RAF JPA Rollout
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know of anyone who thinks that an electronic system for submitting expense claims is a bad idea as long as it works. And I don't doubt that JPA will work in time. The point is that it should not have been rolled out until it at least worked.
I don't know of anyone who thinks the actuals system introduced under JSP thingy is a good idea. If the hierarchy want to understand what is retention-negative about the RAF then this is it. This system is turning 'Join the RAF and see the world' into 'Join the RAF and get f***ed off around the world'.
Replacing a system where SAC admin staff spend 10-15 min processing a 1771 with a system where the claimant - usually senior to an SAC and therefore more expensive to employ - spends an hour processing the same claim is hardly cause for celebration, particularly when the system has been introduced to save admin costs. Does anyone think that anyone apart from the most chiselling of commanders is going to make people do this in their own time.
At least its a sunny day out here (again).
I don't know of anyone who thinks the actuals system introduced under JSP thingy is a good idea. If the hierarchy want to understand what is retention-negative about the RAF then this is it. This system is turning 'Join the RAF and see the world' into 'Join the RAF and get f***ed off around the world'.
Replacing a system where SAC admin staff spend 10-15 min processing a 1771 with a system where the claimant - usually senior to an SAC and therefore more expensive to employ - spends an hour processing the same claim is hardly cause for celebration, particularly when the system has been introduced to save admin costs. Does anyone think that anyone apart from the most chiselling of commanders is going to make people do this in their own time.
At least its a sunny day out here (again).
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up North
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good news. It appears press may at last have picked up on JPA problems. Instruction issued throughout AFPAA today instructing staff not to talk to media on JPA roll out to RAF. All calls to be referred to in house spin doctors!!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Totally agree with Sir Toppam regarding the poorly advertised change to allowances, which in turn has made people more upset. There is a purple coloured A4 booklet knocking around with the standard politically correct pictures on the front, but it's pretty vague. Of all the pointless publications we get anyway - eg. the Royal Air Force 'electronic ways of working' (or something like that) - why couldn't we have produced a users guide to JPA?
The capped actuals thing is another own goal. It'll save a few quid in the short term, but it's not a hearts and minds policy that will retain. Regularly losing a few 'unclaimable' quid has a far worse long-term impact than a singular lower pay 'rise'. And unlike other policies where it's presumed the old school won't like change but newies won't know any different, capped actuals will be an early introduction to the newies to what the company think of you. I would ask "what do other companies do?" The army don't tend to worry about things like people, but then most of theirs don't cost hundreds of thousands to replace.
If I was OC Everything I'd be looking to offset people's anger and frustration with JPA and if I could aim it at the RAF's greatest asset - aircrew (remember, I'm OC Everything) - then reviewing capped actuals would be a gutsy move. The saving would be made by removing the associated bureaucratic process and issuing a simple, flat rate of $30/night anywhere in the world.
The capped actuals thing is another own goal. It'll save a few quid in the short term, but it's not a hearts and minds policy that will retain. Regularly losing a few 'unclaimable' quid has a far worse long-term impact than a singular lower pay 'rise'. And unlike other policies where it's presumed the old school won't like change but newies won't know any different, capped actuals will be an early introduction to the newies to what the company think of you. I would ask "what do other companies do?" The army don't tend to worry about things like people, but then most of theirs don't cost hundreds of thousands to replace.
If I was OC Everything I'd be looking to offset people's anger and frustration with JPA and if I could aim it at the RAF's greatest asset - aircrew (remember, I'm OC Everything) - then reviewing capped actuals would be a gutsy move. The saving would be made by removing the associated bureaucratic process and issuing a simple, flat rate of $30/night anywhere in the world.
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Capped Rates / Expenditure
It wouldn't be so bad if we had a decent pay rise once in a while. How many reviews of working practice have we suffered?
The Firemen get one to modernise them and they get 16% !!
If we got what we deserved, all those good for nothings and the nurse's would be on the band wagon after more money. The difference is that instead of holding the country to ransom, EG Firemen, we end up covering for them. Who covers for us, (Not that we are so un-professional to resort to those measures), but you see my point.
These capped rates are another example of ballox from the top with little in fact no regard for the people at the bottom of the ladder who don't get £400 a day.
In fact...... what do they do, to justify that level of pay? War Fighter First.... Eat healthy.... we these capped limits, you'd be lucky to be able to afford a Large Big Mac Meal.
End JPA now, before it really is too late.
Can't believe this isn't in the media yet? Has it got reporting restrictions placed due to red faces ?
The Firemen get one to modernise them and they get 16% !!
If we got what we deserved, all those good for nothings and the nurse's would be on the band wagon after more money. The difference is that instead of holding the country to ransom, EG Firemen, we end up covering for them. Who covers for us, (Not that we are so un-professional to resort to those measures), but you see my point.
These capped rates are another example of ballox from the top with little in fact no regard for the people at the bottom of the ladder who don't get £400 a day.
In fact...... what do they do, to justify that level of pay? War Fighter First.... Eat healthy.... we these capped limits, you'd be lucky to be able to afford a Large Big Mac Meal.
End JPA now, before it really is too late.
Can't believe this isn't in the media yet? Has it got reporting restrictions placed due to red faces ?
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
formertonkaplum,
I actually disagree that pay is poor - it's one of the few things that would be nice if it went up a lot more, but it's not necessarily needed - apart from perhaps the junior ranks who should get barrel loads more money when they go somewhere like Basra. In fact, I would say that those who loll around in the UK and never go OOA get too much and a rebalance would be a great idea! (£50 a day LSA anyone?)
JPA provided an opportunity to rationalise allowances and that has been achieved to some degree, but the good has been undermined by an apparent net loss for many people as the new rates and levels come into force. It's what people perceive that matters, which is often different to what they actually get! The majority of people won't ever notice the difference between a 3% or a 4% pay rise, but if they have to collect receipts, eat the cheapest thing on the menu and/or ask the restaurant for a photocopy of the menu, they'll get niggly. Add to that unavoidable costs associated with being away on route - and I don't mean beer - and people will notice they are losing money.
If it costs people their own money to do their job, you lose their hearts and minds. But if you give them a daily flat rate and treat them like grown ups, sometimes they will win, other times they will lose and the reduced admin costs will pay for it. I'm gobsmacked we've scored yet another own goal.
I actually disagree that pay is poor - it's one of the few things that would be nice if it went up a lot more, but it's not necessarily needed - apart from perhaps the junior ranks who should get barrel loads more money when they go somewhere like Basra. In fact, I would say that those who loll around in the UK and never go OOA get too much and a rebalance would be a great idea! (£50 a day LSA anyone?)
JPA provided an opportunity to rationalise allowances and that has been achieved to some degree, but the good has been undermined by an apparent net loss for many people as the new rates and levels come into force. It's what people perceive that matters, which is often different to what they actually get! The majority of people won't ever notice the difference between a 3% or a 4% pay rise, but if they have to collect receipts, eat the cheapest thing on the menu and/or ask the restaurant for a photocopy of the menu, they'll get niggly. Add to that unavoidable costs associated with being away on route - and I don't mean beer - and people will notice they are losing money.
If it costs people their own money to do their job, you lose their hearts and minds. But if you give them a daily flat rate and treat them like grown ups, sometimes they will win, other times they will lose and the reduced admin costs will pay for it. I'm gobsmacked we've scored yet another own goal.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recaptured & serving time @ ISK
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Press
For the hierachy that want to keep the rolling goat f**k that is JPA out of the press the timing couldn't be better; 2-Shags, NHS's best year ever, 'where have all the foreign crimals gone' and the local elections are more interesting to the masses than 'RAF not paid properly due another crud govt IT project'.
Still could be worse, I could be short on this month's pay and still not have a pay chit to be able to work out why?
What's the chances of JPA being sorted before the next 'slow news days'?
Still could be worse, I could be short on this month's pay and still not have a pay chit to be able to work out why?
What's the chances of JPA being sorted before the next 'slow news days'?
TAX PERSPECTIVE?
Testing
I do not see what the tax advantage is with actuals. The rates were not taxed and nor would they be in the future. The airlines have rates around the world and the FOOD element of those rates is not taxed. It is true that some airlines have had to change their MO to ensure that their systems accord with that principle but none of them have gone for this half brained idea. As a side issue a chap at the secret airbase in OXON has given JPA as the final straw that caused him to PVR. Like so many Pruners I can quote time wasted on JPA -has anyone managed to put a HTD claim in yet?
