Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways vs. BASSA (Airline Staff Only)

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways vs. BASSA (Airline Staff Only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jun 2010, 12:01
  #4521 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Vertigowerty,
You're welcome and hope to see you soon, too.
The problem with some crew is as we all know they are to quick to press the delete button and they then question they never had the offer in the first place!

(PS:Boondocker, Ididn't mean you btw)
Tiramisu is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 12:35
  #4522 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re Duncan`s blog day 17

Duncan wrote in his blog day 17 :
"BA were ringing people up today and offering them GBP100 and the trip of their choice to come to work - hardly the actions of an airline coping well with the situation"

Well, I had my 2-hour sby changed to QRS and after 3 days at the hotel I was not used!
I even thought he might be talking about EF, but I know there is airport sby for EF crew and some people are not being used either...
DutchStar is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 12:51
  #4523 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: M3 usually!
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No.

We most certainly do not. Stop trying to rewrite history.
Because as crew,I hope that at least we agree that the changes were not about the CSD working more.Come on,we know better than that. You know what it has meant removing the purser on Eurofleet 767s and 757s right? NOT 1 less crewmember but less chance of promotion,etc etc..If you are already a purser or csd I bet this would not touch you that much but for maincrew
ns68 is correct. On Eurofleet the dispute was not about the CSD working more, it was about everyone working more. Eurofleet CSD's have ALWAYS worked on a trolley and, short of having a broom surgically implanted, are already very efficient in the cabin. It is also true that removing the Purser from the Boeing will have a temporary affect on promotions but, only until the last Boeing leaves Eurofleet. ns68, once it is a solely Airbus fleet (and we are not talking long here) we will need a lot more Pursers so no need to worry about that. If you want to be a CSD then you will have to go to long-haul but the writing has been on that wall for a long time.

“The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent British Airways’ positions, strategies or opinions.”
ottergirl is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 12:58
  #4524 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is not the same airline.
You're absolutely right, NS68 it is not. We are now very much a fantastic team, with a can-do approach, a high-level of commitment, very high uniform standards and a huge smile on our faces. Many of us are also wearing "Backing BA Lanyards". If/when you walk back in next week then it will seem very strange to you. The bar has been set - and I'm afraid you strikers are going to stand out a mile if you don't live up to it. Remember: It's very easy to walk out on something. It ain't always so easy to walk back in.

Bettygirl has highlighted what is now a very real concern for many non-strikers. Of course there is a very easy solution to it (and posts on here imply this is being considered): Offer a take it or leave it deal to each and every one of us. The deal does not have to include 184 crew back on - because 80% of us have shown we don't want it and it is just an additional cost. The 2 year pay deal seems to be widely accepted by most, as does the pay freeze.

In lieu of the 184 crew, it could have the previous share scheme/bonus/extra ticket if it is signed before Wednesday (last strike day). Otherwise post-strike, it could be without those extras. That way all non-strikers will get a good deal and strikers make their own decisions.

Oh, and one other thing, lest I forget. BA could ballot each and every one of us and see whether we want BASSA to remain, or if we would prefer a more democratic, professional way of doing things such as the Professional Cabin Crew Council - www.mypccc.co.uk.

Then we can all carry on with this new way of doing things, in a more productive, motivated and highly professional manner. The rest of them can eat samosas with DH til the cows come home.

I'm off to work now. But don't worry strikers, it'll only be me there single-handledly manning the entire BA operation of empty airplanes.

This is my own viewpoint and not that of BA.

Last edited by HiFlyer14; 5th Jun 2010 at 13:10.
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 13:23
  #4525 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Can anyone tell me where you get these 'I'm backing BA' lanyards from.
I would like to wear one.
Betty girl is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 13:27
  #4526 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Out and About
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Betty girl
Can anyone tell me where you get these 'I'm backing BA' lanyards from.
I would like to wear one.
Go to any of the Crew Managers and ask. They are more than happy to hand them out. I wear mine everyday now and will continue to do so after the 9th.
TorC is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 13:38
  #4527 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Thanks TorC,
I will ask mine when I am next in.
Betty girl is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 14:18
  #4528 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: West of LHR
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few stories emerging of VCC getting hassle off CC while operating during the strike period. It would appear a number of pro BASSA CC have crossed the picket line due to financial reasons and are anti VCC.
Dixie Dean is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 14:48
  #4529 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: About to join the A1, UK
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..to deal with this, at a tactical level, there will have to be some fairly robust leadership, ascribing zero tolerance.

I believe, that leadership, will have come from the Captain and the SCCM.

nurj
nurjio is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 15:42
  #4530 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
post 4565

post 4565 "BA have played a blinder?...... would negotiation not have been a better blinder for BA to play?.... How much money is this blinder costing? On the Green front how many empty aircraft are being launched into the sky to play this blinder?"

Dave 3, do you not know that BA tried negotiating for 14 months, and got only "NO - now what was the question again"

I agree that BASSA should have tried negotiation, for a change, you never know if they had actually listened, they may have heard something they liked.

