Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Merged: QANTAS/ALAEA EBA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 13:49
  #3261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Third Floor
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you ever considered that it may cost you a loss of 10% pay to get 5%? ie,deduction of average o/t worked and 4 hour stoppages. At this stage from my rough workings that some Engineers may have already lost the first years 5%
I note your points, but up till now the only LAME's to have "lost" anything are the ones who have taken part in a work stoppage. 4 hours pay per stoppage. Not being involved in overtime certainly cannot be classed as 'losing" something. This is work over and above the allocated 38 hour week and by not helping out a poorly managed, understaffed system is not a loss. Sure, there are some amongst the LAME's that love to come to work on days off and stay back after shift. They get payed extra money for doing so. At most stations/Bases you will generally find that it's the same core of blokes who do the overtime - good on them and good luck to them - they've decided for whatever reason that they will give their free time up in exchange for extra money. Some need the money for "noble" causes such as putting kids through school, child support, donations to charity etc.

However there would be an equal amount of this 'core' group whom do overtime to spend the money on wine, women, hookers, beer, cars, gambling etc, etc. This just about covers the "core" of people whom are involved in regular overtime yet don't forget that as always there's a majority who are more than happy with their 38 hours a week (and in some cases a 'rostered' overtime component of approx 0.5hrs/week) For example, in the last 2 years, I have not spent one extra minute at work than my roster allows for. I work hard and give everything while I'm there, yet just have other things happening in my life and don't have a reason to be there when my employment conditions doesn't call for it. I have no doubt that as a gruop we're definitely worth a 5% pay rise and as our agreement would be backdated for the past 18 months, the overtimers would get this increase on all their past O/T. Believe me when I say that there are lots and lots of LAME's such as myself whom don't need nor want overtime and after the start of the overtime bans some of the regular 'core' of overtimers have found other things to do and ways to manage without the O/T money and will probably never go back to it.

Big M is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 13:51
  #3262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you hear that the insurance paid out $25mil more for that DC10 than it cost? And the small amount the company was fined?

DC and his Team are about managing risk to maximise profit, not about maintaining maxinum safety!

Fly Safe.............

As the company says 'Take 5'%.
YOSHI is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 14:05
  #3263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you hear that the insurance paid out $25mil more for that DC10 than it cost? And the small amount the company was fined?

DC and his Team are about managing risk to maximise profit, not about maintaining maxinum safety!

Fly Safe.............

As the company says 'Take 5'%.
Yes, AA was fined the princely sum of $500,000.00 The $25 million doesn't bring back those that are lost, the lost aeroplane or the reputation one held due to cost cutting to maximise profits for shareholders that have nothing to do with the operation of the airline, or any company for that matter.
QF94 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 14:09
  #3264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: yes
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
loose lips sink ships - five percent
idydir is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 14:14
  #3265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney
Age: 52
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
spend the money on wine, women, hookers, beer, cars, gambling etc
Sounds like any man I ever knew.
mel applied is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 20:12
  #3266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EWANQF

Mate that is the trouble you are getting a DESCENT wage.
inthefluffystuff is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 21:01
  #3267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: uk
Age: 39
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a descent wage

Is that the wage you get for going down?
BIG TITS is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 23:08
  #3268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5% That's what this is about.

Don't loose focus

O/T is only worked regurlarly by about 10% of the workforce. The other 90% don't do any, or very little at least.

This means that 90% of the workforce are loosing nothing other than the occassional 4hr stoppage. This is why this campaign is so painful for Qantas.

LAME's are basically loosing nothing on average, and QF are cancelling hundreds of flights, delaying hundreds more and destroying their commercial relationships with many of their customers.

We will win the fight for better wages. No doubt.

Follow the guidance from your executive, they are the ones on the front line and know the intimate details.

Why we are at it, spare a thought for the QF employed executive members who are under a strong and constant personal attack from QF engineering management. The damage done to their careers is huge. However they will fight to the end no matter what the personal cost is
REALITY is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 00:07
  #3269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: waterfall
Age: 61
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok so we get 5%... or 3% with sweeteners.... or whatever. The day after the EBA is signed, we still don't have enough people on the floor, we still lack training, we still have disengaged management and staff, we are way behind the 8 ball in regards to the deferred etc work on the aircraft, the 380 introduction is a disaster waiting to happen, the Dreamliner is just that, a dream, the cert 4's still aren't paid, the stupid procedures are still there, we are still set up to fail...etc etc, and other eba's are around the corner

('we' means anyone wearing QANTAS on their chest!)

please, ALAEA, consider getting a delegation together of executives, LAME's, seniors, Supers, DMM's, other department staff and push for a meeting with the board - do they really know what the blazes is happening???!!! what they stand to lose??

I am not going down without a fight - push us too far and I'll be on the 7:30 report telling it like it is.

will our current management be the death of QF engineering as we know it?? or are they just cutting us to the bone to sell us out.

