Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk V

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk V

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2010, 20:57
  #1861 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LHR
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but hey ho - we have had a good run I suppose
Some CC certainly have!

The party is over I'm afraid.
LD12986 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:03
  #1862 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LGW
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a few FACTS to add to the mix

The current basic for a Longhaul CSD on the top pay point is £43,283.00 gross

Tax is currently paid on 35% of allowances.

CSD’s get 4 request trips per year and usually bid for premium payment trips ie HKG/SIN/BKK/NRT

The take home pay (net pay after deductions) ranges from £3300 to £4500+ depending on the rostered trips that month.

The cost of employment referred to in the CAA website would certainly have to include the Employers contribution to Pension and National Insurance.

As regards HMRC and the meal allowance audit. Some care was required in submissions to HMRC. If an individual receipt for four breakfasts on the same day was submitted., that would not be accepted by the eagled eyed inspectors and they would credit one. Similarly, it would not be reasonable for one person to have ten coffees in one location. It did require that the receipts were realistic and I would estimate that many similar submissions were made by participating crew members and allowed to go forward unchecked to HMRC.

For a CSD, any increase in the percentage of allowances liable for tax could be considered to be taxed at the 40% rate as it is added to taxable pay and the individual rate for a full time CSD would be in the higher band.

Just a thought
Rover90 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:04
  #1863 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
New Poster,

You said "What have I said that is anti-pilot????????"

Da Dog said "You could not make it up" .... and you followed up with "You could if you are a pilot."

Further on you had a stab at this "I hope you work out your fuel loads better!!!!"

So, in answer to your "Please provide your evidence or else apologise - personal attacks are not allowed on here", I say 'No'! Simples. This is a forum for debate, and if you consider that what I wrote is somehow a "personal attack", then you are incredibly 'sensitive', and in the wrong place!

PiB, you are so transparent it's laughable! Many thanks for the laugh!
deeceethree is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:07
  #1864 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: england
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has any one been able to find out if Bassa met with HMRC?
617sqn is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:07
  #1865 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LHR
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rover90

The take home pay (net pay after deductions) ranges from £3300 to £4500+ depending on the rostered trips that month.
Never in 20 odd years have I ever seen a monthly pay cheque in excess of £3400 - never never never - where are you getting your figures from?
New_Poster is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:10
  #1866 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LGW
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you a CSD on the top pay point? Is your basic £43,283.00 gross?
Rover90 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:10
  #1867 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LHR
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
deeceethree

I posted my comments because Da Dog blatantly twisted the quotes to read someting entirely different to suit his agenda - and he is a pilot

And as for BigBrutha and his fuel loads - well he was very quick to question my mathematics yet when he was proven wrong went very quiet - anything else you wish to add?
New_Poster is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:12
  #1868 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So NP,
As a CSD, the tax you'll be paying has increased by 14%, yes?
midman is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:13
  #1869 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LHR
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rover90

Are you a CSD on the top pay point?
CSD and have been since 1995 - not on top pay point and never achieve the figures you quote
New_Poster is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:15
  #1870 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LHR
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Midman

As a CSD, the tax you'll be paying has increased by 14%, yes?
In a word NO
New_Poster is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:20
  #1871 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LGW
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did say "FACTS"

New Poster

A CSD on the top pay point earns a basic salary of £43,283.00 gross.

I have just looked at the last 12 months pay cheques as a Longhaul CSD and it is, as stated, fact.
Rover90 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:21
  #1872 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by New Poster
Never in 20 odd years have I ever seen a monthly pay cheque in excess of £3400 - never never never - where are you getting your figures from?
Out of idle curiousity I looked through a full time WW CSDs payslips for 12 months. 5 of those months had a take home pay in excess of £3400, with the highest just a touch over £4000. Total gross pay for the previous tax year was also pretty much bang on the CAAs figures. No I know said CSD isn't bribing the schedulers, and has a pretty typical roster, including 767 trips, so if you're not making that sort of cash you ought to be asking questions.
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:25
  #1873 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LGW
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guess we are looking at the same pay slips!

Carnage

Out of idle curiousity I looked through a full time WW CSDs payslips for 12 months. 5 of those months had a take home pay in excess of £3400, with the highest just a touch over £4000.
I totally agree with your post. It is fact, pure and simple.
Rover90 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:33
  #1874 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LHR
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BigBrutha

So you dont agree that it is an additional 7% ?

Or have you got another figure?

I have shown you the workings that I believe are correct - can you show me your workings to prove your point - let's make this easy for you - use £1000 per month and £100 - so we can all see the correlation between your figures and the figures I posted on here

As for your G/F and her earnings I was in my first full year of 75% and earned £36,600 15 years as CSD
New_Poster is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:46
  #1875 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LGW
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where did I go wrong Dad?

