Teesside-2
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It appears that there is no impact on the Draken operations as the parent companies will by the looks of it be just absorbing the assets.
https://find-and-update.company-info...mpany/01853419
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Norwich
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/news...rwich-airport/
Perhaps of interest in Ryanair and its views on the UK market, despite Norwich in the title it focuses on Exeter, Teesside and Norwich in the article.
Ryanair doing its usual is what I take from the article.
Perhaps of interest in Ryanair and its views on the UK market, despite Norwich in the title it focuses on Exeter, Teesside and Norwich in the article.
Ryanair doing its usual is what I take from the article.
Benjis latest Facebook promise..if re elected he will promise to bring back flights to Malaga and Tenerife !
More subsidies or are the airlines ready to follow his lead and toe his line ?
More subsidies or are the airlines ready to follow his lead and toe his line ?
Which doesn't seem to have impacted the new Ryanair routes announced at Pescara, Malta (including Belfast and Norwich), Cagliari, Trieste, Tirana, Madrid, Rome, Charleroi so far this year.
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Uk
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He states if he wins he will bring in Málaga and Tenerife, so it entirely rests on whether he gets re-elected, begs the question why has he not done it so far.
WOuld Tenerife flights require food / a meal provided, Teesside have no such facilities??????
Or are these just election promises, similar to that of the £200 million industrial park, and what's happening to the proposed solar farm, Houchen said that SSE were opening a new office hub at the airport ??
WOuld Tenerife flights require food / a meal provided, Teesside have no such facilities??????
Or are these just election promises, similar to that of the £200 million industrial park, and what's happening to the proposed solar farm, Houchen said that SSE were opening a new office hub at the airport ??
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Teesside
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think on the routes promise, it has to be something already agreed. Which should mean it’s coming whoever gets in - more of a case of the mayor claiming credit.
If I’m wrong, then it’s a risky promise as the airlines won’t do what doesn’t make sense for them. Or subsidies are involved.
My inclination is it’s the first point - already in the bag.
If I’m wrong, then it’s a risky promise as the airlines won’t do what doesn’t make sense for them. Or subsidies are involved.
My inclination is it’s the first point - already in the bag.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Norwich
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bet ryanair will be rubbing their hands together with glee on hearing this. Effectively the Mayor has made clear he wants to secure these routes come what may (in other words at any cost). Therefore, knowing there's pretty much no other show in town, he has pretty much handed ryan a signed blank cheque to name their figure!!!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Teesside
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bet ryanair will be rubbing their hands together with glee on hearing this. Effectively the Mayor has made clear he wants to secure these routes come what may (in other words at any cost). Therefore, knowing there's pretty much no other show in town, he has pretty much handed ryan a signed blank cheque to name their figure!!!
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was never made public what deal was done with Ryanair to get them in before the previous mayoral election so anything is possible. Let's not forget, however, that he has made similar promises before that have come to nothing but he never explains himself.
As for Harold's much repeated backlog at Beoing excuse, we understand why he has made this up, but it is undermined when Ryanair expand at other airports but not MME.
As for Harold's much repeated backlog at Beoing excuse, we understand why he has made this up, but it is undermined when Ryanair expand at other airports but not MME.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Norwich
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bet ryanair will be rubbing their hands together with glee on hearing this. Effectively the Mayor has made clear he wants to secure these routes come what may (in other words at any cost). Therefore, knowing there's pretty much no other show in town, he has pretty much handed ryan a signed blank cheque to name their figure!!!
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You do understand that each new route is dependant on aircraft being delivered.
For instance Norwich routes could be because aircraft 33, 36, 37, 40 have been delivered. Teesside routes may be at aircraft delivery number 49 and 53.
Couldn't be more simpler than that.
But I forget that it goes against your negative views.
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ryanair have explained several times, including today, that the Boeing backlog may result in fare increases in the summer but trying to use that as the excuse for the mayor not delivering on his promises when other airports anounce additional routes is just daft.
You can be confident that if the lack of replacement FR aircraft was the reason for no expansion at MME then this would have been explained by his Lordship. You apear to be the only person coming up with this theory.
You can be confident that if the lack of replacement FR aircraft was the reason for no expansion at MME then this would have been explained by his Lordship. You apear to be the only person coming up with this theory.
How can it be made up when Ryanair and Boeing have publicly stated that there are backlogs in deliveries. SO THAT IS NOT MADE UP!!!!!!!!!
You do understand that each new route is dependant on aircraft being delivered.
For instance Norwich routes could be because aircraft 33, 36, 37, 40 have been delivered. Teesside routes may be at aircraft delivery number 49 and 53.
Couldn't be more simpler than that.
But I forget that it goes against your negative views.
You do understand that each new route is dependant on aircraft being delivered.
For instance Norwich routes could be because aircraft 33, 36, 37, 40 have been delivered. Teesside routes may be at aircraft delivery number 49 and 53.
Couldn't be more simpler than that.
But I forget that it goes against your negative views.
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not the only one. It doesn't take a genius to work it out.
You do realise how companies operate and how they plan expansion or contraction.
Each operation is given a number in line on the expansion plan.
You do realise how companies operate and how they plan expansion or contraction.
Each operation is given a number in line on the expansion plan.
Sounds like a long term sustainable growth plan for the mayor of Toytown (sarcasm).