I do not see what the tax advantage is with actuals. The rates were not taxed and nor would they be in the future. The airlines have rates around the world and the FOOD element of those rates is not taxed. It is true that some airlines have had to change their MO to ensure that their systems accord with that principle but none of them have gone for this half brained idea. As a side issue a chap at the secret airbase in OXON has given JPA as the final straw that caused him to PVR. Like so many Pruners I can quote time wasted on JPA -has anyone managed to put a HTD claim in yet?
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To me, the inconsistency is between the desire to simplify (because it saves money - reasonable) and the reality of introducing a system of allowances that is petty, inflexible and rigid in the extreme - A 4 MINUTE phone call sir - THAT'S NOT ALLOWED. Has anyone tried tipping 10% in a US restaurant?
After 16 years in the RAF and believing that we were actually better treated than most of the civilian world, this is fundamentally changing my view of how much the RAF values me personally. It's not the immature software, it's the actuals system, associated pettiness and implication that I am untrustworthy that I am starting to resent in large measure.
SS
After 16 years in the RAF and believing that we were actually better treated than most of the civilian world, this is fundamentally changing my view of how much the RAF values me personally. It's not the immature software, it's the actuals system, associated pettiness and implication that I am untrustworthy that I am starting to resent in large measure.
SS
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
For all you scptics who said JPA should have had a thorough field trial before being released don an unsuspecting public, well it did.
On Monday 30 Jan JPA was rolled out at Northwood for a pilot run until 24 Feb 06. It was an opportunty for arond 280 personnel from the JSU to experience a pre-production version of JPA application in a realistic environment. They will be able to test JPA and provide feedback prior to the application of JPA in the RAF in March.
Well that is what the press office said on 3 Feb.
Then at the end of March the Army announced that JPA would be delayed by 4 mnths until the end of Mar 07 so that the network infrastructure could be put in place.
On Monday 30 Jan JPA was rolled out at Northwood for a pilot run until 24 Feb 06. It was an opportunty for arond 280 personnel from the JSU to experience a pre-production version of JPA application in a realistic environment. They will be able to test JPA and provide feedback prior to the application of JPA in the RAF in March.
Well that is what the press office said on 3 Feb.
Then at the end of March the Army announced that JPA would be delayed by 4 mnths until the end of Mar 07 so that the network infrastructure could be put in place.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Help,
How do you submit your home to duty these days on JPA. All i can ever get is milage based 1st passenger which gives me 3p per mile, i.e. passenger not driver rate. Tried JPAC, waited 20 minutes, eventually answered then the line went dead. Wasted about an hour before I gave up in frustration.
As for the capped actuals, been having many conversations about this as we are going on det and are taking an imprest. Seems to be a lot of making things up as we go along. For the IE, I will be making my 3 minute phone call each night, and will wait about a month for my mobile phone bill, this effectively means that each imprest cant be closed for about a month or so each time. Also noted that as every receipt is returned with the imprest then the administtration burden, with fewer personnel has increased massively.
I believe that everyone should put up with the extra pain and include every possible receipt, every self certification and do not take the easy option not to fill in the paperwork. Maybe the vast increase in the admin burden will make those responsible sit up and take notice.
This sure makes you appreciate the old system. It is also worth noting that we are second class citizens compared to the civil servants with un-capped actuals, wonder what the new Secretary of State for Defence thinks of this.
How do you submit your home to duty these days on JPA. All i can ever get is milage based 1st passenger which gives me 3p per mile, i.e. passenger not driver rate. Tried JPAC, waited 20 minutes, eventually answered then the line went dead. Wasted about an hour before I gave up in frustration.
As for the capped actuals, been having many conversations about this as we are going on det and are taking an imprest. Seems to be a lot of making things up as we go along. For the IE, I will be making my 3 minute phone call each night, and will wait about a month for my mobile phone bill, this effectively means that each imprest cant be closed for about a month or so each time. Also noted that as every receipt is returned with the imprest then the administtration burden, with fewer personnel has increased massively.
I believe that everyone should put up with the extra pain and include every possible receipt, every self certification and do not take the easy option not to fill in the paperwork. Maybe the vast increase in the admin burden will make those responsible sit up and take notice.
