Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

LUTON -8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th May 2016, 14:29
  #4221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately ground handling team did not respond to captains radio requests
Most likely out of RT range. Could the Cpt not of sent an ACARS message to his Ops who in turn could of phoned the handling agent ?

Massive failure by handling company on the ground.
These issues do happen from time to time, however, the crew noticing half way through a flight doesn't sound too professional either.
The96er is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 16:28
  #4222 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So it seems it was noticed only because the aircraft was nearly full so was easier to spot otherwise the flight would just have carried on regardless of any security issue.
LTNman is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 17:00
  #4223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
In any organisation, however tightly enforced an operational process may be, there will always be the (very) rare occasion when a human being screws up and either forgets to do something or makes a mistake in doing it. Yes you can have another person double checking and a third counter check but ultimately humans are not machines and are prone to error for a multitude of reasons - eg tired, inexperienced, under stress, etc..

The purpose of the passenger-bag reconciliation is to make it sufficiently difficult to put a bomb on a specific plane so terrorists do not bother trying. There are multiple cases every day of passenger catchong a flight and bags follow on a later flight - ie no passenger-bag match occurs. As long as this anti-terrorist goal is achieved, the process has fulfilled its primary goal.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 18:24
  #4224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Stevenage
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
So it seems it was noticed only because the aircraft was nearly full so was easier to spot otherwise the flight would just have carried on regardless of any security issue.
I did say I think that's what happened, not what definitely happened. I'm sure there are other obvious signs. The point being that mistakes do happen. It causes major disruption to passengers, and no doubt results in someone having to pick up a big bill. Human error it may be, but the cost could be huge, and in more than in the monetary sense.
The delayed passengers were apparently surprising good natured and understanding when they boarded last night.

Last edited by musicmike; 29th May 2016 at 18:25. Reason: Adding words in
musicmike is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 23:35
  #4225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Al tube.
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would be more concerned if they had left without a passanger and taken their bags rather than taking too many passengers. I'm not quite sure with the little information we have here how returning to Luton improved security matters?
Alloy is offline  
Old 30th May 2016, 23:58
  #4226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Surrey
Age: 36
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having done the job, it's very easy to forget to scan a boarding pass considering an ezy gate agent has to scan, check passport +possible visa or residency, hand luggage is fine, within 10 seconds. Frustrating when something is missed but it happens.
strawberry Ribena is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 05:58
  #4227 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably another reason why easyjet should do their own headcount before the doors are shut.
LTNman is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 10:41
  #4228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have noticed that there is an increasing amount of delays from the airport with all flights leaving with a 20 minute minimum delay. For example ZB842 to Alicante departed at 09:03am instead of 07:35am. Also yesterday 80% of all flights were delayed. It usually occurs around the morning rush between 06:00 - 09:00, but this has a knock-on effect for the rest of the day. Considering flights with based aircraft in the morning don't have to be 'turned around' what's the excuse, maybe a small delay for a busy airfield and taxi time, but nothing substantial should really come about.
AvGeek1 is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 13:20
  #4229 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can't get a quart into a pint pot comes to mind? With every part of the airport operating at over capacity delays are bound to occur.
LTNman is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 16:22
  #4230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's some strange stuff happening with EZY at the moment.
EZY 2296 to KEF today diverted into GLA on the way up- according to the web site - reason- to pick up more fuel.
Are there problems at Luton at the moment or are EZY just losing it
Falcon666 is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 17:46
  #4231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 30 Posts
If the weather in Keflavik and/or the alternate airport in Iceland is poor, the destination alternate could be in Scotland. Depending on cruise winds and payloads some 319's may not be able to carry enough fuel to do that so either a fuel stop in Glasgow would be required or the offload of a lot passengers.
ESQU is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 18:30
  #4232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's ridiculous to think that they have let it come to this. They have decided to start work to increase capacity at the latest time possible when the airport has already reached overcapacity and will operate like this until the work is complete. But this is the story of our lives at London airports, takes so long to finally decide that the building work will go ahead, I mean look at Heathrow for example. The UK are the worst for it and it's humiliating, we our becoming a laughing stock amongst other EU countries.

The traffic is getting chaotic now , LTNman do you know how progress is getting on with the dualling of the approach road?
AvGeek1 is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 18:32
  #4233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Switzerland ... oh wait: Swaziland
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ILS donwgarded to CAT IIIa

@LTNman
The down grade is listed to come to an end on May 31st. We will have to see
if it is extended but expect the car park cranes to still be on site into early
June as work continues on the final corner
It is now NOTAMed to be CAT IIIa until 31AUG. Hope that the CAT IIIb minima won't be needed tonight.
TBSC is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 18:41
  #4234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: A place you do not know
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew through the airport on Monday to Gran Canaria. I would say that the airport was really good. Arrived about 4:30 with no traffic and a constant flow through the drop off. A lot of check is desks were open for all flights apart from Ryanair with 4 desks for 5 flights which meant that had a big que.

Security was very fast with the board saying waiting time of 3 minutes. I would of said that time was bang on and correct. Once through you walk up the old stairs which were there for you to walk to the old security. When you arrive you are greated with a duty free shop. Big and spacious for people to easily walk through or browse on the items in the shop. The only problem was seating once pass the whsmiths which has been cut back even more and has been boarded up. There was a bit of a que to take off with lots of Wizz coming in and a vueling which made us take off late but we left gate on time at 7:00. Took off about 7:15
Rating 8/10
Improved a lot since last summer when I used the airport.
Boeing737-8 is online now  
Old 31st May 2016, 19:08
  #4235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I correct in thinking that Vueling now have a cabin crew base at Luton?
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 19:42
  #4236 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The traffic is getting chaotic now , LTNman do you know how progress is getting on with the dualling of the approach road?
I am on holiday at the moment so no Friday update this week but last Friday a small section of kerbing was going in opposite stand 16. A junction with traffic lights for the mid term car park hasn't been started yet and nor has the embankment removal either side of the tunnel so there is still a great deal of work to be done. With Monday being a Bank Holiday I don't expect a great deal will change this week.

It is now NOTAMed to be CAT IIIa until 31AUG. Hope that the CAT IIIb minima won't be needed tonight.
Well that rules of the cranes being an issue. Maybe it is the multistory car park that is causing an issue? Not very often that the RVR goes below 180m or 50ft decision height at Luton.
Arrived about 4:30
That's why you had no issues.

As for the airport being so busy this year all I can say is that the airport management are as surprised as everyone else and I got that from the horses mouth but yes the work should have been finished now rather than only 9 months into it.

Last edited by LTNman; 31st May 2016 at 20:11.
LTNman is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 21:32
  #4237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Switzerland ... oh wait: Swaziland
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAT IIIa minima is RVR/200. TAF says BECMG 3121/3124 0200 FG today, luckily not happened (yet).
TBSC is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 22:37
  #4238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Stevenage
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
Probably another reason why easyjet should do their own headcount before the doors are shut.
Particularly as a head count can be done in less than a minute.
musicmike is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 23:40
  #4239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ESQU
Thanks for the info, yeah hadn't really thought that through.
It is a long diversion if the weather comes in.
Falcon666 is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2016, 19:27
  #4240 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So when you think the traffic can't get any worse at Luton think again as taxi drivers block the CTA over their lost contract. More protests to follow as the towns drivers plan more days of rage.

I said a few weeks ago that the towns Muslim taxi drivers would hold protests as they are like the French and don't stand for any nonsense. Just one taxi stopping in the wrong place could block the CTA but 150 turned up in a rolling road block during the morning peak.

Someone has reported joining the queue 3 hours before departure and they still missed their flight to a family wedding.




Last edited by LTNman; 1st Jun 2016 at 20:10.
LTNman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.