Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

All borders to reopen.

Old 26th Aug 2021, 08:01
  #7881 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 980
Received 80 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
And do the data to which you referred distinguish between the workers who spend most of their time in contact with and moving among the aged in their care, on the one hand, and the 'administrators' - for want of a better term - on the other?
Yes, it does. For residential direct care workers (ie workers who spend most of their time in contact with and moving among the aged in their care), 10.1 percent of the workforce was casual or contract.

The breakdown by sub-group was Registered Nurses - 9.8 percent, Enrolled Nurses - 7.8 percent, Personal Care Attendants - 10.8 percent, and Allied Health Workers - 4.8 percent. In 2012 those numbers were 18.7 percent of the direct care workforce was casual or contract; Registered Nurses - 19.4 percent, Enrolled Nurses - 14.8 percent, Personal Care Attendants - 19.5 percent, and Allied Health Workers - 15.1 percent.

And just by the bye, only 4 percent of the direct care workforce had a second job in residential aged care.

Last edited by MickG0105; 26th Aug 2021 at 08:11. Reason: Second job stats
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2021, 08:09
  #7882 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,144
Received 133 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by MickG0105
Possibly because you don't know the meaning of some of the words that you use. If only there was some sort of resource, like a list of words and their meanings, that people could refer to.
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2021, 10:05
  #7883 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
Received 273 Likes on 147 Posts
Yes, it does. For residential direct care workers (ie workers who spend most of their time in contact with and moving among the aged in their care), 10.1 percent of the workforce was casual or contract.

The breakdown by sub-group was Registered Nurses - 9.8 percent, Enrolled Nurses - 7.8 percent, Personal Care Attendants - 10.8 percent, and Allied Health Workers - 4.8 percent. In 2012 those numbers were 18.7 percent of the direct care workforce was casual or contract; Registered Nurses - 19.4 percent, Enrolled Nurses - 14.8 percent, Personal Care Attendants - 19.5 percent, and Allied Health Workers - 15.1 percent.

And just by the bye, only 4 percent of the direct care workforce had a second job in residential aged care.
This is just silly, at least two aged care facilities the virus spread to via a casual delivery driver, so those figures mean nothing. As I said measuring how many nurses are at a facility does not matter. You are just pulling stats out of your backside to make some weird argument that somehow casual workforce was not involved in the spread. When in Melbourne it was directly responsible for it.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-07-...tions/12464302

The Victorian aged care sector is trying to stop casuals from working at a number of different residential homes because, in some cases, staff who were unwell had inadvertently brought the virus into aged care facilities.
By the by, the federal government as I said earlier has actually restricted movement between sites, as they have recognised it as an issue. Basically you have to just work at the site that gives you the most work.


I decided to change tact with the issue,

Aged care is considered highly casualised for a simple reason, the part time positions that 78% of the workforce are on are basically casual conditions (or worse) in a contract. A lot of those contracts guarantee less than 10 hours a week and only exist as they corner the applicant into working casual hours at agreement pay (less than casual rates) rather than casual pay rates. Now maybe I should have used the words quasi-casualisation, but most people involved with the industry refer to it as straight casualisation. The term is used to show a move away from full time positions and the part time positions are actually worse than being on casual rates. Part-timilised workforce doesn't quite sound correct.

Last edited by 43Inches; 26th Aug 2021 at 11:22.
43Inches is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2021, 12:40
  #7884 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 980
Received 80 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
This is just silly, at least two aged care facilities the virus spread to via a casual delivery driver, so those figures mean nothing. As I said measuring how many nurses are at a facility does not matter. You are just pulling stats out of your backside to make some weird argument that somehow casual workforce was not involved in the spread. When in Melbourne it was directly responsible for it.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-07-...tions/12464302



By the by, the federal government as I said earlier has actually restricted movement between sites, as they have recognised it as an issue. Basically you have to just work at the site that gives you the most work.


