Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Manchester-3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Feb 2024, 05:39
  #3661 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MANFOD
QUOTE=Navpi;11598374]Indeed CW came from LGW. Ok single runway ops but 200+ stands.

Did no-one in MAG think about the implications of surrounding the airport with car parks ?
And didn't they sell off some land for non-aviation related use?

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyOzBorn
Runway capacity should not be a problem - although peak periods will be fully subscribed as one would expect. But terminal capacity and apron space presents a much sterner challenge. Expansion, in addition to ongoing new-for-old replacement, is needed.((/quote)

If runway slots are full subscribed at peak periods, isn't the challenge to attract airlines and flights at the quieter times of the day, which presumably would be with non-based a/c for the LCCs or foreign carriers? Based airlines, even if there was room for a couple more a/c for overnight parking, wouldn't want them idle until a runway slot was available after say 09.00, would they, if it caused issues for the rest of the day's scheduling?.
But I agree with Ozzy; the more immediate problem is apron space and terminal capacity.
Incidentally, is there any scope for increasing the max. number of movements when DRO in force?[/QUOTE]

The consensus elsewhere is that the new T2 can only do 35m.

If the last 12 month's comes in at say 29m we only need 2/3 good years at 10% growth for that terminal to then be full !!!

​​​​​You can't rely on T3 because it already at bursting point at times and it's not suitable for intercontinental growth.

So what happens then ?


Dublin is a case in point albeit using different criteria.

https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/dublin-airport-global-airlines-threaten-to-pull-flights-in-row-over-passenger-cap/a1931580029.html




Navpi is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2024, 09:26
  #3662 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,
Can anyone help? does anyone know what's going on with Aer Lingus LH flights. Barbados was cancelled yesterday and MCO has a 4 hour delay. I am due to travel on Sunday to Barbados and is there a bigger problem with their flights.

Thanks in advance.
worsley is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2024, 10:34
  #3663 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Navpi
And didn't they sell off some land for non-aviation related use?

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyOzBorn
Runway capacity should not be a problem - although peak periods will be fully subscribed as one would expect. But terminal capacity and apron space presents a much sterner challenge. Expansion, in addition to ongoing new-for-old replacement, is needed.((/quote)

If runway slots are full subscribed at peak periods, isn't the challenge to attract airlines and flights at the quieter times of the day, which presumably would be with non-based a/c for the LCCs or foreign carriers? Based airlines, even if there was room for a couple more a/c for overnight parking, wouldn't want them idle until a runway slot was available after say 09.00, would they, if it caused issues for the rest of the day's scheduling?.
But I agree with Ozzy; the more immediate problem is apron space and terminal capacity.
Incidentally, is there any scope for increasing the max. number of movements when DRO in force?
The consensus elsewhere is that the new T2 can only do 35m.

If the last 12 month's comes in at say 29m we only need 2/3 good years at 10% growth for that terminal to then be full !!!

​​​​​You can't rely on T3 because it already at bursting point at times and it's not suitable for intercontinental growth.

So what happens then ?

Dublin is a case in point albeit using different criteria.

https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/...931580029.html[/QUOTE]

How is Terminal capacity calculated? If it's 35m for T2, does it allow for peaks and quieter periods, or assume a steady flow throughout the day which we know doesn't happen?
MANFOD is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2024, 13:08
  #3664 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MANFOD
The consensus elsewhere is that the new T2 can only do 35m.

If the last 12 month's comes in at say 29m we only need 2/3 good years at 10% growth for that terminal to then be full !!!

​​​​​You can't rely on T3 because it already at bursting point at times and it's not suitable for intercontinental growth.

So what happens then ?

Dublin is a case in point albeit using different criteria.

https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/...931580029.html
How is Terminal capacity calculated? If it's 35m for T2, does it allow for peaks and quieter periods, or assume a steady flow throughout the day which we know doesn't happen?[/QUOTE]

Meanwhile 5th Air India route from LGW whilst their Manchester slots wither on the vine....AGAIN!

Navpi is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2024, 14:38
  #3665 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The slots for departure after 09.00 are filling up rapidly as there are a good number of arrivals from Europe between 07.00 and 11.00 wirh Ryanair and Easyjet of which most are non based aircraft
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2024, 15:54
  #3666 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stockport
Age: 56
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FR - Reggio-Calabria

Ryanair launch MAN-REG (Reggio-Calabria) 2 weekly (Wed/Sun) from 28th April.
DomyDom is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2024, 16:28
  #3667 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,501
Received 167 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by worsley
Hi,
Can anyone help? does anyone know what's going on with Aer Lingus LH flights. Barbados was cancelled yesterday and MCO has a 4 hour delay. I am due to travel on Sunday to Barbados and is there a bigger problem with their flights.

