![]() |
Tuned out as soon as Scotty's lips started moving.
Fortunately the Health Minister and Chief Health Officer aren’t as sadistic as some of the posters here and are welcoming people to hospitals if they need healthcare irrespective of how they caught the virus or their vaccination status. The fact is that an ICU won't know why someone who's lobbed into its lap and, in any event, won't be able to ask if the patient can't talk. It has ever been thus, and Covid 19 doesn't change it. |
And we now have a tradie who knew he was positive, that has been working on a construction site for at least a week!!! |
Originally Posted by mattyj
(Post 11087166)
..if you can push a wheelbarrow all week with this “terrible affliction” without needing a day in bed..I’d rather catch it than a runny nose
|
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11087110)
and international border caps would remain, but inbound passenger caps, which were recently halved, would be restored back to around 6000 a week. The current 50% cut is unsustainable and is lower than ANY POINT in the last 18 months.
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11087110)
There would be a larger cap for vaccinated returning travellers coming to Australia in Phase B.
|
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11086943)
Meanwhile, another study on blood clots from Pfizer versus AstraZeneca shows they both have the same rate. However, people getting Pfizer were on average older and had more underlying conditions so who knows…,I hope we don’t get a GREAT BIG SCARE CAMPAIGN against Pfizer now like we have had against AstraZeneca.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...udy-finds.html |
The point you seem seem to miss.. your ‘ runny nose ‘ could kill the person you pass it on to. What part of that don’t you understand ?? well since the runny nose I was referring to was not Covid then it’s gonna be a whole new world for you brother |
Originally Posted by SHVC
(Post 11087119)
I like the part where vaccinated ppl get privileges, I wonder what they will be.
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021B00078 |
Well they’ve really made a rod for their own backs there. 70%? 80%?
The likelihood of achieving either of those figures seems pretty low given the complacency demonstrated so far. Let’s face it, Aussies are living in a cotton-wooled society now. Why take responsibility for yourself when you can do whatever you like without consequences? Will be interesting to see how they back away from those targets when it becomes apparent they’re not happening. Fatal leadership error. March-April 2022 and the rate still sitting at less than 60% likely should make it an interesting election lead-up. PS. I’m not disputing that these are the figures we need to get to but can’t see it happening- ever. |
Did anyone else notice something odd about that QLD press conference?
Gladys, Dan whenever they have their ms they always push for ppl to get vaccinated. I don’t think any of those QLD clams even mentioned go get vaccinated. |
Originally Posted by SHVC
(Post 11087432)
Did anyone else notice something odd about that QLD press conference?
Gladys, Dan whenever they have their ms they always push for ppl to get vaccinated. I don’t think any of those QLD clams even mentioned go get vaccinated. wierd links about 10 seconds early |
Well the time I watched it was never mentioned. She just blabbered on about LGAs and talking in circles.
|
I heard that the WA premier has already rejected the PMs plan and isn’t buying into the lockdown plan possibly more. Wonderful, when is the bloody politics going to stop. Rhetorical question there.
|
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11087449)
I heard that the WA premier has already rejected the PMs plan and isn’t buying into the lockdown plan possibly more. Wonderful, when is the bloody politics going to stop. Rhetorical question there.
Originally Posted by The ABC
WA Premier Mark McGowan says the state will reserve its right to enact lockdowns after national cabinet agreed on vaccination targets to progress to the next stage of the nation's COVID-19 roadmap.
But Mr McGowan said that would not necessarily change WA's approach. "Lockdowns would still be possible where needed," he said. "Lockdowns are, really, until we're all vaccinated, the only thing that works."
Originally Posted by The ABC
"When we hit the 80 per cent mark, lockdowns would only be for unusual circumstances in specific locations, but 80 per cent vaccination is very high," Mr McGowan said. "We still reserve the right to lockdown in specific locations if absolutely necessary."So it might be a country town, it might be a local government area, something of that nature."Source
|
"Lockdowns are, really, until we're all vaccinated, the only thing that works." |
McGowan will never admit it but truth is he doesn’t give a toss about the rest of Australia and nor do MOST of his voters.
WA is living the high life economically and it’s citizens have had a level of freedom unparalleled through all of this. McGowan and his troops are in no rush to change anything. An uncontrollable outbreak is the only thing that will change their opinions/actions. |
McGowan will never admit it but truth is he doesn’t give a toss about the rest of Australia and nor do MOST of his voters. WA is living the high life economically and it’s citizens have had a level of freedom unparalleled through all of this. McGowan and his troops are in no rush to change anything. An uncontrollable outbreak is the only thing that will change their opinions/actions. |
Originally Posted by 43Inches
(Post 11087459)
but the state is functioning, free and making money.
|
Well they’ve really made a rod for their own backs there. 70%? 80%? The likelihood of achieving either of those figures seems pretty low given the complacency demonstrated so far. Let’s face it, Aussies are living in a cotton-wooled society now. Why take responsibility for yourself when you can do whatever you like without consequences? Will be interesting to see how they back away from those targets when it becomes apparent they’re not happening. Fatal leadership error. March-April 2022 and the rate still sitting at less than 60% likely should make it an interesting election lead-up. He provided the number and is immediately slammed. Some people need to grow up. |
Originally Posted by Cafe City
(Post 11087347)
Well they’ve really made a rod for their own backs there. 70%? 80%?
The likelihood of achieving either of those figures seems pretty low given the complacency demonstrated so far. Let’s face it, Aussies are living in a cotton-wooled society now. Why take responsibility for yourself when you can do whatever you like without consequences? Will be interesting to see how they back away from those targets when it becomes apparent they’re not happening. Fatal leadership error. March-April 2022 and the rate still sitting at less than 60% likely should make it an interesting election lead-up. PS. I’m not disputing that these are the figures we need to get to but can’t see it happening- ever. Some will need motivating to get the jab, but that’s pretty easily done with a few “vaccinated people can do XYZ….” For once I think we’re reasonably on track and we will be sitting pretty well come end of the year / early new year. |
Originally Posted by 601
(Post 11087465)
Gee he can't do anything right in the eyes of those who don't wish to see.Unless you have been living under a rock, every one, according to the media, has been asking for the number.
He provided the number and is immediately slammed. Some people need to grow up. That was a vaccination level of 80% of all residents - not just for adults. Let's see how we go with that by Xmas. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43. |
Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.