I`m Backin BA (again tomorrow)
giza is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:06
  #4531 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ns 68, stay current please

Mega losses even after mega cuttings (in various dept and onboard which as I said before is the reason behind the departure of a massive number of business pax in my opinion)

(a) If the cuts had not been made they would have been mega mega losses, premier pax stop flying with us because the companies they work for are feeling the effects and would not pay the rates, thats why.

Enormous rewards and wages for the people at the top.

(b) Most of the directors declined their bonuses this year, no bonuses paid to senior and middle management for the last two years

a request to work for free in July.

(c) A voluntary request, a lot of people took this up on their own free will to help (me included)

Charges over for price fixing.

(d) Case thrown out of court, £121 M fine not paid (which is handy, as it will pay for the strike.

I`m backing BA

Last edited by giza; 5th Jun 2010 at 16:25.
giza is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:18
  #4532 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: london
Age: 55
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You mention, again, the opening of T5 as evidence of the poor management in BA which has led us to this point. Perhaps you know more about it than I do, but my understanding is that most of the issues we had in the first few days were actually the responsibility of the BAA. It's easy to point the finger and say 'WW is terrible, look what happened', but in fact the real picture is somewhat more complicated.
Well,he was the first one taking the responsibility for it. So,I guess he knew something wasn't quite right.
The switching of all flights was purely down to management.We all suggested a more progressive approach due to the little training we recevied as well as a possibility that the systems wouldn' t have worked as well as they should but we were completely ignored.based on that yes,I do think poor management and a bit of arrogance in knowin' it all.
On a technical point and I can only speak for myself here and my job,do you remember the first week or two? All jettys were never working?it was taking ages for one to be attached or moved.That led to delays in disembarking. I was there and I remember dispatchers saying that they weren't used to that system and that it would have taken a while to become confident.To you it might be a little thing,to somebody losing their connection,it might have mattered a bit more.
Check-in was particularly slow I remember and bags were going with manual receipt tag. It was all a new system and I remember having a chat to one of the ground staff who said soething on the line of..""I have been working for the company for 10 years and it feels like the first day"" I value experience and it was a shame to hear that.We just had not been trained.It's serious. And ultimately us. 2h walk in T5-when it wasn't even finished- didn't do much for me.As much as I wanted to take in,you couldn't because the building was half done.Any question from passenger I was always re-directing them to the people with the violet shirts(do you remember?)
If you think that made us look good and professional in the eyes of our customers and that it was a good management move I can't change your opinion but that's the way I feel.

Saying this Spin doctor, I now love T5!
ns68 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:31
  #4533 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few stories emerging of VCC getting hassle off CC while operating during the strike period. It would appear a number of pro BASSA CC have crossed the picket line due to financial reasons and are anti VCC.
Hello - long time reader, first time poster here and as a ground VCC, there's been anti-VCC sentiment throughout the whole period, with some VCC being more unfortunate than others. Having said that, I've been incredibly lucky with my crews so far and thank you for all the professionalism I've encountered and fantastic team work. Whether it's been non-striking crew, crew who have said they don't agree with what VCC are doing but we are one team on board or crew who have or will be going on strike, I've encountered the kind of dedication to our customers that make me proud of the majority of our cabin crew.

Both the pilot volunteers and the operating flight deck have all been supportive and I hope that this dispute will be over soon.

My main concerns have been how sick with worry non-striking crew have been at encountering strikers, which is sad. As others on this site have mentioned before, we respect their right to strike - it would be good for people who choose to work not to worry about any sort of retribution from their colleagues from what appears to be a minority.

It's been eye-opening to be a VCC and I can honestly say that I had no idea just how much the job entailed before doing it, and while I might agree that it isn't rocket science, it is hard work and it is tiring and I don't envy the lifestyle.

Anyway, thank you to the fantastic crew who have been operating with us VCC - I hope I get another brilliant lot next trip but am steeling myself for the worst, as always... I have no idea how this will end but it can't go on indefinitely as our customers don't have endless patience, in my opinion.

Sorry for the long post but I just wanted to say thank you to the crews I've flown with and to the customers who are staying with us during this difficult time. I know VCCs are an easy target to blame for people who believe in the strike but a view from my side is that, having been to the colleague forums, I honestly don't think that Willie offered a bad deal or would have simply caved on this matter, and VCCs help expand the flying programme and help to keep the goodwill of our customers, so that by the time this dispute is over, perhaps we'll still have some customers willing to fly with us.

And as to the comments about who's doing our jobs while we're flying... I can't speak for everyone but some of us are maintaining both roles. Am I worried about my job? Yes, but not because of my absence highlighting the lack of necessity of my job. I'm worried because I don't think an airline which has such a bad track record for strikes can be a viable option for customers in the future. As for my role, my department has made so many voluntary redundancies in response to the downturn, I honestly don't think we can get rid of many more. A large number of us took unpaid leave and I think that period demonstrated that we would really struggle with any further reductions. Having said that, I think we're all steeling ourselves for the possibility of a request for further periods of unpaid leave/work in response to this strike. Hopefully it won't happen and hopefully this will all come to an end sooner rather than later.

