Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk VI

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk VI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 17:58
  #1261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diplome
Snas:

Your statement:



may not be that far off the mark and the seeming desperation of Cabin Crew to get something, anything out of this may serve negotiations well.
Agreed too.
Litebulbs is online now  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 18:01
  #1262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paddy:

Since this is our day for mixed metaphors I will state that I'm not going to hold my breath while waiting for those pigs to fly.

I believe CC are too far in right now to turn around and start questioning their leadership. Millions of £'s spent, a populace turned hostile...they have to dance with the one that brought them.

Will be interesting to see how that meeting transpires to say the least.
Diplome is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 18:05
  #1263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can you quantify "getting away with murder"? They have a contract of employment and collectively negotiated agreements.
Ironically, it's an example of poor management. Cabin crew agreements have been far too generous for too long - the overall cost of the cabin crew staffing, not necessarily fully through salaries, but also through restrictive agreements. The nettle should have been grasped long ago.
Papillon is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 18:08
  #1264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: brighton
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
meet

Speak up at the meeting and ask questions of the union and the reps???
Considering the treatment of anyone having dared to do that in recent weeks it will take a vey brave and hard skinned person to do that!
wascrew is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 18:15
  #1265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
seat Occupancy

To those asking about Seat Occupancy.

The loads are good at the min. However, the yields are still 'poor', particularly in premium cabins and the actual number of seats is far less than a year ago - reduced capacity/smaller planes etc....

Its too simplistic a view to just say 'The planes look full to me'. It doesn't tell the whole story.
Also, worth pointing out that load factors in First are VERY poor still and very few, if any, are paying full whack for the privledge.
ArthurScargill is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 18:20
  #1266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Basque Country
Age: 75
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poor management

Ironically, it's an example of poor management. Cabin crew agreements have been far too generous for too long - the overall cost of the cabin crew staffing, not necessarily fully through salaries, but also through restrictive agreements. The nettle should have been grasped long ago.
I confess: I was part of that poor management. I was part of that bunch of half-wits who tried to grasp the nettle. I was part of that shower who dared to address those restrictive practices, a member of that 'macho management' who 'bullied' and 'intimidated' cabin crew, who promised them that New Entrant contracts would not affect their take home pay, who GUARANTEED it wouldn't by agreeing to make up any difference. And STILL they went on strike and Ayling/Street pulled the rug from under us. After 3 days and £125m losses. WW & co are an altogether different ball game and this time the gloves are off and the City are in full agreement.
PaddyMiguel is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 18:39
  #1267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nurj,

The bottom line is we're flying less people and making less money so as a company how can we afford to keep the same staffing levels ? Its VERY basic economics. Not a pleasant pill to swallow i'll admit, but its VERY easy to understand.
I'm also very angry.
As for it being temporary, thats also unlikley. With code shares and mergers we're likely to stream line even futher once this sorry fiasco is done and dusted. Shame BASSA won't be around when they're truly needed

{EDIT - the next phase of streamlining might not hit FC and CC as hard as us on the ground, but it will cetainly have some impact - less routes operated by BA planes no doubt}
ArthurScargill is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 19:12
  #1268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: About to join the A1, UK
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry Mods, No more mention of UNITE mouthpieces.

To all BA CC.

You have to elect the reps that will BEST REPRESENT your interests. For the moment, I think, the bolt has been shot; But, for the future, think long and hard about this. I am constantly reminded that among the CC frat there are some mutli-qualified/multi-lingual/multi-this/multi-that - agents of brilliance - eclat. There is some real talent in the cabin!! Well, sift through the manifetsos of those that stick their heads above the parapet and elect those that you think will be able to NEGOTIATE.

Nurj
nurjio is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 19:32
  #1269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SWAPS Inner
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Paddy's comment that the City are right behind Willy is the bit that would worry me most if i was BASSA or CC. I didn't see the share price taking a tumble yesterday which would suggest the analysts have all been briefed and are convinced - its all going according to plan.
thunderbird7 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 19:48
  #1270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The Deep South (Sussex)
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Can somebody explain how the company would enforce a policy during IA, that if you were sick, you will be deemed to be on strike? What if you are sick prior to any action, or are, for example, involved in an accident whilst driving to work?"

My guess Litebulb is that you when you called in sick you would be given a report time that day to visit the Company doctor at LHR. Turn up genuinely sick:No problem. Turn up fit: you would be cleared for work.


It is such an obvious ploy that the CC will try you can bet your life a plan is in position to deal with it.
Lou Scannon is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 20:13
  #1271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funnily enough BA are advertising for an occupational physician on their recruitment site.

BA Recruitment

regards
binsleepen is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 20:30
  #1272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Age: 51
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I feel there has been an interesting shift in recent days from Crew I know, a few of them now are stating that the strike will not happen. They have gone as far to say that they dont want a strike to happen, but voted yes for one!! Last week they were all saying cannot wait to show WW how proud they are of thier union ...

They say they only voted yes to show BA they are serious, but now do not know where they should turn. When speaking to a friend she said that she is now really worried as she has voted yes but did not think it would actually go ahead or come to this?? When I ask why she had voted yes, the sad thing is that she still does not know why, the usual BASSA facts come out about Fuel,New Fleet, price fixing anything but imposition its been the same for the past few months. We have debated the rights and wrongs of both sides for the past few months, with both of us eventually agreeing not to talk about it due to both of us becoming frustrated. Reality has now hit home and she is very very worried about losing her Job.