On £1000 allowances:

35% is liable for taxation ie £350

and now 59% will be liable for taxation ie £590

Therefore £240 (£590 - £350) extra is now liable for taxation.

Assume a tax rate of 20% (it does not affect the figures)

20% Tax on £350 = £70

20% Tax on £590 = £118

Still assuming the arbitary 20% Tax Rate, increase in Tax = £48 (£118 - £70)

So 48/70*100 = 68.5% increase

Last edited by Rover90; 16th Jan 2010 at 21:52. Reason: typo
Rover90 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:57
  #1876 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 49° 11′ 0″ N, 2° 7′ 0″ W
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
deeceethree
I posted my comments because Da Dog blatantly twisted the quotes to read someting entirely different to suit his agenda - and he is a pilot

And as for BigBrutha and his fuel loads - well he was very quick to question my mathematics yet when he was proven wrong went very quiet - anything else you wish to add?
New Poster: Can we please have a stop to this childish, tit-for-tat, spiteful bickering?

If you must continue to slag people off, have the kindness to do it by PM, and spare the rest of us.
La Pouquelaye is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 22:02
  #1877 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Currently:
35% taxable at say 20% tax and 11% NI
£350 x 31% = £108.50 tax and NI = allowances in your pay of £891.50

From 1st Feb:
59% taxable at say 20% tax and 11% NI
£590 x 31% = £182.90 tax and NI = allowances in your pay of £817.10

So in effect you will be worse off £75.40 per £1000 in meal allowances earned or £7.54 per £100
A CSD full time has a tax rate of 40% on his her taxable allowances.

If a lower rate tax payer pays an extra 7% (by NP's figures) then doubling the tax rate will double the tax payable. 7% becomes 14%.

Compare to a senior Captain, who by NP's pasted calculation will pay about 1.2% more tax.

Cabin crew - who would you want representing you at the next review in 2015?
midman is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 22:13
  #1878 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Miss M,

As an "outstander" you would really understand that this is a disgust from pilots and passengers towards cabin crew for wanting to protect their lifehoods. Let's cut the chase. Carnagey Matey is against cabin crew which is obvious from his posts and we all know that you are concerned about your pension. Glamgirl is against LHR as per her statement some months ago that they have been waiting for this since Singlefleet was introduced at LGW.

Can I ask, with the risk of being banned, why you hate cabin crew so much? This is what this thread is about, isn't it?

Seriously? Ok then. I am not against LHR. I've explained this to you before. The reason why we've expected this whole thing is because LGW is the blue print of the future of BA (as many see it). Not because I have anything against LHR. I've many friends at LHR and I am proud and happy to call them friends and I wouldn't want anything bad happening to them. The things happening at the moment at LHR is not classified (in my book at least) as bad things. Bad things would be loss of contract/pay cut/CR/massive cut of routes and so on.

Although I'm sure Carnage Matey is fully capable of standing up for himself, I don't believe he hates cc at all. He seems well informed to me, actually. Please remember that just because someone doesn't agree with you, doesn't mean they hate you (or cc in this instance).

So, MissM, what do you think about the tax hike? Are you happy with the fact that bassa didn't/couldn't be bothered/wasn't able to negotiate with the tax people? Do you care that you'll be losing money because of this?

Gg
Glamgirl is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 22:20
  #1879 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: london
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Poster - you said of the new tax deal 'it works out around 7% extra tax per month.'

Do you still think that? I am appalled by your maths if you do! In the example you so kindly provided you said:

350 at 31% = 108.50 in tax per month
590 at 31% = 182.90 in tax per month

How is this a 7% difference in extra tax a month? It looks like quite a bit more to me. ( for the record a 7% increase in tax in your example would be an extra 7.60 a month not an extra 74.40)

Think you may own a magic pencil!

That money will make a big difference to a lot of your colleagues. It is beyond patrionising to tell them to buy an abercrombie t-shirt a month less.

BASSA could and should have done a lot better for their hard working members. Shameful.
jetlag22 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 22:27
  #1880 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LGW
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slight error in the calcs £74.40 not £75.40

Midman

Old tax paid = £108.50
New tax paid = £182.90

Increase in tax paid = £74.40 (£182.90-£108.50)

Percentage increase in taxation= 74.40/108.50*100 = 68.57% increase in tax paid on allowances

A LH Cabin Crew Member will now pay 68.5% more tax on their meal allowances. Whatever figures you use the result is the same....68.5% increase in tax paid on meal allowances assuming that 59% of the allowances are now taxable.

Last edited by Rover90; 16th Jan 2010 at 23:40.
Rover90 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.