Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Recruitment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jul 2023, 20:04
  #3721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 275
Received 39 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man
From the Australian

National Australia Bank employees earning up to $100,000 annually will be offered pay rises totalling 17.5 per cent over four years under a wage deal that locks in working from home rights for thousands of workers.

Qantas staff to get 9% over 5 years while they are gouging the public on fares and making record profits. I don’t know how the board and senior management look at themselves in the mirror.
Probably fair to say the same thing about the banks in Australia gouging the public too!

And as for their senior management….
Colonel_Klink is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 13th Jul 2023, 22:04
  #3722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: NSW
Posts: 76
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Makiko
I don't think you would be a very smart SC if you attempted to manipulate or twist facts in front of a Fed Court Judge
You also wouldn’t be a very smart individual to be discussing a Federal Court matter and then provide a link to a FWA transcript to try and prove your point.

It’s an entirely different jurisdiction in a somewhat related matter with different advocates.

Yes, dumbo would be an appropriate description.

Last edited by ddrwk; 13th Jul 2023 at 23:17.
ddrwk is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2023, 22:45
  #3723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 619
Received 157 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally Posted by Makiko
"But Ian Neil SC said AIPA would argue over the coming days that Qantas had contributed to its own operational issues"

Well unless QF management were Nostradamus & knew exactly how pandemic was going to unfold sure they would have made a ton of mistakes
  1. Qantas made operational decisions in order to save themselves millions of dollars. (ie. standing down staff, forcing crew to take LWOP, reducing numbers, etc.)
  2. These decisions are now causing a massive training burden.
  3. To ease this burden Qantas want to ignore the provisions of the EA.
  4. Now the question is, is it reasonable for Second Officers who were stood down for nearly 2 years to cop a $100,000 p/a hit to their pay as a result of Qantas’s cost reduction decisions, OR, is it reasonable that Qantas follow the EA and be made to foot the bill for their own decisions that saved them huge amounts of money.

With Qantas raking in multi-billion dollar profits, I hardly think it “reasonable” that S/O’s have to pay the price for the ramifications of Qantas’s cost cutting spree.


Last edited by Beer Baron; 14th Jul 2023 at 03:22.
Beer Baron is offline  
The following 5 users liked this post by Beer Baron:
Old 13th Jul 2023, 22:59
  #3724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: NSW
Posts: 76
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Beer Baron
  1. Qantas made operational decisions in order to save themselves millions of dollars. (ie. standing down staff, forcing crew to take LWOP, reducing numbers, etc.)
  2. These decisions are now causing a massive training burden.
  3. To ease this burden Qantas want to ignore the provisions of the EA.
  4. Now the question is, is it reasonable for Second Officers who were stood down for nearly 2 years to cop a $100,000 p/a hit to their pay as a result of Qantas’s cost reduction decisions, OR, is it reasonable that Qantas follow the EA and be made to foot the bill for their own decisions that saved them huge amounts of money.
Yes but Makiko is suggesting that while the business has the RIGHT to make whatever decisions it feels it needs to at the time, there is no RESPONSIBILITY to live with the consequences of those decisions. Surely you can see that others must pay for any negative outcomes?
ddrwk is online now  
Old 14th Jul 2023, 01:20
  #3725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,627
Received 601 Likes on 171 Posts
Originally Posted by Beer Baron
  1. Qantas made operational decisions in order to save themselves millions of dollars. (ie. standing down staff, forcing crew to take LWOP, reducing numbers, etc.)
  2. These decisions are now causing a massive training burden.
  3. To ease this burden Qantas want to ignore the provisions of the EA.
  4. Now the question is, is it reasonable for Second Officers who were stood down for nearly 2 years to cop a $100,000 p/a hit to their pay as a result of Qantas’s cost reduction decisions, OR, is it reasonable that Qantas follow the EA and be made to foot the bill for their own decisions that saved them huge amounts of money.


With Qantas taking in multi-billion dollar profits, I hardly think it “reasonable” that S/O’s have to pay the price for the ramifications of Qantas’s cuts cutting spree.

I think you should attend a next step course ( remember them) to retrain your appalling thoughts or you will be shipped to the gulag.
dragon man is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by dragon man:
Old 15th Jul 2023, 14:27
  #3726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Anvya
Posts: 139
Received 47 Likes on 19 Posts
Cabin crew asked Dixon if her job was safe ? He said yes but you won’t like it !
KAPAC is online now  
Old 18th Jul 2023, 06:43
  #3727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: melbourne
Age: 34
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bedwings
Hi All
How long do I have to do Qantas online assessment before link expire?
Around 2 weeks from the date you had it sent. Also log into the portal it will have the date.
jetbhags is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2023, 09:18
  #3728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Aust
Posts: 188
Received 38 Likes on 19 Posts
Looks like the plan is for quite a few to join the ranks in the next 5 years. Guess they have to crew the a220 somehow 🤪
SixDemonBag is online now  
Old 25th Jul 2023, 11:40
  #3729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Aust
Posts: 188
Received 38 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Gazza mate
The last time I heard a Qf chief pilot say we’ll be recruiting like crazy for the next 5 years was 2007. Those recruiting doors very abruptly slammed shut only 2 years later. History doesn’t repeat but it often rhymes…
sure does. They can’t plan a BP ahead, let alone a year.
SixDemonBag is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by SixDemonBag:
Old 1st Aug 2023, 21:46
  #3730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 22
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Fo or so

