![]() |
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11085526)
Well looks like another month lockdown for sydney
but construction will be allowed but with capacity limits people living alone will be allowed another person to visit them, ie a friend royal prince Alfred hospital is turning ambulances away right now due to a developing covid situation. In other news…. Our super smart Ballina couple have been hit with a total of $14000 in fines. They are lucky they are not in WA, they probably would be in jail. |
Originally Posted by Ladloy
(Post 11085517)
only 16% fully vaxed. 1000s will die.
|
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 11085552)
1000’s already do. Perspective. 4’ish million dead from COVID - around 60 million die every year from all the other stuff we don’t try to eliminate.
|
Originally Posted by KRviator
(Post 11085525)
That death toll may well be cheaper than having the nations biggest city locked down. Read this morning the Sydney lockdown alone is $220,000,000 per day! Victoria is $150,000,000. At $5.0M per life (for a healthy young adult) that's 44 deaths per day (NSW) and 30 Vic equivalent cost - assuming every death is a healthy, young(ish) taxpayer, not some old duck in their 80's or 90's like the vast majority have been and who are now, mostly, vaccinated.
How long until someone decides it's worth it? No matter if "they" do, SHVC is spot on with his assertion: They have set this unrealistic goal and now have to stick to it, having built their entire reelection campaigns on the "But only I kept you safe!" mantra - which the UK is showing to be a false prophecy. Despite vaccinations, despite lockdowns, you will still have cases, you will still have deaths. The goal of absolute zero Covid, while admirable, is like zero fatalities in flying, It's a target, a wish, we all aspire to achieve it, but it'll never happen. The grubby politicians have dug us a hole so deep that we will never climb out unless they can think beyond their political careers which will never happen! Remember politicians face reflections, that's a huge negative for the general public when it comes to making decisions outside of their own greed! |
Originally Posted by Ladloy
(Post 11085573)
Would love some examples because this argument doesn't hold water.
Of note, "Influenza and Pneumonia" caused 2,373, 2,879 and 4,124 deaths for those three years sampled, for an average of 3,125 deaths per year. Prostate cancer, around 3,100 blokes carked it per year, while around 2,900 women died from breast cancer. So, between lung cancer, pneumonia, prostate and breast cancer we've killed off around 17,500 people a year! If you want to add motor vehicles, that's an additional 1,100 a year, nationwide... The total deaths for each year were 143,473, 153,580 & 168,960 - averaging that gives 155,000 people dying each year. |
Originally Posted by SOPS
(Post 11085551)
I am not doubting you. Do you have a source for all of that? I’m just interested.
In other news…. Our super smart Ballina couple have been hit with a total of $14000 in fines. They are lucky they are not in WA, they probably would be in jail. |
Originally Posted by KRviator
(Post 11085592)
For Australia alone, you can start with ~8,500 a year from "Malignant neoplasm of trachea, bronchus and lung" also known as lung cancer. The vast majority (90% men / 65% women - Source) of which is caused by - entirely voluntary, and accepted-by-Government - tobacco smoking. ABS: Leading causes of death, Australia, 2010, 2014, 2019
Of note, "Influenza and Pneumonia" caused 2,373, 2,879 and 4,124 deaths for those three years sampled, for an average of 3,125 deaths per year. Prostate cancer, around 3,100 blokes carked it per year, while around 2,900 women died from breast cancer. So, between lung cancer, pneumonia, prostate and breast cancer we've killed off around 17,500 people a year! If you want to add motor vehicles, that's an additional 1,100 a year, nationwide... The total deaths for each year were 143,473, 153,580 & 168,960 - averaging that gives 155,000 people dying each year. Smoking - billions spent on advertising and regulation. This one is a choice and the cost is huge on the taxpayer. Breast and prostate cancer - billions spent per year on early detection, chemo, management, charities Motor vehicles - HEAVILY regulated with compulsory billions spent on advertising for safety, speeding and drinking. Remember when seatbelts were mandatory and people cracked the poos? You know what all these things have in common? If they were all left unregulated the death rate would be astronomically higher just like covid. If we let it rip right now take the swedish, US or UK death rates and apply them to Aus. 30 to 50k dead, herd immunity will not be achieved either. So you're happy to increase the death rate in Australia by 30% for up to 3 years? Another argument is the cost of a human life. Dead people don't pay tax, thousands of dead people in a short time is very bad for the economy. Worse than the current debt accrued by the LNP. |
