Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Is Ukraine about to have a war?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Is Ukraine about to have a war?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 16:10
  #9561 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by SOPS
I have no military background or experience. So I have to ask this. It seems Putin has now threatened the entire West with the use of nukes. The French, the UK and the the USA are out there with with Subs, I assume ready to launch.

Has Putin got so deranged that he is willing to destroy the world to prove a point. ( what that point is, I don’t know).
.
He's gambling that his threats are enough to make the West pause, because he thinks they will never use nuclear weapons (or at least not to defend Ukraine) - remember he thinks the West is weak and won't stand up to him directly. So his rational is if he drops a tactical nuke on a Ukrainian city, he's not going to be getting Western SSBMs inbound.
Davef68 is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 16:10
  #9562 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,813
Received 141 Likes on 65 Posts
I pray for a westerly wind.
MPN11 is online now  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 16:17
  #9563 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 530
Received 174 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by WhatsaLizad?
Regarding Medvedev, he has been pretty consistent playing the Russian media with his hardline statements.

It appears to me that Medvedev could be a fallback position for Putin. If things continue badly, he could "resign" and install Medvedev who is no doubt controlled by him and continue pulling the strings in the background as the real ruler. It could be the perfect setup for Putin's future if things don't recover to normal for the average Russian and Medvedev's leadership is deemed soft. The people then clamor for a hardline leader and guess who reappears to 'save the day'.

Thoughts?
They've already played that switcheroo after Putin's first couple of terms when the constitution prevented him from having three in a row I believe. If memory serves Medvedev became President while Putin became his "subordinate" prime minister.

Everyone knows that Medvedev is Sooty to Putins Matthew Corbett.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 16:17
  #9564 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,708
Received 349 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by Davef68
He's gambling that his threats are enough to make the West pause, because he thinks they will never use nuclear weapons (or at least not to defend Ukraine) - remember he thinks the West is weak and won't stand up to him directly. So his rational is if he drops a tactical nuke on a Ukrainian city, he's not going to be getting Western SSBMs inbound.
probably not, but since Biden very clearly said "Don"t. Don't. Don't." the Russian troops will in all probability face the full traditional warfare wrath of the west. Black sea fleet - boom. Bases in crimea - kaboom. Russian forces in Ukraine territory - gone. Anything flying over Ukraine - downed. No-fly zone in Ukraine. Full closure of Russia from everything so that even NK will seem like a regular beach holiday resort.
Beamr is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 16:23
  #9565 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,753
Received 156 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by melmothtw
They should just target the right hand carriageway so that it can only be used for leaving Crimea, and not for bringing in reinforcements.





..that's a joke, BTW.
The Ukrainians could hack the traffic signal lights to show only green eastbound and red westbound. Chaos would reign and victory would soon follow. The city of Montreal, Canada has perfected just such a system. This technology coupled with Montreal’s tactical use of traffic cones, cement barriers, lane closures, detours and conversion of streets to bike paths is brilliant. During winter ( rapidly approaching in the Ukraine ) shambolic snow clearing operations ensures complete gridlock. Perhaps they will share their expertise.
albatross is online now  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 16:24
  #9566 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 628
Received 205 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Beamr
probably not, but since Biden very clearly said "Don"t. Don't. Don't." the Russian troops will in all probability face the full traditional warfare wrath of the west. Black sea fleet - boom. Bases in crimea - kaboom. Russian forces in Ukraine territory - gone. Anything flying over Ukraine - downed. No-fly zone in Ukraine. Full closure of Russia from everything so that even NK will seem like a regular beach holiday resort.
I suspect you're right. And if Russia would look even more stupid if their nuclear strike was met with a conventional response and they were *still* getting beaten...

Edit: Or more stupid still if they fire one and it doesn't go Bang, which sounds like a non-zero probability

Last edited by pasta; 22nd Sep 2022 at 16:49.
pasta is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 16:50
  #9567 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,333
Received 629 Likes on 272 Posts
Or more stupid still if they fire one and it doesn't go Bang, which sounds like a non-zero probability
or goes bang on launch..........
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 16:54
  #9568 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,080
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Newspaper novaya gazeta claims, the number of mobilised reservists called up for duty is one million now, not 300 000. This is advised in the blacked out paragraph 7 of the recent government order the newspaper says.
Less Hair is online now  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 17:01
  #9569 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Amersham
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Beamr
probably not, but since Biden very clearly said "Don"t. Don't. Don't." the Russian troops will in all probability face the full traditional warfare wrath of the west. Black sea fleet - boom. Bases in crimea - kaboom. Russian forces in Ukraine territory - gone. Anything flying over Ukraine - downed. No-fly zone in Ukraine. Full closure of Russia from everything so that even NK will seem like a regular beach holiday resort.
So we think Russia's response to Ukraine attacking 'now Russian area's' will be Tac Nuclear. What response would you expect to an all out attack by NATO on Crimea / Black Sea fleet etc ?

