Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

BA Direct Entry Pilot.

Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

BA Direct Entry Pilot.

Old 5th Jun 2017, 15:04
  #3681 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 238
Get rejected did you?
Enzo999 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 15:12
  #3682 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Age: 53
Posts: 116
Button pushed ignored.

What a load of

Why so anti BA did they find you out and not employ you??
Icanseeclearly is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 08:16
  #3683 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: The EU
Posts: 484
Originally Posted by Enzo999 View Post
And it's terms and conditions (although worse than used to be) are still the best.
I think there are plenty of people in other UK airlines that would disagree with you. Myself included. Actually, if the majority of BA staff were to remove that stick from their rectum and drop the 'my job is more important than your job' persona, they may get more respect from the rest of the airline community.
Vokes55 is online now  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 08:49
  #3684 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,238
I might not agree with some of the language used above but it's not an entirely unreasonable sentiment.

We have no idea what the result for employees will be for last week events....but the bonus schemes have been historically p poor compared with most of the completion, even after a good year...so next year.........

As far as flight crew are concerned there seem to be some issues surfacing with the replacement to Bidline that some think may well effect roster quality and quality of life.

Last edited by wiggy; 6th Jun 2017 at 11:17.
wiggy is online now  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 09:00
  #3685 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 238
Originally Posted by Vokes55 View Post
I think there are plenty of people in other UK airlines that would disagree with you. Myself included. Actually, if the majority of BA staff were to remove that stick from their rectum and drop the 'my job is more important than your job' persona, they may get more respect from the rest of the airline community.
I think that's a very unfair comment and says more about your own "issues" than those of most BA staff. I have been flying for 13 years now and in that time I have flown for several other UK companies along with BA for the past year. I am in no way a Cheerleader of BA and will be the first to point out its failings I also don't see BA as "Better" than anyone else or look down my nose at other Airlines. I also see there are many benefits to working for a LCC or Charter but in my experience terms and conditions are not one of them. As said I have worked for several U.K. Companies and have applied for most of the others so have a very good understanding of what's on offer else where and In my experience this is as good as it gets. PPJN will tell the story in my first year I will make early/Mid 70s in salary, a pension contribution of 13%, 6 weeks off spaced equally, PHI, LOL, world wide staff travel, free type rating That's far better than the Zero hour contract I would get at Easy or Ryan, the 10/13th salary at Monarch plus these guys all charge 30k for ratings.

On another note before coming here I proscribed to a similar feeling about BA pilots but having worked here it's totally unjustified, on the whole they are amoughst the best guys and girls I have flown with.

Maybe it's not the BA guys that need to pull that sick out.
Enzo999 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 10:20
  #3686 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: London
Posts: 134
Just for info Monarch is now full time again , but the hours you fly are probably equivalent to part year ( with full year pay MADNESS) about 750ish
Anyway I believe the choice at BA is fantastic!! You can make the job fit around you (with seniority) which you just can't do at other airlines
Snapper5 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 10:34
  #3687 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: somewhere in the middle
Posts: 261
There's a reason that there's a number of us stressing (to a greater or lesser extent) about when / if we'll get yanked out of the hold pool, and I would suggest that ego is a long way down the list.

Pay, Lifestyle and Career Progression are my number 1,2 and 3 reasons for wanting this. Not necessarily in that order.
thetimesreader84 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 11:22
  #3688 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: London
Posts: 153
I must admit that even if we aren't taken out of the pool straight away I would be astounded if they didn't keep us swimming.
That really is chucking money down the toilet. I know they have done that in the past but surely if there is an easy way to save cost then that would be it!
applecrumble is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 11:45
  #3689 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Botswana
Posts: 866
Wiggy surely it can't be coming as a surprise to people that there will be less roster control under JSS. Regardless of how its been sold, JSS is just a preferencing system, no more, no less. As you're not going to be able to see the lines in advance, it is my understanding that there will be close to zero control like we get now under Bidline. The other problem is that once the union agreements have taken their toll JSS will not function as it is supposed to. We'll end up with Carmen MkII where nobody is happy.
RexBanner is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 23:28
  #3690 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,334
Yep, those who voted for it after believing the union hard sell are in for a very nasty shock when they see how much control they have lost and how much the company have gained One of the best rostering systems in the world has been chucked out for a few scraps and Alex Cruz has been handed exactly what he wanted, huge mistake.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2017, 06:59
  #3691 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,238
Wiggy surely it can't be coming as a surprise to people that there will be less roster control under JSS.
Agree with you and Max, certainly it should be no surprise at all to those who have seen various "innovations" in our scheduling over the years...
wiggy is online now  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 20:07
  #3692 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ex-DXB
Posts: 927
Emirates profits have nose dived Ethihads investments have all failed loosing them billions and Qatar are just plain mental whereas BA/IAG make money and lots of it
Correct - EK's profit nosedived from 7.7 billion last year to 2.5 Billion this year.

This woeful profit of 2.5 Billion is still 1 Billion more than IAG's. Not bad for a single airline against IAG's many airlines.

Good luck with the applications everybody.
Craggenmore is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 20:54
  #3693 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,836
Yeah not bad when you own the friggin oil supply
Superpilot is online now  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 21:52
  #3694 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,007
Craggenmore...

Having just checked those figures, I agree that EK's profit was 2.5 Billion. Just check the currency units though, does make one heck of a difference...
Cough is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 23:38
  #3695 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 521
Whoops

Dirham fail. Doh!
OBK! is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2017, 07:40
  #3696 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 238
An 85% drop in profits is fairly dramatic no matter how you twist it. Considering they have had an airport built for them (actually 2), most of their aircraft gifted to them, no unions, unbelievable amounts of slave labour, cheap oil and no social taxes, frankly there is no excuse for this not being the most profitable airline in the world!

I agree though they produce a good product.
Enzo999 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2017, 16:54
  #3697 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 21
Madness

Originally Posted by RexBanner View Post
Wiggy surely it can't be coming as a surprise to people that there will be less roster control under JSS. Regardless of how its been sold, JSS is just a preferencing system, no more, no less. As you're not going to be able to see the lines in advance, it is my understanding that there will be close to zero control like we get now under Bidline. The other problem is that once the union agreements have taken their toll JSS will not function as it is supposed to. We'll end up with Carmen MkII where nobody is happy.
Ditching Bidline for a preference system is stupid. I would be interested to know the rational behind any decision to do that.
Phil.Capron is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2017, 08:06
  #3698 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 198
Originally Posted by Phil.Capron View Post
Ditching Bidline for a preference system is stupid. I would be interested to know the rational behind any decision to do that.
The rationale was a dipsh*t membership, a convincing BACC and very close ballot results.
It's only the Roster production side. Current Ops processes remain as before. So roster stability still in place.
Right Engine is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2017, 08:42
  #3699 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 341
It's not a preference system.
jb5000 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2017, 08:57
  #3700 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Botswana
Posts: 866
Jb5000, yes it is. Are we going to be able to see each individual line we are bidding for pre roster release a la Stage 1 of Bidline? The answer is no. So basically JSS is the equivalent of being on a Blind line expressing preferences at Stage 2.
RexBanner is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.