Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Aug 2009, 13:28
  #1161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can advise the Captain, SFO and FO as much as you like, but it is the Captain and only the Captain who holds legal authority and is in charge, followed by the SFO and FO.
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 13:38
  #1162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Poof in Boots is now called Potopilot. It's hard to keep up!
FlexSRS is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 13:41
  #1163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me be blunt...if it ever happens on any of my flights I'll be advising the Captain that the aircraft will not be leaving one down with me onboard....Sorry...who's in charge. You make me laugh and laugh and laugh
A very arrogant post and especially when you think of the delay caused which will only affect the passengers. Do you remember them? The ones paying our salaries. Why would you not leave LHR with one crew down on one occassion? Afraid of hard work?
nuigini is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 13:44
  #1164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Surrrey
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Going one down is a slippery slope Im affraid and will become common place. Again it appears that they are trying everything to undermine agreements that have been created for a reason.

So prehaps flight crew will be happy to operate with three instead of four whenever there is a shortage.
am i bothered is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 14:06
  #1165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Straights of America
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight crew regularly do depart with less crew than they're entitled to: witness downroute disruption or any delayed 3 man HKG or 2 man MIA. They're entitled to go back to stand for the extra man but they don't.

In the case in question only the magnanimity of the Captain kept Vicky Pollard on board. With an extra standby called out it's clear that the he'd already considered offloading the trouble maker and could have done so should he have wished. I suspect it was only the presence of his/her case in the hold that kept the insubordinate one on the trip. Don't make the mistake of thinking your union is in charge if the aircraft. It isn't, and if you give the commander lip you'll be waving goodbye to the aircraft from T5.
StraightDave is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 14:15
  #1166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flyeruk69,

I'm just wondering where you got the details of the "proposed" disruption agreement? I haven't seen/heard anything from BA on this (apart from needing it to change from 2 local nights after a diversion). Is this Bassa's take on what would happen, or has it been published by the company as well?

Gg

Ps. In regards to working with less crew on either fleet, I'm afraid you'll have a big fight on your hands avoiding that, as LGW has been doing it for years and we manage to provide just as well a service with less crew than LHR. Yes it means working harder, but it can be done.

Last edited by Glamgirl; 11th Aug 2009 at 14:18. Reason: adding a ps
Glamgirl is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 14:35
  #1167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
GG,

PM on its way to you shortly with details.
deeceethree is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 14:37
  #1168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cabin Crew are in the middle of a dispute at the moment.....try and get your heads out of the pilot universe for a moment...its not the real world.

If a crew member wants to get off the aircraft because some Captain insists on leaving crew down, then thats whats going to happen. I have it on good authority that on the flight in question 7 crew would have walked off the aircraft if the pilots attempted to leave without the full crew compliment. Captain,God whoever can do nowt about it. No full crew compliment...No flight..End of story
potopilot is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 15:32
  #1169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Surrrey
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Staight Dave that maybe how it works in charter not here.

Incorrect crewing levels without agreement flight aint going
am i bothered is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 16:11
  #1170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Straights of America
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last time I checked BA didn't have a seperate section of aviation law from charter. Once the door's closed were going! And no, I do not grant you permission to use your phone on board to call BASSA!
StraightDave is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 17:15
  #1171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Surrrey
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately agreements are agreements whether you like it or not. So either this gets added to the list on the dispute items or maybe procedure will change so that cc do not board the aircraft until the correct crew compliment is present. But I am sure this matter is being looked at along with the many other issues at present.
am i bothered is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 17:28
  #1172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FlyerUk69 - it does not say anywhere in the proposal that you would be "in on days off" under the new Disruption Agreement. This is another myth perpetuated by BASSA for their own devious means. Read the BA proposal yourself. It says:

Contact Cabin Crew at home to advise of roster changes during disruption
Introduction of willing-to-work

Therefore if you were rostered to work while disruption was ongoing IT MAY CHANGE. If you were a WTW volunteer then you could be contacted to work WHEN WILLING!! ABSOLUTELY ZILCH ZERO NOTHING NADA ABOUT COMING IN ON DAYS OFF!!!

I am actually extremely tired and drained of having to explain the BA proposal to people now. They cannot use their own words; they simply spout BASSA crap and it usually goes something like this:

The pilots got a great deal and are getting it all back in two years time.
Why are cabin crew being singled out and not other departments?
This is all due to bad management - price fixing/T5 blah blah blah
BA want us to take a paycut.
I want to work harder I don't want a paycut.
Please, please please read and understand the BA proposal for yourself. BASSA are pepetuating myths for their own agenda. Do not get caught up in it.
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 17:33
  #1173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Highflyer,

I'm not getting my hopes up in regards to Bassa militants analysing things for themselves. Considering they're still comparing the LCY-NYC route with OpenSkies and saying it'll cost millions etc etc, even though we've explained plenty of times what's happening with that route and who's paying for it.

Mental block, fingers in ears anyone?

The people saying they're willing to work harder but for same money... This is the frustrating bit, because they won't accept less crew, shorter trips, fixed links, or anything else in the proposal. Is there someone out there (pro Bassa preferably) who would like to tell us how they're willing to work harder? I'm really interested to know what they'd be interested in agreeing to.

Gg
Glamgirl is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 17:40
  #1174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interestingly, the subscription fee for another section of Unite is being increased by 10%. This is not an airline section of Unite.

Is this to pay legal fees for BA taking Unite/Bassa to court, or to pay for the pay rises to the "managers" of Unite?

Answers on a post card please.

Gg
Glamgirl is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 18:48
  #1175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A number of threaders have stated that there seems to be no plan for industrial action at this time. Were you to see the Waterside staffers involved in emergency / contingency planning for such an event it would seem to me that WW is not taking it very seriously as many members of the crisis teams would be hard pressed to plan a dog walking exercise let alone a free party? Yes its that bad!
HZ123 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 22:13
  #1176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time to polish up the old CVs then....Walsh doesn't back down...Cabin Crew walk (legally, as any competent union would ensure )...no question. I'd bet your pension on it.
potopilot is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 22:31
  #1177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
potopilot, or Stallpusher, or Poof In Boots, or whoever you are - pride usually comes before a big fall.

Time to polish up the old CVs then
Who's going to have you then?
deeceethree is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 00:19
  #1178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rugby
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Potopilot wrote: No full crew compliment...No flight..End of story
What's the big deal about being one CC down? It is clear that other centres operate different crewing levels to LHR without compromising safety. I am sure that if you asked the pax if they wanted to delay the flight or do without (say) coffee, you would get a pretty definitive answer! Most people have places to be and a time to be there (even if it is just a holiday) and having paid their money, want the journey to happen. Or perhaps you have lost sight of the fact that you are employed to provide a service to the paying customer.

D.
Dawdler is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 00:20
  #1179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Straights of America
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Walsh doesn't back down......................but Tony Woodley does
StraightDave is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 02:08
  #1180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the big deal about being one CC down? It is clear that other centres operate different crewing levels to LHR without compromising safety. I am sure that if you asked the pax if they wanted to delay the flight or do without (say) coffee, you would get a pretty definitive answer! Most people have places to be and a time to be there (even if it is just a holiday) and having paid their money, want the journey to happen. Or perhaps you have lost sight of the fact that you are employed to provide a service to the paying customer.
To BASSA, and many crew for that matter, it is a big deal to leave LHR with one crew down. BA actually needs dispension from the union to do so which is absolutely outrageous and I'm basing my opinion because I have been affected myself and stood on the ground with passengers on for hours whilst waiting for standby crew to arrive. In my opinion this is not to put the customers first.
nuigini is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.