Is Ukraine about to have a war?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,854 Likes
on
1,222 Posts
Lonewolf you might find this of interest, China is courting the small island states and part of it is allowing the use of chinese police and military on the islands if requested.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-61630963
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-61630963
Last edited by NutLoose; 3rd Jun 2022 at 16:08.
Not entirely on topic, if at all, but yes, the situation in Romania regarding freedom of the press is not very good either. Most of the media institutions, expecially the TV stations, are also controlled by the politicians in power. Still, Reporters sans frontières ranks freedom of the press in Hungary as 85th out of 180 countries, with a score of 59.8, significantly worse than Romania, ranked as 56th out of 180, with a score of 68.46.
The difference is Serbia is not (yet) an EU country and can't veto the EU sanctions. But yes, I don't like Serbia's attitude regarding this conflict either. And, before being accused of prejudice again, I'm half Serb.
ETA: Fidesz did accuse Marki Zay of wanting to take Hungary into the war but then as the Brits found out a couple of years ago (courtesy of the Law courts) campaigning politicians do make claims that may, or may not be true!
Interesting article, if the translation is faithful to the original.
The author made an allusion to the Eurozone incorporating Russia into it and being on China's doorstep, which for China is a bad hand to be forced to play. That is the position I was advocating for in the 90's : with the wall down, embrace Russia, bring them into team NATO, because the real power problem is in the Pacific and the Indian Ocean littoral) ... and nobody wanted to hear it..
The author made an allusion to the Eurozone incorporating Russia into it and being on China's doorstep, which for China is a bad hand to be forced to play. That is the position I was advocating for in the 90's : with the wall down, embrace Russia, bring them into team NATO, because the real power problem is in the Pacific and the Indian Ocean littoral) ... and nobody wanted to hear it..
In all fairness it has to be said that the German Army doesn't even possess anything as modern and potent as these IRIS-T systems. They will have to be new manufactured and will not have been planned, e.g. Diehl BGT will have to aquire parts for producing and assembling these additional systems. Unlike some of the other Equipment sagas for Ukraine this delay is probably genuine.
On a positive note: Once Ukarine has these systems no enemy aircraft will survive within a radius of ~20miles. No matter which altitude. Extremely lethal.
On a positive note: Once Ukarine has these systems no enemy aircraft will survive within a radius of ~20miles. No matter which altitude. Extremely lethal.
Interesting article, if the translation is faithful to the original.
The author made an allusion to the Eurozone incorporating Russia into it and being on China's doorstep, which for China is a bad hand to be forced to play. That is the position I was advocating for in the 90's : with the wall down, embrace Russia, bring them into team NATO, because the real power problem is in the Pacific and the Indian Ocean littoral) ... and nobody wanted to hear it. (Yes, I burned the rejection slips in frustration).
The author's glib "go take Taiwan" line seems to overlook that a border crossing op (Russia/Ukraine) is a whole different animal than an amphibious landing. Anything beyond this probably belongs in the South China Sea Gathering Storm thread.
The author made an allusion to the Eurozone incorporating Russia into it and being on China's doorstep, which for China is a bad hand to be forced to play. That is the position I was advocating for in the 90's : with the wall down, embrace Russia, bring them into team NATO, because the real power problem is in the Pacific and the Indian Ocean littoral) ... and nobody wanted to hear it. (Yes, I burned the rejection slips in frustration).
The author's glib "go take Taiwan" line seems to overlook that a border crossing op (Russia/Ukraine) is a whole different animal than an amphibious landing. Anything beyond this probably belongs in the South China Sea Gathering Storm thread.
Remarkable difference in quality of videos and artillery accuracy between Russia and Ukraine
https://defence-ua.com/weapon_and_te...vali-7652.html
https://defence-ua.com/weapon_and_te...vali-7652.html
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,854 Likes
on
1,222 Posts
Slovakia to build weaponary for Ukraine before for themselves, how awesome is that.
https://en.defence-ua.com/industries...rity-3184.html
Russia also lost an expensive UAV nr Odessa
https://en.defence-ua.com/news/expen...down-2771.html
..
https://en.defence-ua.com/industries...rity-3184.html
Russia also lost an expensive UAV nr Odessa
https://en.defence-ua.com/news/expen...down-2771.html
..
Last edited by NutLoose; 4th Jun 2022 at 23:57.
Russia also lost an expensive UAV nr Odessa
https://en.defence-ua.com/news/expen...down-2771.html
..
https://en.defence-ua.com/news/expen...down-2771.html
..
Join Date: May 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To be fair while that link is a month old. South Air Command Public Relations Service (Odesa) claims to have shot down another one yesterday - 4 Jun. https://t.me/odesacityofficial/8276 or https://news.yahoo.com/expensive-rus...111015891.html
That would be the 3rd one claimed.
