Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11229084)
Any Idea? A big orange cloud
|
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11229091)
More on the tank rolling over the troops, from the tanks view
|
Originally Posted by Sue Vêtements
(Post 11229119)
Somehow it seems like the tank is driving a lot faster than in the other video
Now they need to do it at this speed. |
Originally Posted by Recc
(Post 11229096)
According to Dan Kaszeta (who should know) it is an ammonium nitrate explosion. Likely a result of an agricultural warehouse being targeted (or hit by mistake). Almost certainly not a deliberate use of chemical weapons.
https://twitter.com/DanKaszeta/statu...78308074897411 |
Originally Posted by Wokkafans
(Post 11229129)
|
Originally Posted by Recc
(Post 11229096)
According to Dan Kaszeta (who should know) it is an ammonium nitrate explosion. Likely a result of an agricultural warehouse being targeted (or hit by mistake). Almost certainly not a deliberate use of chemical weapons.
https://twitter.com/DanKaszeta/statu...78308074897411 |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11227733)
You think that’s bad sue, have you seen his propaganda?
(Chopped a few propaganda pictures) |
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 11228129)
Widescreen - not a NATO job at all but the EU could act as a partner to a future Russia (they already were to some extent with the German policies of building links through trade).
The power and money of the EU could help a reborn Russia stand on it's own feet but there would have to be no military threat - which the Russians perceive NATO to be - it would have to be trade based and would need a lot of investment from the West. The Russians have a common currency, an almost common language and a country-wide system of command and control/government - if you can remove the FSB and the thought police from their country and introduce a bit of free speech without the threat of imprisonment (or worse) the raw materials for a successful rebirth of a proud nation are there. Those in the Power (including the FSB) aren't going to give up, or even share, their power with democratic elected competitors. That is, why I suggest, to take care the Russian Federation breaks up, etc. It removes the Nukes threat, removes the original powers and brings back a more manageable scale. See how much difficulties the US does have to keep its democracy upright. |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11228759)
Not sure why you think the Chinese TV crew would fake their own footage to UKR advantage..
|
Originally Posted by dead_pan
(Post 11228134)
Whilst Russia is a country-mile from doing a Yugoslavia IMO, it does beg the question what would the likes of NATO, the EU and China do if it were to descend into civil war, with its various bits vying for control over its natural resources and nukes? If it came to some sort of sphere-of-influence carve-up, China could do quite well with the resource-rich eastern territories, Europe being left with all the lunatic-fringe territories west of the Urals...
The Nukes: I don't think, that stuff is suitable for regional conflicts, apart from that, just too expensive to manage. Natural resources: Oil can be relatively easily transported (though large scale is still overhead intensive), but gas needs the tubes. And those tubes will cross that many areas to reach somebody willing to pay for it at a large scale, that it is likely a conflicting area is crossed. When the tubes are already in place, it's a difficult situation. When the tubes need to be instated, forget it. The China connection: It's a huge distance, so needs careful planning, protection, etc. Less suitable for conflicting areas. Mongolia isn't that much a China friend, on top of that pretty uninhabitable, so, difficult. West of the Urals: Yeah, that was the thought of the NATO future, before Putin started messing around with reality and becoming more and more a NATO opponent again, early 2000. Apart from the Putin made mess (social, political and some more), Russians are quite nice people, a bit rough on the edge, though that is not that strange in other areas on the Globe, US Midwest, Mexico, Colombia, etc. |
Another ship hit today:7
IG |
“Ship on fire” also reported on CNN. Waiting for more details.
|
Originally Posted by WideScreen
(Post 11229259)
TBH, I do think, there are a lot of Chinese reporters, with itching fingers to report the reality, vs. China state propaganda. This footage gave them an excellent opportunity, without serious risk of being accused of damaging the CCP.
|
Originally Posted by Imagegear
(Post 11229286)
Another ship hit today:7
IG |
According to Ukrainian sources the Russians once again attempted to ford the Siverskyi Donets river, near Bilohorivka, earlier this afternoon.
It went about as well as their previous attempts... |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11229368)
According to Ukrainian sources the Russians once again attempted to ford the Siverskyi Donets river, near Bilohorivka, earlier this afternoon.
It went about as well as their previous attempts... |
|
Ukrainian army in first, that I am aware of, use of ground launched Brimstone. Anyone recognise the launcher?
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11229386)
Ukrainian army in first, that I am aware of, use of ground launched Brimstone. Anyone recognise the launcher?
Either way, interesting… |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:21. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.