Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Network Aviation PIA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Dec 2023, 05:46
  #1041 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
Received 69 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Jester64
Spoken like a true subsidiary pilot!

You can walk into a company like NWK at the moment with next to no experience, perform a **** sim assessment and pysch test, be an ass at the interview and still get the job. Good luck doing that at a mainline assessment. Does this make one candidate higher quality than the other? Absolutely
How much are you willing to bet that everyone, let’s say in last 6 years did as you posted - a sim, pysch test and interview to secure a position at mainline? You might want to check your ranks before committing.
Bigredsky is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 07:04
  #1042 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: nowhere
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 70 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigredsky
How much are you willing to bet that everyone, let’s say in last 6 years did as you posted - a sim, pysch test and interview to secure a position at mainline? You might want to check your ranks before committing.
no ****…but my point refers to let’s say external
candidate A outscoring external candidate B by a golden mile during mainline assessment. Candidate A gets a start at mainline. Candidate B gets rejected and ends up at a cheaper subsidiary like NWK. Are you telling me mainline recruited the lesser quality candidate?
Jester64 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 07:15
  #1043 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 593
Received 325 Likes on 115 Posts
Originally Posted by Jester64
no ****…but my point refers to let’s say external
candidate A outscoring external candidate B by a golden mile during mainline assessment. Candidate A gets a start at mainline. Candidate B gets rejected and ends up at a cheaper subsidiary like NWK. Are you telling me mainline recruited the lesser quality candidate?
Depends on what you’re comparing. Mainline interviews are stupidly heavy on the puppy patting qualities of a candidate whereas a NAA/NJS/Alliance interview actually confirms the candidate can fly and knows how to do a visual approach. Mainline wouldn’t know if they hired a lesser quality candidate from a flying skills perspective as they don’t check anymore.

NAA Pilots are at NAA not because they flunked the Mainline interview, they are there because they wanted to live in Perth and have minimal overnights. Mainline doesn’t offer that. They need to ensure any future EA contains excellent lifestyle provisions as QF management will do everything they can to replace expensive mainline pilots with a cheaper entity.
aussieflyboy is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by aussieflyboy:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 07:18
  #1044 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
Received 69 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Jester64
no ****…but my point refers to let’s say external
candidate A outscoring external candidate B by a golden mile during mainline assessment. Candidate A gets a start at mainline. Candidate B gets rejected and ends up at a cheaper subsidiary like NWK. Are you telling me mainline recruited the lesser quality candidate?
No, I’m telling you that some of your fellow pilots didn’t do any of the assessments yet hold a Pilot position at mainline.
Bigredsky is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 07:38
  #1045 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: nowhere
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 70 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy
Mainline wouldn’t know if they hired a lesser quality candidate from a flying skills perspective as they don’t check anymore.
Has mainline scrapped the sim assessment for external applicants?
Jester64 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 08:00
  #1046 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 593
Received 325 Likes on 115 Posts
Originally Posted by Jester64
Has mainline scrapped the sim assessment for external applicants?
Generally involves flying straight and level and a single inboard engine V1 cut on a 747.
aussieflyboy is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 08:01
  #1047 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: At work
Posts: 44
Received 96 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by pinkpanther1
You've missed the point I was trying to make. Poetic Justice was explaining how no other pilot in Australia is equal to a Qantas pilot because we haven't endured such 'competitive recruitment'. I'm simply pointing out that those TAA pilots who joined the company didn't either, yet there's no issue with them being referred to as Qantas pilots. I don't care who calls themselves what, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.

And dare I say if TAA had hypothetically continued and was absorbed by QF in the last decade they too would have "Link" and Beards. Let's not kid ourselves they just got lucky in a different time, under a different CEO with different ethics. It's this kind of 'Them vs us' attitude that causes the divide and conquer mentality in the first place.
No not at all.

TAA/Australia and Qantas were both wholly owned airlines of the Australian government. They were merged and floated. Hence why Qantas mainline have two EBAs. When you go to shorthaul, you are on LWOP from longhaul, flying under the Australian EBA.

There are still Australian pilots rotating at the top on senior fleets living their best life. They got the better deal with the integration.

The subsidiary airlines since privatisation solely exist to reduce costs. That is it. If they weren’t cheaper or more flexible, they’d be cast adrift and another subsidiary would be acquired. There are of course some talented smart people in these operations. There are also corridor creepers and henchmen looking to further their careers in the mother ship.

The entrance requirements however are less. Some, may get the mainline ticket. Most won’t. That is just the nature of the beast.
Big Silver Spoon is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 08:03
  #1048 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 648
Received 135 Likes on 54 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy
Depends on what you’re comparing. Mainline interviews are stupidly heavy on the puppy patting qualities of a candidate whereas a NAA/NJS/Alliance interview actually confirms the candidate can fly and knows how to do a visual approach. Mainline wouldn’t know if they hired a lesser quality candidate from a flying skills perspective as they don’t check anymore.

NAA Pilots are at NAA not because they flunked the Mainline interview, they are there because they wanted to live in Perth and have minimal overnights. Mainline doesn’t offer that. They need to ensure any future EA contains excellent lifestyle provisions as QF management will do everything they can to replace expensive mainline pilots with a cheaper entity.
They still do a sim in the 76, VOR, ILS, Missed approaches
Ladloy is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 08:57
  #1049 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,478
Received 324 Likes on 121 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy
Generally involves flying straight and level and a single inboard engine V1 cut on a 747.
Ahhh yeah no, entirely incorrect
morno is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 08:58
  #1050 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australians
Posts: 32
Received 31 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by romeocharlie
Well, you probably wouldn't have passed the mainline literacy test.
Thankyou for your insightful contribution to the discussion sir. Without people like you I might actually have some self respect. Well done sir!
TooManyPineapples is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 09:26
  #1051 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 191
Received 120 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Jester64
Spoken like a true subsidiary pilot!

You can walk into a company like NWK at the moment with next to no experience, perform a **** sim assessment and pysch test, be an ass at the interview and still get the job. Good luck doing that at a mainline assessment. Does this make one candidate higher quality than the other? Absolutely
The skygod mentality is alive and well. I would call sick if I had to fly with you. What an attitude. You give your mainline colleagues a bad name.

I’ve known retards that have gotten into mainline, and also the subsidiaries. No recruitment process will stop that.
davidclarke is offline  
The following 8 users liked this post by davidclarke:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 10:26
  #1052 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 849
Received 69 Likes on 26 Posts
This is why we can't have nice things.

(By "nice things", I mean pay and conditions worthy of the job of a professional pilot.)

And I mean it - as aptly displayed above, with this sort of disunity in the industry, whatever you're fighting for under whatever EBA, you're doomed to get 1/8 of F-ALL.
josephfeatherweight is offline  
The following 5 users liked this post by josephfeatherweight:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 12:53
  #1053 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Mexico
Posts: 21
Received 40 Likes on 9 Posts
This thread has turned into absolute filth. Some absolutely garbage humans bashing fellow pilots. It's unfortunate that these types of QF pilots exist. Pprune really brings out that 5%. 💩
dusty99 is offline  
The following 7 users liked this post by dusty99:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 18:54
  #1054 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,100
Received 495 Likes on 133 Posts
Pprune really brings out that 5%.
That’s true of most social type forums. Most QF pilots have seen enough weird decision making and cocked up approaches over the years to recognise that they’re human. Most QF pilots are top blokes, just like every other corner of Australian life. Do all Airlines have equally skilled and professional pilots? Not a chance, that would be extremely unlikely, it would be as likely as all football teams being equally skilled. They have different owners ( executive management) coaches ( Instructor pilots) , training facilities ( training facilities) and talent pools to draw from, and most importantly, cultures. The football teams don’t always stay at the bottom of the table either, they can rise to the top of the league or they can be relegated. Most teams do know how to play the game though, and most of the time they avoid own-goals.
framer is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 19:04
  #1055 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
Received 69 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by ShandywithSugar
Have I had a knock to the head and woken on April 1st?

Parking - the issue with parking is because of Networks growth. You should be parking in Network HQ and catching a bus over. The carpark can only take so many Mazda 3s.
Encroaching on SH routes - too late. Isn't that what you all wanted? Bali?
Overnighting at Mines - that's your job. Mine flying , not RPT.

All too good to grab the great fast promotions and rapid growth with a **** eba and now want to start fixing it. The horse has bolted.

It is good to see though Hudsons as the new Network cafe of choice though , we can speak freely there!
Lol, thought “parking” was the staff car park. Hahahaha. Jeez I hope you are not a captain.
Bigredsky is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 21:56
  #1056 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: I would tell you, but my GPS keeps getting jammed
Posts: 169
Received 49 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by dusty99
This thread has turned into absolute filth. Some absolutely garbage humans bashing fellow pilots. It's unfortunate that these types of QF pilots exist. Pprune really brings out that 5%. 💩
That's why I barely go on here anymore. It's all turned into doom and gloom.

Last edited by VHOED191006; 11th Dec 2023 at 22:37. Reason: Clearly I should go on here more to keep my grammar in check lol
VHOED191006 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 23:35
  #1057 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by dusty99
This thread has turned into absolute filth. Some absolutely garbage humans bashing fellow pilots. It's unfortunate that these types of QF pilots exist. Pprune really brings out that 5%. 💩
the bashing's started with pilot's accepting lower pay and condition's to undercut other's put there jobs at risk take over there routes now they want equal pay and condition's and cry when they dont get support from the very people they spat on?


new NAA pilot sock's
unobtanium is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2023, 23:56
  #1058 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 191
Received 120 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by unobtanium
the bashing's started with pilot's accepting lower pay and condition's to undercut other's put there jobs at risk take over there routes now they want equal pay and condition's and cry when they dont get support from the very people they spat on?

new NAA pilot sock's
What were ‘Those’ pilot meant to do? Take a job at Coles and stick it to them? The fight is with the C-suite not your fellow pilots. You can’t ridicule a pilot for taking a job to put food on the table.
davidclarke is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Dec 2023, 23:58
  #1059 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: around the corner
Posts: 21
Received 17 Likes on 4 Posts
What part of "a victory for the Network pilots is a victory for all the Qantas Group pilots" is so difficult to understand?

Unbelievable
dive and drive is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by dive and drive:
Old 12th Dec 2023, 00:14
  #1060 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: NSW
Posts: 79
Received 39 Likes on 16 Posts
While some of the comments here have gone too far, they are likely driven by a resentment amongst mainline pilots that has built up since Jetstar was first created.

Many see promotional timeframes being blown out, at least in part, by the expansion of subsidiary flying into networks previously operated by mainline.

Some also see it as ironic that fast promotion amongst subsidiaries is now being followed up by demands for equivalence of pay and conditions with mainline, where progression is significantly slower.

I am not commenting on the rightness or wrongness of this attitude, however it would be naive to ignore the fact that many hold this view.
ddrwk is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by ddrwk:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.