Covid Vaccines and Pilots
Actually widely disseminated to all medical examiners as part of a regular update, but go on believing it’s all being “hidden”.
The PR interval increase “conspiracy”?
Easily debunked. Here’s a study from European Cardiologists in 2019, well before the Covid vaccine, stating a normal PR interval can be considered to be 300ms or less, and readings of up to 300ms are common in athletes. Not the people who generally have heart problems.
Perhaps the FAA took time to implement that recommendation, but this was something definitely spoken about by Cardiologists well before the Covid vaccine existed.
Management of cardiac conduction abnormalities and arrhythmia in aircrew (under the heading Atrioventricular conduction disturbance)
The PR interval increase “conspiracy”?
Easily debunked. Here’s a study from European Cardiologists in 2019, well before the Covid vaccine, stating a normal PR interval can be considered to be 300ms or less, and readings of up to 300ms are common in athletes. Not the people who generally have heart problems.
Perhaps the FAA took time to implement that recommendation, but this was something definitely spoken about by Cardiologists well before the Covid vaccine existed.
Management of cardiac conduction abnormalities and arrhythmia in aircrew (under the heading Atrioventricular conduction disturbance)
i never said it was conspiracy , read it again . in fact i said it is NOT . Pay close attention to the words. try to comprehend the difference.
thanks for the link but no one anywhere said the FAA implimented recomendations from any euro cardiac study . maybe they did , maybe they done all thier own research , as you pointed out they 've been discussing parameters for longer than the pandemic hysteria has been going with no changes . ECG been a part of avmed for decades , now, they all of a sudden need to move the goal posts .
maybe it 's all a big coincidence just like all the coincidences when people have thier jabs followed by their collapses and heart attacks and the rest of it. We 're not talking about football players , we 're talking about airline pilots who the traveling public want faith in their tickers and know they arent' gonna explode in flight like that fella 's from ***** Air last year . So they quietly increased the interval but don 't make a big deal and you think this is normal and just a coinciudence. i almost wish I had your blind unqestionning puppydog faith in the system and could just roll along with head in sand , happy to be allowed into a mcDonnalds.
that makes no sense. they made the vaccine for the earlier strains and it didn ' t work on the earlier strains . That ' s the entire point. it never stopped people getting it and it never stopped people giving it. at best it reduced the effect for a short time , this has been admitted to. by the time omicron (XI) came along they knew the cat was out the bag and stopped saying it but people (some people not all) never noticed the subtle change. eg. Dre obviously didn 't notice. This is all old news , glechki. They lied to you. I 'm guessing you believed them and made a medical decision based on it . i think that sucks.
They all said it but not in relation to Delta or Omicron, only earlier strains.
It wasn't a lie, nor was it wrong regarding the strain that it was designed for.
**** ups like this don't have to be a conspiracy, it can be a pack of idiots and/or liars, or vested or financial interests.
Last edited by tossbag; 20th Jan 2023 at 11:27.
And then there is this ....... Doesn't help the cause.....
hmmmmmm ......
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-...recy/101827548
hmmmmmm ......
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-...recy/101827548
There was very little window between the vaccine being rolled out and the Delta variant that evaded it to a large degree. There was still net benefit against Delta and reducing transmission was still a factor even if a lot weaker.
I'd focus more on the elephant in the room of vaccinating recently infected individuals, where the vaccine risk is hugely elevated and the benefits almost none. With so many asymptomatic cases I'd wager a lot of people unknowingly got their boosters not long after infection.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....act_id=4206070
Mishandled, yes.
"They all said it but not in relation to Delta or Omicron, only earlier strains. It mutated and the vaccine lost as vast portion its efficacy. It wasn't a lie, nor was it wrong regarding the strain that it was designed for."
There's the problem right there. The vaccines are a non-sterilizing (otherwise known as 'leaky') to a virus that rapidly mutates. This was well known before they came out and were mandated. How about some low-cost therapeutics to ease the pressure. The problem with that is 'low-cost'.
Many billions are to be made elsewhere.
There's the problem right there. The vaccines are a non-sterilizing (otherwise known as 'leaky') to a virus that rapidly mutates. This was well known before they came out and were mandated. How about some low-cost therapeutics to ease the pressure. The problem with that is 'low-cost'.