This sure makes you appreciate the old system. It is also worth noting that we are second class citizens compared to the civil servants with un-capped actuals, wonder what the new Secretary of State for Defence thinks of this.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still no FP, still no pay statement. At least I'm not banned from the forum anymore - apologies to whoever I upset with the link that was sent to me by the Unit FSO...
It is illegal not to receive a pay statement when, or before being paid - see the Employment Rights Act 1996: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1996/96018--a.htm#8
We are also entitled to complain to an Employment Tribunal if a statement is not received on-time. However, under QR1000 - one must first make a Redress of Complaint within 3 months; but may then make the same complaint to the Tribunal concurrent with the redress (within one month I think).
It would be interesting to see the outcome of 1000 redresses of complaint against DCDS(Pers).
I could PVR - if I could log-on.
"JPA - putting the c**ts in accountants"
It is illegal not to receive a pay statement when, or before being paid - see the Employment Rights Act 1996: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1996/96018--a.htm#8
We are also entitled to complain to an Employment Tribunal if a statement is not received on-time. However, under QR1000 - one must first make a Redress of Complaint within 3 months; but may then make the same complaint to the Tribunal concurrent with the redress (within one month I think).
It would be interesting to see the outcome of 1000 redresses of complaint against DCDS(Pers).
I could PVR - if I could log-on.
"JPA - putting the c**ts in accountants"
Leaving the RAF doesn't mean you escape the effects of JPAC!!!
I left the RAF in 1990 and am now approaching the age where my full RAF pension applies. I thought I would ring up and find out if I had to take the pension at 55 or, as I will still be working, could I defer taking it and what would the accrual rate be for each year of deferment.
Being computer literate!! I looked on the net and found the following site http://www.rafcom.co.uk/pay_allowanc..._preserved.cfm which gave a phone number 0141 224 3600 for pensions.
I rang thinking it would be a quick call
. The dreaded option choice girl who said "welcome to JPAC" answered me. This didn't immediately ring a bell amongst my old grey cells so I pressed option 1 for pensions. The dreaded " we are experiencing unduly high levels of calls" please hold. This of course should be " we haven't employed enough people and we don't really care that you have to wait"
So I waited and waited - bit of good musac Dam Busters on the line but no humans so I gave up. Rang a bit later same, rang again - engaged
Finally rang 0141 224 3602 - immediate answer!! but lady couldn't help said I had to go through 3600
Asked for managers number of call centre and got 0141 224 8551 but of course no answer on that one.
JPAC was now beginning to ring some bells - had I seen something on Pprune about JPA - bingo read threads and became depressed
Decided to look on net again for more info on JPAC and guess what found that there is a freephone number for JPAC 0800 085 3600 so I had wasted money waiting on a 0141 number
I feel for you guys and gal’s left in the RAF who have to put up with this computer based rubbish. For info the company I work for pays £30 (in UK) a day for food - no receipts required.
HF
I left the RAF in 1990 and am now approaching the age where my full RAF pension applies. I thought I would ring up and find out if I had to take the pension at 55 or, as I will still be working, could I defer taking it and what would the accrual rate be for each year of deferment.
Being computer literate!! I looked on the net and found the following site http://www.rafcom.co.uk/pay_allowanc..._preserved.cfm which gave a phone number 0141 224 3600 for pensions.
I rang thinking it would be a quick call
. The dreaded option choice girl who said "welcome to JPAC" answered me. This didn't immediately ring a bell amongst my old grey cells so I pressed option 1 for pensions. The dreaded " we are experiencing unduly high levels of calls" please hold. This of course should be " we haven't employed enough people and we don't really care that you have to wait"So I waited and waited - bit of good musac Dam Busters
on the line but no humans so I gave up. Rang a bit later same, rang again - engaged Finally rang 0141 224 3602 - immediate answer!! but lady couldn't help said I had to go through 3600
Asked for managers number of call centre and got 0141 224 8551 but of course no answer on that one.JPAC was now beginning to ring some bells - had I seen something on Pprune about JPA - bingo read threads and became depressed
Decided to look on net again for more info on JPAC and guess what found that there is a freephone number for JPAC 0800 085 3600 so I had wasted money waiting on a 0141 number
I feel for you guys and gal’s left in the RAF who have to put up with this computer based rubbish. For info the company I work for pays £30 (in UK) a day for food - no receipts required.
