Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Luton-10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Oct 2023, 17:27
  #3561 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,082
Received 292 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally Posted by sealo0
Was there / is there a notice saying “ car left at drivers own risk”?
If there wasn't it would be the exception rather than the rule, however were negligence involved (by the operator) the words are worth nothing.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 17:53
  #3562 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.london-luton.co.uk/Londo...2d9a0bbf1c.pdf

Section 13. Seems the airport is liable if I read it right

LTNman is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 18:05
  #3563 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
https://www.london-luton.co.uk/Londo...2d9a0bbf1c.pdf

Section 13. Seems the airport is liable if I read it right
Seems to hinge on whether the fire was forseeable
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 18:12
  #3564 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
https://www.london-luton.co.uk/Londo...2d9a0bbf1c.pdf

Section 13. Seems the airport is liable if I read it right

see section 10
Falcon666 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 18:12
  #3565 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: the dark side
Posts: 1,112
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LTNman
https://www.london-luton.co.uk/Londo...2d9a0bbf1c.pdf

Section 13. Seems the airport is liable if I read it right
I don’t think you do. It’s neither obvious (foreseeable) the car park and vehicles would be damaged by a fire, or that they (airport) knew vehicle X was going to catch fire.

If LLA have met all current planning, building and Fire regulations, or exceeded them, they are likely to not be solely liable. I wouldn’t want to be car X’s insurance company though, and I doubt there’s going to be many poor lawyers at the end of the process either.
jumpseater is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 18:23
  #3566 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,636
Received 136 Likes on 65 Posts
However did that building get approved without a sprinkler system?
Good ol' Toilet-town Airport's going to inflict even worse pandemonium and misery for the next three years or so as they rebuild all that.
I pity the people who've lost their cars because doubtless the insurance companies are going to cavil and procrastinate payouts as liability/responsibility is argued over probably for years. I hope not, but...
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 18:25
  #3567 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Let's assume car park 2 and the road around it is unavailable for use for *at least* a year, the mid term car park becomes a drop off zone, and the Dart is perhaps replaced by buses to/from Parkway every 10 minutes. (If these assumptions are wrong, please correct me.)
Does this provide sufficient access in and out of LTN to handle 18+ million pax per year ? The junction between Airport Way and the Mid term car park with adjacent traffic lights does not seem designed for a high volume of vehicles.
I accept that air travel demand in November is low... but I'm wondering if it will still be possible to get 18m or 19m pax in and out of what is a large cul-de-sac without a substantial change. Pax will be forgiving in the week after a fire... but will not forgive so easily by Xmas.

Disclaimer - I typically either walk to/from Parkway or take a National Express coach

Last edited by davidjohnson6; 11th Oct 2023 at 19:15.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 18:30
  #3568 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,580
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
Anybody notice the airports re-opened?
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 18:36
  #3569 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
However did that building get approved without a sprinkler system?
.
Because it's not a building; it's a completely open-sided, open-ended structure.
WHBM is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 18:46
  #3570 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Switzerland ... oh wait: Swaziland
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Accommodating tons of fuel and batteries.
TBSC is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 19:03
  #3571 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
However did that building get approved without a sprinkler system?
Good ol' Toilet-town Airport's going to inflict even worse pandemonium and misery for the next three years or so as they rebuild all that.
I pity the people who've lost their cars because doubtless the insurance companies are going to cavil and procrastinate payouts as liability/responsibility is argued over probably for years. I hope not, but...
From British Auromatic Fire Sprinker Assocaition
"Guidance on the fire precautions considered necessary in the design and construction of car parks can be found in the Approved Document B to the Building Regulations for England and Wales (ADB) and Scottish Technical Standards. This guidance currently does not require sprinklers to be installed in car parks."

It will be interesting to have a walk around Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted & Manchester Airports see if they have such in place.
pabely is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 19:17
  #3572 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lestah
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
Because it's not a building; it's a completely open-sided, open-ended structure.
Car parks are recognised as buildings in the Building Regs Doc B - Fire Safety.

There is no mandatory requirement for sprinklers in car parks in the Regs. You do occasionally see them installed, but rare.

As an aside, there will have been linear heat detection fitted and that will have triggered the alarm notification.

BAFSA (Sprinkler Association) have a differing view to Doc B (doc BAFSA 10A) and listening to the interview of the on-site Brigade Officer today, he appeared to support the installation of sprinklers given the tight building layout at Luton.


Local Variation is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 19:20
  #3573 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Be interesting if Bedfordshire Fire brigade signed off fire inspections with a footnote about such recommendations.

