircraft that are serviceable, the MoD are not against the idea of sending them to the war.

They can’t muster 9 serviceable jets for the Red Arrows, never mind trainers for Valley to generate pilots, but he’s not against the idea of sending some to Ukraine. 😂

Warren Peace is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 11:11
  #14165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
I know the Poles offered some 'redundant' Mig 29s and the USA said no but I bet there's a contractor somewhere in the USA who could supply them if asked (other ex Russian types too).
chevvron is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 11:14
  #14166 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
who has made light of it?
Generalising, and certainly no one here. I must admit, I did post after watching the vid with the "dual charge" missiles targeting the Russians in the open. The music in that is probably where my head was at with the 'making light of it' comment.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 11:44
  #14167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,937 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Originally Posted by fineline
This looks like an interesting documentary, but I can't watch it on BBC iPlayer site because I'm in Australia. This is really weird policy on behalf of BBC - what is the point? OK so they save some streaming server costs, which I haven't contributed to because I'm not a BBC license payer. But they don't provide me any alternative, paid or otherwise.

I guess I could work around this using a VPN. When people in Russia are forced to do that we call it censorship and repression. But when it comes to BBC content, Vlad and his team don't even have to block it - the beeb have done that for them. What do we call that?

Overall I like the beeb (despite a bit of a "cultural style guide" flavour - what media org doesn't have their own today?) and I do enjoy a few radio shows and podcasts that they deign to let me access.

Sadly there is another interesting one running too which you probably cannot watch, it refers to the collapse of the Soviet Union 1985 up to 1999 and is graphic in places. A VPN is the way to do it.
I think the BBC do this because they sell content abroad, and if you could watch it the world over the revenue would be lost, we can watch it in the UK as most of us HAVE to have a licence, so pay for the content.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...999-traumazone

Last edited by NutLoose; 31st Jan 2023 at 12:00.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 11:47
  #14168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,174
Received 284 Likes on 159 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Russia's, claims



https://twitter.com/DougieJones101/s...51933260365824

When you look at these figures listed above remember in Dec 2021 the Ukrainian airforce had



Plus say half a dozen Puma, So allowing for the above shoot downs of 205 reported, that still leaves 110 or so that have either been donated or micraculously appeared, especially since they are still operating all types in theatre.



So "5862 aircraft shot down out of 200 aircraft just prewar and of course a lot are still operating.. so even allowing for the odd Mig 29 delivered, those figures are wildly adrift, which casts a heck of a lot of fantasy on the other figures posted.

Details of types before the war from
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...orces-stack-up
Have you signed up with the Russians, Nutty, as some of your numbers are rather mysterious. Where, for example is this mentioned - or can be derived by adding numbers - " "5862 aircraft shot down" ?
Tartiflette Fan is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 11:54
  #14169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,937 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Originally Posted by Buster Hyman
Generalising, and certainly no one here. I must admit, I did post after watching the vid with the "dual charge" missiles targeting the Russians in the open. The music in that is probably where my head was at with the 'making light of it' comment.
That's probably to make the vids more acceptable to the public watching them and supporting the cause, it sort of insulates you from the fact that you are watching people dying in front of your eyes often in the worst possible way.
It's just a result of this ****ty war, where no one wins..
NutLoose is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by NutLoose:
Old 31st Jan 2023, 11:58
  #14170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,937 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
Have you signed up with the Russians, Nutty, as some of your numbers are rather mysterious. Where, for example is this mentioned - or can be derived by adding numbers - " "5862 aircraft shot down" ?
Damn, I have been inlfiltrated by Comrade Keyboardski, I typed " but missed the key, hence the added 2
NutLoose is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 12:05
  #14171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,937 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
I know the Poles offered some 'redundant' Mig 29s and the USA said no but I bet there's a contractor somewhere in the USA who could supply them if asked (other ex Russian types too).

The Poles allegedly delivered some as ermm spare parts, but still all assembled.

NutLoose is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 12:11
  #14172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,937 Likes on 1,252 Posts



Last edited by NutLoose; 31st Jan 2023 at 12:26.
NutLoose is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 31st Jan 2023, 13:10
  #14173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 517 Likes on 215 Posts
Wow...gee....140 Tanks of mixed makes, models, and capabilities.

Like forming a bucket brigade to fight a forest fire using different kinds of buckets.

But...when you are in desperate need....any help at all is welcomed.

We shall soon see just how good "our" Tanks are as compared to how good they are thought to be.

Lets hope we have better results than did the Russians when they threw their Tanks into the Meat Grinder of modern anti-tank warfare.
SASless is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 14:43
  #14174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: EHEH
Posts: 533
Received 244 Likes on 77 Posts
In response to your last para: is it just the tanks, or is it also down to training and tactics?
FUMR is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 15:18
  #14175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Feet grounded, head in the clouds
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fineline
This looks like an interesting documentary, but I can't watch it on BBC iPlayer site because I'm in Australia ...
There might be a bit of protecting foreign sales, as Nutty suggests, but the main reasons are to do with rights (copyright, licencing agreements, distributorships etc.) on the programme and also on clips from other organisations that they may have used in the programme.
Addlepate is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 15:41
  #14176 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,446
Received 1,602 Likes on 734 Posts
PM rules out donating Tranche 1 Typhoon to Ukraine

Speaking on Tuesday, the prime minister's official spokesman said: "The UK's Typhoon and F-35 fighter jets are extremely sophisticated and take months to learn how to fly. Given that, we believe it is not practical to send those jets into Ukraine.

“We will continue to provide and accelerate our military support to Ukraine and listen carefully to their requests.

"It is the length of time it takes to learn how to use what are very complex pieces of equipment that is the limiting factor in this case but we will explore what more we can do to support Ukraine."

On Monday, Britain's defence secretary had said he was keeping an open mind about joining any future coalition supplying jets.

Ben Wallace told parliament there was a track record of countries saying they would not send arms and then relenting……

ORAC is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 15:58
  #14177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,937 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Wow...gee....140 Tanks of mixed makes, models, and capabilities.

Like forming a bucket brigade to fight a forest fire using different kinds of buckets.
It worked in the Gulf war though
NutLoose is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by NutLoose:
Old 31st Jan 2023, 16:01
  #14178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,133
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
It worked in the Gulf war though
Indeed, one would assume that the Ukrainians would have the wherewithal to operate the three tanks types as three stand alone forces with their own crewing and support elements, rather than mixing them into the same units. I mean, that's how every other country operating mixed fleets of any type of military equipment does it, right?
melmothtw is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 31st Jan 2023, 17:39
  #14179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,287
Received 718 Likes on 252 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
"The UK's Typhoon and F-35 fighter jets are extremely sophisticated and take months to learn how to fly.
That is quite some improvement: when did that happen.

Where do they get these clowns?
langleybaston is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 17:52
  #14180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
It worked in the Gulf war though
I was thinking the same thing - and the west's tanks faired quite well against the Russian tanks and anti-tank weapons there.

I suspect we're about to find out if that was due to training/tactics or to the overall superiority of the platforms.

BTW, read elsewhere that they expected the western tanks to be in-theater by the end of March at the latest
tdracer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.