PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   STANSTED - 2 (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/245928-stansted-2-a.html)

southside bobby 10th Sep 2017 14:05

Ta.....just as my further researches have revealed & in more succinct form than most!.. & of course the Tigerair mentioned is Tigerair (Singapore) only..

racedo 10th Sep 2017 16:37


Originally Posted by pamann (Post 9887543)
This website and forum gets worse and worse by the day with constant nitpicking and bitching. Not everyone speaks the Queen's English nor do they type it. However I can understand Southside's posts, it really isn't that difficult it is clearly just Southside's style. It's as bad as poking fun at someone because they are different. No one posting here is employed by Pprune to police these forums as the 'Grammar Police'. So please just give it a rest and wind your necks in. .

:D:D:D:D
Here Here

leadinghand 10th Sep 2017 23:29

Ladies,isn't it about time someone posted a decent rumour on this Rumour Network?

leadinghand 10th Sep 2017 23:34

Let me be the first..
with thompson pulling their longhaul out of stn next year the stage will be set for another carrier to enter the fray.Top of the list of contenders at the mo appears to be AA followed by a certain chinese carrier.

mik3bravo 11th Sep 2017 00:25


Originally Posted by leadinghand (Post 9888057)
Let me be the first..
with thompson pulling their longhaul out of stn next year the stage will be set for another carrier to enter the fray.Top of the list of contenders at the mo appears to be AA followed by a certain chinese carrier.

Hang on - AA as in American Airlines?🤔

canberra97 11th Sep 2017 11:23


Originally Posted by leadinghand (Post 9888057)
Let me be the first..
with thompson pulling their longhaul out of stn next year the stage will be set for another carrier to enter the fray.Top of the list of contenders at the mo appears to be AA followed by a certain chinese carrier.

Never been a P in Thomson!

That always annoys me just as much as Stanstead does...rant over.

Regarding American Airlines I can't see them making a third attempt at Stansted.

southside bobby 11th Sep 2017 11:50

STN records 2.7m pax in August + 9.9% it`s busiest ever month & for a rolling 12 month total of 25.4m.:ok:..Cargo marginally up in August with 21,000 tonnes + 1.4% & rolling 12 month figure of 259,400 tonnes which is a 4% increase..

southside bobby 11th Sep 2017 12:09

canberra97...just for the record & I know you aim for completeness too, American Airlines 2nd coming @ STN was not really an "attempt" as such & not a full network integrated permanent approach,it was purely aimed @ Eos & MaxJet...job done they were "outta here big style"...Whether a 3rd coming has any credence well logic says no.........(however)..

canberra97 11th Sep 2017 12:42

I am totally aware of why American Airlines had their second attempt at Stansted to fight off EOS and Maxjet and the reasons behind it but a third attempt at the airport in my opinion won't happen.

ps notice I used 'and' rather than & and 'at' rather than @ or even 'third' rather than 3rd.

southside bobby 11th Sep 2017 13:27

pps...& I notice you are still using the word "attempt" it was not an attempt it was just a strategic ploy & that was the reasoning for my post as attempt suggests possible failure as an outcome & in the STN context 2nd time around it was an absolute success...so one attempt & one success right?...& in my opinion too as I stated a 3rd coming is not logical......
Oh & by the way I notice everything but will not discuss my deliberate keyboard use with you.Can you & the others please keep the discussions or exchanges to relevant issues which we are more interested in rather than attempting to score cheap irrelevant points.Ta

Planespeaking 11th Sep 2017 18:44

[QUOTE=southside bobby;9888463]pps...& I notice you are still using the word "attempt" it was not an attempt it was just a strategic ploy & that was the reasoning for my post as attempt suggests possible failure as an outcome & in the STN context 2nd time around it was an absolute success...so one attempt & one success right?...& in my opinion too as I stated a 3rd coming is not logical......
Oh & by the way I notice everything but will not discuss my deliberate keyboard use with you.Can you & the others please keep the discussions or exchanges to relevant issues which we are more interested in rather than attempting to score cheap irrelevant points.Ta[/QUOTE
SSB the adverse comments regarding your posts are because of your 'deliberate keyboard use'. Cannot you find a pattern forming here? It is not that people are trying to score 'cheap irrelevant points', it's just that we would like to understand what you are saying. We appreciate your support for STN, please help by writing your posts in intelligible English.

01475 11th Sep 2017 19:17

None of us are obliged to type anything, and none of us are obliged to read everything that has been typed.


I always work on the basis that people should type how they please (bearing in mind that if they were typing something because they want people to read it, the number of people who do so may be affected by the way they decide on) and that people should read what they want to (keeping in mind that they may miss something interesting based on what they want to).

If it really upsets anyone then there is an ignore list feature.

canberra97 12th Sep 2017 12:31

We don't want or even feel the need to use the ignore list all we want or expect from adults as in posters on these forums is for them to type in a manner that others can understand not in a gibberish childlike manner.

It's as if SSB has a different mentality when it comes to the English language and if he thinks he is being clever by doing so it only looses him any credibility on these forums so until he grows up and conducts his post in a more familiar way he can't be taken to seriously.

I think that's what others including myself are trying to get across.

Skipness One Echo 12th Sep 2017 12:35


ps notice I used 'and' rather than & and 'at' rather than @ or even 'third' rather than 3rd.

We don't want or even feel the need to use the ignore list all we want or expect from adults as in posters on these forums is for them to type in a manner that others can understand not in a gibberish childlike manner.
This is the third time you've had a public spat with someone this week that's become a playground spat. Use private messages if you want to have a go at another person, it's tedious for the rest of us.....

canberra97 12th Sep 2017 14:02

Skip

We've had words in the past and I would prefer out of all people for you to personally keep your thoughts to yourself.

Your the first person to put someone down either on here or on airliners.net for far less than what I have wrote.

pamann 12th Sep 2017 15:03

Can we please get this back on track and in the nicest possible way Canberra97 can you wind your neck in and build a bridge for the sake of all of us here.

Thank you.

canberra97 12th Sep 2017 15:37

pamman

Yes I will secumb to your advice and I agree let's get back on track as I prefer to take it from yourself rather than someone else as in skip.


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:05.


Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.