Flybe-V2
Info posted elsewhere suggests there are 4 more (ex Flybe Mk1) Q400's expected, anywhere between the next 10 days and late December (different dates per airframe), all subject to change.
In the meantime, G-EXTB (on lease from LOT) has now entered service, and I believe there's another to come.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: EGAC
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flybe are back at IOM:
BHD-IOM starts 30/10/22
BE606 BHD 1420-1500 IOM (Mon-Fri) BE608 BHD 1805-1845 IOM (Sun)
BE609 IOM 1920-2000 BHD (Sun) BE607 IOM 2015-2055 BHD (Mon-Fri)
IOM-LHR starts 31/10/22
BE725 IOM 1545-1720 LHR (Mon-Fri)
BE726 LHR 1805-1940 IOM (Mon-Fri)
BHD-IOM starts 30/10/22
BE606 BHD 1420-1500 IOM (Mon-Fri) BE608 BHD 1805-1845 IOM (Sun)
BE609 IOM 1920-2000 BHD (Sun) BE607 IOM 2015-2055 BHD (Mon-Fri)
IOM-LHR starts 31/10/22
BE725 IOM 1545-1720 LHR (Mon-Fri)
BE726 LHR 1805-1940 IOM (Mon-Fri)
And lets not mention the 'there are plenty of a/c available, lessors will be desperate, BE will be able to get the pick of the bunch' comments.
I think the point is, if there is a shortage of airframes why not delay the launch of the new service rather than suspending existing services? Not a great way to improve your reputation.
And lets not mention the 'there are plenty of a/c available, lessors will be desperate, BE will be able to get the pick of the bunch' comments.
And lets not mention the 'there are plenty of a/c available, lessors will be desperate, BE will be able to get the pick of the bunch' comments.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BMA
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not sure, but perhaps if the existing service has competition it might be cheaper to rebook your pax via them, rather than axing the new route with no competition where 2+ flights and compensation might be involved for pax. Reputation takes a hit whatever services get chopped.
I am inclined to agree, either they want to grow their slice of the BHX - Scotland market or they don't. If they aren't serious then can the routes and put their energy and resources elsewhere.
Rightly or wrongly, they may be prioritising some of the upcoming routes, LHR-NQY (starts at end of Oct) springs to mind.
Are zombie-flybe really saying to Cornwall County Council and the IOM govt who subsidise Eastern and Loganair's ops respectively that there's no need to subsidise at all or that they should choose flybe instead?
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Launching Newquay going into winter on a point to point basis (with no codeshares at LHR?) seems just aimed at damaging the Eastern operate PSO on LGW-NQY. Similarly attacking the very niche and govt supported IOM-LHR up against Loganair just seems fairly spiteful and a spolier. These are low volume niche markets that can barely support one carrier in winter, I remain concerned that flybe2 offer nothing new net new in market.
Are zombie-flybe really saying to Cornwall County Council and the IOM govt who subsidise Eastern and Loganair's ops respectively that there's no need to subsidise at all or that they should choose flybe instead?
Are zombie-flybe really saying to Cornwall County Council and the IOM govt who subsidise Eastern and Loganair's ops respectively that there's no need to subsidise at all or that they should choose flybe instead?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would suggest that the desperation to find routes that they hope won’t lose a large fortune (only a small fortune) into Heathrow simply confirms what I have always said which is that Flybe v2 is simply a Heathrow (and to a lesser extend, Amsterdam) slot play. It will take a number of years to play out, assuming they don’t run out of money before then and in the meantime cause all sort of damage to other companies, but I’m afraid no current Flybe v2 staff can expect to get 10 year long service medals.
And by the looks of it, that isn't going to change.
Sample return for the dates in November, Flybe is fractionally more expensive - even before you add £18 each way for a bag - than Loganair. easyJet LGW is much cheaper but their bag charges look to have shot up in recent times - £54.98 return for their bundle, which is almost as much as the base fare on many flights.
If you want a cheap fare, it's Gatwick (as long as you don't take a bag). If you want the lowest fare to Heathrow, it's Loganair with or without a bag. I can't see any USP or anything different Flybe are bringing to the party, unless I'm missing something?
Sample return for the dates in November, Flybe is fractionally more expensive - even before you add £18 each way for a bag - than Loganair. easyJet LGW is much cheaper but their bag charges look to have shot up in recent times - £54.98 return for their bundle, which is almost as much as the base fare on many flights.
If you want a cheap fare, it's Gatwick (as long as you don't take a bag). If you want the lowest fare to Heathrow, it's Loganair with or without a bag. I can't see any USP or anything different Flybe are bringing to the party, unless I'm missing something?
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And by the looks of it, that isn't going to change.
Sample return for the dates in November, Flybe is fractionally more expensive - even before you add £18 each way for a bag - than Loganair. easyJet LGW is much cheaper but their bag charges look to have shot up in recent times - £54.98 return for their bundle, which is almost as much as the base fare on many flights.
If you want a cheap fare, it's Gatwick (as long as you don't take a bag). If you want the lowest fare to Heathrow, it's Loganair with or without a bag. I can't see any USP or anything different Flybe are bringing to the party, unless I'm missing something?
Sample return for the dates in November, Flybe is fractionally more expensive - even before you add £18 each way for a bag - than Loganair. easyJet LGW is much cheaper but their bag charges look to have shot up in recent times - £54.98 return for their bundle, which is almost as much as the base fare on many flights.
If you want a cheap fare, it's Gatwick (as long as you don't take a bag). If you want the lowest fare to Heathrow, it's Loganair with or without a bag. I can't see any USP or anything different Flybe are bringing to the party, unless I'm missing something?
