Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Edinburgh-4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jan 2024, 08:56
  #2121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,543
Received 373 Likes on 219 Posts
my immediate thought was another 7000 possible complainants about aircraft noise!
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 09:49
  #2122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by inOban
For anyone not familiar with the area, the line which bisects the site is the tram which will get an extra stop. The existing P&R stop is in the bottom right of the picture and the runway is the old one which is disused.
thanks for the orientation. I can see what I assume is Arthur’s Seat but I wasn’t quite sure where the planned development was. I don’t see that as being particularly affected by airport flyover noise but it’s amazing how far the sideline noise, take off and reverse thrust, travels at night.
willy wombat is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 09:55
  #2123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,606
Received 98 Likes on 67 Posts
You can see part of the old GA area bottom left in the illustration below.

If you look at this link, I think the development is basically under the table bottom right - anything taxying to the 300 stands etc will be very close.

https://nats-uk.ead-it.com/cms-nats/...ics/321387.pdf
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 10:17
  #2124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Luton/Tenerife
Posts: 965
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
my immediate thought was another 7000 possible complainants about aircraft noise!
The Airport was there when they purchase their new residences so they must know what to expect......
ericlday is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 10:28
  #2125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,111
Received 318 Likes on 185 Posts
Originally Posted by ericlday
The Airport was there when they purchase their new residences so they must know what to expect......
Has that ever stopped a 'retrospective NIMBY'?
ATNotts is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 10:39
  #2126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,543
Received 373 Likes on 219 Posts
Originally Posted by ericlday
The Airport was there when they purchase their new residences so they must know what to expect......
As Notts says that's never stopped anyone - and of course it really reduces the amount of space available for any airport expansion
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 17:47
  #2127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 39
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
As Notts says that's never stopped anyone - and of course it really reduces the amount of space available for any airport expansion
This is my main concern. EDI is already a very busy airport for its size and clearly needs expanding both ramp and terminal-wise...yet the people in charge seem happy to sell vast swathes of land and cram it in even more.

I do wish the Highland showground had relocated to this area instead of houses, it would have been ideal, with new roads being built to serve both facilities, as well as a dedicated tram stop for the RHSG, freeing up a huge area for the airport to make use of in the future and creating a modern venue for the Highland Show. Sadly it has not worked out this way and with even more houses now also being built on the other side of Glasgow Road, there is simply nowhere left in the area.
edi_local is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 19:34
  #2128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Edin
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by edi_local
This is my main concern. EDI is already a very busy airport for its size and clearly needs expanding both ramp and terminal-wise...yet the people in charge seem happy to sell vast swathes of land and cram it in even more.

I do wish the Highland showground had relocated to this area instead of houses, it would have been ideal, with new roads being built to serve both facilities, as well as a dedicated tram stop for the RHSG, freeing up a huge area for the airport to make use of in the future and creating a modern venue for the Highland Show. Sadly it has not worked out this way and with even more houses now also being built on the other side of Glasgow Road, there is simply nowhere left in the area.
With what appears to be a done deal, subject to all the normal pre contract stuff, GIP, according to various reports will retain day to day control and management of the airport. Blackrock (the owner) will be responsible for any significant expenditure decisions and expansion. Regarding the possible limitations and remaining ground for any terminal expansion, presumably, BR could attempt to negotiate a deal to purchase RHS land. This would open up a large amount of estate to build on. The other option, which I’ve heard a few people from within EDI mention when using the airport each week is adding air bridges to the existing pier. This could create at least four more wide body capable stands. Adding air bridges should be simple. The likelihood is another floor or level to the terminal would be required to channel pax from arriving int flights. The creation of previously reported gate rooms would also be easy to create on the pier.
Planeraz is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 20:05
  #2129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Planeraz
With what appears to be a done deal, subject to all the normal pre contract stuff, GIP, according to various reports will retain day to day control and management of the airport. Blackrock (the owner) will be responsible for any significant expenditure decisions and expansion.
Does the above mean that GIP are no longer selling EDI as a standalone asset?
tartan 201 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 20:56
  #2130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Edin
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tartan 201
Does the above mean that GIP are no longer selling EDI as a standalone asset?
This is what I interpret, having read a few reports. I assume Blackrock as the owner in waiting of GIP could if they wanted to sell the asset (EDI) at some point.
Planeraz is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 21:18
  #2131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Age: 53
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Planeraz
GIP, according to various reports will retain day to day control and management of the airport.
What reports are these, for us all to read.
VickersVicount is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2024, 23:15
  #2132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My interpretation is that the team who created GIP are taking over the operation of all Blackrock's infrastructure assets. A lot of Blackrock's money comes from pension funds who are just about the only source of long-term funding and also require a steady income stream to pay pensions when the holders retire which is why so many of them have invested in our regulated industries. This may turn out good for EDI and LGW

