Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

MERGED: Alan's still not happy......

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

MERGED: Alan's still not happy......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Feb 2014, 02:41
  #2781 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on Joe.....

Your the only one who says it how it is in the end......
I will sit by and watch the parliament who will give me what I deserve (thanks Mr McFarlane) rather than joining a conference call recently summonsed.
Acute Instinct is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 02:48
  #2782 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western Pacific
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The PM's first response in question time was to state that there services available to those who lose their jobs. Unbelievable!!! What a leader!
Oakape is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 03:03
  #2783 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The PM

Get ready for it.........
Its the carbon tax.........
Fully staged, it's all about the senate.....
Acute Instinct is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 03:12
  #2784 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas supports carbon price

By Cathlin Thurbon | March 14th 2011 | In Carbon.


The Australian Financial Review today reported that Alan Joyce, chief executive of Australia’s biggest airline, Qantas Airways, yesterday gave his support for the carbon tax proposed by Prime Minister Julia Gillard. The AFR quotes Mr Joyce as saying “We can understand the logic in the carbon tax and why the government regards it as a necessity – we’re convinced that all organisations should do whatever they can to reduce emissions”.
When it was politically convenient, AJ gave it, his full support.
Clipped is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 03:15
  #2785 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Iraq
Age: 35
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pay increases and bonuses will not be contemplated until Qantas is profitable again. This is in addition to the reduction of fees paid to the Qantas board and a reduction in the take home pay of the Qantas Group CEO by 36 per cent this financial year
Alan won't be happy about that
http://www.scribd.com/doc/209513859/Qantas-Fact-Sheet
No Hoper is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 03:36
  #2786 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Netherlands
Age: 67
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FINALLY, the press are waking up......what happened Alan...did you forget to buy this month's advertising??


You're right Alan Joyce, Qantas' results are unacceptable, so why don't you sack yourself? | News.com.au
King William III is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 03:38
  #2787 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Hunter Valley NSW
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The carbon tax is a factor, its a factor with just about every manufacturing company that has left our shores to set up, where they can afford the wages and the power bills. And Who TF thought that running a carbon tax out of Parliament House Canberra was going to save the freckin world, anyway. Whilst the trains run out of the Hunter Valley packed with black coal to send to China where it is almost impossible to see, unless a howling gale is around. Talk about having a freckin bucket with a hole in it, that is what this carbon tax is. It just adds to QF's woes, and why would they spend a fortune changing uniforms for the cabin crew, nothing wrong with the last one, do they actually employ bean counters there, and if so, WTF do they do? All we have now is a bunch of QF employees more frightened than ever, every bodies shoulder is vulnerable, no one is safe, only the union leaders, and a few of the management, and those two knobs ,Shorten and Albernese have only added to it. What a terrible day for all concerned, hopefully the dust will settle and some common sense applied. No down tools, thanks Sheldon, if you do Joyce will pull the plug, and it will not be for two days. He is counting on you doing it.
Ida down is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:00
  #2788 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In the big chair
Age: 48
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting chat with a colleague from a global fund manager. Seems to be a school of thought that the reason The Fed govt is sitting on its hands re QF Sales Act is there may be an imminent privatisation bid from a domestic consortium. The sell-down of QF shares post jobs slashing announcement is certainly not the norm. Given $3bn of liquidity in the company, it would seem that something very fishy is going on in the market, and a consortium could pick up Qantas for a song, at about a quarter of the price APA offered 5 or so years ago. Certainly co-incides with why QF have stopped all asset expansion.
Insider Trader is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:01
  #2789 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
If the carbon price is such a factor why are many businesses, including Qantas, still claiming it isn't a big deal?!
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:02
  #2790 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 1,370
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
I don't see what all the fuss is about, $252Million, that's less than the price of a single A380...

But in all seriousness, let's have a good look, ALLLLL of a sudden they have decided to become more efficient? Really? Why haven't you been aiming to be more efficient for the last few years? What tools!!

Least we now know what the extra type being retired is, the 747 Non-reconfigured, they put the 2 types of 747s in seperately!

Oh, so you're going to suspend growth of Jetstar Asia? What on earth happened?! You've spent so long telling us how incredible these businesses would be and how much they would contribute to the Group... we'd have a lot more respect for this tool if he just came out and said "Ooops, we messed up, but we are going to fix it"

Yes, you want to retire those old gas guzzlers...oh but we're going to defer the new 787s which could actually save us a giant chunk of money in the long run... maybe we should have put them with Qantas and better utilised them?!

