Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

SOUTHEND 5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Apr 2017, 18:10
  #4081 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cheshire
Age: 45
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The build it and they will come plan does not seem to have worked and where are the 1m+ pax coming from by 2018 in order to hit this 2.5m pax target they are so confident of hitting?


Some may say that people are putting a downer on SEN but the truth is from the outside it seems a bit odd that the largest division in the group is the lowest performing division when it comes to contributing to profit. I have a vested interest in SEN doing well but there is nothing wrong with being realistic.
rowly6339 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2017, 18:46
  #4082 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stobart shares are up nearly 100 per cent in the last year. If your worried about your investment sell the poxy things. They yield over 5 per cent. If you don't fancy the gearing. Er. Sell them ..
SARF is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2017, 19:57
  #4083 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the banks of the Crouch
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh the power of Pprune - a few adverse comments and Jersey completely alters it's topography. We can even move mountains!!!!!

Regarding Stobarts rolling up the runway and taking it away, this is exactly what they have done with the old North and South aprons and taxiways. I stopped in the airport a few days ago and it looked like a huge construction site, great piles of rubble (Jersey's mountains perhaps), giant earthmovers, JCB's and tipper trucks all over the place and no end of workers beavering away. It looks as if a serious amount of cash has been thrown at the upgrading of the aprons and taxiways.

Let's hope it does lead to an increase in activity, or if not we can certainly handle a few more LCY diversions with the extra stands available.

Cheers
southender is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2017, 20:13
  #4084 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ZRH
Age: 43
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm very happy about their performance. Over the moon in fact, but none of this profit was generated by the aviation division which accounts for 1/3 of the groups total value.

I have little interest in assessing the past performance of a stock I own. Far more important is a assessment of the future. They built it and they didn't come so now they've got an airline and they'd better come this time otherwise there could be tears.
flight_mode is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2017, 20:24
  #4085 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Stobart's optimism is based on the shortage of runway capacity in the south east over the next decade or so, maybe longer.
They have made the capital investment, so now they must hope for increasing usage of their asset to cover the interest.
I suspect their greatest fear is a recession. Although that doesn't look likely at present, the greatest danger is a collapse of the Eurozone.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2017, 20:46
  #4086 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still maintain that Stobart will not be running the airport in 5 years time. If it is not successful they will sell their stake at a profit to a business or venture capitalists who think they can turn it around and if it is successful they will sell their stake at a greater profit to a company that wants to run a London airport.

I think it is a win win situation for Southend as Stobart has built the building blocks even though some will argue that they are not the best at running an airport.
LTNman is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 07:30
  #4087 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 75
Posts: 2,697
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
davidjohnson6

You asked for information regarding the relationship between the airport owner and its operator.

Southend Borough Council are the freehold owners of SEN and Stobart has a long lease of the property of around 150 years I believe. So the situation is similar to LTN apart from the much greater length of tenure at SEN and a much smaller (although I don't know the amount) annual payment to the freeholder.
Expressflight is online now  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 07:38
  #4088 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Express - many thanks for the info. I imagine that in 150 years time, transport technology will have changed radically and airport may not necessarily be as useful in its current form as it is now. It sounds as if (in practical terms) that Stobart effectively own the airport.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 09:20
  #4089 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stobart paid Regional Airports Ltd 21 million and Southend Borough Council the princely sum of £1 for a 150 year lease.
DC3 Dave is online now  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 09:44
  #4090 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hither and Thither
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Article in the local paper, Five jet-set years at our airport: Easyjet marks anniversary of first flight from Southend (From Echo)
Red Four is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 11:29
  #4091 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 60 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by DC3 Dave
Stobart paid Regional Airports Ltd 21 million and Southend Borough Council the princely sum of £1 for a 150 year lease.
One assumes, though, that the council were able to pass on all the costs for upkeep of the airport to Stobart. Probably not such a bad deal for the local ratepayer.
Andy_S is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 11:38
  #4092 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: southend on sea
Posts: 100
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Extension

So at what point will an extension between Easy and Sen be discussed ?
fatmed is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 12:46
  #4093 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SOUTHEND Airport is now at the same capacity as Luton as it celebrates five years as an easyJet base...with ambitious plans to become bigger and better.
More than four million passengers have flown out of the airport, run by Stobart Aviation, on over 32,000 easyJet flights since April 2012.
Will someone run that one past me again ... Squeezy have been operating out of LTN for some 20 years, out of SEN for just 5 years, some 800,000 punters per year out of SEN, god knows how many per year out of LTN ... So how does that put SEN on the same capacity as LTN?