Currently a near normal flight shedules for tomorrow, but whether passengers arrive on time will be another matter.
pabely is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 19:54
  #3574 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a copy of the planning application where Beds Fire Brigade comment. They just wanted fire hydrants every 75m and certain access requirements.
LTNman is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 20:34
  #3575 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest update from the airport.

Operation update

Main roads around the area have also re-opened, but delays are expected on the airport approach.

For those arriving by car, the Long and Mid-stay car parks are fully operational, and a temporary drop-off area has been established in the Mid-stay car park.

For those travelling to the airport by rail, the DART shuttle remains out of service with replacement buses in operation.

Additional staff remain on hand to assist passengers across the airport.

Passengers should contact their airline for information regarding their flight.

Temporary drop-off zone

If you are arriving at the airport by car, a temporary drop-off area has been established in the Mid-stay car park. Delays are expected in the area so please drop passengers off promptly and exit as soon as possible. Buses are running to/from the terminal and no charges are in place for this service.

Special Assistance

Special Assistance shuttles are running from the Mid-stay car park to the airport terminal. Any passengers needing this service are asked to make themselves known to staff.

DART

The DART shuttle from Luton Airport Parkway to the terminal remains out of service with replacement buses operating until further notice. Please allow extra time for your journey.

Page last updated at 20:48 on 11.10.2023
LTNman is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2023, 23:29
  #3576 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pabely
From British Auromatic Fire Sprinker Assocaition
"Guidance on the fire precautions considered necessary in the design and construction of car parks can be found in the Approved Document B to the Building Regulations for England and Wales (ADB) and Scottish Technical Standards. This guidance currently does not require sprinklers to be installed in car parks."

It will be interesting to have a walk around Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted & Manchester Airports see if they have such in place.
I was at Manchester airport Terminal 1 MSCP last weekend and I noticed a sprinkler system in place.
This specific structure was built in the early 70’s but I imagine the sprinkler system was installed way after.
MANFAN is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2023, 04:46
  #3577 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Massive traffic queues that peaked all the way back to the Gypsy Lane turn off on the A505 this morning, as traffic heads to the temporary drop off area for the first wave of departures. A touch of deju vu, as traffic has gone back to how it was with all of the old drop off arrangements that were a complete failure. No Dart either, which is replaced by buses that still costs £9.90 return.

At least the drop off is free for the first 15 minutes but is costing LLAOL a small fortune in lost drop off charges.

Last edited by LTNman; 12th Oct 2023 at 05:03.
LTNman is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2023, 05:00
  #3578 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a house
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to wonder whether it is safe to have 2 large multi storey car parks in such a confined space in the future. The CTA is poorly designed with everything squeezed on top of each other.
Yes, you need space for coaches, buses, taxi and a drop off and pick up zone plus the DART but there is currently too much with the short stay car parks.
Sprinklers alone are not the answer.

Why has the DART not reopened? Is the station too close to a structurally unsafe car park or has it been damaged in some way?
ExpectmorePayless is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2023, 05:19
  #3579 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 965
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
Let's assume car park 2 and the road around it is unavailable for use for *at least* a year, the mid term car park becomes a drop off zone, and the Dart is perhaps replaced by buses to/from Parkway every 10 minutes. (If these assumptions are wrong, please correct me.)
Does this provide sufficient access in and out of LTN to handle 18+ million pax per year ? The junction between Airport Way and the Mid term car park with adjacent traffic lights does not seem designed for a high volume of vehicles.
I accept that air travel demand in November is low... but I'm wondering if it will still be possible to get 18m or 19m pax in and out of what is a large cul-de-sac without a substantial change. Pax will be forgiving in the week after a fire... but will not forgive so easily by Xmas.

Disclaimer - I typically either walk to/from Parkway or take a National Express coach
I was thinking about this yesterday. For me, there are going to need to be significant short term cutbacks in flights down to a more manageable level. Maybe to 50% of the summer peak. Clearly the airlines will be annoyed here, but you’re going to see 1000s of people missing flights every day because of the “last mile”.

The mid term car park is a handy stop gap, but that can’t be a longer term solution.

I know it’s awkward, but I was wondering if the new stands which came into action earlier this year could be used as a temporary drop off area with the fencing pushed back. Reopened when the car park is rebuilt.
Dannyboy39 is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2023, 05:21
  #3580 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Dart is closed due to the risk of collapse of the multi story. Also noticed that no car parks can be pre booked until October 27th and then only the short term. The other car parks are bookable from October 30th. It’s all a complete mess.
LTNman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.