Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Network EBA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Feb 2024, 00:25
  #421 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: A semi-detached 3x2
Posts: 247
Received 239 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by gordonfvckingramsay
This is an important factor. Ask any NJS pilot what it’s like to go from a relatively relaxed lifestyle job to a soon-to-be short/medium haul international operation on crappy, and declining conditions. Network is next on their list of operations to morph into something it was never suppose to be.
A lesson was learned by Network pilots when the A320 was introduced out of the blue after the last agreement went up. NJS’ experience has been taken on board too, which might go someway to explaining why the last three votes have gone down.
walesregent is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by walesregent:
Old 18th Feb 2024, 00:32
  #422 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,303
Received 336 Likes on 129 Posts
Let’s hope the FW commissioners don’t fall for the shell game.
Chronic Snoozer is online now  
The following 3 users liked this post by Chronic Snoozer:
Old 18th Feb 2024, 07:44
  #423 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 44
Received 28 Likes on 10 Posts
Fair Work IB won't be deciding the entire EA, just the parts that aren't agreed on yet so it's hard to see massive changes to what has been on the table previously. I wonder if QF pulling some previously agreed upon items just before applying for IB will count as bad faith conduct in Fair Work's eyes?

A left field idea I've heard is what if the Network pilots say to QF that the proposed deal is mostly fine, but for charter only purposes? RPT can be left to some other part of QF? Normally it would be hard to see QF sending aircraft without J class or wifi across the country on RPT with the prices they charge, but we are where we are and it seems foolish to doubt the reports of cross country flying conducted by Network in the future.
BravoSierraLima is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 18th Feb 2024, 07:54
  #424 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,059
Received 730 Likes on 197 Posts
Didn’t QF walk away taking several items with them in a typical IR dummy spit? I don’t believe there is an agreed document in play.
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 08:41
  #425 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 44
Received 28 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by gordonfvckingramsay
Didn’t QF walk away taking several items with them in a typical IR dummy spit? I don’t believe there is an agreed document in play.
https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secu...e-2023/changes

Towards the bottom of the page it talks about IB deciding terms that couldn’t be agreed on by the bargaining reps, it doesn’t appear to say that the entire agreement is rewritten by Fair Work.
BravoSierraLima is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 08:58
  #426 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
This is directly from the FWC website above.

'An intractable bargaining workplace determination must include agreed terms and core or mandatory terms'

This tells me that the last EBA voted down was the 'agreed' terms. QF IR removing those agreed terms will never fly at the FWC.
davidclarke is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 08:59
  #427 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Cill
Posts: 149
Received 113 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by BravoSierraLima
A left field idea I've heard is what if the Network pilots say to QF that the proposed deal is mostly fine, but for charter only purposes? RPT can be left to some other part of QF? Normally it would be hard to see QF sending aircraft without J class or wifi across the country on RPT with the prices they charge, but we are where we are and it seems foolish to doubt the reports of cross country flying conducted by Network in the future.
As it should have always been. Left to some other part of QF , like Qantas Short Haul B737 , as it was.

Another week of surprises now doubt.
ShandywithSugar is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 09:10
  #428 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,059
Received 730 Likes on 197 Posts
Originally Posted by BravoSierraLima
https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/secu...e-2023/changes

Towards the bottom of the page it talks about IB deciding terms that couldn’t be agreed on by the bargaining reps, it doesn’t appear to say that the entire agreement is rewritten by Fair Work.
I would agree, except I don’t believe QF were still bargaining. What they did was walk away from the table mid negotiation because the pilots had used their industrial right to disagree. QF have become accustomed to getting their way and seem to be having trouble adjusting to pilots pushing back. A no vote does not constitute an intractable situation unless both parties are still in negotiations. Im any case this will be an interesting test case.

The line pushed by management when they met with the unions on Friday read pretty much like this. This is the best deal we can offer. We can’t afford to pay you the market rate. We need flexibility and we can’t give you the lifestyle you desire. Basically times are tough, the margins are too slim, blame the mining companies etc etc.

We shouldn’t be buying this BS, it’s from page whatever of the QF IR playbook. It’s all been done before and while it has worked numerous times, it fails any form of pub test in this climate and won’t work again…unless we let it.

My prediction is that QF will return to the table at the eleventh hour just prior to the IB hearing. They will slap some marginally better deal on the table with a few hidden Easter eggs to worsen the deal behind our backs at a later date. Unfortunately some will fall for it, but most won’t. Also unfortunately, the offer may be enough to have PIA suspended or terminated, which will be their intent.

The pilot market has spoken. We are in very short supply. Train drivers and many other workers are overtaking us. Don’t buy the BS!
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
The following 7 users liked this post by gordonfvckingramsay:
Old 18th Feb 2024, 10:00
  #429 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 582
Received 319 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by ShandywithSugar
As it should have always been. Left to some other part of QF , like Qantas Short Haul B737 , as it was.
I think you’ll find most of the WA RPT routes were not done by Shorthaul champ - Australian Airlink (NJS).
aussieflyboy is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 10:15
  #430 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Unfortunately not the Orient
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 93 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy
I think you’ll find most of the WA RPT routes were not done by Shorthaul champ - Australian Airlink (NJS).
Huh? ............
SandyPalms is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 10:33
  #431 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here & There
Posts: 51
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by davidclarke
This is directly from the FWC website above.