These views are all mine and not my employer's
Doh Nuts is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:34
  #4534 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: london
Age: 55
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mega losses even after mega cuttings (in various dept and onboard which as I said before is the reason behind the departure of a massive number of business pax in my opinion)

(a) If the cuts had not been made they would have been mega mega losses, premier pax stop flying with ust because the companies they work for are feeling the effects and would not pay the rates, thats why.
YES,I understand cutting.. but WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHT CUTS?People in our club europe cabin were not getting much more than our eurotraveller pax.There were couple of little touches that justified booking in club.That was a larger seat/a full tray/ hot towels /maybe a pack of macadamia nuts if not hungry..We do not have a single thing out of those four.Do you know how many times I have been told, ""Business club-that s how they call it-it is not worth it anymore""..And as I have said,I think a lot of passengers decided to move away from us.There is a lot apologising onboard.Are you crew? Once again.it is my experience and my view.


Enormous rewards and wages for the people at the top.

(b) Most of the directors declined their bonuses this year, no bonuses paid to senior amd middle management for the last two years
I am referring to the latest news.Not that it matters that much,being only shares and not actual money,but still a bad move considering we are fighting to survive.

a request to work for free in July.

(c) A voluntery request, a lot of people took this up on their own free will to help (me included)

yes,I know somebody that did it.they left their allowances for the month in an attempt to help the company,and then as soon as we go on strike,the company says how they have got a reserve of cash to take them through the strike.
I admired his will to help..but it is a bit of a kick in your teeth..

Charges over for price fixing.

(d) Case thrown out of court, £121 M fine not paid (which is handy, as it will pay for the strike.
I know that,I also know that we paid charges in the US though.So it wasn't really for free.
ns68 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:36
  #4535 (permalink)  
Junior trash
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isnt that just a list of BAAs failings? Jetties, Baggage system, signposting etc etc. Willie took responsibility because it was the right thing to do, not because it was all his fault. (as an aside has Lizanne accepted responsibility for ballsing up the first ballot yet?)

What we'd all like to know is how this relates to BA needing to get its cost base to somewhere near the level of the competition, and how it justifies the strike.
Hotel Mode is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:37
  #4536 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wetleases and T3

dave3 wrote:
If real crew are all turning up for work and operation is above the one BA forcast why are BA still using wet lease aircraft and crew and why is there still a need for volunteers?
Of course, not all crew have turned up for work and there is a reduced schedule in place which has to be maintained or increased if possible.

I thought I'd pass on some information on what's happening at T3, which is rather the forgotten man at BA's LHR operation.

There was a pre-strike schedule of 23 daily flights to six European destinations, namely HEL, VIE, BCN, MAD, AGP and LIS. Up to yesterday, BA cancelled all 23 flights but got six wetlease carriers to operate 16 flights a day. Every destination got at least 50% of the pre-strike schedule.

Today, the situation could hardly be more different. BA is operating 14 flights with its own metal and has just one wetlease flight.

I think this shows that BA is winning the battle to increase SH flights.
Caribbean Boy is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:39
  #4537 (permalink)  
Junior trash
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
YES,I understand cutting.. but WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHT CUTS?People in our club europe cabin were not getting much more than our eurotraveller pax.There were couple of little touches that justified booking in club.
Understood. But these cuts dont exist in isolation. Part of the reason BAs product has deteriorated is because IFCE costs too much. BA couldnt cut staff/pay so it goes in product instead.
Hotel Mode is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:49
  #4538 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NS68

I see little point in you going on about the problems concerning the opening of Terminal 5.

I believe it cost BA about 15 million pounds. That's about the same cost as 2 days of striking. Taking it proportionally you ought to be utterly appalled at the the cost of 20 days of pointless striking by your militant colleagues.

Terminal 5 got its reputation back fairly quickly. Do you think the same will apply to the cabin crew's reputation? Shame the strikers have wrecked it for all the hard working cabin crew who are backing BA and facing backlash from the public and the rest of the airline.
suninmyeyes is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 16:56
  #4539 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA offer October 2009

Tiramisu,

Thanks for posting this offer by BF. As it's been noted, mainly by HighFlyer14, the new share scheme and new travel ticket are no longer available. Indeed, they do appear to have been offered for just a brief period of time. If I were CC, I won't be happy to see subsequent offers to get worse.
Caribbean Boy is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 17:17
  #4540 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: london
Age: 55
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NS68

I see little point in you going on about the problems concerning the opening of Terminal 5.

I believe it cost BA about 15 million pounds. That's about the same cost as 2 days of striking. Taking it proportionally you ought to be utterly appalled at the the cost of 20 days of pointless striking by your militant colleagues.
taken out of context,I agree,it s pointless! My post included the mentioning of T5 purely as an example of things that made the company lose credibility..it was a bit more complex than that.

But as I said..it doesn't matter too much when it's out context-the context was about WW LEADERSHIP if you go back couple of pages.It was just to say that management should work with its employes not against them.
ns68 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.