Thanks in advance.
Aircraft was damaged by ground equipment, probably in MCO. Damage found at MAN by engineers. Crew went out of hours before it was fixed.
TURIN is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2024, 11:26
  #3668 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indian authorities apparently want more passengers on direct flights than the many 000s using hubs like Dubai, Doha.

May be worth them having a word with Air India who by my estimation have applied then withdrawn slot requests for Manchester about 6 times now.


https://www.flightglobal.com/airlines/air-india-riyadh-air-bosses-look-to-win-traffic-from-overseas-hubs/157157.article


Talking of more flights the current advertising in New York by VisitManchester the team tasked with "selling Manchester" , is absolutely abysmal. Its tirgid.

I recommend the parish track it down.


Pretty much any image off Instagram would show a world class city reminiscent of lower Manhattan or Shanghai , attractive, vibrant etc.... but what they have come up with is pitiful. Who on earth signed it off and where is the joined up thinking. If you are going to promote Manchester then you have to provide a link to the opportunities re sport, retail, food, nightlife and of course how to get there..

Sincerely hope MAG have had a word considering they have a direct interest.












Last edited by Navpi; 1st Mar 2024 at 15:16.
Navpi is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2024, 17:09
  #3669 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Munich
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pegasus will increase SAW to 13 weekly in the summer.
Seljuk is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2024, 09:35
  #3670 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting day at MAN today as they see the arrival of their first AMM-MAN-AMM service with RJ.
Doors to... is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2024, 10:23
  #3671 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You mean A320 I take which at present is over Slovakia and is due at 13.15
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2024, 12:16
  #3672 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for not being more clear, I say RJ as in Royal Jordanian, not as in the aircraft, it is actually an A320 aircraft.
Doors to... is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2024, 14:07
  #3673 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deleted.
Doors to... is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2024, 19:18
  #3674 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Feb results are out. The busiest February on record. Over 1.9m pax handled with 100% of them clearing security within 15 mins.

Also from SPD X feed...Royal Air Maroc to reintroduce its Casablanca-Manchester flight from 23rd June: AT818 CMN 1255 MAN 1635 AT819 MAN 1735 CMN 2120 Tue/Thu/Sun using B737. On sale soon.

Last edited by eggc; 11th Mar 2024 at 21:18.
eggc is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2024, 22:06
  #3675 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SYD
Posts: 529
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to say that the press release announcing the above news is really disappointing. Has anybody proofread it?

Firstly, the release date is given as 03/11/2024. That is just wrong. We're in ENGLAND, not New Hampshire.

Secondly, my pet hate: rounded numbers! READERS CAN UNDERSTAND THE ACTUAL FIGURES!!! If the actual number of passengers handled in February was 1,900,000 precisely, then I will come back on here and post a humble apology. However, if the real number was something else, then can you please show your audience some respect and tell us the actual figure? We can't make meaningful historic comparisons with lazy incomplete numbers.

Finally, the press release reveals a new thrice-weekly Boeing 737 schedule to Casablanca with Royal Air Maroc. Great news. So good that it surely deserves a press release of its own?
OzzyOzBorn is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2024, 22:23
  #3676 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: GB
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the RAM announcement was a mistake & let slip too early - surely there will be a proper press release issued when it was supposed to be formally announced!
laviation is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 00:21
  #3677 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,501
Received 167 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by OzzyOzBorn
I have to say that the press release announcing the above news is really disappointing. Has anybody proofread it?

Firstly, the release date is given as 03/11/2024. That is just wrong. We're in ENGLAND, not New Hampshire.

Secondly, my pet hate: rounded numbers! READERS CAN UNDERSTAND THE ACTUAL FIGURES!!! If the actual number of passengers handled in February was 1,900,000 precisely, then I will come back on here and post a humble apology. However, if the real number was something else, then can you please show your audience some respect and tell us the actual figure? We can't make meaningful historic comparisons with lazy incomplete numbers.

Finally, the press release reveals a new thrice-weekly Boeing 737 schedule to Casablanca with Royal Air Maroc. Great news. So good that it surely deserves a press release of its own?
Jesus what a rant! Who p155ed on your chips?
TURIN is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 00:26
  #3678 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SYD
Posts: 529
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TURIN
Jesus what a rant! Who p155ed on your chips?
And which of the three points highlighted are without merit?
OzzyOzBorn is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 00:32
  #3679 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,501
Received 167 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by OzzyOzBorn
And which of the three points highlighted are without merit?
All of them.
TURIN is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 02:02
  #3680 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SYD
Posts: 529
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TURIN
All of them.
OK. So the press release headlining the February stats neglected to include the key figure. It was published on 3rd November 2024. And apparently unintentionally outed an unannounced scheduled service. That's all fine?

I thought that precision and attention to detail would matter more to an LAE.
OzzyOzBorn is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.