'An intractable bargaining workplace determination must include agreed terms and core or mandatory terms'

This tells me that the last EBA voted down was the 'agreed' terms. QF IR removing those agreed terms will never fly at the FWC.
How can it be "agreed" if it was voted down?
YeahNup is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 10:48
  #432 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,303
Received 336 Likes on 129 Posts
The Company can put up any EA it likes for a vote. Agreement is optional and in name only. And everyone has the right to vote it down. Will be interesting to learn how Q presents its case for IB.
Chronic Snoozer is online now  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 11:00
  #433 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: A semi-detached 3x2
Posts: 247
Received 239 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by YeahNup
How can it be "agreed" if it was voted down?
This is a point that is being debated by the various parties yet you seem convinced that it’s settled. Do you know what the IB process is at that level of intricacy? Will it not involve submissions from the bargaining parties to determine what is indeed agreed? Qantas might say that they agree to nothing beyond what’s in the existing agreement but they had better come ready to convince the commission that they agree to nothing that they previously put to the workforce to vote on. Anyway, it is stupid to speculate on what process the commission will follow because I don’t believe anyone here is a commissioner and it’s not like we can look to many precedents for guidance.

Last edited by walesregent; 18th Feb 2024 at 11:30.
walesregent is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 11:06
  #434 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by YeahNup
How can it be "agreed" if it was voted down?
Well the AFAP and the reps agreed to support it, so that would indicate that the parties agreed to the terms, even though it wasn’t voted up. It would be a different story if the union hadn’t supported the vote. What I’m saying is it will be hard for QF IR to argue that the terms they took off the table just prior to the IB application were not agreed upon.
davidclarke is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 21:15
  #435 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here & There
Posts: 51
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by walesregent
This is a point that is being debated by the various parties yet you seem convinced that it’s settled. Do you know what the IB process is at that level of intricacy? Will it not involve submissions from the bargaining parties to determine what is indeed agreed? Qantas might say that they agree to nothing beyond what’s in the existing agreement but they had better come ready to convince the commission that they agree to nothing that they previously put to the workforce to vote on. Anyway, it is stupid to speculate on what process the commission will follow because I don’t believe anyone here is a commissioner and it’s not like we can look to many precedents for guidance.
Probably the best advice I've read to date. So many "Philadelphia lawyers" giving speculative exhortations.
YeahNup is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 21:35
  #436 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pprune is ******
Posts: 165
Received 178 Likes on 74 Posts
Originally Posted by gordonfvckingramsay
I would agree, except I don’t believe QF were still bargaining.

…unless we let it.

My prediction is that QF will return to the table at the eleventh hour just prior to the IB hearing. They will slap some marginally better deal on the table with a few hidden Easter eggs to worsen the deal behind our backs at a later date....
PIA fatigue is setting in Network. People are tired of the toxicity. The milennials love money and will accept anything now to be paid again, because they are using it as a stepping stone. I've heard them say it... be warned.
dejapoo is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 23:04
  #437 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dejapoo
PIA fatigue is setting in Network. People are tired of the toxicity. The milennials love money and will accept anything now to be paid again, because they are using it as a stepping stone. I've heard them say it... be warned.
This is exactly what Qantas is hoping for! Stay the course, you are almost there. As suggested before, start a Go Fund Me page, there are many who would assist, if financial considerations are an issue.
Don't sell out your integrity or your colleagues for the thirty pieces of silver.
If the grass looks greener on the other side, time to start tending your own grass.
​​​​​​
Celtic2912 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 23:48
  #438 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those milennials are stepping on their own appendage if they take a crap deal now. They will potentially reap the benefits for the rest of their careers if they help set the tone now for EBA negotiations into the future.

Last edited by ol-mate; 19th Feb 2024 at 01:42.
ol-mate is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2024, 00:02
  #439 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,059
Received 730 Likes on 197 Posts
Originally Posted by dejapoo
PIA fatigue is setting in Network. People are tired of the toxicity. The milennials love money and will accept anything now to be paid again, because they are using it as a stepping stone. I've heard them say it... be warned.
The stepping stone really needs to be to another country for a long time if the history of those breaching the ’picket line’ is anything to go by. Millennials need to have a very good hard think about this nest they occupy.

Regarding money, was a Gofundme ever set up?
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2024, 00:24
  #440 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: AUS
Posts: 148
Received 27 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ol-mate
Those milennials are stepping on their own appendage if they take a crap deal now. They will potentially reap the benefits for the rest of their careers if they help the tone for EBA negotiations into the future.
Whereas the Boomers at mainline sold out the milennials of future recruitment by voting up substandard B scales in order to feather their own nests......
pinkpanther1 is offline  
The following 8 users liked this post by pinkpanther1:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.