Many billions are to be made elsewhere.
CASA Avmed also makes regular changes to aviation medical and certification protocols. They even send out a newsletter every month to DAMEs outlining changes. Up until a few years ago being a Type 1 diabetic was disqualifying for holding a Class 1 medical. However this was changed and now T1 diabetics can hold a Class 1 with limitations. This happened because protocols were developed for this condition, no doubt in consultation with experts in the field. The same happened for the ECG change.
Here’s an article explaining the change, and the reasons why it isn’t an issue nor linked to the vaccine:
New FAA cardiac health rules not prompted by COVID-19 shots
Here’s some quotes from experts about the FAA change, and I’ve highlighted the positions of the cardiologists giving the comments to reinforce they are actual experts in this field, not Tucker Carlson or some online nutter:
“In an otherwise healthy heart, this is usually a benign condition and rarely causes any symptoms,” said Dr. Roland Assi, a cardiac surgeon and assistant professor at Yale University.
Dr. Eric Adler, a cardiologist and professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, said it is not uncommon for people to have such delays. “If the block is less than 300 milliseconds there is no indication for further therapy nor increased risk or impairment of bodily function,”
Dr. Richard Kovacs, chief medical officer at the American College of Cardiology, agreed that the FAA’s new guidelines are not worrisome.
The following users liked this post:
Lets step back & look.
https://www.bmj.com/company/newsroom...ll-save-lives/Many may assume that successful phase 3 studies will mean we have a proven way of keeping people from getting very sick and dying from covid-19. And a robust way to interrupt viral transmission.
Yet the current phase 3 trials are not actually set up to prove either
https://www.bmj.com/company/newsroom...ll-save-lives/Many may assume that successful phase 3 studies will mean we have a proven way of keeping people from getting very sick and dying from covid-19. And a robust way to interrupt viral transmission.
Yet the current phase 3 trials are not actually set up to prove either
CV19 deaths Qld Vs WA
From 1 April 2022 QLD has 651 reported covid deaths, WA has 393 over the same period.
WA has about half the population of QLD so you would expect closer to 326 - even lower as WA has about a 20% higher vax rate than QLD.
Both states had single digit numbers before opening borders.
WA has about half the population of QLD so you would expect closer to 326 - even lower as WA has about a 20% higher vax rate than QLD.
Both states had single digit numbers before opening borders.
You can check on all states.
If you read the full decision - This is what was said.
"I am not prepared, in the absence of appropriate evidence, to simply conclude that the Policy is reasonable and/or lawful or proportionate as a workplace health and safety response to the risks presented by COVID 19.
& This
"However, I also give significant weight to the fact that a vaccination policy such as that included in the Policy intrudes on one’s right to bodily integrity if it is complied with. The practical effect of the Policy is to place pressure on an employee to give up this fundamental right, given that non-compliance is accompanied by potential disciplinary consequences that include termination of employment. This weighs against the Policy being assessed as reasonable."
Also the recent teacher one.
https://www.theguardian.com/australi...accine-mandate
"I am not prepared, in the absence of appropriate evidence, to simply conclude that the Policy is reasonable and/or lawful or proportionate as a workplace health and safety response to the risks presented by COVID 19.
& This
"However, I also give significant weight to the fact that a vaccination policy such as that included in the Policy intrudes on one’s right to bodily integrity if it is complied with. The practical effect of the Policy is to place pressure on an employee to give up this fundamental right, given that non-compliance is accompanied by potential disciplinary consequences that include termination of employment. This weighs against the Policy being assessed as reasonable."
Also the recent teacher one.
https://www.theguardian.com/australi...accine-mandate
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Someday I will find a place to stop
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
7 Posts
In Australia when applying for a pilot job where the requirement is to be vaccinated, is that a minimum of 2 jabs or 5?... (serious question and laughing at the same time)
Nova
Reference the above comments…
Seems Phelps knows there’s an issue though is in a quandary just how to handle it. On the one side her ‘colleagues’ would be saying one thing and yet she is seeing evidence of actual different results. Must be a bit mind bending for her at the moment.
