Network EBA
if they dont want militants they know exactly what to do and how to turn it around, and they are not interested. So MILITANCY IT IS!!! Until such time as they f..king wake up, no pilot should change course.
The following 10 users liked this post by Zeta_Reticuli:
The following 2 users liked this post by AviatoR21:
Burning excess fuel for the sake of it is unprofessional and just wasteful. You want to be paid more but happy to burn fuel which is the highest cost for an airline.
The following users liked this post:
They f..king brought it upon themselves. They are the ones who treat their staff with absolute disdain and hatred, they are the ones who destroyed this industry. Not me or any other pilot. Every pilot entered this industry with rose tinted glasses and shiny jet syndrome. What the f..k does it say about the state of the industry when newcomers dont even give a f..k about a new jet anymore??? This is solely on management. They caused it and they can reap the benefits or their own sheer greed and arrogance. The fact of the matter is you could run airline without these management pigs, yet they wont be running **** without pilots, engineers and flight attendants.
if they dont want militants they know exactly what to do and how to turn it around, and they are not interested. So MILITANCY IT IS!!! Until such time as they f..king wake up, no pilot should change course.
if they dont want militants they know exactly what to do and how to turn it around, and they are not interested. So MILITANCY IT IS!!! Until such time as they f..king wake up, no pilot should change course.
The following users liked this post:
It might only take 6 weeks or so to train up a cabin crew and they can do the job but it takes experience and smarts to deal with difficult passengers and real emergencies. Experienced, senior cabin not only save money but sell the product .
The following 5 users liked this post by KAPAC:
Last edited by Bigredsky; 30th Mar 2024 at 06:11.
Respectfully disagree- partially anyway. We used to get cabin crew who were former teachers, cops, paramedics, etc. For them working the cabin was a peace of piss and they added immense value to the operation. For most people fresh out of high school lots of training and time on the job is required until they offer similar value.
The following 9 users liked this post by walesregent:
Respectfully disagree- partially anyway. We used to get cabin crew who were former teachers, cops, paramedics, etc. For them working the cabin was a peace of piss and they added immense value to the operation. For most people fresh out of high school lots of training and time on the job is required until they offer similar value.
The following 4 users liked this post by Gas Chamber:
Respectfully disagree- partially anyway. We used to get cabin crew who were former teachers, cops, paramedics, etc. For them working the cabin was a peace of piss and they added immense value to the operation. For most people fresh out of high school lots of training and time on the job is required until they offer similar value.
The following users liked this post:
Before I am criticised , yes it is only part of the article but to me how long can Qantas keep up the facade of 9% for 5 years or 1.8% per annum when average agreements are running at plus 4% per annum and the public service at over 5%.
The following users liked this post:
They will try to keep it up until they have to skulk hang-dog to the board explaining why they are unable to implement the boards chosen strategy due to a lack of trained and engaged crew. At some stage the board will give direction to the CEO to ‘fix that problem’. My fear is that even with significant wage increases they will be behind the drag curve on training and recruitment and it will take a decade to power over the hump while market share is obliterated. All it would take for Qantas to fall apart internationally is a big operator ( EK, Etihad, Qatar, The new Saudi one, Delta, American, etc) to open a couple of bases down under. Melbourne and Sydney or Perth. Thats a big risk to have sitting in someone else’s hands.
The following 7 users liked this post by framer:
They will try to keep it up until they have to skulk hang-dog to the board explaining why they are unable to implement the boards chosen strategy due to a lack of trained and engaged crew. At some stage the board will give direction to the CEO to ‘fix that problem’. My fear is that even with significant wage increases they will be behind the drag curve on training and recruitment and it will take a decade to power over the hump while market share is obliterated. All it would take for Qantas to fall apart internationally is a big operator ( EK, Etihad, Qatar, The new Saudi one, Delta, American, etc) to open a couple of bases down under. Melbourne and Sydney or Perth. Thats a big risk to have sitting in someone else’s hands.
The following 5 users liked this post by Global Aviator:
Funny how all the obvious management goons on here disappear when voting is closed/nothing happening.
how’s it going Nathan Safe?
LOL
how’s it going Nathan Safe?
LOL
I’m not too sure if it’s current but I have just today seen a photo posted by someone purporting to be him babysitting a bottle of Grange in the first class lounge. I would go MIA if I had a “bottle in front-a-me” 😉
The following 5 users liked this post by gordonfvckingramsay:
The following users liked this post:
