LONDON CITY - 2
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BACF will temporarily increase the frequency on a number of there leisure routes from LCY during the months of July and August.
ANE - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly
FLR - Will increase from 4 to 6 x weekly
GRX - Will increase from 4 to 5 x weekly
IBZ - Monday frequency will increase from 3 to 4 flights.
MAH - Will increase from 3 to 4 x weekly .
AGP - Will increase from 6 to 7 x weekly. 2 flights will operate on a Wednesday
NCE - Will increase from Daily to 7 x weekly. 2 flights will operate on a Friday
UIP - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly
VCE - Will increase from 3 to 4 x weekly
BACF will temporarily suspend there service to ARN during the same period and reduce frequency on it's routes to AMS EDI, GLA, FRA & ZRH
ANE - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly
FLR - Will increase from 4 to 6 x weekly
GRX - Will increase from 4 to 5 x weekly
IBZ - Monday frequency will increase from 3 to 4 flights.
MAH - Will increase from 3 to 4 x weekly .
AGP - Will increase from 6 to 7 x weekly. 2 flights will operate on a Wednesday
NCE - Will increase from Daily to 7 x weekly. 2 flights will operate on a Friday
UIP - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly
VCE - Will increase from 3 to 4 x weekly
BACF will temporarily suspend there service to ARN during the same period and reduce frequency on it's routes to AMS EDI, GLA, FRA & ZRH
ANE - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly
UIP - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly
UIP - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly
Assuming 9 round trips per month, that translates to 50.5 and 52.4 pax per flight respectively. Assuming a 76 seater aircraft, we get load factors of 66.4% and 69% for the peak leisure travel season. Neither route in S13 had particularly high fares.
Are the increases on these 2 routes driven by some sort of marketing support agreement, or is there some other reason for the schedule increases ?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unpleasant to applaud the misery and inconvenience of others!
Strange fellow, you seem to enjoy this.
They're not SEN passengers and certainly not yours.
Strange fellow, you seem to enjoy this.
They're not SEN passengers and certainly not yours.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With all the Cityjet changes, any idea how much less overall capacity they will have vs summer 2013? It's 7 routes dropped in total I think, but added capacity to a few of the remaining routes.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WX have today made changes to there S14 LCY schedule. Below are a list of the changes (Some of which may have been posted earlier in this thread)
https://www.cityjet.com/news/cityjet...-network.shtml
DUB - Weekday frequency will increase from 5 to 7 x daily. Resulting in a overall capacity to increase by 38%. All flights will be op by a RJ85.
FLR - Weekly frequency will double from 6 to 12 x weekly
ORY - Weekday frequency will increase from 5 to 7 x daily. Resulting in a overall capacity to increase by 18%.
RTM - A RJ85 will replace a F50 on key rotations
TLN - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly.
https://www.cityjet.com/news/cityjet...-network.shtml
DUB - Weekday frequency will increase from 5 to 7 x daily. Resulting in a overall capacity to increase by 38%. All flights will be op by a RJ85.
FLR - Weekly frequency will double from 6 to 12 x weekly
ORY - Weekday frequency will increase from 5 to 7 x daily. Resulting in a overall capacity to increase by 18%.
RTM - A RJ85 will replace a F50 on key rotations
TLN - Will increase from 2 to 3 x weekly.
With all the Cityjet changes, any idea how much less overall capacity they will have vs summer 2013? It's 7 routes dropped in total I think, but added capacity to a few of the remaining routes.
Last edited by BAladdy; 9th Jan 2014 at 10:38.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With reports like this written by "experts" it's no wonder the UK is in the state that it is.
One wonders who commissioned the report, as, of all the London airports, this is probably best situated to serve the sharks that live and work, and supposed create the wealth, that keeps the rest of us serfs in the manner to which we have become accustomed!
Absolute tosh! Even Boris should be able to work that out.