Hutch
HUTCHP is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 17:06
  #9570 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Davef68
He's gambling that his threats are enough to make the West pause, because he thinks they will never use nuclear weapons (or at least not to defend Ukraine) - remember he thinks the West is weak and won't stand up to him directly. So his rational is if he drops a tactical nuke on a Ukrainian city, he's not going to be getting Western SSBMs inbound.
I foresee two options if he does use a nuke, the first (more likely) that he be issued with an ultimatum to vacate his forces from Ukraine and, failing that, NATO unleashes a conventional massive strike on his forces, effectively finishing them off, forcing him to concede and withdraw. The second is that (again, following an ultimatum), we nuke some strictly military target with direct connection to Ukraine, also with the same aim i.e. that he withdraw his forces.

If Russia responds with another strike then we could be looking at a wider conflict where we go after his C+C and missile forces.

Increasingly I think the likes of China is key here. Word is that they too are getting increasingly alarmed at the situation and are pushing for some sort of diplomatic resolution. As someone noted above, the fact were are spiralling into a potential catastrophe for no reason whatsoever is madness personified.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 17:08
  #9571 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
This is advised in the blacked out paragraph 7 of the recent government order the newspaper says.
Denied by Peskov. But then, he swore blind that Russia had any ambitions towards Ukraine this time last year.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 17:10
  #9572 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,813
Received 141 Likes on 65 Posts
Much would, IMO, depend on where RU chooses to do the Stupid Thing, which I could guess would be well away from their ill-equipped and NBC-ready troops. And, of course, the readiness state of assorted Western assets [land/sea/air] to generate a swift response. That we will not know, or should not know. until they are used.

We are all standing on the cliff edge, and subject to the fantasies of Putin and his lap-dogs.
MPN11 is online now  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 17:13
  #9573 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,708
Received 349 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by HUTCHP
So we think Russia's response to Ukraine attacking 'now Russian area's' will be Tac Nuclear. What response would you expect to an all out attack by NATO on Crimea / Black Sea fleet etc ?

Hutch
I don't think that they'd nuke Ukraine, IMO they are bluffing and if not, there surely must be reasonable people lower in the command chain capable to cut the wires of the big red button. But if they would, the can would then be open so the response would be either nuke or then not. However I think that Biden didn't bluff by saying “Don't. Don't. Don't. It would change the face of war unlike anything since the Second World War.” If the west does not respond in kind in essence striking back only with traditional means, would even Putler dare to throw a second nuke towards the US or to mediterranean in hopes to catch a carrier group as it would then inevitably mean a lot of glowing glass in Moskva.
Beamr is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 17:47
  #9574 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,072
Received 2,940 Likes on 1,252 Posts
I cannot see him nuking Ukraine for the simple reason he will destroy not only the
Ukrainian wheat production by irradiating the soil and crops, but he would wipe out a lot of Russias too wind dependant.



His sunflower production



And his Corn production.



In fact a lot of Russias food production capability, see

https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/rssiws/al/rs_cropprod.aspx
NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 18:22
  #9575 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,708
Received 349 Likes on 119 Posts
The Kremlin mastermind is now giving tactical orders. Reminds me of certain Kim family, always seen with crowd of generals writing down their immortal wisdoms.


Beamr is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 18:22
  #9576 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Róisín Dubh
Posts: 1,389
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Putin decided Medvedev was unsuitable to replace him as a result of Medvedev not using Russia's veto against the attack on Libya. Medvedev was originally a Liberal, but when Putin effectively neutered him he swung massively to the right. Unless Medvedev is the leader of the Right wing which Putin allegedly fears so much within his country, he is a busted flush.
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 18:37
  #9577 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,456
Received 1,620 Likes on 739 Posts
I have no military background or experience. So I have to ask this. It seems Putin has now threatened the entire West with the use of nukes. The French, the UK and the the USA are out there with with Subs, I assume ready to launch.

Has Putin got so deranged that he is willing to destroy the world to prove a point. ( what that point is, I don’t know).
Working on the premise that, with the absence of any UKR/NATO tactical nukes there is no “escalation ladder” if they employ battlefield nukes. So, would the US risk New York to save Odessa?

https://una.org.uk/sites/default/fil...-_ted_seay.pdf

ORAC is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 18:55
  #9578 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,708
Received 349 Likes on 119 Posts
This is brilliant, Charles Pathé would be proud!


Beamr is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 19:10
  #9579 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,072
Received 2,940 Likes on 1,252 Posts
You know, I almost feel sorry for these two….. ok, I’m over it.

NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2022, 19:33
  #9580 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,708
Received 349 Likes on 119 Posts
Accidents happen.
However now we know what the first ones mobilized will be equipped with: the 60's stuff. Imagine what the 300000th will be getting


Beamr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.