Last edited by inOban; 17th Jan 2024 at 13:20. Reason: typo
inOban is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2024, 19:19
  #2133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.scottishfinancialnews.co...r-ps943bn-deal

A few reports out now on the takeover of GIP by BlackRock.
A350Saltire is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2024, 13:03
  #2134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by inOban
My interpretation is that the team who created GIP are taking over the operation of all Blackstone's infrastructure assets. A lot of Blackstone's money comes from pension funds who are just about the only source of long-term funding and also require a steady income stream to pay pensions when the holders retire which is why so many of them have invested in our regulated industries. This may turn out good for EDI and LGW
I assume you meant BlackRock and not Blackstone?
Breathe is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2024, 13:20
  #2135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
corrected thanks
inOban is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2024, 14:07
  #2136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oil Capital of Central Scotland
Age: 57
Posts: 486
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
So how did we all miss this?
Passenger dies after fall at EDI
Donkey497 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2024, 16:53
  #2137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Age: 53
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by inOban
corrected thanks
Lets hope its nothing like GreyBull…
VickersVicount is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2024, 09:06
  #2138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Saltash
Posts: 151
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.ch-aviation.com/news/136...ps-in-mid-3q23

Looks like EDI will be seeing the new KLM 321 in October this year.
4eyed anorak is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 13:57
  #2139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flightrider
Interesting numbers. The only point to make is that you can still lose money flying at 100% load factors if the yields are on the floor. I was led to believe that at least one of the above routes is not in a good place for that very reason.
Originally Posted by Flightrider
I agree. It will be interesting. I suspect two routes from the above list won't be here next summer, but we'll simply have to wait and see.
Originally Posted by Flightrider
With one existing TATL link being described as a low-yield basketcase by those working for the airline in question and another related operation not exactly achieving loadfactors becoming of the size of the aircraft deployed, it will be fascinating to see whether capacity increases or declines next year, regardless of the airport's ability to cope with it.
The posts above were made in July and August 2023 and relate to the services between EDI and the US that operated then (UA to EWR*2/IAD/ORD, DL to ATL/BOS/JFK and VS to MCO). All of these services are on sale for S24 and all start within the next two to four months.

Current schedules show IAD starting six weeks earlier than it did in S23, ATL finishing four weeks later and MCO starting two and a half months earlier. All will operate with aircraft of the same size as operated in S23, except IAD, where the S24 schedule shows 757s but 764s operated some flights in S23 (the 764s were a relatively late addition then, so it’s possible that they could also operate in S24).

Would it be reasonable therefore to conclude now that the two routes over which the doubts quoted above were expressed can indeed be expected to operate in S24 (barring some force majeure type event)? If so, why might they have been given a reprieve?
tartan 201 is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2024, 20:24
  #2140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oil Capital of Central Scotland
Age: 57
Posts: 486
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
.... and we've missed other EDI news, not as bad as someone actually dying as a result of transiting via EDI, but a flight cancelled and the captain appearing in court tomorrow morning on an offensive weapons / firearms charge is reasonably notable.

Reports of United captain detained at EDI Security over taser - flight cancelled

We need to up our game and change focus away from speculation on routes or ownership.
Donkey497 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.