I decided to change tact with the issue,

Aged care is considered highly casualised for a simple reason, the part time positions that 78% of the workforce are on are basically casual conditions (or worse) in a contract. A lot of those contracts guarantee less than 10 hours a week and only exist as they corner the applicant into working casual hours at agreement pay (less than casual rates) rather than casual pay rates. Now maybe I should have used the words quasi-casualisation, but most people involved with the industry refer to it as straight casualisation. The term is used to show a move away from full time positions and the part time positions are actually worse than being on casual rates. Part-timilised workforce doesn't quite sound correct.
Your original contention was about the "casualised nature of the Aged care workforce". I've demonstrated with verifiable data from a reputable source that the aged care workforce has not been casualised. Don't like the data, come up with something better rather than trying to change the meaning of words.

For fear of stating the blindingly obvious, delivery drivers, casual or otherwise, are not part of the aged care workforce; they're part of the transportation industry workforce.

As to yet another false contention from you, that I've argued that the casual workforce was not involved in spreading COVID-19, I haven't said boo about that. That's just something else you've made up. I commented quite specifically on your patently and demonstrably false contention that the aged care workforce was casualised. It's not. If you're going to trot out misconstrued opinion in the unconditionally declarative form as a fact, expect to be called on it once in a while.

As to your changing tact, I've seen little demonstrated in this exchange. Unless you were looking to change the accepted meaning of another word, I suspect that you meant "tack".
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2021, 12:47
  #7885 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
Received 273 Likes on 147 Posts
Oops did mean change tack,

However my assertion still stands correct, the nature of the aged care sector is casualised. The part time agreements are casual in nature. So still efectively are casualising the workforce.
43Inches is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2021, 02:19
  #7886 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 52
Posts: 2,030
Received 139 Likes on 47 Posts
Originally Posted by Paragraph377
Mick, try googling the information. You seem to be proactive at googling statements or reports that support your premise that everything isnít that bad. You are always on here saying how well the economy is going and how things are better than they seem. I call bollocks. There are countless economists online discussing how many businesses are failing. There are equally as many psychologists mentioning how counselling services are out of control. There are countless medical experts telling us that lockdowns are causing people to cancel doctors visits and things like cancer are going undiagnosed. Sure, online shopping, camper van and caravan sales and vehicle sales have skyrocketed. But ask the tourism operators and businesses, the taxi and transport industry and the hotel/motel industry how things are going and itís a different story. Our economy has been broken in half. We have now been saddled with decades more debt. Using rigged stock market prices and inflated house prices as a measure of a strong economy is an absolute false reading.
I would have suggested Mick visits Cairns and tells local businesses owners how well the economy is booming, but I fear it may result in him getting his lights punched out.

I think this thread, in running its course, has highlighted how rooted Australia (and NZ) actually are; there are two distinct groups who are never going to see eye to eye on a major contemporary issue, and I see that also across society.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2021, 02:26
  #7887 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 980
Received 80 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat
I would have suggested Mick visits Cairns and tells local businesses owners how well the economy is booming, but I fear it may result in him getting his lights punched out.

I think this thread, in running its course, has highlighted how rooted Australia (and NZ) actually are; there are two distinct groups who are never going to see eye to eye on a major contemporary issue, and I see that also across society.
For the avoidance of any doubt and further embarrassment to some contributors, I have not said nor argued that the economy is booming. As I pointed out to P377 at the time I hadn't said boo about the performance of the Australian economy other than to simply to state the facts that while the Australian economy shrank in 2020, by Q1-21 the economy had recovered such that it was larger than in Q4-19.

I have family in Cairns, I am well aware of the two-speed economy up there.

But, you know, glass half full - thanks for thinking of me.

Last edited by MickG0105; 27th Aug 2021 at 02:35. Reason: Reference to previous response.
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2021, 08:43
  #7888 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Asia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
WA to ban people living there after 2 truck drivers test positive . Premier said itís a tough step to take but best for the state going forward .
Torukmacto is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2021, 08:55
  #7889 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 936
Received 50 Likes on 27 Posts
Lock down now, go hard McGowen Delta is very deadly and highly virulent squash and crush this virus early.
SHVC is online now  
Old 27th Aug 2021, 09:26
  #7890 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Posts: 1,846
Received 254 Likes on 107 Posts
AFL grand final in Cairns or Hobart I say.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2021, 09:47
  #7891 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Searth YouTube "House bill 4471"
this ought to be good!
machtuk is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2021, 09:58
  #7892 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,153
Received 204 Likes on 111 Posts
Originally Posted by machtuk
Searth YouTube "House bill 4471"
this ought to be good!
How - we arenít in the US State of Michigan? Australian legislatures arenít controlled by the now crackpot US Republican Party. That bill (that bans mask and vaccine mandates) is doomed to fail in Michigan anyway, so zero chance of anything similar passing in Australia where both major parties support mandates.


