Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

SOUTHEND 5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Dec 2016, 15:37
  #3221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,585
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
putting an SSJ into Southend a couple of months ago on a "familiarisation" pretty much gave the game away
Plan B must be Newcastle then, they're always in and out "training"!
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 15:38
  #3222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could be Copenhagen is one of the new routes. After Easyjet moved their Copenhagen flights from Stanstead to Luton, there is no convenient way to get there.
tayair6 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 15:45
  #3223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fact that when Cityjet were in the frame there was talk of 18 routes and now the same number with Flybe is it not fair to assume that at this point Stobarts are talking about the same destinations?

I personally think this is all a bit knee jerk on there part and they are desparately trying to cobble something together so they don't lose face and at the same time try to increase passenger numbers at SEN
Hawklord69 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 16:42
  #3224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the CityJet deal is dead together with those lovely new jets.

Plan B could be act in haste, repent at leisure?
LTNman is online now  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 16:59
  #3225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also worth noting that in last 24 hours Cityjet have updated the careers page on their website, all mention of SEN now vanished
Hawklord69 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 17:02
  #3226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tws123
What's been said [by CityJet] is that CityJet gave Stobart a target date to make their decision by; the deadline passed; Stobart said no deal; CityJet were left disappointed by the decision, but now move ahead with their alternative ventures.
Management at SEN and Stobart are inflicting wave after wave after wave of reputational damage to the airport and Stobart.
It's like a Carry On film.
Astonishingly pathetic inability to deliver. I give them one thing, at least they're consistent.
mik3bravo is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 17:25
  #3227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SEN never has had a good management in the 50 years i have been attached in some way.
tophat27dt is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 17:33
  #3228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe better jets are on the way - maybe it's better this way as you get an airline which fits the market better.

Cityjet always seems like putting a square peg in a round hole ...
cumbrianboy is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 18:00
  #3229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cumbrianboy
Maybe better jets are on the way - maybe it's better this way as you get an airline which fits the market better.

Cityjet always seems like putting a square peg in a round hole ...
Can you explain what you mean. WX appear to be a fairly successful airline who've carved out a segment of the market and doing quite well.
mik3bravo is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 18:04
  #3230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm questioning the commercial acumen and experience of Stobart and SEN management. If you look back at the track record performance it isn't great. I'm beginning to wonder if SEN is a pet vanity trophy in the Stobart portfolio with blind ignorance clouding ability and commercial sense.
mik3bravo is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 18:32
  #3231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mik3bravo
I'm questioning the commercial acumen and experience of Stobart and SEN management. If you look back at the track record performance it isn't great. I'm beginning to wonder if SEN is a pet vanity trophy in the Stobart portfolio with blind ignorance clouding ability and commercial sense.
Sadly i think you're spot on, at the end of the day Stobarts made there money with lorries and distribution, not with aeroplanes and airports
Hawklord69 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 19:00
  #3232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,585
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
Maybe better jets are on the way - maybe it's better this way as you get an airline which fits the market better.
genuine question - who?
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 19:15
  #3233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leeds, UK & Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all a bit of a mess, isn't it.

Could WX operate the SSJs for Stobart under the flyBe brand? It seems complex, but if Stobart need jets in a hurry...

It does have the advantage for WX that their brand isn't "damaged" by an LCC type product. I doubt the whole deal fell apart over a G&T though.
brian_dromey is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2016, 20:39
  #3234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cheshire
Age: 45
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Hawklord69;9600795]Judging on previous form i have my doubts as to whether there is a plan B

I'm unsure as to how you keep these negotiation and plans secret and piutting an SSJ into Southend a couple of months ago on a "familiarisation" pretty much gave the game away but would i be right in thinking that LCY could have put pressure / made incentives to Cityjet to pull out of this deal?

I'm nothing more than a keen observer / enthusiast but it looks to me like Stobarts have been backed into a corner with Flybe being the only viable option at present, i doubt they were in negotiations with them until the Cityjet deal went belly up and that appears to gone that way only in the last few days, surely Flybe are now in a position whereby Stobarts will have to bow down to them to get any sort of deal.


Cityjet didn't pull out of the deal, Stobarts did.
rowly6339 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2016, 08:30
  #3235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a plan 'B' or option 'B'. Stobart have stated they plan to fly to 18 new destinations in the summer of 2017. Whether it's a good plan, workable or viable it does exist. 18 destinations - the same number as Cityjet were talking about. I suspect much of the preliminary work had already been done by Stobart and that Cityjet were going to take on the commitment to operate the routes. Obviously, Stobart didn't like what was on the table from Cityjet, or felt extending their Flybe franchise made more business sense to them (although they can't be entirely happy or they wouldn't have gone so deep with Cityjet).

I think judgement should be reserved until we see if the routes materialize. At times like this I always try to remember that without Stobart and their investment we would, in all probability, be contributing to a SEN historical thread talking about BAF, Dan Air and the Berlin Air Lift.
DC3 Dave is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2016, 08:46
  #3236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lots of moans here about Stobart but we all need to remember that it was Stobart and only Stobart that had the vision to build Southend's new infrastructure including a new terminal, station, apron, tower and runway extension. Without Stobart where would Southend be today so it might be worth while cutting them some slack as we all wait and see what happens next.
LTNman is online now  
Old 7th Dec 2016, 09:17
  #3237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Westcliff-on-Sea
Age: 79
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LTNman - I agree entirely that without Stobart, Southend would be in an even sorrier state than it is now. Give them a chance; they must have something that they think is worth going for or they wouldn't have pulled out of the Cityjet deal. Remember that in the past there have been calls for airport closure with industrial units or housing being built there. Had all the investment not taken place then that may have happened. Stobart may not be brilliant at airport/airline management but wait and see - we may all be surprised. Remember, without them SEN could well have bitten the dust by now.
SEN Observer is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2016, 11:41
  #3238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 60 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by DC3 Dave
There is a plan 'B' or option 'B'. Stobart have stated they plan to fly to 18 new destinations in the summer of 2017.
I'm not sure that stating you have a plan is the same as actually having a plan......
Andy_S is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2016, 12:35
  #3239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do accept the possibility that there's a large shovelful of bs in saying they have a plan B, but I think it will become clear in the next few weeks whether there is a reasonably advanced plan in place or not. I also wonder whether Flybe would be happy if one of their franchisees was making bold statements about routes to be flown in their name that were unlikely to come to fruition.

Last edited by DC3 Dave; 7th Dec 2016 at 13:26.
DC3 Dave is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2016, 13:42
  #3240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure that stating you have a plan is the same as actually having a plan......
Let's keep Brexit out of this discussion.
Barling Magna is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.