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BMA
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In purist terms, yes. In reality, it doesn't help anyone to plan a trip they couldn't already do.
Do they have any codeshares or through ticketing at all yet?
It looks more and more like that!
Do they have any codeshares or through ticketing at all yet?
I would suggest that the desperation to find routes that they hope won’t lose a large fortune (only a small fortune) into Heathrow simply confirms what I have always said which is that Flybe v2 is simply a Heathrow (and to a lesser extend, Amsterdam) slot play.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BMA
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Loganair’s Chief Executive posted this on LinkedIn
“Loganair has carried over 20,000 customers this summer between the Isle of Man and London, flying to both Heathrow and London City. It's great to see so many customers enjoying the Loganair service: - assured onward same-ticket connections worldwide with our partner airlines including British Airways; - free baggage allowance included with every ticket; - flights on seven days a week; - our rewarding Clan Loganair frequent flyer scheme; - our GreenSkies programme to offset the carbon emissions from every flight. Above all, our operation supports 40 local jobs in the Isle of Man for our great team of pilots, cabin crew and engineers based there. If we have the pleasure of welcoming you on one of our flights, please do say hello - they're a fantastic team who do a great job looking after our customers, and together, we're in it for the long haul. #flyloganair#theisleofmansairline”
Cleary they are sticking around for the fight.
“Loganair has carried over 20,000 customers this summer between the Isle of Man and London, flying to both Heathrow and London City. It's great to see so many customers enjoying the Loganair service: - assured onward same-ticket connections worldwide with our partner airlines including British Airways; - free baggage allowance included with every ticket; - flights on seven days a week; - our rewarding Clan Loganair frequent flyer scheme; - our GreenSkies programme to offset the carbon emissions from every flight. Above all, our operation supports 40 local jobs in the Isle of Man for our great team of pilots, cabin crew and engineers based there. If we have the pleasure of welcoming you on one of our flights, please do say hello - they're a fantastic team who do a great job looking after our customers, and together, we're in it for the long haul. #flyloganair#theisleofmansairline”
Cleary they are sticking around for the fight.
Launching Newquay going into winter on a point to point basis (with no codeshares at LHR?) seems just aimed at damaging the Eastern operate PSO on LGW-NQY. Similarly attacking the very niche and govt supported IOM-LHR up against Loganair just seems fairly spiteful and a spolier. These are low volume niche markets that can barely support one carrier in winter, I remain concerned that flybe2 offer nothing new net new in market.
Are zombie-flybe really saying to Cornwall County Council and the IOM govt who subsidise Eastern and Loganair's ops respectively that there's no need to subsidise at all or that they should choose flybe instead?
Are zombie-flybe really saying to Cornwall County Council and the IOM govt who subsidise Eastern and Loganair's ops respectively that there's no need to subsidise at all or that they should choose flybe instead?
Also plenty of the affluent London-based Cornish 2nd home-owning set, who may be tempted away from the 5 hour drive in the Range Rover for their weekend jaunts to Rock or St Ives (anyone frequenting the A30 west of Exeter late on a Friday evening, at any time of year, will be aware of the volume of people in this category)
None of us know whether Flybe are being very smart with these moves, or if they're comitting commercial suicide. I'd side with the giving them the benefit of the doubt for now.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BMA
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was plenty of disquiet in Cornwall when the PSO was announced as LGW. Yes, codeshares are needed, but there are plenty of longhaul markets served from LHR (that aren't from LGW) that folk coming in from the SW will want to connect to.
Also plenty of the affluent London-based Cornish 2nd home-owning set, who may be tempted away from the 5 hour drive in the Range Rover for their weekend jaunts to Rock or St Ives (anyone frequenting the A30 west of Exeter late on a Friday evening, at any time of year, will be aware of the volume of people in this category)
None of us know whether Flybe are being very smart with these moves, or if they're comitting commercial suicide. I'd side with the giving them the benefit of the doubt for now.
Also plenty of the affluent London-based Cornish 2nd home-owning set, who may be tempted away from the 5 hour drive in the Range Rover for their weekend jaunts to Rock or St Ives (anyone frequenting the A30 west of Exeter late on a Friday evening, at any time of year, will be aware of the volume of people in this category)
None of us know whether Flybe are being very smart with these moves, or if they're comitting commercial suicide. I'd side with the giving them the benefit of the doubt for now.
Well quite, it's because by they're using an ATR72 which doesn't have the seat/mile costs of an A319.
It's an ATR72 because the volume on IOM-LON is split across 3 x daily to London with 1 x LHR and 2 x LCY to maintain a business friendly schedule.
The once daily London option already has a loco option on easyJet, now there does seem to be room for loco and frequency but flybe are simply looking to replace Loganair.
It's an ATR72 because the volume on IOM-LON is split across 3 x daily to London with 1 x LHR and 2 x LCY to maintain a business friendly schedule.
The once daily London option already has a loco option on easyJet, now there does seem to be room for loco and frequency but flybe are simply looking to replace Loganair.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well quite, it's because by they're using an ATR72 which doesn't have the seat/mile costs of an A319.
It's an ATR72 because the volume on IOM-LON is split across 3 x daily to London with 1 x LHR and 2 x LCY to maintain a business friendly schedule.
The once daily London option already has a loco option on easyJet, now there does seem to be room for loco and frequency but flybe are simply looking to replace Loganair.
It's an ATR72 because the volume on IOM-LON is split across 3 x daily to London with 1 x LHR and 2 x LCY to maintain a business friendly schedule.
The once daily London option already has a loco option on easyJet, now there does seem to be room for loco and frequency but flybe are simply looking to replace Loganair.