Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qf LAME EBA Negotiations Begin

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qf LAME EBA Negotiations Begin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Mar 2011, 01:32
  #361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: at work
Age: 44
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So this bloke wants a 50% payrise. EA increase plus another $320 per week. I wish him all the best. Don't worry pal I am sure there is an opening in management for you somewhere soon.
Only got 100% support from my section Fed Sec.
EA's should help everyone and not just a small greedy few.
duderanch is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 03:50
  #362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Up left - Down right
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Removing caps & quotas is a big step forward for all. Well worth the sacrifice of accrued service points.
Short_Circuit is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 03:58
  #363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane
Age: 49
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So far, since meeting Fed Sec last wednesday to hear about the progress of the EBA, I have discussed the proposed points system with quite a few other LAME's.

Only two have had negative sentiment towards the proposal. Both because of service points owing. Both stated that then needed to think about themself and not others. Both said think short term and not long term. Fine if you are planning to leave in 18 months I guess.

Personally, I stand to lose in the short term as I may possibly see a course in the next 18 months.

I am all for the new proposal however
BrissySparkyCoit is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 08:35
  #364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
accured service points

If anyone thinks that accured service pionts will be transfered to a new system,"your dreaming" not only from a union position the company would not have it as it would move some up so fast that the pay office would not be able to keep up.......get real guys a new system starts from day one,no baggage,so get over it....Rim
the rim is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 09:28
  #365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
There are quite a few people who don't care about the "proposal", some who are sitting on the fence, alot who like it, but also quite a few who are loosing points and are getting pretty pi$$ed off about it. But there are also a lot of guys, (and I mean alot!!) who have absolutely no idea what is being proposed. Their opinions will matter when the proposal (whatever it is) is released.

A few meetings to thrash it out wouldn't go a-stray so we can all get back on the same track. Slinging crap at each other will achieve very little.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 12:41
  #366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane
Age: 49
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a proposal in progress I guess. People should just wait and see what the outcome of negotiations around it come to. I am certain the ALAEA will present to members very clearly what the proposal will being. Better to wait and see what the outcome is than to start getting all pi$$ed off.
BrissySparkyCoit is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2011, 03:04
  #367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weed out the 'company stooges' and the 'Rogue Reps'.

Expect them, find them, identify them to everyone and then expel them as members.

It's the only way to deal with this sort of self interest
Longbow25 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2011, 05:19
  #368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane
Age: 49
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That rep wouldn't happen to be our Avalon based curry loving rep would it?
BrissySparkyCoit is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2011, 05:36
  #369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pity City
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Longbow - "Weed out the 'company stooges' and the 'Rogue Reps'".
Everyone will be affected differently by whatever is proposed. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and they are entitled to express it. However, if they are not upfront about their agenda i.e. pushing a personal agenda while representing the ALAEA; or a company agenda dressed up as a personal one, then they deserve to be exposed.

There will be a chance to debate the proposal, everyone will get a vote. Until then stay united and support the committee.


Longbow - "then expel them as members".
I think that takes things a bit too far. Being a member is a lot more than a particular position you take on an EA proposal!
33 Disengage is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2011, 07:08
  #370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane
Age: 49
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I spent 10 years as a delegate for an AME union and one of the things you have to do is encourage members to vote how they see fit. You can explain to them your personal opinion however, it's up to the member to decide for themself.

I recall a time when discussing an issue with the manager of our wonderful H3 facility in Brisbane. I agreed with his point of view on a particular issue however, the membership consensus was opposite to my view and that is what I was pursuing in negotiations.

He then said to me "well if you agree with me then you need to go out there and sell this to them".

Clearly, he had no idea what unions are about.

As I said, under the proposal (which is still being tweaked), I stand to lose in the short term however, I can see that the system will be a much fairer system in the long run. Change it now and disadvantage a few in the short term? Change it later and disadvantage a different group in the future? Perhaps there will be an agreement reached that keeps almost everyone happy? Who knows.

Until then, no point getting pi$$ed off about a proposal that is in the workings!
BrissySparkyCoit is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2011, 00:36
  #371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I am sure that there are a few "agenda's" going around. However, as always, membership will ultimately decide which way we go. We all have an opinion, and most importantly, we all have minds of our own.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 01:52
  #372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: this is australia
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In good faith my arse.....

I won't be holding my breath for Thursdays meeting.
QF seem to want to waste everyone's time.
6 months of meeting and still no offer.....
Grassmere Avenue is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 04:10
  #373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is time Qantas stops wasting its time paying "Old Meadow" all this money and re-engage with its workers to come up with a solution.

I think If Qantas wanted to, I know the boys in Engineering would be more then happy to draft up a future plan to include;

-Long term 3rd party contracts with foreign operators

-A sustainable future for Qantas and Qantas Engineering

-Re-gain that Qantas image it once had of been the safest airline in the world.

- Be competitive and at the same time a great place to work and earn a decent wage/salary.

-Draw up a future plan to strive towards.


It is not that hard to invest in the people that work for the airline, instead of wasting time and money with a contractor that gets off on seeing the demise of Qantas, does Qantas realise he is being paid by another airline to damage its image.....
MEA332 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 06:34
  #374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ALAEA lodged for PIA at 5PM today.

I expect there to be a hearing regarding the ballot by the end of the week in FWA.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 06:41
  #375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pity City
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fed Sec,

I, and many of those I work with, support the PIA application. Is this lodgement part of the process after 6 months of "negotiations", or have things turned nasty this week?
33 Disengage is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 06:44
  #376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just sick of going to meeting after meeting and getting nowhere. They need to know that this is real, they seem to have short memories.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 07:01
  #377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Either way it will flush ot their next move for better or worse.

Are the ground staff under a PIA at present?
ampclamp is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 07:10
  #378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just goes to show that Qantas Management have learnt NOTHING!

Good going Q Management Clap Clap for the Handicaps!, seems like you guys are too busy pissing off your staff, rather then running the company like you should and creating more routes that you can fill the parked 747s, 767s and the A330s you decided to paint in orange. Good work guys, I am sure you are proud of the achievments you have made already this year.
Funny thing is, some people started to have faith in you Chris Nassenstein, good going mate! Would have thought you knew all about the previous PIA when you had to send Air NZ engineers to turn around your aircraft.

The Exodus to VB, J* etc here they come, good AME's your way.
MEA332 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 07:30
  #379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only exodus will be when QF offer redundancies, other than that there will only ever be natural attrition.
another superlame is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 09:35
  #380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Aus
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Fed Sec,
Does this mean us retired QF Lames should be expecting a call from Newport Aviation in the future?
I think I will have to see what my reply was last time,something like go yourself,I would of thought that these so called managers learnt from the Murray Moments last PIA.
Righty Tighty is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.