Hey is there a Qantas pilot in here that can describe some pay differences or advantages to taking an FO position over SO position with qantas.
Ranger290 is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 03:18
  #3731 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 397
Received 107 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger290
Hey is there a Qantas pilot in here that can describe some pay differences or advantages to taking an FO position over SO position with qantas.
You're going to get at least a few people tell you how you'll make upto 300k a year on day one as a 737 FO, and it used to be that every SO was on at least 200k apparently.

I'm sure both are numerically possible, but hopefully someone breaks down what you can expect as a base and THEN add expected overtime/allowances/super etc rather than throwing around arbitary outlier numbers as seems to be the norm when discussing Qantas pay.

Unless I'm mistaken you can't go back to SO from FO either, so either chair is going to be yours for a very long time - consider the relevance of that to your situation.
Lapon is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 03:20
  #3732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pprune is ******
Posts: 165
Received 178 Likes on 74 Posts
Originally Posted by Lapon
You're going to get at least a few people tell you how you'll make upto 300k a year on day one as a 737 FO, and it used to be that every SO was on at least 200k apparently.

I'm sure both are numerically possible, but hopefully someone breaks down what you can expect as a base and THEN add expected overtime/allowances/super etc rather than throwing around arbitary outlier numbers as seems to be the norm when discussing Qantas pay.

Unless I'm mistaken you can't go back to SO from FO either, so either chair is going to be yours for a very long time - consider the relevance of that to your situation.
You can go back. Just once.
dejapoo is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 03:30
  #3733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,300
Received 357 Likes on 196 Posts
Originally Posted by Lapon
You're going to get at least a few people tell you how you'll make upto 300k a year on day one as a 737 FO,
On 4th year rates and working maximum hours for a year - yes.

and it used to be that every SO was on at least 200k apparently.
Some senior 380 SOs could make close to $300k with a year of high overtime trips, but all new SOs are employed under the new T&Cs so would be in the $100ks for salary range.

I'm sure both are numerically possible, but hopefully someone breaks down what you can expect as a base and THEN add expected overtime/allowances/super etc rather than throwing around arbitary outlier numbers as seems to be the norm when discussing Qantas pay.
737 FO min guarantee - $150k, but rostered hours always come out higher, so one who doesn’t pick up any extra flying would get at least $200k plus allowances and the bonus, up to $300k for those who work to the max. I’d say the majority are around $230-240k pa. For new SOs now on all fleets low to mid $100ks plus allowances.

In all cases from now any new employee on taking a promotion from SO to FO on any fleet will result in a pay rise.


dr dre is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 04:28
  #3734 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 22
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Thanks for the responses. Im
guessing the allowances for SO will
be much higher than FO but in any case it sounds as though starting as 73 FO is significantly better
Ranger290 is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 08:40
  #3735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 397
Received 107 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger290
Thanks for the responses. Im
guessing the allowances for SO will
be much higher than FO but in any case it sounds as though starting as 73 FO is significantly better
It depends what you after.
Money? Then probably the 737 FO spot, but if its money you are after why are you even in Australia?

Despite the new pay rates I'd personally go SO and commute somewhere driveable outside the capitals, but we are all different.
Lapon is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 09:02
  #3736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some external who are on the hold file, have friends who waited 4 plus years to come off it.

Some are looking at 12 plus months on the hold file after being told would expect a start at the beginning of the year. It would be more a matter of trying to get start sooner rather then later on the 737 then playing the waiting game for a SO spot
Freightdog87 is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 09:14
  #3737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
If you’re the recipient of an email inviting you to apply for DEFO on the 737, caveat emptor.

There’s a reason they’re 30-40 FOs short on the 737 next training year.

The overall package is worth more as a 737 FO but you work a lot harder for it. Expect 15 days work plus 3 days (unpaid) reserve in a 28 day roster at the bottom. That will include some pretty ****ty day trips for 3 hours or less, and multi day trips with back of the clock sectors for less than 3 hours a day.

Driving to work in Sydney is about to get a whole lot harder too, with the loss of car parking next to the domestic terminal adding at least 45 mins to your daily commute to and from if you’re on day trips in that base. ADL, PER and BNE are better. MEL is about 25-30 mins per day waiting for buses and getting to and from the terminal.