HF
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't have thought the software writers would be too happy about all of this.
[I'm assuming that Oracle are the software providers going by the above spoof poster http://www.oracle.com/index.html].
Maybe someone should drop their corporate affairs office an e-mail with links to this thread?
[I'm assuming that Oracle are the software providers going by the above spoof poster http://www.oracle.com/index.html].
Maybe someone should drop their corporate affairs office an e-mail with links to this thread?
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder.........
Just recently been away for 4days on a course,nothing new about that.Flights and hire car paid for,B+B booked through CHBS,nothing new there.Arrived at accommodation and had an entitled evening meal,1 course with a coffee to follow came to a grand total of £7.45,bill went on final accommodation receipt,saving to MOD £12.55.1st day of course had lunch,cost less than £5 so didnt keep receipt(told at briefing no need for costs less than £5),actual cost was £3.50.In the evening I went to visit friends and had a chinese(they paid!),saving to MOD £23.50 if I can't recoup cost of lunch.2nd day same happenings,friends made dinner,another minimum of £20 saving to MOD.Final day lunch as before,evening meal was a Maccy D's,totalling £4.99 at the airport waiting for the evening flight home.Again minimum save to MOD £15.01 if I can't recoup lunch cost.Thats a total minimum saving for the MOD of about £50 and that doesnt take into account the EE's I used to get automatically.
Now if another 10 people did the same.............and it happened on a regular basis?
Cost saving venture??
I cannot comment on what my final claim total will be as at the moment I still do not have access to a terminal to log onto JPA!!
PS.What happens if your receipts are in Arabic?
Just recently been away for 4days on a course,nothing new about that.Flights and hire car paid for,B+B booked through CHBS,nothing new there.Arrived at accommodation and had an entitled evening meal,1 course with a coffee to follow came to a grand total of £7.45,bill went on final accommodation receipt,saving to MOD £12.55.1st day of course had lunch,cost less than £5 so didnt keep receipt(told at briefing no need for costs less than £5),actual cost was £3.50.In the evening I went to visit friends and had a chinese(they paid!),saving to MOD £23.50 if I can't recoup cost of lunch.2nd day same happenings,friends made dinner,another minimum of £20 saving to MOD.Final day lunch as before,evening meal was a Maccy D's,totalling £4.99 at the airport waiting for the evening flight home.Again minimum save to MOD £15.01 if I can't recoup lunch cost.Thats a total minimum saving for the MOD of about £50 and that doesnt take into account the EE's I used to get automatically.
Now if another 10 people did the same.............and it happened on a regular basis?
Cost saving venture??
I cannot comment on what my final claim total will be as at the moment I still do not have access to a terminal to log onto JPA!!
PS.What happens if your receipts are in Arabic?
Originally Posted by ranger703
PS.What happens if your receipts are in Arabic?
Got to spend the savings somehow!
ranger
The system relies on just the circumstances you have described. I am assuming that you were in the UK but the principles apply anywhere. Firstly as a principle you do not have to have a receipt for expenditure of less than £5 (JSP 712). So for every day away I am sure you spent £4.99 on phone calls, laundry or a newspaper or any combination thereof. Are you sure that you did not spend £4.99( although I think that is capped at £4.50) on lunch everyday?! Also for those nights your friends paid/cooked are you sure you did not have a snack/soft (£4.99) drink afterwards or before you went out? As for the £7.45 could you not find anything more expensive and dont forget your half bottle of wine/ 2 pints with it and a tip of 10%. Finally if the receipt is in Arabic or any other lingo it is up to the auditor to get a translation not you, in fact I would recommend all receipts in foreign speak just to piss the system off. Having said that, they would probably employ a translator at £200/day just to catch out an overclaim of a penny! Good luck with trying to put the claim in.
The system relies on just the circumstances you have described. I am assuming that you were in the UK but the principles apply anywhere. Firstly as a principle you do not have to have a receipt for expenditure of less than £5 (JSP 712). So for every day away I am sure you spent £4.99 on phone calls, laundry or a newspaper or any combination thereof. Are you sure that you did not spend £4.99( although I think that is capped at £4.50) on lunch everyday?! Also for those nights your friends paid/cooked are you sure you did not have a snack/soft (£4.99) drink afterwards or before you went out? As for the £7.45 could you not find anything more expensive and dont forget your half bottle of wine/ 2 pints with it and a tip of 10%. Finally if the receipt is in Arabic or any other lingo it is up to the auditor to get a translation not you, in fact I would recommend all receipts in foreign speak just to piss the system off. Having said that, they would probably employ a translator at £200/day just to catch out an overclaim of a penny! Good luck with trying to put the claim in.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Well North of London
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Home to Duty (HTD)
Hoots,
After much scratching of the head and digging around on the intranet I managed to actually put in a manual HTD claim and get it accepted!
If you travel more than 240 days per year you can claim automatically, and it just gets added to your pay. If you get detached/deployed alot, and lets face it who doesn't these days, then you have to claim manually using JPA iExpenses.
The secret is to use the receipt based tab, not the mileage based one that you and I both thought the most obvious. As you spotted the latter option is only if you carry extra passengers on your journeys.
You put in a date the claim was incurred (say 1 Apr 06) and how many days you travelled. It is then up to you to calculate how much you can claim. Here you will need to get hold of a copy of JSP752 or find the signal giving the rates (intranet access probably required for either). For me with HTD(Private) I now get the Public Car Rate of 26.2p per mile. Don't forget you need to deduct your personal Contribution (PC) of 9 miles each way for private homes. The PC for HTD(Public) is one mile each way I think. Now tot it all up and stick it in the amount claimed box - phew!
Example.
If you live 20 miles from work, you can claim 22 miles for a return journey
((20 - 9) * 2)
This works out to £5.76 per day (22 * 26.2p)
I don't know if the system still stands that you can claim full mileage (i.e. no PC) if you travel more than 5 days per week.
Hope this helps to get you started
D4R
After much scratching of the head and digging around on the intranet I managed to actually put in a manual HTD claim and get it accepted!
If you travel more than 240 days per year you can claim automatically, and it just gets added to your pay. If you get detached/deployed alot, and lets face it who doesn't these days, then you have to claim manually using JPA iExpenses.
The secret is to use the receipt based tab, not the mileage based one that you and I both thought the most obvious. As you spotted the latter option is only if you carry extra passengers on your journeys.
You put in a date the claim was incurred (say 1 Apr 06) and how many days you travelled. It is then up to you to calculate how much you can claim. Here you will need to get hold of a copy of JSP752 or find the signal giving the rates (intranet access probably required for either). For me with HTD(Private) I now get the Public Car Rate of 26.2p per mile. Don't forget you need to deduct your personal Contribution (PC) of 9 miles each way for private homes. The PC for HTD(Public) is one mile each way I think. Now tot it all up and stick it in the amount claimed box - phew!
Example.
If you live 20 miles from work, you can claim 22 miles for a return journey
((20 - 9) * 2)
This works out to £5.76 per day (22 * 26.2p)
I don't know if the system still stands that you can claim full mileage (i.e. no PC) if you travel more than 5 days per week.
Hope this helps to get you started
D4R
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I noticed that my net HTD is less than the previous centrally-paid RILOR. After much digging it turns out that HTD is based on travelling 18 days per month whereas RILOR was 20 days. Therefore I have lost about £12 per month at a time when travelling costs are soaring above inflation. Another shafting.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlipperySlappery
....entering a cross-section of real 1771s (including the complicated ones) using real Servicemen (no, not the 'HR Professionals') to flag up problems like the hire car fuel issue.
SS
SS
nker. For your, and the rest of this forums, interest 'The HR Professionals' are as impressed with JPA as the rest of the Air Force.After attending a 2 day training course (that was cobbled together by the trainers over the weekend prior to us getting there!) we have been thrown in the deep end with the rest of you.
So stop having a pop at 'Handbrake house', we are as much in the dark as the rest of you. I'm sure that where possible my fellow scribbles will attempt to help, remember, we didn't decide to introduce this thing.
Not received your flying pay! My JNCO received exactly £0.00 from JPA this month.
Oh yes we love the new system.
Having been around when SAMA was introduced this ranting is oh so familiar. The scribbles all wanted our Kardex back, back then, it didn't happen and SAMA stayed........history repeats itself.