Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways vs. BASSA (Airline Staff Only)

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways vs. BASSA (Airline Staff Only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd May 2010, 16:55
  #3361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firstly, I can't read 167 pages of comments on this thread alone so please forgive me if I repeat comments from before.

Can'tFly's comment above is quite valid. I have found it beyond annoying that the media have take up a very anti-management stance by reporting all of the alleged reasons for the failure of the talks.

Also, I have not once heard the BASSA side of the argument in detail.
What exactly is it you DON'T agree with?
Without resorting to personal insults and petty bickering, can ONE person explain WHY you feel the need to impact your "colleagues"?
Why do YOU feel that you are above taking a bit of pain right now to keep ALL of us employed?

As things stand financially, there will be no choice but to resort to compulsory redundancies across the airline.
Less profitable routes and a swage of the shorthaul operation would be cut seeing a great number of employees across departments lose their jobs.

From the point of view of the VAST majority of the rest of the airline as well as a significant number of your CC colleagues, what you are doing is petty, selfish and foolish.

SO.... please enlighten us. What are your arguments really about?

I'M BACKING BA !!!!
PureScotsman is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 17:05
  #3362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pogles Wood
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fargoo

A couple of hundred members of the Socialist Workers party have decended on ACAS' offices and several have broken in to the building to try and disrupt the meetings.

According to one of the lefties on the BBC news they are doing it to show solidarity


Now, maybe, just maybe, those lead astray into believing that this is not a militant/political stance may just see the light before it's too late.

Open your eyes guys, please!
ranger07 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 17:37
  #3363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe just a mis-speak, but the bloke on Channel 4 news just said that there will "a one day strike on Monday"..... Does he mean that the strikes will begin on monday with one day followed immediately by a further four?
Eddy is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 18:04
  #3364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pogles Wood
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
purescotsman

If you were able to read the previous 167 pages, you would still not find a diffinitive answer to your question re 'what are they striking for?'

The only thing that is consistant are the inconsistancies. It changes from 'imposition' to 'return of staff travel', to imposition then mistrust and so on.
ranger07 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 18:15
  #3365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My god. Just watched a video on BBC website of the protestors chanting at Mr. Walsh.

The man's just earned some respect points for putting up with that inappropriate behaviour from what I'm willing to place good money on the fact are largely members of the Socialist Worker party for one reason and one reason only : the opportunity to rabble rouse and protest at every turn.

Well done, Willie, for standing up to them.

And well done to Woodley for helping Mr. Walsh make his escape and for putting the mob in their place.
Eddy is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 18:34
  #3366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder who might have 'encouraged' this rabble to disrupt proceedings!!!
Sporran is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 18:37
  #3367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are you suggesting, Sporran ?

- no, really... I don't know who you might be referring to.
Eddy is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 18:37
  #3368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sporran - I have no idea please enlighten me and the others on here?
OzzieO is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 18:46
  #3369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ugh @ Bassa and Crew Forum glee.....

Today's ugly turn of events will help NOBODY. Indeed, I think things have just taken a biiiig leap backwards.

BBC News - BA and union talks stopped by protesters
Eddy is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 19:05
  #3370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never thought I would say this, but kudos to Tony Woodley for standing up to the idiots. Gone up a tiny bit in my estimations.
swalesboy is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 19:05
  #3371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the protesters made their way to the 23rd floor where the talks were being held, then someone leaked the location of the meeting room.
Caribbean Boy is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 19:11
  #3372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I understand it, it's been alleged on another forum that Mr. Walsh was responsible for arranging the visit by the Socialist (never-been-a) Worker Party..... I'm sceptical.
Eddy is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 19:12
  #3373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 39,000ft
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another example of why I left BASSA
MarkSpeed is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 19:15
  #3374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pogles Wood
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They do have supporters then after all.

Respectable bunch eh?????????????
ranger07 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 20:02
  #3375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in between
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a quote from the latest ESS news:

The airline added that it was deeply concerned that Derek Simpson felt it was appropriate to post on Twitter a running commentary of delicate negotiations aimed at preventing a strike which will impact thousands of hard working families wanting to go their half term holidays and the job security of his members.
Numpty...

PS it says T.W.I.T.T.E.R in the quote not PPrune. Strange, It changes automatically from twitte.r to pprune

Last edited by Dutchjock; 22nd May 2010 at 20:07. Reason: Hang on, why does twitter change into pprune??
Dutchjock is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 20:25
  #3376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Far Side
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With friends like that, who needs............

"Respeck" to both Willie and Derek for their handling of what could have been a nasty incident. Maybe there's hope after all.
ZQA297/30 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 20:56
  #3377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.
but what we all do have is decency and decorum something that you are lacking .
are we talking about the same people that marched outside the Aurora hotel? that changed against WW? That called their colleagues Scabs?

if so, I am incredulous you can say that they have decency and decorum! It is interesting that CC want people to respect them but it is ok for them to attack their colleagues, with a lack of respect for the rest of the company that it is difficult to believe.
christmaslights is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 21:21
  #3378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: 18m N of LGW
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly another example of all that is wrong with unionism. The louts who engineered this had no thought for the purpose of this important meeting. Still, let us hope that the "progress being made" continues. However, I think that Simpson's Tweetering was outlandish and probably illegal since this was a very private meeting, it was certainly childish and totally unprofessional. An apology would be appropriate.

Last edited by InFinRetirement; 22nd May 2010 at 21:48.
InFinRetirement is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 21:43
  #3379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't posted on here for a while as it was just the same back and forth of the argument but am incensed about Simpson tweeting during these important meetings! It speaks volumes about his personal agenda - he's not intested in solving the dispute or coming to an agreement - it's simply to get his name into the frame in the hopes of some future stardom with the union and Labour party.
Please wake up cabin crew and see this for what it really is - UNITE are leading the airline into bankruptcy - no one will have a job let alone a travel perk.
The new argument seems to have forgotten the original reasons the strikes were called - the "safety" issues of workling one down are now abandoned and travel concessions and reinstatement are the new tools to hold BA to ransom.
CurlyWurly is offline  
Old 22nd May 2010, 21:56
  #3380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: M3 usually!
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Written/text threats to poison pilots food.
Can I just say that, to put this in to context, I have been flying with BA for 23 years and I think CC have been joking about eye-drops in pilots dinner for most of them. Thats not to say that it is acceptable, or even that it is ever done; what can be said as a joke in the galley though does not translate well in black and white. Most of the 'guilty' crew in this category never intended this as a threat, or even that it would be construed as such. If anything it was a poorly timed joke and, if english is not their first language then they may not have realised how it could be misconstrued. Am I the only one who thinks this?
ottergirl is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.