And, did I miss something? ... Besides the headline I didn't read anything about Easyjet marking the anniversary, only Southend Airport making a big song and dance about it!
Harry Wayfarers is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 12:55
  #4094 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Westcliff-on-Sea
Age: 79
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harry Wayfarers

Then perhaps you should try reading the article again. The comparison with LTN is clearly set out and Easy does compliment the airport. It strikes me that you're just looking to criticise at every available opportunity even if it is completely unjustified.
SEN Observer is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 14:01
  #4095 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 75
Posts: 2,697
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Echo's opening line that "Southend Airport is now at the same capacity as Luton..." was yet another example of their appalling editorial inaccuracy. What Glyn Jones actually said further down was "The work we are doing at the airport gives us enough capacity for 36 aircraft movements per hour. This is the same capacity as Luton".

As for the suggestion that easyJet did not mark the anniversary I think their commercial manager Neil Slaven's remarks refute that statement:

" ... the airline is pleased with how well Southend Airport is performing."

"Southend has become a really well established airport in the region."

"We are working with the airport to make it a success and are fully committed to achieving this."

"A lot of people said it wouldn't work, but we have proven them wrong."

Maybe the £3 million that Stobart are currently spending on rebuilding the aprons, stands and taxiways might be the stimulus that sees EZY increase its presence at SEN next year.
Expressflight is online now  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 14:35
  #4096 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southend-on-Sea
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harry, why so angry when it comes to SEN? You need to get some rosier tinted Ray Ban's. from where I am seated SEN is so much better for everyone since the good old bad old days! Stobart seem to take their time getting around to things, but they certainly get there in the end. £160 million invested is commitment in my book. They have put their money where their mouth is!
Mister Blue Sky is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 15:13
  #4097 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 60 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Mister Blue Sky
£160 million invested is commitment in my book. They have put their money where their mouth is!
I’ve made this point before but it’s not Stobart’s money, it’s shareholders…..

Investing is all very well, but when it’s with shareholders funds the shareholders will expect to see some return on that investment.

It’s by no means certain that will happen.
Andy_S is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 16:07
  #4098 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I keep saying to the Luton folk capacity is set by the weakest link in the chain, whether that be the runway capacity, taxiway capacity, the apron space or the various parts of the terminal like the number of check-in desks and baggage belts.

There seems to be quite a lot of spin in the article. Comparing Southend to Luton is like comparing Luton to Gatwick.

I doubt very much that the capacity of Southend's runway will be anything like 36 movements per hour due to backtracking. Luton is only achieving that sort of figure as most aircraft no longer backtrack but I stand corrected if the opinion here is that 36 movements per hour can be achieved when either runway end is in use.

Also the passenger experience will be somewhat diminished if Southend was handling 5 million passengers rather than around a million passengers it handles now.
LTNman is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 19:38
  #4099 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Harry Wayfarers
Will someone run that one past me again ... Squeezy have been operating out of LTN for some 20 years, out of SEN for just 5 years, some 800,000 punters per year out of SEN, god knows how many per year out of LTN ... So how does that put SEN on the same capacity as LTN?

And, did I miss something? ... Besides the headline I didn't read anything about Easyjet marking the anniversary, only Southend Airport making a big song and dance about it!
Why do you always use the term PUNTERS instead of the correct term of PASSENGERS, it's so annoying.

Why do you always refer to EASYJET as SQUEESY, it's so annoying.

Why do you always berate an article after not reading it fully, it's so annoying.

Why do you always slag of Southend Airport, it's so annoying.

Why do you always have to reply in an arrogant fashion to those who criticise your posts, it's so annoying.

I am sure others will agree!
canberra97 is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 20:50
  #4100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Echo's opening line that "Southend Airport is now at the same capacity as Luton..." was yet another example of their appalling editorial inaccuracy.
Thank you Expressflight.

It strikes me that you're just looking to criticise at every available opportunity even if it is completely unjustified.
So that would be why I defended SEN to the hilt regarding the two women that expected to doss down in the terminal overnight ... and I attracted criticism for my defence of the airport.

Why do you always use the term PUNTERS instead of the correct term of PASSENGERS, it's so annoying.
Why does PPRuNe refer to them as SLF (Self Loading Freight)? ... It's so annoying!

After some 35 years in aviation one tends to use trade, rather than public, expressions, live with it!

Why do you always refer to EASYJET as SQUEESY, it's so annoying.
After some 35 years in aviation one tends to use trade, rather than public, expressions, live with it!

Why do you always berate an article after not reading it fully, it's so annoying.
Why do you always berate another forum member before realising that not all his posts are berating, that he takes a neutral stance which doesn't always show him to be an ass licker?

Why do you always slag of Southend Airport, it's so annoying.
So that would be why I defended SEN to the hilt regarding the two women that expected to doss down in the terminal overnight ... and I attracted criticism for my defence of the airport.

Why do you always have to reply in an arrogant fashion to those who criticize your posts, it's so annoying.
To those that criticize my posts or to those that attack me personally and/or call me names quite unnecessarily?

I believed this to be a forum, indeed thread, for mature adults to exchange opinions, indeed knowledge, in open debate and without reducing themselves to, Saturday night bar behaviour, criticizing other(s) personally and/or name calling and/or to make specific posts merely to attack another forum member.

I am sure others will agree!
Ditto!
Harry Wayfarers is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.