Interestingly despite being a much older design ( israeli licensed copy) the forpost seems to cost about twice as much as a a Bayraktar TB2. I wonder what the extra 2 million dollars is spent on.
That would be the 3rd one claimed.
Interestingly despite being a much older design ( israeli licensed copy) the forpost seems to cost about twice as much as a a Bayraktar TB2. I wonder what the extra 2 million dollars is spent on.
Guest
All these losses are academic without knowing how much stuff each side has.
Are there any figures for losses, re-supply, current inventory, current production?
The West is giving a lot of kit, well clearing out the back of their cupboards and getting rid of the old stuff. One wonders how much stuff the West has?
So when does the West run out and any similar figures for re-supply?
Are there any figures for losses, re-supply, current inventory, current production?
The West is giving a lot of kit, well clearing out the back of their cupboards and getting rid of the old stuff. One wonders how much stuff the West has?
So when does the West run out and any similar figures for re-supply?
Last edited by uxb99; 5th Jun 2022 at 15:17.
All these losses are academic without knowing how much stuff each side has.
Are their any figures for losses, re-supply, current inventory, current production?
The West is giving a lot of kit, well clearing out the back of their cupboards and getting rid of the old stuff. One wonders how much stuff the West has?
So when does the West run out and any similar figures for re-supply?
Are their any figures for losses, re-supply, current inventory, current production?
The West is giving a lot of kit, well clearing out the back of their cupboards and getting rid of the old stuff. One wonders how much stuff the West has?
So when does the West run out and any similar figures for re-supply?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,854 Likes
on
1,222 Posts
It could be argued that Putin is also fighting for survival at this stage. Just because those other Russian areas need resources and commitment, doesn't necessarily mean they'll get them; just look at the resources (not) being deployed to fight forest fires.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,854 Likes
on
1,222 Posts
Well the long range artillery is gaining momentum,. Shame they may have got them for free though.
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and...edia-3191.html
Another 60 Krab being bought from Poland
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and...edia-3157.html
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and...edia-3191.html
On June 1, 2022, the Belgian private company Flanders Technical Supply (FTS) delivered to Ukraine a stock of 64 M109A4 howitzers which had been purchased by the company from the Belgian army in 2015.
According to the Belgian Minister of Defense (MoD), the howitzers would have gone to Ukraine. The Belgian MoD had started discussions with FTS which apparently had already sold them.
When retired in 2008, the Belgian M109A2/A3 155 mm self-propelled howitzers have just been modernized to M109A4 BE standard through an “MLU M109 program” (Mid-life Update). So we can say that the Ukrainians will have the latest generation of M109 155 mm howitzers.
The M109 is an American-made 155 mm self-propelled howitzer based on a tracked armored chassis, first introduced in the early 1960s. It has been upgraded a number of times, most recently to the M109A7.
According to the Belgian Minister of Defense (MoD), the howitzers would have gone to Ukraine. The Belgian MoD had started discussions with FTS which apparently had already sold them.
When retired in 2008, the Belgian M109A2/A3 155 mm self-propelled howitzers have just been modernized to M109A4 BE standard through an “MLU M109 program” (Mid-life Update). So we can say that the Ukrainians will have the latest generation of M109 155 mm howitzers.
The M109 is an American-made 155 mm self-propelled howitzer based on a tracked armored chassis, first introduced in the early 1960s. It has been upgraded a number of times, most recently to the M109A7.
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and...edia-3157.html
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,854 Likes
on
1,222 Posts
When you see the state of some of the stuff Russia is trying to regenerate it gives you an idea of their losses.
https://en.defence-ua.com/industries...them-3173.html
meanwhile back in Germany
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and...aine-3144.html
At this rate Ukraine will be NATO compatible in short order equipment wise.
https://en.defence-ua.com/industries...them-3173.html
meanwhile back in Germany
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and...aine-3144.html
At this rate Ukraine will be NATO compatible in short order equipment wise.
Last edited by NutLoose; 5th Jun 2022 at 11:14.
Putin himself is not fighting, those fighting for him are probably not as well motivated as the Ukranians fighting for their homeland. If the Russians lose, they lose Putin, if the Ukrainians lose they lose their homeland, lives, wives, children etc.. . Hmm...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,854 Likes
on
1,222 Posts
This makes interesting reading with shades of the battle of Bastogne, under equipped for the territory and badly lead.
https://en.defence-ua.com/events/ukr...army-3183.html
https://en.defence-ua.com/events/ukr...army-3183.html
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,854 Likes
on
1,222 Posts
Re the oligarchs, my understanding (from something I read a week or more ago), is that several of them (seven I believe) have met "mysterious" deaths! Perhaps the rest are lying low whilst plotting!
Last edited by FUMR; 5th Jun 2022 at 15:12.