I think the statements of the strike will not happen are more of hope than one of fact. Rabbits caught in the headlights...
Newyorker001 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 21:00
  #1273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they're now really worried, why on earth did they vote yes? BA made it abundantly clear to all staff that a yes vote was an extremely serious move and that it would have major consequences - in fact they explicitly stated that a yes vote wasn't a vote for more dialogue, it was a vote for a strike. They can't turn around now and say they didn't realise when they were told. Simply saying that they didn't think it would go ahead just isn't good enough - it's not fair to BA, it's not fair to those who actually meant it when they voted yes, it's certainly not fair on passengers.

They might well be regretting their decision, but in all honesty they SHOULD be worried and thinking they've done the wrong thing. They could well have brought the roof down on their heads.
Papillon is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 21:10
  #1274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Papillon

And those are the 64,000 dollar questions.........As someone else pointed out earlier we have lots of intelligent Cabin crew, Graduates, multi-talented, multifaceted, multi this, multi that..but if that's really true there's been a mass suspension of critical and analylitical facilities somewhere down the line.
wiggy is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 21:25
  #1275 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm so uppset with the whole thing. I looked at some websites, adn this is intresting:

What is Mind Control?

Peer Group Pressure
Suppressing doubt and resistance to new ideas by exploiting the need to belong.

Confusing Doctrine
Encouraging blind acceptance and rejection of logic through complex lectures on an incomprehensible doctrine.

Disinhibition
Encouraging child-like obedience by orchestrating child-like behaviour.

Verbal Abuse
Desensitizing through bombardment with foul and abusive language.

Finger Pointing
Creating a false sense of righteousness by pointing to the shortcomings of the outside world and other cults.

No Questions
Accomplishing automatic acceptance of beliefs by discouraging questions.

Fear
Maintaining loyalty and obedience to the group by threatening soul, life or limb for the slightest 'negative' thought, word or deed.
The above is from:

Cult Information Centre - Common Questions About the Cults (Mods, only added as referense point)


Im not saying that Unite or Bassa is a cult, but the bits I hilighted are scary in my opinion.
bitsnpieces is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 21:25
  #1276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but the words BASSA just seem to have brainwashed all logical thinking.
I'm afraid ultimately people are responsible for their own actions. The information has been out there, it hasn't been hidden. BA themselves wrote to every cabin crew member and explicitly warned them. Blaming BASSA for it is a cop out. I know that seems harsh, but it is in the end true. No-one was forced to vote yes and no-one can honestly say they didn't realise what was at stake.
Papillon is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 21:32
  #1277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Age: 51
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with that, we are old enough to looked up the facts. It does make you wonder though. How badly managed crew have been over the years for them not to believe what thier employer has been saying. Or is the bullying from other crew that bad?
Newyorker001 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 22:19
  #1278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the problem not with the BASSA reps themselves ? In most unions you have representatives from all levels of the hierarchy. It appears to me, from the outside looking in (as far as BASSA is concerned), that all the reps seem to be senior CSDs (or long serving crew) with the most to lose in this particular fight. Maybe its just a very poor spread of representation who as a result haven't actually 'represented' crew at all, but simply themselves.
ArthurScargill is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 22:41
  #1279 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ArthurScargill.Is the problem not with the BASSA reps themselves ?

That is an understatement.Everyone keeps going on about LA LA Lady but what about the rest of the reps.
Weather Map is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 22:42
  #1280 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newyorker001,

They say they only voted yes to show BA they are serious, but now do not know where they should turn. When speaking to a friend she said that she is now really worried as she has voted yes but did not think it would actually go ahead or come to this?? When I ask why she had voted yes, the sad thing is that she still does not know why, the usual BASSA facts come out about Fuel,New Fleet, price fixing anything but imposition its been the same for the past few months. Reality has now hit home and she is very very worried about losing her Job.


Perhaps you should show your friend(s) the latest information from the PCCC that they've sent out?

What is this strike about?

Since its’ launch, the Professional Cabin Crew Council has demonstrated a voice of moderation. We have publicly stated that BA is being entirely reasonable. The High Court ruled on 19 February that that is the case. Interestingly, Mr Justice Sir Christopher Holland also made the following pronouncements:

1. BA Financial Difficulties
“I have taken into account, first, the dire financial situation of BA as at the 6th October. As to this, I see nothing material in how that situation came to arise, the now undisputed fact is that BA was then in a very serious financial state, such that management reasonably had urgently to do something (and had to be seen to do something) in the interests of the Company, its employees and its financial backers”.

2. Whether the crew complements are Contractual:
“What I am reading is what it is: a negotiated fleet collective agreement apt to cover planning for and deployment of 11,500 employees; it is not the stuff of 11,500 individual contracts. It is thus my judgment that there was no material incorporation into Miss Malone's contract and hence there was no breach post 16 November 2009”.

3. The Imposition of Crew Complements
I have further taken into account the now undisputed fact that as at the 6th October negotiations with the Union had come to a halt, notwithstanding the efforts of ACAS, and were unlikely to restart unless and until the internal factions of Unite had resolved their differences so as to form a negotiating team. It is thus, that I find that it was objectively reasonable in the prevailing circumstances to act unilaterally and to make the first change to Miss Cumming's predicated contract, that is, to impose a cabin crew complement other than by way of a collective agreement”.

So in summary, the High Court has ruled that BA were correct about the financial position, the crew complements are NOT contractual and the imposition was required due to Unite not negotiating. The Professional Cabin Crew Council would therefore advise each and every crew member to carefully consider the above facts before going on strike, and to ask:

“Exactly WHAT is this strike about now?”


www.professionalcrewcouncil.com
Be a Part of the Change

[email protected]



Gg

I'm BA crew and this is my opinion and not that of my employer

Glamgirl is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.