Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Virgin Australia Cadet program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jun 2017, 00:37
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikewil
Is anyone still waiting to hear back after submitting their videos?

I am still waiting too, anyone else?
7478i is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 18:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Perth
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 7478i
I am still waiting too, anyone else?
I just got a reply from them. I applied for the ab-initio route and have been rejected.
23alpha is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 23:21
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Perth
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Coopmeup
Well, I'd like to know what their "non-specified" criteria is!! Just got my rejection email. I applied for ab-initio. Have completed maths & physics at high school, I've completed a BSc, I have 15 hours TT, I have a Class 1 Med, and wrote what I thought was a pretty good application but still failed to even make the very first cut

So, I must be too old or too male. Either way seems like discrimination to me.

...yes, I'm feeling a little sandy.
Although I have no flying experience, I have a master in Professional Engineering and have had experience working in an airline's technical services. I also thought I had a pretty good candidacy but didn't even make it to online testing like you. I wonder who's making their online testing?
23alpha is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2017, 00:37
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Victoria
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too applied for ab-intio. Ive only got my RPL and like 30 command hours, had a pretty solid application. Low hours but a licence that showed I was interested in the field, solid cover letter. Sent them my ASIC, a copy of my class 2, etc even though i didnt really have to. Sent my training notes, log book, all of it. Only one problem didnt have a passport yet. Sent them an email, they were happy for me to send it after the close of date. Sent the passport app off and get the passport like a week and a bit after the application closing. In the mean time when i applied, i noticed some things in the applcation that it didnt say on the requirements page. Things like a birth cert, and the last 3 pages of your log book. The page on their website just said log book. So i send an email with extra stuff to cover myself. Yeah sure no worries i added that to your aplication. Passport comes in. Send it to them on a monday. No response. Thats strange normally they reply within the day. Send it again on thursday morning. Response thursday afternoon. Rejection email. Seems very suss.
StillUntitled is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2017, 06:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand getting the rejection letter may come to as a shock to a lot of you, I've had my fair share...but you have to remember you are up against a very high number of applicants. Ask yourself, how do you stand out against the other 1000 applicants, what's makes you special. If you want to be trained and given an airline job at the end, you're going to have to be a cut above the rest.
Flyboy1987 is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2017, 06:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disappointed

It is very disappointing, but im with everybody else here, there are too many people competing for these positions, statistics say hundreds are going to be really disappointed once we receive the "thanks but not this time" letter. I don't feel bad cause I have my own career and I success in other things, it wasn't my time this time but it has been my time before and it will be my time many more times to come. who knows maybe they are looking for certain ages, or maybe for females, someone posted there something about them hiring many women in the past, or maybe they are looking for looks after all many of us had to submit a simple video with very quick and basic answers not really much you can do in two minutes, maybe they just wanted to see how easy on the eye your are. Hang in there everyone, keep getting involve in this sort of things and one day we'll make it, that's how it works.
cadet5 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 02:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: .
Posts: 754
Received 29 Likes on 9 Posts
With all due respect coopmeup,

Perhaps your distain of having to do the video was obvious to recruitment!
puff is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 03:42
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 23alpha
I just got a reply from them. I applied for the ab-initio route and have been rejected.


Still waiting here, when did you submit your videos?
7478i is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 05:13
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Coopmeup
With all due respect Flyboy,

You do not know what was contained in my application and how I attempted to stand out. I think conveying a very high level of academic achievement, and displaying a professional manner with strong work history, great references, and a strong desire to 'get a foot in the door' should be sufficient to progress to at least some online psychometric assessments.

This is not Big Brother and I should not have to submit a video of me prancing around in a tutu to get the attention of the recruiters for a position which does not require that level of extrovertedness.
Whatever you submitted wasn't enough, you may have been borderline, they may have taken one look at your application and said no, who knows.

It's great you've studied maths and physics, but so have most pilots.

Don't take it personally and spend weeks thinking about the application you submitted, it was probably overseen by a member of HR who have no idea what to look for in a pilot, move on, your time will come.

It's no coincidence that these opportunities normally go to the applicants whose father is a widebody captain within the company. You'll watch the video the successful applicants make about how they grew up with aviation in their blood as they used to visit dad in the cockpit.

Work hard and it will eventually happen for you.
Flyboy1987 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 07:08
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Coopmeup
Thanks for the encouragement Flyboy. The bitterness of being rejected even though I know in myself I will make a better pilot that every one they finally choose will make my eventual success taste even sweeter.

P.S. I am so sick of nepotism it isn't funny.
Mate, it's hard not to be bitter.
You may run in to the guys and girls who are successful and you'll wonder how the hell they got in, that's life.

I went down the GA road and now looking at the majors after 3 years, my mates went cadetships and are upset they'll never get to do the flying I done, to each their own.

As for nepotism, this industry is full of it, and if my old man was in an airline or owned/worked in GA, of course I'd be using him for a foot in the door, unfortunately for me he's an electrician who's terrified of flying!
Flyboy1987 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 07:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: China
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
having unwavering self-belief is considered a poor attitude is it XM?
Coopmeup is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 07:45
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Coopmeup
having unwavering self-belief is considered a poor attitude is it XM?
Yes..............

Lots of dead pilots with unwavering self belief.
Tankengine is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 08:37
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: australia
Posts: 377
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by XM02A
Tankengine
What that means is that you can do so without needing to berate fellow candidates. How the hell do you know that you'll make the best pilot with your limited experience as you described in your earlier post? Very disrespectful, nepotism or no nepotism.
It is hard not to berate them with the blatant discrimination shown in this program in the previous cadet program that they ran.

5 out of the 8 cadets were females.

I would be willing to bet that less than 10% of the applicants were female.

Notice how these females are also very attractive as well. Maybe the same division of HR that takes care of cabin crew recruitment is also looking after the cadet pilot applicants.
mikewil is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 08:55
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: China
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's a big difference between backing yourself to become the best, and thinking that you already are. I fall in the former.
Coopmeup is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 09:21
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by Coopmeup
Thanks for the encouragement Flyboy. The bitterness of being rejected even though I know in myself I will make a better pilot that every one they finally choose will make my eventual success taste even sweeter.

P.S. I am so sick of nepotism it isn't funny.
First off, it isn't nepotism. Applicants who know people in the company (whether they be friends or family) do a unique insight to the recruiting process of an airline and are able to gain that knowledge prior to their selection process. They may get an advantage because of this, but that isn't proof of nepotism. Plenty of senior captains out there who have kids that have been knocked back from from cadetships.

Second of all, if any future applicants are reading this, don't for one second be arrogant enough to think that you "will make a better pilot than every one else they choose". Remember in Top Gun when Viper tells Maverick that he likes arrogance in a pilot? Well airlines absolutely hate overt arrogance in their pilots, and it's the easiest way to rejected from a cadet interview.

5 out of the 8 cadets were females.

I would be willing to bet that less than 10% of the applicants were female.
Lastly for all those whinging about affirmative action and girls getting the jobs over the boys, having known plenty of female cadet pilots, they are absolutely at the top of their game and do give the boys a run for their money. I've no doubt anyone selected for this program, regardless of gender, was at the top of their selection pile. It may just be coincidence that it was 50% female, and the females were the stronger, more motivated candidates than the men. But more likely there were probably just as many female applicants as male. I'm hearing in some university and flying school courses that female enrolments are equal to or are exceeding male enrolments in the last few years. The old boys club of aviation is gone. No use complaining, you weren't up to scratch, better start worrying about the rest of your career.

Last edited by dr dre; 8th Jun 2017 at 09:55.
dr dre is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 09:53
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: .
Posts: 754
Received 29 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Coopmeup
Hi Puff, I used a video as an example of how we must obviously be expected to display non-specified qualities in order to be successful. I didn't even make it that for - which you would have known if you had have read the thread properly instead of making a stupid ill-informed comment like a douche.
Nice coopmeup, I have read the thread properly, if you look back earlier in the thread I actually posted something that I thought might have entered into your head that whatever you had for your application might not have cut the mustard against other people external of the company, and people from within the company that have a demonstrated pattern of work and dedication and knowledge to the organisation. As for doing the video interview, yes they are BS...but you do realise that there is a 3 stage interview process to work at Bunnings to stack shelves?

Friendly bit of advice from someone actually in the industry, don't act like a douche(as you delightfully bought back) and act like the industry owes you anything. It's a tiny industry on the grand scale of things, and a crap attitude will find you not just getting rejected from this, but everything you ever go for.

Aviation needs skills and attitude, you might think you have one, but you have displayed so far you don't have the other.

As for nepotism, the first 2 courses had no Captain's children (women or not) on it, and plenty applied!

Mike - I suggest you hang around the airport a bit more and observe some of the VA cabin crew these days, they are not ALL the 20 year old blondes from 15 years ago.(Those still there are now approaching 40) Quite a large number of 45+ are being hired now.
puff is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 11:22
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: australia
Posts: 377
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by dr dre
But more likely there were probably just as many female applicants as male.
Rubbish. Do I need to dig up the stats on annual numbers of CPLs issued to males vs females to prove your suggestion is utter BS?

All that having gender quotas does, is denies the position for people more qualified and capable for the job.

Perhaps we should also have quotas to meet to ensure we have an appropriate number of Aboriginals, Muslims, Gays, Trangenders etc in cockpits.
mikewil is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 14:43
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by mikewil
All that having gender quotas does, is denies the position for people more qualified and capable for the job.
What if the female candidates showed they were more suited for what VA was looking for? Maybe the typical teen/early twenties male personality wasn't what VA sought for this cadetship in particular and, like has been mentioned on other threads, empathy and getting along with people are what airlines are looking for. Maybe the women were better suited to this.

But at the end of the day, the fact is the cadetship makes up a fraction of recruitment. 4 positions going to women when according to your standards it should have only been 1 or 2 or none is hardly anything to complain about. Males will still make up the majority of pilot recruits.
dr dre is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 14:48
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by Coopmeup
To everyone who has suggested I have a poor attitude due to one sentence that I have previously written I'll say this...

If you don't aspire to be the best in your field then what kind of pilot does that make you?
We all try to do the best we personally can do and strive to improve ourselves, but I think it's when you said:
I know in myself I will make a better pilot that every one they finally choose will make my eventual success taste even sweeter
That when you say that you know you will be better than every one else they could possibly choose, that comes across as arrogant.

Last edited by dr dre; 8th Jun 2017 at 14:59.
dr dre is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2017, 23:04
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Lower North Shore
Posts: 277
Received 23 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Coopmeup
To everyone who has suggested I have a poor attitude due to one sentence that I have previously written I'll say this...

If you don't aspire to be the best in your field then what kind of pilot does that make you?

The truth is you can be the best hands on pilot In the word but it won't get you past the HR BS in today's Airline interviews. I know some really good people who've missed out, and some others got in that leave you asking why!
Brakerider is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.