Network Vacancies
Why not compare QF 737 to 787 on the MEL-PER sector as well then..?
Comparing A320 to A320 would be technically correct yes, but that is not what you are inferring here.
Last edited by RealSatoshi; 24th Feb 2023 at 04:59.
737 Captain can make similar to a 787 captain be it working a lot harder for it.
Here's a question for you, Satoshi. Let's ignore real figures. How much do you think an A320 FO and an A320 Captain should be making as a comparison to the average fulltime aussie wage?
1.2x? 1.5x? 2x?
The average aussie wage. Think about all the hundreds of jobs out there. Most would be at home every night, less stress, less skill and training, and wouldn't have 180 people's lives in their hands multiple times per day dealing with schedules, fatigue, MELs, crosswind/TS/sheer/traffic in ctafs/visibility/etc
Actually, let's make it more interesting. How much should those A320 FOs and Captains make compared to the average WA wage? 1.5x more? 2x more? 3x more?
Comparing Pilot wages to the average Aussie wage is a Fools Game for many reasons - we all know it...
Last edited by RealSatoshi; 24th Feb 2023 at 14:32.
Surely these factors combined with the cost of pilot training would suggest an A320 FO be provided with a few more rods!
You're an apologist for Network's poor wages. Now it's time to defend them.
How much more should an a320 pilot be making compared to the average aussie doing presumably the average job? Easy question to answer.
Network A320 pilots should be at least aiming for parity with mainline 737 wages and conditions.
Network F100 pilots should be at least aiming for better than NJS 717 wages and conditions.
Similar wages and conditions for similar jobs.
There are ways of doing unofficial industrial action. Do the bare minimum as a starting point.
Network F100 pilots should be at least aiming for better than NJS 717 wages and conditions.
Similar wages and conditions for similar jobs.
There are ways of doing unofficial industrial action. Do the bare minimum as a starting point.
One could argue that it would take considerably less if QF Management had mainline pilots operating the routes Network are operating…
The following users liked this post:
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Keep you your jaded and toxic comments to yourself Pete, clearly you don’t understand what that word actually means. 🤦🏼♂️
Charming. Does it ever occur to some of you skygod wankers that quite a few people lost their livelihoods during the pandemic, and if those people want to live in a particular part of the world, they're left with little choice but to accept what's available in the local market?
The following users liked this post:
20% churn rate per year. Broken system. Provide a viable career path for existing Mainline Crew. Requires a complete change in mindset.
I’ll accept the current model if QF Management demonstrates savings achieved with low T & C’s Vs costs of training, admin etc etc.
Till that cold day arrives in hell I expect QF Management to abide by their own promulgated “non negotiable business principles “ ie “recruiting the right people into the right jobs”. As a poster on Qrewroom highlights those same principles state:“Our future success is underpinned by our people being skilled, motivated and supported to do great things.”