Alliance, NJS and Network have gutted large portions of the 737 operation so you’ll spend extended periods in ports like DRW getting paid 6 bucks an hour for it, while Alliance flies eJets all around you with QF call signs.

Rosters improve as you climb the PSN and you’ll get weekends off, and fewer days at work (as low as 8 or 9 in 28 at the top). That’s where you can pick up extra hours, or ignore the pleading messages from crewing, if you choose. At the top, you’ll likely get assigned some stuff though as there are relatively few pilots assignable due to inefficient rostering practices.

Delays where you don’t get paid, loss of flying if you get delayed, cancelled sectors (unpaid), unpaid reserve and general lack of support these days across the domestic operation all add to the frustration.

That said, it’s a great bunch of people to work with, the flying’s fun and there’s WiFi.

SOs get paid less, have little responsibility, don’t work as much and get more days off. Haven’t seen a SO roster for a while but senior LH pilots didn’t work much more than 21 or 22 days in 56 last time I did. Lots of LH trips have home transport - and that makes a huge difference to your lifestyle. Don’t underestimate it. That ability to walk off a jet and just get driven home is great.

Please, stop worrying about allowances. You’re paid allowances for a reason, and that’s to eat while you’re away. Unless you plan to be a hermit, expect to spend a significant portion of them. Considering them
as take home salary is pretty sad.

Horses for courses. Lots of SOs have joined the company with window seat time and are happy to sit in the back seat for a while with a seniority number locked in - and probably wait for the 321.

Last edited by DirectAnywhere; 2nd Aug 2023 at 09:48.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
The following 6 users liked this post by DirectAnywhere:
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 09:35
  #3738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AU
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by DirectAnywhere
If you’re the recipient of an email inviting you to apply for DEFO on the 737, caveat emptor.

There’s a reason they’re 30-40 FOs short on the 737 next training year.

The overall package is worth more as a 737 FO but you work a lot harder for it. Expect 15 days work plus 3 days (unpaid) reserve in a 28 day roster at the bottom. That will include some pretty ****ty day trips for 3 hours or less, and multi day trips with back of the clock sectors for less than 3 hours a day.

Driving to work in Sydney is about to get a whole lot harder too, with the loss of car parking next to the domestic terminal adding at least 45 mins to your daily commute to and from if you’re on day trips in that base. ADL, PER and BNE are better. MEL is about 25-30 mins per day waiting for buses and getting to and from the terminal.

Alliance, NJS and Network have gutted large portions of the 737 operation so you’ll spend extended periods in ports like DRW getting paid 6 bucks an hour for it, while Alliance flies eJets all around you with QF call signs.

Rosters improve as you climb the PSN and you’ll get weekends off, and fewer days at work (as low as 8 or 9 in 28 at the top). That’s where you can pick up extra hours, or ignore the pleading messages from crewing, if you choose. At the top, you’ll likely get assigned some stuff though as there are relatively few pilots assignable due to inefficient rostering practices.

Delays where you don’t get paid, loss of flying if you get delayed, cancelled sectors (unpaid), unpaid reserve and general lack of support these days across the domestic operation all add to the frustration.

That said, it’s a great bunch of people to work with, the flying’s fun and there’s WiFi.

SOs get paid less, have little responsibility, don’t work as much and get more days off. Haven’t seen a SO roster for a while but senior LH pilots didn’t work much more than 21 or 22 days in 56 last time I did. Lots of LH trips have home transport - and that makes a huge difference to your lifestyle. Don’t underestimate it. That ability to walk off a jet and just get driven home is great.

Horses for courses. Lots of SOs have joined the company with window seat time and are happy to sit in the back seat for a while with a seniority number locked in - and probably wait for the 321.
Do we know how many were prepared to go the DEFO route just closed? Did they get the numbers?
On Guard is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 10:30
  #3739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 577
Received 314 Likes on 110 Posts
I know of a few Group Pilots who were offered start dates as SOs however due to Covid and extended times on the hold file were unable to afford the pay cut. They asked if they could have Direct Entry FO positions and were told this is not possible and therefore turned the Qantas position down.

Are they now offering DEFO positions? I imagine this would be quite the slap in the face to the above folk.
aussieflyboy is online now  
Old 2nd Aug 2023, 10:37
  #3740 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AU
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy
I know of a few Group Pilots who were offered start dates as SOs however due to Covid and extended times on the hold file were unable to afford the pay cut. They asked if they could have Direct Entry FO positions and were told this is not possible and therefore turned the Qantas position down.

Are they now offering DEFO positions? I imagine this would be quite the slap in the face to the above folk.
Not officially DEFO but SO with a quick transition to FO, ie during induction. I believe this is not uncommon so your friends sadly may have been misinformed?
On Guard is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.