Originally Posted by
Bend alot
If you read the full decision - This is what was said.
"I am not prepared, in the absence of appropriate evidence, to simply conclude that the Policy is reasonable and/or lawful or proportionate as a workplace health and safety response to the risks presented by COVID 19.
& This
"However, I also give significant weight to the fact that a vaccination policy such as that included in the Policy intrudes on one’s right to bodily integrity if it is complied with. The practical effect of the Policy is to place pressure on an employee to give up this fundamental right, given that non-compliance is accompanied by potential disciplinary consequences that include termination of employment. This weighs against the Policy being assessed as reasonable."
Also the recent teacher one.
https://www.theguardian.com/australi...accine-mandate
What, did you read the article? She won a claim not for unfair dismissal, but a workers comp claim for injury via the way the Gov managed the vacc mandate.
Tamsin RoseSat 5 Nov 2022 06.00 AEDTA Sydney teacher sacked for not complying with New South Wales’s vaccination rules has been awarded ongoing workers’ compensation payments of $1,378 a week after she suffered “psychological injury” in the way the mandate was enforced.