Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st August 2022 | 18:04
  #6541 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 142
From: Around
Originally Posted by WE Branch Fanatic
How did you work that out? To my simple mind, since commissioning she has does operational sea training (roughly four weeks which included the first foxed wing landing and launch), Exercise Joint Warrior late last year (two weeks), some flying training in January (a week), something like six weeks operating in the Norwegian Sea and the Arctic in March/April, and just over a month in the Mediterranean in May/June. How many days does that add up to?
98. If your calcs are correct. I stand by 87, either way, not many.
downsizer is offline  
Reply
Old 31st August 2022 | 20:07
  #6542 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 46
From: Wilds of Warwickshire
Why would anyone be surprised? Isn’t this vessel from the same source as gave us a class of Destroyers which we can only use on cold days?
KiloB is offline  
Reply
Old 31st August 2022 | 21:49
  #6543 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 99
From: Róisín Dubh
Read the following tongue in cheek question on another site:

”Would this have been avoided if the crew was more diverse?”
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Reply
Old 31st August 2022 | 22:13
  #6544 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 115
From: East Sussex
Originally Posted by Bing
Except there are two baskets.
And for about the same price we could have had three America Class Amphibious Assault ships.

Although a bit smaller than the QE Class they are longer than Ark Royal and with a 7.9m draught can operate in shallower waters than bot the British ships QE/PW 11m Ark 10m. Which would have made getting in and out of Portsmouth a lot less likely to result in a courts martial for the captain and navigating officer.

Perhaps we could have bought some Ospreys as well.

I think that lot would put a smile on the face of the Royal Marines and given the UK a credible expeditionary capability.



WB627 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 07:49
  #6545 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 425
From: Portsmouth
Originally Posted by KiloB
Why would anyone be surprised? Isn’t this vessel from the same source as gave us a class of Destroyers which we can only use on cold days?
You are Lewis Page and I claim my five pounds...
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 08:45
  #6546 (permalink)  
Community Builder
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 663
Likes: 398
From: London
Originally Posted by Una Due Tfc
”Would this have been avoided if the crew was more diverse?”
If the top-notch engineer who might otherwise have spotted the root cause didn't apply, because they thought they wouldn't be made welcome, just possibly...

:-)
pasta is online now  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 10:40
  #6547 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 678
Likes: 56
From: York
Originally Posted by SASless
Now just imagine if there were actual hostilities ongoing and suddenly half of your carrier fleet goes U/S and needs a period of repair and must retire from t he combat zone of operations to some friendly port with the adequate facilities.....like say the Persian Gulf Region.

Where would that be?

Eggs in one basket concept springs to mind.
plenty of companies near the gulf to fix it!



dctyke is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 12:42
  #6548 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 15
From: Gibraltar
I was on Qm2 when she grounded in a clearly marked channel and damaged the starboard out pod. It happens. Get over it. Irritating but very fixable
Navaleye is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 14:14
  #6549 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
DC.....how many have dry docks that will hold the Carrier?

Where are those dry docks located?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 14:27
  #6550 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 425
From: Portsmouth
Originally Posted by SASless
DC.....how many have dry docks that will hold the Carrier?

Where are those dry docks located?
Ahem.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-t...-base-in-oman/

It's almost as if someone had a plan........
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 16:45
  #6551 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 49
From: 12 miles out
There's only two docks in the UK that will take the carriers: Rosyth and Port Glasgow. The latter is privately owned and barely sees a vessel from one year to the next, in the five years I worked on the Clyde I saw two use the dock, both vessels were cable layers.
Getting into Rosyth on one shaft would be interesting as the river basin would have to be negotiated first in order to line up for the dock. Commercial tug companies name your price!
Akrotiri bad boy is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 17:07
  #6552 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 425
From: Portsmouth
Originally Posted by Akrotiri bad boy
There's only two docks in the UK that will take the carriers: Rosyth and Port Glasgow. The latter is privately owned and barely sees a vessel from one year to the next, in the five years I worked on the Clyde I saw two use the dock, both vessels were cable layers.
Getting into Rosyth on one shaft would be interesting as the river basin would have to be negotiated first in order to line up for the dock. Commercial tug companies name your price!
There is another. So there is.......

Used more frequently than Inchgreen/Port Glasgow
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 17:41
  #6553 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Google Maps latest photo shows the two dry Docks in Oman to be filled with several oil tankers.....in questionable states of repair.

So it would appear that 23 Million UKP investment might sound good....but reality would suggest being able to get your prized aircraft carrier into one of them on very short notice would be about.....well.....Nil.
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 17:42
  #6554 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 288
From: Nevada, USA
Latest nonsense from Sharkey

“The Ramifications of RAF Personnel being unwilling to go to sea.” - Her Majesty's Top Gun (hermajestystopgun.com)
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 18:25
  #6555 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 326
From: Royal Berkshire
Originally Posted by Not_a_boffin
There is another. So there is.......

Used more frequently than Inchgreen/Port Glasgow
Seaton...?
GeeRam is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 18:29
  #6556 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 58
From: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
One day he'll finally admit to having been cucked by a member of the RAF.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 18:39
  #6557 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 425
From: Portsmouth
Originally Posted by SASless
Google Maps latest photo shows the two dry Docks in Oman to be filled with several oil tankers.....in questionable states of repair.

So it would appear that 23 Million UKP investment might sound good....but reality would suggest being able to get your prized aircraft carrier into one of them on very short notice would be about.....well.....Nil.
Google maps. Rigggghhhht.......

Are you suggesting that drydocks just stand around empty, waiting for a carrier???
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 21:43
  #6558 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 288
From: Nevada, USA
HMS Prince of Wales update - propellor shaft coupling has failed - RN "looking at the best way to carry out what will be a complex repair" [via Jonathan Beale BBC Defence correspondent]
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 21:46
  #6559 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 175
From: Australia OZ
01 Sep 2022 Perhaps accurate detail: HMS Prince of Wales to be dry-docked while HMS Queen Elizabeth takes on some of her tasking | Navy Lookout
SpazSinbad is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2022 | 22:14
  #6560 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Not a Boffin,

Was that a serious reply?

What shall the RN get for its 23 Million UKP expenditure re Dry Docking?

What lead time is required to get a Carrier into either of the two Dry Docks at that location?

What technical capabilities exist at the Yard?

SASless is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.