Was it not the case that BAA were forced to sell STN but wanted to keep hold of it right up to the end. Skipness why do all of you recent posts all seem to be anti STN, are you joining LGS & the Luton Fanboys? Moved from the Dundee thread Skipness One Echo I must ask. Why are you so anti anything and everything Stansted? It's not about me hating "Team Stansted", I am just staggered at how in business, a lack of institutional memory (or stupidity / naivety) allows a lot of money to be wasted repeating the same mistakes. I fully support the based airlines doing what they do but the waters get muddied badly when people witter on about expanding STN with two runways into a "hub" when they singularly fail to see why it's sitting half empty with one runway. It's a market behaviour, a real world, business friendly quanitfiable metric, not all that complex. I wholly support STN for what it is and try not to laugh to hard at those trying to sell it as something it's never been. Where else do you see Ryanair and easyJet in such "palatial" surroundings as some Irish CEO once said? Indeed, this flight has been running for over 20 years and is well used. Do I need to touch on the fact it has connections to god knows how many destinations via FR & EZY Go educate yourselves. I bet half of you don't even have the experience of ever having used Stansted. Number of connections offered by Ryanair = Zero Number of connections offered by easyJet = Zero They are point to point low cost operators who don't offer connections. That's the whole business model, by all means fly from Scotland to STN and connect but at your own risk and more than likely on easyJet.... unlike it's competitor at 'Bedfordshire International'. |
Funny how a lot of us think the same though. :ok:
Let's move on to some positivity. Some of you are beginning to make my eyes bleed to be honest. :zzz: |
BAA built a very nice new STN against all airline advice then paid the price when reality kicked in. It has lovely facilities and growth potential galore as it's not as busy as it was supposed to be. MAG are looking to make something of STN but the main reason BAA gave up and concentrated on LHR is that they tried everything to get other airlines in and no one was having it. BAA got badly burned by the whole debacle, all credit to MAG if they get things on a surer footing, but the transport strategy that got us to where are now was a fantasy in the 80s, compounded in the 90s then forgotten in the noughties. |
I think BAA is better left in the past. They were a nasty, greedy airport monopoly that spared no thought to anywhere or anyone other than Heathrow. They epically failed and finally paid the price. That's why they no longer exist! What they are now known as I think explains exactly where their priority is clear enough! Not to mention the suggested sales of SOU, ABZ and GLA.
But bizarrely everything Skipness refers to is under BAA management. Yet just a year into MAG ownership and Stansted becomes one of the UK's fastest growing airports and it's fair to say new carriers are coming in quicker than they have done for several years. Funny how that happens. Some co-incidence would you say Skipness? |
MAG are going the exact same way as BAA, they are gathering a monopoly in the UK to!!!
Before STN MAG were all MAN like BAA were LHR and didn't do much for there other airports oh wait they sold one instead. |
Funny how that happens. Some co-incidence would you say Skipness? MAG can do all sorts of things to get traffic in, BAA got Continental, Lufthansa, SAS, American Airlines (twice) but all were unsustainable. Right now MAG are getting the traffic back up, I genuinely hope they succeed where BAA failed. It's re-writing history to suggest they didn't try very hard though. |
So a year on and Stansted under MAG ownership has achieved...
We should also now see potential future growth from EasyJet. Not bad really for a year seeing it was stagnant under BAA's ownership. Will be interesting to look back in a years time. :ok: One thing I will add is that having used Stansted recently the new security area looks a bit cheap and shabby like some poor MFI job. I do hope they improve on it. |
So we have a list of gains but what has Stansted lost in the last year?
There are a few easyjet aircraft based at Southend I am sure MAG would like to get back. |
One thing I will add is that having used Stansted recently the new security area looks a bit cheap and shabby like some poor MFI job. |
As I have always said Stansted is a great airport and I am a fan of the place but I wonder why the business jet community has never really taken to the place and prefers Luton.?
The main reason STN fails to attract Biz-Jets in similar numbers to LTN is location,location,location! |
Im hoping Stansted will get some long haul flights back, would be really great to see, but i agree Stansted has improved since BAA have gone, so lets forget about them and look to a brighter furture:ok:
|
The main reason STN fails to attract Biz-Jets in similar numbers to LTN is location,location,location! |
One thing I will add is that having used Stansted recently the new security area looks a bit cheap and shabby like some poor MFI job. I do hope they improve on it. |
Security clearance is a lot quicker now though
|
Long delays and several cancellations today due to Italian ATC strike!
|
Schedules at Stansted for S14 look a lot less peaky than they have done for several years.
Typically from about 13:30/14:00 till 16:00 in the afternoon, the place usually pretty much went dead. That no longer seems to happen where these times are significantly busier for S14. The busiest periods around early afternoon and early evening are also generally slightly less intense than previously, helping to make a much better spread of flights across the day. Of course there's still going to be some busier and quieter periods, but nowhere near as extreme. Only a brief spell in the morning at around 09:00 or 10:00 and then in the evening for a short time about 21:00 or so, are generally quieter. To put this into context, here is the Departures on a Monday between 13:00 and 15:00 in S13 compared to S14: S13 EZY3103 13:05 Nice FR2281 13:05 Warsaw-Chopin QS2175 13:05 Gran Canaria EZY259 13:15 Belfast-International EZY3245 13:15 Ljubljana FR2462 13:15 Bydgoszcz EZY3189 13:20 Lyon FR8474 13:20 Poitiers FR032 13:30 Oslo-Torp FR8182 13:35 Fuerteventura FR225 13:40 Dublin FR908 13:40 Cork FR1396 13:45 Oslo-Rygge FR2612 13:45 Santander FR3004 13:55 Rome-Ciampino FR4196 13:55 Milan-Bergamo FR8132 14:00 Gran Canaria GR625 14:20 Guernsey FR8592 15:00 Bergerac S14 EZY3103 13:05 Nice FR4196 13:05 Milan-Bergamo FR3004 13:10 Rome-Ciampino EZY259 13:15 Belfast-International EZY3071 13:15 Munich FR2281 13:15 Warsaw-Modlin FR2462 13:15 Bydgoszcz FR1396 13:20 Oslo-Rygge FR225 13:40 Dublin FR908 13:40 Cork FR2612 13:50 Santander TOM5116 13:55 Gran Canaria 9U834 14:00 Chisinau EZY3191 14:00 Lyon FR032 14:05 Oslo-Torp FR7965 14:05 Osijek FR8132 14:10 Gran Canaria FR8546 14:15 Berlin-Schonefeld FR8182 14:20 Fuerteventura GR625 14:20 Guernsey FR105 14:30 Shannon FR754 14:35 Frankfurt-Hahn FR2404 14:35 Munich-Memmingen FR8345 14:40 Porto TCX7982 14:40 Bodrum FR8592 14:50 Bergerac FR9275 14:50 Eindhoven FR5986 15:00 Madrid |
FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,FR,:zzz:
Almost a one horse airport:E The airport could do with a bit more diversity to give it a really secure future. |
Thought EZY agreed with MAG to increase their flights from STN, may of had a change of heart
|
But still with almost double the amount of passengers as LTN & 18 times SEN & Rising :E
|
Very true but another way to look at it is that Luton is running at almost full while Stanated is half empty:E
Joking aside what is Stansted's present capacity? What is Stansted's growth rate if you strip out FR? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.