dr dre is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2021, 05:13
  #7893 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 52
Posts: 2,030
Received 139 Likes on 47 Posts
Originally Posted by SHVC
Lock down now, go hard McGowen Delta is very deadly and highly virulent squash and crush this virus early.
SHUT THE BORDERÖ.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2021, 18:10
  #7894 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Abeam YAYE
Posts: 327
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ICU nurse speaks out

This video deals with covid. It has info worth considering.

ICU nurse speaks out
pithblot is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2021, 20:54
  #7895 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 125
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by pithblot
This video deals with covid. It has info worth considering.

ICU nurse speaks out
Ivermectin is a Parasitic drug. Not a Anti-Viral drug. It is used in humans for parasitic worms, head lice etc. More commonly used on horses.
The FDA is currently doing tests to see its effectiveness with Covid.

Of course it may help Covid symptoms, but it may not...
The Vaccines are NOW are proven to negate or hugely reduce Covid deaths.
There are side effects to any drug.

And still to this day, there is no known cure for any known Virus - including the common cold...


Obba is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 00:32
  #7896 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 576
Received 73 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by pithblot
This video deals with covid. It has info worth considering.

ICU nurse speaks out
Definitely not a trusted source of infomation, especially when the other videos are from infowars
Ladloy is online now  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 00:34
  #7897 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,153
Received 204 Likes on 111 Posts
Originally Posted by pithblot
This video deals with covid. It has info worth considering.

ICU nurse speaks out
Itís a poorly shot video on a camera phone of someone called Nicole, first name given only, who claims to be an ICU Nurse and cries ďweíre all being lied to!Ē and tells us to watch the JRE podcast for ďthe truthĒ.

As far as the rubbish Iíve seen from anti-vaxxers in the last 12 months that was one of the worst.
dr dre is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 01:05
  #7898 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Obba
Ivermectin is a Parasitic drug. Not a Anti-Viral drug. It is used in humans for parasitic worms, head lice etc. More commonly used on horses.
The FDA is currently doing tests to see its effectiveness with Covid.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime...?ocid=msedgntp
rattman is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 01:40
  #7899 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Age: 40
Posts: 1,106
Received 61 Likes on 34 Posts
1,218 new cases in New Sick Wales today, completely skipping the 1100's...The genie is well and truly out of the bottle, but of the 6 new deaths, all over 70, 4 unvaccinated, and two with only one dose. Now that makes me wonder, as I'm in my 30's having my second dose this arvo - though I would have preferred to not have them at all, that's not an option if I want to get back to work the way McGoose is carrying on...

But anyways... if people in their 70's & 80's haven't had even one dose the question needs to asked, why are millions of people lockdown, losing literally billions of dollars in salary & super, to protect people who won't try to protect themselves!?? At what point do we say "You've had your chance to get the shot, you've not taken it, so you're on your own! Good luck!" because I refuse to believe someone who is over 70 has not had a chance to get both vaccinations by now.
KRviator is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 02:09
  #7900 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: The Swan Downunder
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by KRviator
1,218 new cases in New Sick Wales today, completely skipping the 1100's...The genie is well and truly out of the bottle, but of the 6 new deaths, all over 70, 4 unvaccinated, and two with only one dose. Now that makes me wonder, as I'm in my 30's having my second dose this arvo - though I would have preferred to not have them at all, that's not an option if I want to get back to work the way McGoose is carrying on...

But anyways... if people in their 70's & 80's haven't had even one dose the question needs to asked, why are millions of people lockdown, losing literally billions of dollars in salary & super, to protect people who won't try to protect themselves!?? At what point do we say "You've had your chance to get the shot, you've not taken it, so you're on your own! Good luck!" because I refuse to believe someone who is over 70 has not had a chance to get both vaccinations by now.
A better question might be Why weren't they vaccinated. Is it because they chose not to be or is it a health department failing. Also does the 1218 include unlinked cases or hasn't that come into effect yet.
Xeptu is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.