Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Dec 2009, 16:42
  #4561 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will step out of this forum as it serves no purpose other than bashing hard working cabin crew
But bashing hard working BA Management is ok though, right?
henkybaby is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 16:48
  #4562 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the meeting, we drew to the union’s attention a possible flaw in their ballot process.
How kind of Willie to do that. No doubt some willie basher will say he's just scaremongering.

Sounds to me like BA are saying: "Bring it on, we have all the bases covered".
Desertia is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 16:50
  #4563 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It appears WinstonSmith that you live in a different world to everyone else, a dictatorship or Orwellian dream, that bears no resemblance to reality.

Living in a democracy, people can still legally protest against imposition that has been elaborately engineered and contrived by a disengenuous management.
Fume Event is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 16:55
  #4564 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you live in a {snip} Orwellian dream, that bears no resemblance to reality
.
that has been elaborately engineered and contrived by a disengenuous management.
Now that was funny! I think they call it projection.
henkybaby is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 16:56
  #4565 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland
Age: 77
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"At the meeting .... ballot process".

A cynic, such as me, would suggest that is a way of BA and Unite trying to cobble together a face saving solution to help Unite out of the position BASSA have put them in.

FE

You've got to be Leo H C from the Ryanair postings - it's the sort of thing he says.
finncapt is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 17:00
  #4566 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Overseas
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know that the majority of CSD's I work with have always played a role in service. However, sometimes they don't, for a number of reasons. Historically, working with 14 on a -400 has worked perfectly well in those cases.

The company has decided (and it's their train set) that it is worth having the odd flight where the IFE gets left for a while (a 50 seat Club service finished after 1.45 on my flight yesterday...) to not have to pay that salary cost. If they are wrong, and business suffers to the degree that it is worth selling £3/4million of tickets to fund it, it will change back.

I hope they do change certain things - putting the most junior member on Club kitchen seems daft, and who goes when on the breaks needs looking at, but as someone said earlier, its just your job to provide the service the company wants. I don't agree with some of the ways BA wants me to operate my flights, but it's their aircraft and their AOC so I do it to the best of my ability their way because thats what they pay me for.
52049er is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 17:03
  #4567 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
people can still legally protest against imposition that has been elaborately engineered
At no point has it needed to be elaborate. The BASSA dunderheads have refused to negotiate like adults and have given BA no other choice than to make money-saving impositions (let's face it, they aren't for fun, are they?).

It's been quite simply engineered with BASSA's help.

But now Wicked Willie is hinting that BASSA might be legally obliged to pay BA damages if they strike. Let's hope BASSA's lawyer's haven't cocked up, that would be a tad embarrassing, wouldn't it?
Desertia is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 17:14
  #4568 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bath Road
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One particular CSD must hate coming into work these days and actually do a bit of work on the aircraft.

Before he would do boarding reluctantly - do a bit of complaining on the crew - place his backside in the CSD's office as soon as the signs came off and eat and drink whilst watching movies or listening to music - sigh and mutter and indirectly blaming you for having to hand out the hot dishes during the meal service in Club - do the hourly walk with disgust and complain on the crew for not wearing their name badge on the cardigan - get back to the CSD's office and give you the evil eye for daring to sort out your DF in his office.

I remember on flight in particular from MEX when one crew went sick downroute - he simply would not give us a hand with the 1st service in WT because he was dealing with a disappointed passenger in First which was far more important than doing a trolley - it turned out he was chatting away with a friend of his who was on the flight. He did give us a hand with the 2nd service - he told the Purser to take a trolley and himself would run the galley because it was more "appropiate" - which he did but it left him in a very lousy mood - he went back to his office as soon as the last tray had been given out and had his own meal behind closed curtains. Number 2 on that trip was also told to do the paperwork and close the DF trolleys somewhere else - BUT - not in the CSD's office.

This CSD must be having a joy nowadays.
winstonsmith is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 17:21
  #4569 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bath Road
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope they do change certain things - putting the most junior member on Club kitchen seems daft, and who goes when on the breaks needs looking at
Agree - this is the problem with our seniority system as 9 out of 10 ten times numbers 2 (777) and 7 (747) are the last positions to go. It can also be hard work if you are number 2 on 747 and on second break with the CSD - who tend to be dealing with their other duties at that time - and you need to look after Club - and sometimes World Traveller Plus too.
winstonsmith is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 18:24
  #4570 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they have not complied with the requirements of the law and make a call for strike action based on a flawed ballot, Unite would be liable for our damages and their members would not be protected.
So, after all the "they can't legally sack us" by Fume Lurker CFC etal. it would appear that BA are hinting very heavily that if BASSA haven't got it absolutely word perfect, they will.

So have BASSA pointed out to the membership exactly what flaw BA were claiming? No. Have BASSA given any assurances that there is no flaw? No.

Be very, very careful out there. I truly fear for my fellow colleagues who are being blindly led by this Union. We have all, cabin crew, pilots, and even customers pointed out numerous mistakes that this Union have made. They are very likely to have made others, and you are literally putting your life in their hands if you strike.

And Fume, living in a democracy people can vote no if they disapprove of the Union's position, and come into work even if the Union calls a strike.

So Top Bunk, having read your WW quote I would like to add a 5th option:

5. BASSA strike and BA let them, and then sack the strikers due to an illegality in the ballot.

Best of luck Strikers. You are so gonna need it.

The above represents my own personal viewpoint, and not that of BA.
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 18:24
  #4571 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LHR
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the meeting, we drew to the union’s attention a possible flaw in their ballot process. There are legal obligations that Unite must comply with running a strike ballot. If they have not complied with the requirements of the law and make a call for strike action based on a flawed ballot, Unite would be liable for our damages and their members would not be protected.
We hope Unite will consider its actions carefully and not put our customers’ travel plans and our cabin crew at risk.
So is WW saying that CC could be held personally liable if BA makes a successful damages claim against Unite/BASSA?

Is this because Unite is an association (I understand all assets are held in a trustee company) and therefore not a legal person and therefore cannot be sued or instigate legal action (I assume why Unite was not on the court papers for the legal action)?

Now that is a shot across the bows.
LD12986 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 18:35
  #4572 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The way I read it is that if they strike, and are therefore in breach of their contract, the members would not be protected, ie. contracts terminated.

But, heh, the BASSA faithful are soooooo confident that that can't happen.....

I do sincerely worry for the majority of my colleagues, many of whom, don't know what to think and are bullied by this Union into believing that because they are members, they have to conform. You only have to read some of the posts on here accusing anyone not conforming of ignorance, beligerence, etc. to realise how much pressure is exerted out there. A very good crew friend of mine, who is normally as tough as old boots, said they won't cross a picket line due to the reprisals so they will go sick! It's people like that that need protecting. The BASSA faithful can rot for all I care.

I am BA Cabin Crew. The above represents my own view, and not that of BA.
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 18:51
  #4573 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Interestingly, no comments yet from the hardliners about Topbunk's post (#4610) with the quote from Willie Walsh about yesterdays meet with Unite. I would have expected CFC, Fume Event and other like-minded posters to come barrelling in with a(nother) slating of the CEO, and how it is all lies! Not a bite! Most unusual, given that the quote is pretty fundamental to this entire ballot. biteme, on the other hand, may have retched when he/she saw it, which is why biteme has exited stage left?

Doesn't give BASSA and/or Unite much time to ensure their feet aren't made of clay, and on the weekend too! I wonder if the lawyers charge more on a weekend ......
deeceethree is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 18:55
  #4574 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
deeceethree, the X-Factor is on the telly.

Hence the silence...
overstress is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 19:00
  #4575 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will put money on the fact that the flaw is the ballot being sent to 1000 VR crew who have now left the company.

When asked about this, one rep replied "Can't you see what we're trying to do for you?" Err Lose my job? Cos that's about the only thing I can see the Union doing right now.

I am BA cabin crew. The above represents my own view, and not that of BA.
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 19:01
  #4576 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland
Age: 77
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LD

"Is this....legal action)?"

A most interesting point - I hadn't realised Unite was an association.

Someone will have to pay the costs and, if Unite have protected their funds, these may well fall to BASSA and when they run out of money who next?

I asked several pages back why BASSA did not obtain some indemnity against costs for its members or state categorically that the individual was not responsible.

Thank goodness we don't get the X factor in Finland - just Midsomer Murders tonight and it's Morse tomorrow afternoon. Coronation Street is up to about 1965 but I don't watch that (retired nigel).

Last edited by finncapt; 12th Dec 2009 at 19:13. Reason: added
finncapt is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 19:22
  #4577 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bath Road
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HiFlyer14

I will put money on the fact that the flaw is the ballot being sent to 1000 VR crew who have now left the company.
A good friend of mine - very pro-BASSA - said that all those who have left on VR have contacted UNITE to let them know about them receiving a ballot and not being eligible to vote.

Amusing, is it not?
winstonsmith is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 19:38
  #4578 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockport
Age: 84
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TwoRoles asks:

Have you flown in Club on a full Hi-J 747 aircraft or a 3 class 777 and if so how did your experience differ from before 16th November?
I am not a regular in J-class, but have sampled it twice recently, once LHR-TLV on a 767 before imposition and once LHR-SIN on a fairly full High-J 747. I assume that on that occasion I was only in J because WT+ was oversubscribed.

On both occasions the speed and level of service was the same to my inexperienced eye.
Dairyground is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 20:05
  #4579 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A good friend of mine - very pro-BASSA - said that all those who have left on VR have contacted UNITE to let them know about them receiving a ballot and not being eligible to vote.
Hi Winston..So can we assume that they are trying to say that they have not voted? No matter, it would still render the vote invalid as there is no way of verifying whether or not they did actually vote.

The fact that BASSA are handling this in such an amateurish and cackhanded fashion says it all really...If the stakes weren't so high it would be very amusing...but I am genuinely fearful for people's jobs now.

Slidebustle, given this latest development you may want to reconsider as you may actually benefit from NOT being a member of the union now. Being a member of the Union looks like a very unsafe place to be right now.

I am BA cabin crew. The above represents my own view, and not that of BA.
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 20:53
  #4580 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So it looks like BASSA have mismanaged the ballot - at least as far as BA believe. So I guess that injunction preventing the strike will be arriving shortly. BASSA look like chumps. How utterly utterly utterly predictable.
Juan Tugoh is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.