Jo Nova has a ‘cautious’ look-see at the Phelps comments:
“..One of the top doctors in Australia Dr Kerryn Phelps — a familiar face on the news here, has come out saying that she has suffered “devastating” side effects from the Covid vaccines herself. She also says that her doctors are seeing ” ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation, but they are afraid to talk about it for fear of being de-registered and losing their career…
..Phelps speculates that 1 in 3000 adult Australians may have had a serious reaction to each Covid vaccine, so after 3 doses, that’s 1 in 1000 and rising with every booster..
..If Kerryn Phelps had started a conversation in August or September 2021, perhaps other doctors would have spoken up then too. Fear kept many people silent. Censorship is a life and death thing..”
https://joannenova.com.au/2022/12/fo...ed/#more-88452
Seems Phelps knows there’s an issue though is in a quandary just how to handle it. On the one side her ‘colleagues’ would be saying one thing and yet she is seeing evidence of actual different results. Must be a bit mind bending for her at the moment.
Jo Nova has a ‘cautious’ look-see at the Phelps comments:
“..One of the top doctors in Australia Dr Kerryn Phelps — a familiar face on the news here, has come out saying that she has suffered “devastating” side effects from the Covid vaccines herself. She also says that her doctors are seeing ” ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation, but they are afraid to talk about it for fear of being de-registered and losing their career…
..Phelps speculates that 1 in 3000 adult Australians may have had a serious reaction to each Covid vaccine, so after 3 doses, that’s 1 in 1000 and rising with every booster..
..If Kerryn Phelps had started a conversation in August or September 2021, perhaps other doctors would have spoken up then too. Fear kept many people silent. Censorship is a life and death thing..”
https://joannenova.com.au/2022/12/fo...ed/#more-88452
Btw, how does Nova state Dr Phelps is one of Australia's top doctors, based on what?
You want evidence?
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...uietly-tacitly
I have an open mind and look forward to been shown why he is wrong. Just saying he is a right wing nut case won’t cut the mustard I’m afraid.
I have an open mind and look forward to been shown why he is wrong. Just saying he is a right wing nut case won’t cut the mustard I’m afraid.
You want evidence when you haven't given any evidence, just another evidence free blowoff by a RWNJ.
The following users liked this post:
No context
And then there is this ....... Doesn't help the cause.....
hmmmmmm ......
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-...recy/101827548
hmmmmmm ......
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-...recy/101827548
Lying?
Further up the posts a Mod warned you about claiming you'd had posts moderated or removed when he states you haven't.
exfocx,
I didn't post it to say anything about vaccine harm, it was more about a commentary on the Australian government not being forthcoming. As the title of the article says -
I didn't post it to say anything about vaccine harm, it was more about a commentary on the Australian government not being forthcoming. As the title of the article says -
Australian governments have kept much of their COVID research and modelling secret. Why?
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Someday I will find a place to stop
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
7 Posts
I can't find via search that this has been mentioned on this thread, but its worth a watch of quite a few of the Russell Brand channel videos on youtube or rumble. If you can tolerate some of his interlaced humour, its extremely enlightening.
He is tackling and exposing a lot of information about pfizer/media/covid vaccination. Even one of the latest videos has a doctor on the BBC that managed to hijack an interview and say about the increase death rate and heart issues, also now that the CDC is finally starting to investigate causal links.
For those of you not aware Rumble is a similar site to Youtube, but is not censored in the same way Youtube is which complies with WHO doctrine, which in turn is funded largely by big pharmaceuticals (fact).
He is tackling and exposing a lot of information about pfizer/media/covid vaccination. Even one of the latest videos has a doctor on the BBC that managed to hijack an interview and say about the increase death rate and heart issues, also now that the CDC is finally starting to investigate causal links.
For those of you not aware Rumble is a similar site to Youtube, but is not censored in the same way Youtube is which complies with WHO doctrine, which in turn is funded largely by big pharmaceuticals (fact).
The following users liked this post:
Rumble is a similar site to Youtube, but is not censored in the same way Youtube is which complies with WHO doctrine, which in turn is funded largely by big pharmaceuticals (fact).
"science"
Btw, you should also look into "peer review", maybe speak to someone who's completed a high end degree what real peer review is. Over the last few decades "peer review" sites have proliferated because of the drive for academics having to publish to gain recognition.
The following users liked this post: