Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st September 2022 | 22:44
  #6561 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 425
From: Portsmouth
Originally Posted by SASless
Not a Boffin,

Was that a serious reply?

What shall the RN get for its 23 Million UKP expenditure re Dry Docking?

What lead time is required to get a Carrier into either of the two Dry Docks at that location?

What technical capabilities exist at the Yard?
About as serious as using Google maps as a reference. Lead time days. It's a repair yard, not build.

Have a look who operates the yard....
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 00:41
  #6562 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,213
Likes: 1,648
From: Ferrara
I'm waiting to see what positive spin WEBF puts on this embarrasement
Asturias56 is online now  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 08:33
  #6563 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 49
From: 12 miles out
Reading the Navy Lookout article concerning the coupling failure it all starts to make sense. I've seen a number of sea water cooled couplings fail, the usual cause has been a constriction within the cooling pipework usually as a result of internal corrosion of inadequately galvanised components. This leads to a reduced flow and ultimately an over heated bearing/coupling. In a worst case scenario this could lead to a scored shaft and the need to remove the shaft and dress out the damage. The last time I oversaw such a repair the shaft had to go overseas as no UK facility had the infrastructure or experience to carry out the work.
Akrotiri bad boy is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 09:27
  #6564 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 43
From: glasgow
Did QE not have a similar issue?
falcon900 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 09:28
  #6565 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 58
From: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Originally Posted by Asturias56
I'm waiting to see what positive spin WEBF puts on this embarrasement
Surely this provides a wonderful training opportunity...or something?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 09:47
  #6566 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 425
From: Portsmouth
Originally Posted by falcon900
Did QE not have a similar issue?
No. Initial vibration on QNLZ trials caused by incorrectly seated prop blade, leading to discovery of unrelated thrust block issue - both understood and sorted.

On PWLS it is a different issue, different cause - and fairly unusual.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 11:44
  #6567 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 1,205
From: Baston
Originally Posted by Not_a_boffin
No. Initial vibration on QNLZ trials caused by incorrectly seated prop blade, leading to discovery of unrelated thrust block issue - both understood and sorted.

On PWLS it is a different issue, different cause - and fairly unusual.
We might hope that it is VERY unusual. The tax payer has not had a very good return for the massive investment.
langleybaston is online now  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 16:11
  #6568 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 216
Likes: 54
From: Somerset
Originally Posted by langleybaston
We might hope that it is VERY unusual. The tax payer has not had a very good return for the massive investment.
Like any Defence item the return is mainly from the production and heavy maintenance stages in the form of jobs and maintained skills/expertise. After that it is like an insurance policy or a guard dog. Costs money to keep and you hope you don't need it.

N
Bengo is online now  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 17:38
  #6569 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 115
From: East Sussex
Rear Admiral Steve Moorhouse delivers the latest update on HMS Prince of Wales

https://twitter.com/i/status/1565747919810138113

Significant Damage to the shaft and propeller and superficial damage to the rudder.
Perhaps those on here more qualified than me, could comment on whether this could have been caused by a failure to grease the shaft, or was more likely caused by striking a submerged object.

Just as well we had a spare available to send Stateside

WB627 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 18:01
  #6570 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 326
From: Royal Berkshire
Originally Posted by WB627
Just as well we had a spare available to send Stateside
Not to do the SRVL trials though, as Queen Liz doesn't have the full Bedford Array system fitted.
GeeRam is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2022 | 19:40
  #6571 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 343
Likes: 15
From: UK
Originally Posted by WB627
Rear Admiral Steve Moorhouse delivers the latest update on HMS Prince of Wales



Perhaps those on here more qualified than me, could comment on whether this could have been caused by a failure to grease the shaft, or was more likely caused by striking a submerged object.

Just as well we had a spare available to send Stateside
It's a sea water cooled coupling, so there's no requirement for it to be greased. What with all the sea water surrounding the ship.
Bing is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 01:56
  #6572 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
ABB,

No Temp sensors on the shaft bearings or similar water cooled running gear?

SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 09:12
  #6573 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 49
From: 12 miles out
Not sure about the carriers but the vessels I've worked on did not have temp sensors on the water cooled bearings. Some systems have inspection windows in the pipework with flapper wheels which should be visible and seen to be spinning in the coolant flow. Temp sensors or not engine room rounds require the watch officer, or team, to use hand held digital thermometers to take temp recordings of all water cooled bearings. Results would be analysed and trends observed.
I imagine as the vessel had only reached Nab Tower before dropping the pick the engineering team were conducting their first rounds after leaving port before declaring the ship good for steady away.
I may be wrong but that's what I've done at exactly that spot on many occasions.
Akrotiri bad boy is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 10:46
  #6574 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 425
From: Portsmouth
Given that it's the external (IE underwater) coupling that's failed, it's fair to say it's not part of rounds.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 13:21
  #6575 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Coupling or Bearing failure?

Why would a "coupling" need to be water cooled?

Or do Couplings contain bearings for two parts that rotate at the same speed and connect two pieces of structure together.

Terminology issue here or a technical difference?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 13:46
  #6576 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 425
From: Portsmouth
Definitively external coupling failure, NOT bearing. No cooling required, because it's not a bearing surface.

Oil injection couplings basically use hydraulic pressure to drive an outer (female) shaft over and up a tapered shaft of lesser diameter. When the desired position is achieved, pressure is released and you've basically got an interference fit with very high friction and hence torque Tx ability. It's a very similar system to how propellers are installed on their shafts. The coupling is contained in a fairing to prevent water ingress.

It's pretty simple - which is why it's so surprising that it appears to have failed.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 14:07
  #6577 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 58
From: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Perhaps, until the Royal Navy get their act together, they could park HMS QE2 in the middle of the Indian Ocean and redraw all their maps, with everywhere 500 miles closer, to give the impression of being able to provide adequate coverage?

The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 14:42
  #6578 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
NAB,

That explanation helps explain the usage of the words "Cast Iron Failure" when big things break bringing things to a stop.

So with that explanation and the report the Ship's Rudder was damaged in the process....can one assume the female section of the shaft backed off the male section ahead of it and the attached Prop made contact with the Rudder damaging it?

Just yesterday I had a small demonstration of Rudder/Prop failure on my 20 foot outboard when it managed to pickup a length of Ski Tow Rope with attached handle....wrapping the rope about the prop until the handle conveniently grabbed the Skeg of the outboard motor....bringing them to an instant halt.

Thank goodness for a trolling motor that got me to the shoreline where a wet dock repair was done.

SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 14:46
  #6579 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 273
Likes: 61
From: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Smile Dry Dock

Is a DD 1824' long x 305' wide of any use at all? I'm sure Harlands would be amenable and the crew could have a run ashore in Belfast. (Disclaimer, as a second year electrical apprentice I helped build it, but I suspect any of my work has been repaired by now)

A342

ACW342 is online now  
Reply
Old 3rd September 2022 | 14:50
  #6580 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 216
Likes: 54
From: Somerset
NAB,
Thanks, I understand what is being talked about now.

Given that there is reportedly damage to the stbd prop, and rudder, which I understand is offset to allow the shaft to be drawn if needed, it seems that a potential mechanism is that the fairing failed, and departed the coupling heading for the prop, which chewed-up the fairing and itself then fired some or all the remains into the rudder. The coupling itself may, or may not, be OK.

N
Bengo is online now  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.