5000 jobs reduced ey? Well, whilst no one wants to see people sacked I don't many of us could disagree that the 1500 from Management and Non-Operational is probably a good place to start.

I don't think anyone can disagree that a leaner, meaner business is better for the majority in the long run, it's a shame that it's gotten to a position where it has apparently become bloated to the point of 15% of it's jobs being able to be made redundant. Once again though that allllll comes down to Management, they are the ones who have sat atop their ivory perch for so long and watched it all and done so little, they could have spent the last few years working on these efficiencies and doing it little by little but instead they were so focussed on their little escapades in Asia that they lost sight of the core business and now the Qantas Group all have to suffer in one fell swoop. Not mention everyone else in Aviation below, this will have knock-on effects that will be felt for years to come in terms of people moving up the Aviation ladder, everyone from Pilots and Engineers to Check-in Staff and Baggage Handlers, of course the corporate types will probably just shift industry, same job different industry, no problems for them.

And of course, no acknowledgement from those on the ivory perch for their part in it all, they've done an amaaaaazzzing job of course, it's everyone and and everything else that let them down...
Ixixly is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:06
  #2791 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 551
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
a reduction in the take home pay of the Qantas Group CEO by 36 per cent this financial year
Like hell the Leprechaun will be taking a pay cut - any cut in "take home pay" will be well and truly made up with share options and other contra deals.

An interesting bit in the "fact sheet" linked a few posts ago...........

The Qantas Group has indicated that our investment is small in the context of the Group (approximately $300 million in invested capital, which is less than the price of one A380 and the opportunities for Jetstar in Asia are significant
$300mil "invested" (wasted) is insignificant in the context of the group yet a loss of $252mil means the sky is falling?

I mean if $300m is less than the price of 1 A380 then $252m is even more lesserer than 1 A380.

I am confused
Kiwiconehead is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:20
  #2792 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Iraq
Age: 35
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kiwiconehead, it does seem a bit odd that a loss of 250 mil has caused all the problems.
Maybe an excuse to slash and burn?
Likewise, Alan's pay "cut" is to show that he his suffering as well
No Hoper is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:22
  #2793 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Bubble
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
?rel=0" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen>

in case anyone is bored
600ft-lb is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:30
  #2794 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 225
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Saw GT commenting Had to turn it off, but his Chairmans Club membership will certainly be continued.
Propstop is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:32
  #2795 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
it's a shame that it's gotten to a position where it has apparently become bloated to the point of 15% of it's jobs being able to be made redundant.
This is not correct. A sizeable proportion of the jobs made redundant will be replaced by outsourced work and carried out by staff employed by other companies for which QF will pay a fee rather than direct salaries.
1A_Please is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:45
  #2796 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't understand why they are announcing the retirement of 767s like it is something new. The retirement schedule announced today is exactly the same as the one I saw last year... And while I don't know for sure, I think it is a similar situation for the 747 fleet. And I thought we all knew the last 8 A380s were being deferred (if not cancelled entirely)... So why is this being treated as news?
Flugbegleiter is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:48
  #2797 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,297
Received 332 Likes on 126 Posts
Hey I know I'm not the smartest guy in the room, but.... I don't get either why a $250mill loss is such a big deal to a company sitting on a few billion cash. Its ONE aircraft. Barely.

Maybe the thread title can finally be changed to reflect the true thrust of it - 'QANTAS WORKFORCE is not HAPPY'.
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 04:49
  #2798 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they've done an amaaaaazzzing job of course, it's everyone and and everything else that let them down...
Indeed, Truss says it himself, but..... did he mean it?... more to come from the Canberra playground..



.
TIMA9X is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 05:02
  #2799 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Outofoz
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Did anyone phone Royal Melbourne and ask if Leigh was playing a couple of rounds down there today?
No where to be seen.....incredible.
hotnhigh is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 05:03
  #2800 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
ey I know I'm not the smartest guy in the room, but.... I don't get either why a $250mill loss is such a big deal to a company sitting on a few billion cash. Its ONE aircraft. Barely.
You definitely aren't the smartest guy in the room. You seem to be confusing buying an asset for $250M with making a loss. When you buy an asset you expect to earn money from that asset for years to come. Qantas has nearly $20Bn worth of assets and its return on those assets was negative $250 million. Surely you get that this is terrible.
1A_Please is offline  


Show Printable Version
Email this Page

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.