One wonders who commissioned the report, as, of all the London airports, this is probably best situated to serve the sharks that live and work, and supposed create the wealth, that keeps the rest of us serfs in the manner to which we have become accustomed!
Absolute tosh! Even Boris should be able to work that out.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually I agree.
It's becoming a fairly major noise nuisance after assurances of "only Dash 7s" (quietest in the world) to "only 146s" (quietest jets) to A318s used to ferry bankers who could easily use Crossrail when it opens. It's the HS2 of airports, expensive to use, saves some time for the wealthy and is a nuisance to the neighbours.
Ken Livingston also favoured this idea, btw the final approach into 09 is lets' be honest, very close to Canary Wharf. Much more bang for your buck if you close lCY and put a third runway at LHR. No one at LHR can compalin about noise as it's been there since 1947, the locals in Newham have been misled time after time. We already have too many airports competing for too little traffic. Will all those BA Gold Card holders be using easyJet going forward or Crossrail for lounge access and the full Monty at LHR? It's becoming a rich man's toy and a BA licence to print money with a large noise footprint in an urban area aimed at bankers. It's not as if they'll stop travelling if LCY closes now is it?
It's becoming a fairly major noise nuisance after assurances of "only Dash 7s" (quietest in the world) to "only 146s" (quietest jets) to A318s used to ferry bankers who could easily use Crossrail when it opens. It's the HS2 of airports, expensive to use, saves some time for the wealthy and is a nuisance to the neighbours.
Ken Livingston also favoured this idea, btw the final approach into 09 is lets' be honest, very close to Canary Wharf. Much more bang for your buck if you close lCY and put a third runway at LHR. No one at LHR can compalin about noise as it's been there since 1947, the locals in Newham have been misled time after time. We already have too many airports competing for too little traffic. Will all those BA Gold Card holders be using easyJet going forward or Crossrail for lounge access and the full Monty at LHR? It's becoming a rich man's toy and a BA licence to print money with a large noise footprint in an urban area aimed at bankers. It's not as if they'll stop travelling if LCY closes now is it?
Thread Starter
What should be closed is the New Economics Foundation, who came up with this latest lot of rubbish. Who provides the with their funds ? Well the fourth largest contributor to their £2m operating costs is, believe it or not, the European Commission....... now, I don't see the NEF having a go at airports in Frankfurt or Paris; no, they say, let's stitch up a facility used by the financiers in London so we can divert some of that world trade to the Continent.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Skipness, we normally sing from the same song book, but I'm willing to bet that LCY was there before you moved to the area and, as such, I don't really feel you can rightly complain about the aircraft noise, even if the types have changed.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Willy, yes indeed it was and it doesn't annoy me at all. It is however noticeably *much noisier* than it was when i moved here in 2007 which was much noisier than the days of those long forgotten DHC7s. It's been mission creep from day one and whereas I am pro-aviation, I am very pro holistic strategy with integrated transport, avoiding *unecessary* market segmentation. Choice isn't always great or needed, see BFS/BHD, LTN/STN, LPL /MAN. We've got more airports than we'll ever need and not making good use of them.
Anyone living North of LCY get's a fair amount of noise as reduced power departures are rare off that runway. You can rightly complain, as many (poor and non white banker type) locals were, that it would only be DHC7s, then only 146s and now it's A318s on a bankers shuttle. An ERJ190 is not quiet on a high power climb out. I have the ability to move, many of them, don't. The demographics are bankers and second home owners off to the South of France, it makes me slightly uneasy at how the locals in the poorest burgh in the country, are almost invisible. Excuse me if I am not too put out by financiers of London having to get a brand new express train to the new T5 or T2 rather than thundering out over Newham saving mere minutes of their over paid and precious time.
Still it's only Stratford, who cares?
Anyone living North of LCY get's a fair amount of noise as reduced power departures are rare off that runway. You can rightly complain, as many (poor and non white banker type) locals were, that it would only be DHC7s, then only 146s and now it's A318s on a bankers shuttle. An ERJ190 is not quiet on a high power climb out. I have the ability to move, many of them, don't. The demographics are bankers and second home owners off to the South of France, it makes me slightly uneasy at how the locals in the poorest burgh in the country, are almost invisible. Excuse me if I am not too put out by financiers of London having to get a brand new express train to the new T5 or T2 rather than thundering out over Newham saving mere minutes of their over paid and precious time.
Still it's only Stratford, who cares?
Thread Starter
Still it's only Stratford, who cares?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hemel Hempstead
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where do they get these people from? LCY is the lifeblood of the City, and an essential fixture to support the largest financial sector in Europe. Loose LCY and you're likely to loose the big banks and one of the largest parts of our economy.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is not the lifeblood of the city! Heavens above, it was so niche BA nearly pulled out when BACON was wound up. It's a rich man's toy in a poor neighbourhood literally cut off from all around it. Crossrail ensures that LHR connects more people to the City faster, relax, LCY going away would not be the end of the world. It's my local airport btw, I am not exactly unfamiliar with it's history, routes and demographics.
Yes as you've just pointed out, all departures are turned at the Wharf onto North East and held below low for longer than the norm to avoid LHR inbounds. The noise is spread North West and North over Stratford, which is not a quiet place when LCY is active. I'm pretty pro aviation but it's misleading to pretend HSBC will leave London with a Crossrail station to LHR at Canary Wharf. Is there anything to be said against noise and pollution dumped on the poorest parts of London so the Masters of the Universe don't have to cross town to the existing facilities estd. 1947?
Cheaper to buy and close LCY as a quid pro quo for runway 3 at LHR than buy LHR and build a new estuary airports and still probably close LCY. We've been planning in isolation for years, it's not sensible and while I am far from a Greeny, the expansion plans will make LCY a major airport, something that was *NEVER* intended. Money stomps over all though....
It's also a licence to print money for BA who have succesfully removed most competition and charge a premium over LHR/LGW.
This one will be a bit of a mystery to the more aviation-minded board members here, concern for those living north of LCY when the runway is 09/27 .....
Cheaper to buy and close LCY as a quid pro quo for runway 3 at LHR than buy LHR and build a new estuary airports and still probably close LCY. We've been planning in isolation for years, it's not sensible and while I am far from a Greeny, the expansion plans will make LCY a major airport, something that was *NEVER* intended. Money stomps over all though....
It's also a licence to print money for BA who have succesfully removed most competition and charge a premium over LHR/LGW.
Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 10th Apr 2014 at 18:22.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK
Age: 64
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, Crossrail will make getting to LHR easier from the Wharf. But it won't make LHR easier to use. Part of LCY's advantage is it is speedy to navigate (especially arrivals). I've got from touchdown to train in 9 minutes at LCY - that'll never happen at LHR.
A thriving city needs lots of transport infrastructure - and LCY is a very valuable part of that mix.
A thriving city needs lots of transport infrastructure - and LCY is a very valuable part of that mix.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In the mines
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As others have said Skipness, I normally agree with you, but have to disagree with you on this one. Even with a full 190, I have only ever used TO1 ambient ONCE in the last year, and will always be above 2000' before we turn North on the BPK.
As for the toy comment. Tell that to the full planes of people who are flying on the PMI and IBZ etc routes. They are full and the only thing that has changed over the last 5 years is that the secret is out on how easy the airport is to use compared to LHR. Most days the EDI flight passengers are on the DLR before the LHR flight has left the Lambourne hold.
Utter madness from this article.
As for the toy comment. Tell that to the full planes of people who are flying on the PMI and IBZ etc routes. They are full and the only thing that has changed over the last 5 years is that the secret is out on how easy the airport is to use compared to LHR. Most days the EDI flight passengers are on the DLR before the LHR flight has left the Lambourne hold.
Utter madness from this article.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crossrail ensures that LHR connects more people to the City faster, relax, LCY going away would not be the end of the world