Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Nimrod MRA.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jan 2011, 18:19
  #1501 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St Annes
Age: 68
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the last 2 posts (assuming I get this in quick) show why the service and the company, whilst (probably) often sharing the same basic aim, end up worlds apart due to a lack of understanding of what the other is on about.

The company, being a PLC, should indeed be aiming at maximising the share price (not necessarily the same as making profits, but often the two go hand in hand), to maximise return to the owners...ie the shareholders. A good engineer will indeed identify with their work, and will find it hard to believe that anybody else could have a closer relationship with it, or a greater desire to see it work as well as it can.

Which all fades to nothing when you are at 5000 ft, 20 miles from an enemy DDG, and the 'stealth mode' knob falls off.

It's like Turkeys and Reindeer at Christmas, frankly - the Reindeer are determined to provide a good service, but the turkey is REALLY COMMITTED.

Dave
davejb is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2011, 18:23
  #1502 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kawasaki XP1 (no not a motorbike), what price we build it under license in 5 years time? The politics (UN not national-well maybe) would be immense but you have to start somewhere. A snip at $114m each.
It seems to have several advantages over the P8 - not least of which is having four donks. Buy 10 off the shelf, but with the Rollers BR 710; (there are 120 knocking about in the sheds, already paid for) for an extra 2,000 lbs of thrust each, so better performance, especially on two.

Simultaneously, start R&D for the Mark 2, with more British kit, get another 10 into service, then refit the Mk 1s to Mk 2 standard. Three squadrons plus the OCU for less than the cost of 9 Nimrods.

What shall we call the beast? How about Triton? The son of Neptune, he had the ability to calm the waves.
Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2011, 18:38
  #1503 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 503
Received 40 Likes on 10 Posts
Kawasaki XP1 (no not a motorbike)
Do you want to consider that again?



Kawasakis with "drivers" all around - it might be a sh!te MPA but Fincastle would be great!

iRaven is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2011, 21:09
  #1504 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Blighty
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What shall we call the beast? How about Triton? The son of Neptune, he had the ability to calm the waves.
Neptune, analogous to Poseidon, indeed had a son called Triton...

Should the Brits fly a jet called Triton (which was talked about a year or so back), we could never go near American and Australian MPA crews...

For all we would get is...

"Who's your planes daddy?"
getsometimein is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2011, 08:54
  #1505 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Simultaneously, start R&D for the Mark 2, with more British kit, get another 10 into service, then refit the Mk 1s to Mk 2 standard. Three squadrons plus the OCU for less than the cost of 9 Nimrods.
Except, as I understand it, the Nimrods have already been paid for. This must be what they meant by 'cost +' contracting.
Harley Quinn is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2011, 16:39
  #1506 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harley Quinn

Correct. However, sooner or later HMG will have to re-establish a viable MPA force. This seems to me to be the best way. (I don't think the P8 will be very effective.)

Let's hope they start to build the new fleet before too much expertise and experience is lost.

PS If the Poseidon is used in counter-drug operations, will it be called the OP8?
Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2011, 17:03
  #1507 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Age: 73
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mra4eng

My point was not that the company shouldn't care about profit but whilst their sole interest was in profit, the product suffered. The buoys and girls I worked with on the ground cared very much about their product, but it is management who control the show and their career is determined by a spreadsheet.

I should have said Kawasaki XP1 not THE motorbike, on the other hand the picture is much nicer.
AQAfive is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2011, 00:03
  #1508 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: A 1/2 World away from Ice Statio Kilo
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"US Navy explores contractor-operated Global Discovery MPA plan
The US Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) has revealed a previously undisclosed plan, under the moniker of the Global Discovery Maritime Patrol Aircraft (GD MPA), to contract for a contractor-operated MPA service to support counter-narcotic operations. According to a request for information (RfI) issued by NAVAIR on 16 April 2010, the Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC), in support of the Counter Narcoterrorism Technology Program Office, has a requirement for two contractor-owned/contractor-operated manned aircraft with an eight-hour mission endurance"

Any takers BAE does have a presence in the USA, there are also some ladies from Dirty Harrys that could do with the income boost!
Charlie sends
Charlie Luncher is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2011, 06:57
  #1509 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,451
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
Maybe some drug barons could get together, set up a civil MPA company, win the contract, and then ensure that they don't find themselves....
Biggus is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2011, 16:13
  #1510 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Devon
Age: 71
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Hi gents

News from Woodford is that two hangared aircraft, (PA13) which has been moved outside today and (PA09) which should follow tomorrow, will be the first aircraft to be scrapped.

What a complete waste of money.

Hunty
hunty is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2011, 22:19
  #1511 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Stockport
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were originally going to cut them up into low loader sized chunks but apparently now going to use a mobile shredder on site.

This country is run by Fvckwits
manccowboy is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2011, 22:31
  #1512 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
What a complete waste of money.
Yup!

This country is run by Fvckwits
Yup! We should have learned our lesson from this similar "Buy British" debacle...
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 00:41
  #1513 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Stockport
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seriously.......there needs to be a public inquiry, how can the people who have made these decisions get away with this scandalous public waste? Not only in monetary terms but people losing their jobs and livelihoods.

To sweep all this under the carpet is a bigger scandal than the banking crisis.

When are people going to be held accountable for their actions in this joke of a country
manccowboy is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 07:26
  #1514 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 270
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seriously.......there needs to be a public inquiry, how can the people who have made these decisions get away with this scandalous public waste? Not only in monetary terms but people losing their jobs and livelihoods.
More importantly for the country as a whole, loosing the capability

Nimrod was not only about sub hunting and SAR, the aircraft, and extremely highly trained crews, were involved in far more than that - and for the past decade, and more, the 'other' roles were in such demand (by the many agencies that utilised the aircraft) that far more hours were spent flying them that ASW or SAR.

An absolute disgrace
MFC_Fly is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 08:50
  #1515 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The question has to be asked - why the hell are they being scrapped so quickly?!
Postman Plod is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 09:06
  #1516 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because Woodford is prime real estate!
peppermint_jam is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 09:20
  #1517 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Because Woodford is prime real estate!
As was Hatfield to a certain extent (although this was originally sold to excavate aggregate).

BAe never have, and never will have any regard to heritage. No-one at Hatfield ever thought that place would shut but it did. It's all about bottom line and you can moan all you like about loosing jobs and livelihoods, it all counts for diddly squat at the end of the day.

Whatever the (real) reasons are for the cancellation of this project, lobbying and petitions are not going to get the decision changed. This country has an alarming history of making major boo boos when it comes to our aircraft industry. Sadly, this will just be another example of it.
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 09:34
  #1518 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Stockport
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because Woodford is prime real estate!
Not necessarily

Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council - LDF Core Strategy DPD - Core Strategy DPD: Preferred Options Consultation
manccowboy is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 10:29
  #1519 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
manccowboy. An interesting link, thanks (don't organisations date their documents anymore).

8.27 The whole of the aerodrome lies within the Green Belt and as such there is significant constraint on the type of development that can take place on the site.
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't bruiser Prescott sneak through an Act that classified all aerodromes as "brown field" sites?

http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...velopment.html

Last edited by GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU; 13th Jan 2011 at 10:40.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 20:09
  #1520 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why scrap so quickly

Postman Plod,

Because DE&S have funds set aside to pay for cancellation this FY and nothing in FY 11/12. If it goes into next FY, something else will have to be cut to pay for the MRA4 cancellation costs.

You could not make it up.
Mend em is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.