Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas Engineering redundances - Advice required!!!

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Engineering redundances - Advice required!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Dec 2012, 08:54
  #241 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Delhi
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That qf94 really is a very bad person. You are making lies about Steve he did not say he supports Dixon he just makes it clear that Dixon would be better than Joyce. If I may I can ask you qf94 what option you would be prefering. I ask this because they are the two likely scenarios facing us.

1. Alan Joyce CEO. dismantling maintenance. no new International craft on order. Hands services and routes to EK. Wants to open new Asian airlines with qf equity. Is a greedy liar.

2. Geoff Dixon. will sell Jetstar. invest in Qantas International. Will scrap EK alliance. Will cease new fantasy Asian airlines. Is a greedy liar.

I pick 2. You clearly pick 1 because you are a 380 glory boy who will do anything to make the system work. Please go away we are sick of your bullhsit.
mahatmacoat is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2012, 11:37
  #242 (permalink)  
rtv
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pm me if anyone knows who qf94 is ... We should have a chat
rtv is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2012, 11:57
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
QF94 is obviously a longhaul captain/F/O , that is fairly clear, but you and i should not care about this fly, this is an engineers related thread and the fate of the company is not our worry, just the engineers fair go, and i believe Steve is doing a good job under the circumstances, hell if we were paid to worry about the companies future then we would be senior execs right? Errr maybe not i forgot about KPI'S......
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2012, 12:40
  #244 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: aviation heaven, australia
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mahatmacoat, do you seriously think GD is going to do that. HE is no way an option. He tried to shaft you all already and you are only there because he stuffed up. now he's aiming to come back and finish what he started. You have to wake up. GD and AJ are 2 peas from the same pod.

NOTHING ANY OF YOU DO WILL CHANGE THE OUTCOME OF WHAT IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN.

@ RTV.......Really, you want to know who he is. Why are you using an alias then? Because you don't like his opinion you want to persecute him at work.......Get over yourself tough boy.

Last edited by empire4; 13th Dec 2012 at 12:44.
empire4 is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2012, 18:39
  #245 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RTV you need to take a Bex and go have a lie down
qf 1 is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2012, 20:10
  #246 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not Sydney
Posts: 139
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Let's keep it on the topic guys otherwise this thread will be closed!
Ignore the trolls and concentrate on managements' next phase of destroying QANTAS Engineering!!
United we may stand, divided we will all fall!
1746 is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2012, 21:18
  #247 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's keep it on the topic guys
Correct you are. We will be running meetings in Syd next week in the smoko rooms at various times. This thread is about questions you have. I guess if you ask them to me here, I can answer as best I can but also I can use the questions as a basis for the meetings.

cheers
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 02:51
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fedsec there is a rumour going around that you guys have pushed the company hard for "last on first off"

Is this true?
the_company_spy is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 02:55
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fedsec there is a rumour going around that you guys have pushed the company hard for "last on first off"

Is this true?


Yes it is. Prefered by members as opposed to interviews. Required by EBA. Company want it to compose 1% of your total score. ALAEA want it to be 99%. Not settled yet but it will definately make up part of the decision but not all.

Company want other things that we find highly offensive such as an OHS Rep getting as many points for holding that position as a person would get for holding a 767 licence.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 03:16
  #250 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about someone with 20 yrs service but only 1 yr experience as a lame, as opposed to someone with 18 yrs service but with 10 yrs experience as a lame? Are you going to push for straight out years of service?
the_company_spy is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 04:11
  #251 (permalink)  
rtv
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Company spy ... Mate have a look at the award , it's time in the company.
rtv is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 05:03
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: in my mind
Age: 34
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FED SEC...
1.... Does the company want everyone to interview for a chance to stay?
2 Where is the company at with VR EOI from LMO?
going postal is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 05:37
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does the company want everyone to interview for a chance to stay



They did when they closed HM Sydney: It was a load of ****e they new who they wanted. And in the end They picked who they wanted, and some of the people that did not get an offer,Some really outstanding engineers in my opinion just walked out the door, but most are doing extremely well.
Talk to them today and the say it was the best decision they made.

Last on first off: There was talk about that too on the closing of HM Sydney
Load of ****e too it wasn't the case at all, well back then anyway
opalops is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 06:11
  #254 (permalink)  
rtv
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve could u tell us what part of the EBA it talks about interviews ? I cannot seem to see that , haha though I cannot find my glasses .
rtv is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 06:27
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Whilst last on first off is traditional and easy to work out it does have some downside.

Firstly the younger guys get to the top of the list no matter how good at the job they are.

Then you get the relative newcomers, a good number of who will be ex Ansett guys getting it up the rear again.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 07:01
  #256 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seniority through time served should count for something though not sure what weighting it should attract. Young guys would say none, old timers would say lots.
the_company_spy is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 07:12
  #257 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Seniority through time served should count for something though not sure what weighting it should attract. Young guys would say none, old timers would say lots
Hence the vote in favour of last on first off.

Last edited by ampclamp; 14th Dec 2012 at 07:18.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 07:16
  #258 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firstly the younger guys get to the top of the list no matter how good at the job they are.
Nearly every Engineer thinks they are better than the other bloke (or occassional Lady).

Steve could u tell us what part of the EBA it talks about interviews ? I cannot seem to see that , haha though I cannot find my glasses .
EBA doesn't talk about interviews. It does talk about years of service also experience. Talks about retaining mix of age and also skills.

Does the company want everyone to interview for a chance to stay
No but they may interview for vacancies in other ports.

2 Where is the company at with VR EOI from LMO?
They have like half a dozen or so from Sydney. Still open around other parts of country. We meet them on 20th to find out.

What about someone with 20 yrs service but only 1 yr experience as a lame, as opposed to someone with 18 yrs service but with 10 yrs experience as a lame? Are you going to push for straight out years of service?
No. We think a component should be based on years as LAME and other part as years with company.

We will talk about all of the above at meetings. Keep the questions coming.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 07:34
  #259 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However it is worked out it needs to be better than the farcical system used for 380 training.
Being assessed by a peer who is applying for the same position as yourself was never going to be a fair system.

Surely the people who were made redundant from heavy and have come back would be worried, as their "years of service and experience" etc is not going to reflect their previous employment.

Redundancy twice in 6 years. What a great company.
another superlame is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2012, 07:39
  #260 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mahatmacoat
That qf94 really is a very bad person. You are making lies about Steve he did not say he supports Dixon he just makes it clear that Dixon would be better than Joyce. If I may I can ask you qf94 what option you would be prefering. I ask this because they are the two likely scenarios facing us.

1. Alan Joyce CEO. dismantling maintenance. no new International craft on order. Hands services and routes to EK. Wants to open new Asian airlines with qf equity. Is a greedy liar.

2. Geoff Dixon. will sell Jetstar. invest in Qantas International. Will scrap EK alliance. Will cease new fantasy Asian airlines. Is a greedy liar.

I pick 2. You clearly pick 1 because you are a 380 glory boy who will do anything to make the system work. Please go away we are sick of your bullhsit.
I'm sorry. Did I speak off script? Didn't follow the flock? Remember, no one is above or beyond question or challenge.

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Your above post is THE definition of BS!

rtv
Pm me if anyone knows who qf94 is ... We should have a chat
Angle of Attack
QF94 is obviously a longhaul captain/F/O , that is fairly clear, but you and i should not care about this fly, this is an engineers related thread and the fate of the company is not our worry, just the engineers fair go,
The obvious just isn't obvious to some.

rtv, if you hadn't already picked up from many previous posts, I'm a LAME at S.I.T. Pop round next Monday morning when I'm on shift, and ask for QF94. I'll know who you're asking for, then we can meet and have that chat you so dearly want. Don't ask others to do your dirty work for you.

AoA, the only thing clear is that you are clueless as to your surrounds. Do you read posts, or just follow rants?

I'm glad I don't align myself with buffoons like yourselves above. It's the likes of you guys that bring companies down. No wonder QANTAS has a field day with us and wins every fight against us in the end.
QF94 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.