I need to see our side of the story out there, now!
pablo m is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 00:49
  #3270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about getting some of those security guys involved when we discover suspect wiring on aircraft out of overseas MRO's.
I remember working on OGI(?) with an ex-engine line LAME. He found the fire loop wiring incorrectly routed! He contacted Maint Watch and the B767 Maint Watch guy came down and inspected the engine. When he saw it he spat the dummy. He'd apparently been banging on to management about the defects they're coming out of the Welsh "Centre of Excements" with. I bet the report he wrote got buried.
Konehead is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 01:06
  #3271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you ever considered that it may cost you a loss of 10% pay to get 5%? ie,deduction of average o/t worked and 4 hour stoppages.
Only a small percentage of LAMEs regularly work O/T. A larger number may come in when they need a bit extra for that holiday or new lawnmower etc.
The extra 2% in our paypacket is the equivalent of coming in on O/T for two days per year. I would rather stay at home than come in for the extra money, year in year out.
Average O/T is incorporated into some rosters therefore is not lost.
But really mate, you cannot rely on OT to pay bills. Especially when QF is constantly trying to reduce costs by abolishing it. When you have'nt had a pay increase in 2 and a half years, its easy for someone to rely on OT more and more without noticing it. And this is not right or fair. Where will these ppl be when OT dries up?
If the only way we can operate currently is with O/T, then how will we go as the fleet expands? I doubt O/T will be abolished, because it's cheaper to pay O/T than employ more staff.
Konehead is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 01:15
  #3272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok so we get 5%... or 3% with sweeteners.... or whatever. The day after the EBA is signed, we still don't have enough people on the floor, we still lack training, we still have disengaged management and staff, we are way behind the 8 ball in regards to the deferred etc work on the aircraft, the 380 introduction is a disaster waiting to happen, the Dreamliner is just that, a dream, the cert 4's still aren't paid, the stupid procedures are still there, we are still set up to fail...etc etc, and other eba's are around the corner
Go Pablo! Couldnt agree more.
Konehead is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 02:04
  #3273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stuff em

were holding off our pia over the school holidays but qf hasn't granted our leave so we cant spend time with our families......we seem to be giving far more than were taking...........the only giving from qf is os maintenance and our routes to jetstar.......the scales arent balanced

im voting no to anything other than 5% and all the extras included in the previous eba document...
wake_up_geff is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 02:28
  #3274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wake Up Geff

Good on ya Wake Up! i'm with you son!
Stick to our guns boys and girls!
Boardman is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 02:30
  #3275 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: s28e153
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think we should leave the media stuff to the Bexley boys and girls.
They are doing a great job for all our benefit.
And meanwhile, more from the Australian...


Qantas plays with fire

D.D. McNicoll | June 25, 2008
JULIA Gillard explained that she was looking a bit eccentric on Sunday morning in Washington, DC, as she had cobbled together a wardrobe after her bags failed to arrive with her.
The airline? Qantas. Her luggage came in later that day. Her bags went missing again last Friday when she flew home. The airline? Qantas. "So this happens to deputy prime ministers too?" Strewth's US colleague asked. "There's no discrimination with Qantas, no discrimination at all," Gillard said with a laugh. "I'm not taking it personally. The amount I fly, I think it's the law of averages." But will she tackle Qantas chief executive Geoff Dixon on the matter? She laughed that off, too, but with something of a steely glint in her eye.

Wondering if that was also blamed on the lame PIA

Last edited by division1; 3rd Jul 2008 at 02:50.
division1 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 02:53
  #3276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Word on the streets is many delays being blamed (in terminal announcements) on Engineering that are nothign of the sort.....

FOD FOG. makes me vomit
ejectx3 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 03:04
  #3277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I personally don't know what the company is complaining about. I noticed that the QF1 left a bit after 10am the other day. Almost 8 hours early!!!! If we just stick to the O/T bans there will be no disruptions. Management have everything under control.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 04:35
  #3278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you ever considered that it may cost you a loss of 10% pay to get 5%? ie,deduction of average o/t worked and 4 hour stoppages. At this stage from my rough workings that some Engineers may have already lost the first years 5% and started on the 2nd
How does it go ... "No gain without pain."

By my "rough workings" if our OLD Executive had taken the approach that the present Executive has, ten years ago, we would be 15% better off now, and that would be allowing for lost income following the 6 months of lost overtime.

Tall buildings survive longer on a solid foundation, our Executive is underpinning our foundations for the future and they have my support.
vortsa is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 05:43
  #3279 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
As per news reports, looks like another meeting between ALAEA and QF next Tuesday.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 05:52
  #3280 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Up left - Down right
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets hope GD & his mob come prepared to negotiate a fair deal so we can get the flying public back in the air, on time and with safety.
Short_Circuit is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.