Originally Posted by KRviator
(Post 11085592)
For Australia alone, you can start with ~8,500 a year from "Malignant neoplasm of trachea, bronchus and lung" also known as lung cancer. The vast majority (90% men / 65% women - Source) of which is caused by - entirely voluntary, and accepted-by-Government - tobacco smoking. ABS: Leading causes of death, Australia, 2010, 2014, 2019
Of note, "Influenza and Pneumonia" caused 2,373, 2,879 and 4,124 deaths for those three years sampled, for an average of 3,125 deaths per year. Prostate cancer, around 3,100 blokes carked it per year, while around 2,900 women died from breast cancer. So, between lung cancer, pneumonia, prostate and breast cancer we've killed off around 17,500 people a year! If you want to add motor vehicles, that's an additional 1,100 a year, nationwide... The total deaths for each year were 143,473, 153,580 & 168,960 - averaging that gives 155,000 people dying each year. |
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11085596)
it was mentioned on channel 7 news tonight. Expect the formal announcement tomorrow morning at 11 which is the usual premiers news conference.
|
Originally Posted by SOPS
(Post 11085611)
Thanks mate. We are behind you.. just on the news now
Rapid antigen testing will be made available |
The basics is 4 extra weeks, but some rules changed ie tradies and construction can be back working. year 12 will be back to school |
Originally Posted by rattman
(Post 11085621)
Pretty much every news source is reporting it now. The basics is 4 extra weeks, but some rules changed ie tradies and construction can be back working. year 12 will be back to school
Rapid antigen testing will be made available |
May as well lift the entire lockdown, it's pointless.
|
Originally Posted by Xeptu
(Post 11085648)
May as well lift the entire lockdown, it's pointless.
|
Originally Posted by ruprecht
(Post 11085649)
I think we’re just buying time to get vaccines in arms at this point.
Her choices are a full uncompromising lockdown, or, let it rip. This is not going to end well. |
Originally Posted by Xeptu
(Post 11085661)
There is no time, it's too late, that will take weeks, by then there will be thousands of infections, all that is going to do is increase the chances of a breakout strain.
Her choices are a full uncompromising lockdown, or, let it rip. This is not going to end well. Eventually though, we will have to examine the costs of the lockdown vs lives saved (or deaths postponed) - but we are a long way from that point. |
I say again, she has to lock down hard. She has to bring in the Army to the ‘communities’ that come to Australia, but don’t ‘ understand’ except when applying to Centrelink . Its now or never.
|
Originally Posted by SOPS
(Post 11085682)
I say again, she has to lock down hard. She has to bring in the Army to the ‘communities’ that come to Australia, but don’t ‘ understand’ except when applying to Centrelink . Its now or never.
It’s not The Day of The Triffids… |
I think we’re just buying time to get vaccines in arms at this point. That has been the point from day one. |
Originally Posted by SOPS
(Post 11085682)
I say again, she has to lock down hard. She has to bring in the Army to the ‘communities’ that come to Australia, but don’t ‘ understand’ except when applying to Centrelink . Its now or never.
Gladys is screaming for Jobkeeper to come back seeing as Sydney is looking at another four weeks of this. Is Canberra going to listen? SloMo certainly would look after his own backyard in Sydney if he could, but the optics of playing favourites would royally screw him politically (like he isn't screwed enough already). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24. |
Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.