Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Sep 2009, 20:20
  #1721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And this is because.....
...... in a low-cost operator the 'troughers' in BASSA would see the end of their lifestyles, and UNITE would see a dive in subscription income?
deeceethree is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2009, 12:31
  #1722 (permalink)  
CFC
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East sussex
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here we again...

...... in a low-cost operator the 'troughers' in BASSA would see the end of their lifestyles, and UNITE would see a dive in subscription income?
...but of course that would'nt affect Flight Crew in your small world, would it?
CFC is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2009, 12:43
  #1723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CFC,

You're still not paying attention are you? It has been stated here dozens of times!

BA cabin crew are the most overmanned and, for many of the LHR senior grades, the most overpaid in Europe, if not the world! BASSA have consistently interfered in the day to day operation of the airline for decades. Consequently it is the cabin crew as a group, together with BASSA, that now have to take the pain. Owing to the utter ineptitude of BASSA, that is going to be unpleasant for the cushy lifestyle that has been enjoyed, but undeserved, by many.

Simple.
deeceethree is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 05:29
  #1724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Increased Subs

Anyone have any thoughts on the recent increase in monthly subs for BASSA membership? A 99p rise which may not seem alot but on the basis of it being nearly 7% one wonders how this extra "income" will be used. Perhaps there is a new "creative writer" being employed to write even more entertaining missives on their website. Perhaps extra income is required in preparation for the extra postage costs that will be incurred when the "ballot papers" are sent out. £16.39 a month not the best value for money.

Also anyone know how one gets to see how the "income" generated by all the subs paid by its members is used? Am sure it would make interesting reading.

p.s. note to self current rate of inflation 1.8%. Sub increase 7%. Recommended pay cut 2.61% bargain...........

Last edited by drew3325; 29th Sep 2009 at 05:50.
drew3325 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 06:43
  #1725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unite gave £1,364,175 to the Labour Party in 2008.

You might not like the current government but your paying to keep them solvent.
stormin norman is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 07:57
  #1726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ask OPS!
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice to see that the hierarchy of Unite can still live it up at the trade unions congress though. On their members money.
wobble2plank is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 08:50
  #1727 (permalink)  
CFC
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East sussex
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deeceethre wrote:

BA cabin crew are the most overmanned and, for many of the LHR senior grades, the most overpaid in Europe, if not the world! BASSA have consistently interfered in the day to day operation of the airline for decades.
Are you saying by the above you have been with BA for decades?
CFC is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 09:46
  #1728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in between
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's say he has been in BA for decades CFC, now why dont you try to answer the actual point being made?
Dutchjock is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 12:20
  #1729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been and I agree with Deeceethree.
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 12:29
  #1730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lemonia. Best Greek in the world
Posts: 1,759
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
This thread is not helping anyone!!

There are 90 pages of this thread.
I've read all the postings.

I'm not sure that the thread is helping anyone. No-one from Bassa responds to serious questions, so it just frustrates contributors.

The only position we've heard from the Bassa-style CC is quite simply "what we have we hold", - end of.

Positive contributions from LGW staff, and from pilots, and from non-BA folk are by and large ignored. GG and JSL must wonder about their colleagues.

I'm now going to try to stay away, until and unless anything meaningful develops.
Ancient Observer is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 13:30
  #1731 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CFC,

You have assumed I am in BA, haven't you? In any event, anyone's time in or out of BA is largely an irrelevance - let us see if you can counter any of the reasoned arguments/points/positions here without resorting to inane, hollow BASSA-speak. Go on, have a go! I dare you!
deeceethree is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 14:59
  #1732 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...without resorting to inane, hollow BASSA-speak.
That's all they know how to do. Sadly it explains why the axe is hanging over 2000 people with the HR1 notice period ending tomorrow when more than that could have been taking VR with a nice pay off.

Idiots.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 17:56
  #1733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i heard today that enough crew have volunteered for voluntary redundancy to cover the 2000 headcount equivalent reduction.the problem is that unless new crew levels on the aircraft can be agreed,they cannot be released as there will be insufficient crew to man the aircraft.that is the reason why they have not been allowed to go already.
difficult negotiations ahead for this week.its all taking a long time to resolve,the original deadline for agreement was end of june if i remember correctly.
bermudatriangle is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 19:04
  #1734 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which means if the crewing levels aren't agreed, they will be imposed. The deadline is tomorrow for all practical purposes. If a deal is agreed, I can see those 2000 (or more perhaps) walking with a nice VR payoff.

As previously mentioned (not that CFC appears to have read any of the thread), if no deal is agreed a deal will be imposed shortly followed by 2000 P45s going in the post with statutory redundancy. Any resulting attempt at a strike will almost certainly be prevented by legal means.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 19:52
  #1735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand that approximately 43% of 14000 cabin crew are part time (=6000 individuals)
If there is a requirement to remove 2000 MPE from the business, and the average part timer works 66% (equal shares between 50% and 75% plus 150 at 33%), then 6000 out of the remaining 8000 must have applied for part time.

A few rough assumptions in there but is this realistic?

Can so many people from a workforce afford to go part time, leaving the equivalent of only 14% working full time?

I doubt it.
midman is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 21:06
  #1736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Can the company afford to have so many part-timers? 2 or more people doing 1 job are always going to cost more than 1 person doing the same job (admin, uniforms, etc). Whilst the company may be content to have some part-timers, that doesn't mean it wants a lot of them ......
deeceethree is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 21:39
  #1737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Age: 66
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am surprised as many as 43% may be part time, that is almost 6000 part time contracts.
That is a lot more uniforms to pay for and SEP training days + the admin costs etc.
KitKat747 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 22:17
  #1738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can you say BASSA is ineffective, when the same old people keep stating that a large proportion of BA crew are the best paid in the world? I would say that is a very effective union and until the world crash, BA still made substantial profits!

If they had listened to some of the advice on here, they would have been down on market rate years ago.

And please stop banging on about a strike being illegal. Why would it be? OK, taking BA to court over SOSR may be a struggle, but industrial action against an imposition is not.
Litebulbs is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 23:10
  #1739 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say that is a very effective union
Effective? If you're an old contract CSD or purser at LHR, maybe...
overstress is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 06:42
  #1740 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LHR
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Effective union or historically weak management?
LD12986 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.