SOUTHEND 5
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EasyJet 2016
I took a random 7 days in June 2016....there are 61 return flights from SEN. Is this the same as 2015? I assume this is work for 3 A319s only.
Still nobody is interested in Malta; I find that amazing.
Still nobody is interested in Malta; I find that amazing.
tophat27dt
For Summer 2016 (July onwards) there are 63 weekly rotations, which is the same as last year and fully commits the three based A319s, although I think it quite likely that two or three VCE-SEN flights may be added as easyJet have stated they wish to increase VCE-LON frequencies from the new VCE base and SEN was mentioned. Currently the timetable shows only 2 x weekly SEN-VCE services compared to 4 x weekly normally.
For Summer 2016 (July onwards) there are 63 weekly rotations, which is the same as last year and fully commits the three based A319s, although I think it quite likely that two or three VCE-SEN flights may be added as easyJet have stated they wish to increase VCE-LON frequencies from the new VCE base and SEN was mentioned. Currently the timetable shows only 2 x weekly SEN-VCE services compared to 4 x weekly normally.
Both Stobart Flybe-liveried ATR72s EI-REL & 'REM have positioned to IOM to commence the Flybe lease and Lithuanian ATR72-200 LY-MCA is operating the SEN Stobart/Flybe routes today. Perhaps this will be replaced by a Stobart ATR42 in due course for the winter.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Replaced by what aircraft?
If I have counted correctly, Stobart now has approx. 20 weekly departures from SEN to three destinations. Does that signal a slow wind-down of the operation there or are they still committed and will boost SEN next summer with new destinations and a second airframe?
If I have counted correctly, Stobart now has approx. 20 weekly departures from SEN to three destinations. Does that signal a slow wind-down of the operation there or are they still committed and will boost SEN next summer with new destinations and a second airframe?
In fact EI-EHH entered service at SEN this afternoon and LY-MCA has ferried to DUB to commence operating Aer Lingus Regional routes. Perhaps this will continue until EI-REH returns to service.
As far as the question of S2016 is concerned it's anyone's guess as to what will happen. The ATR42 is probably more suited to the level of demand during the winter on the CFR, RNS and GRQ routes. The Flybe S2016 timetable will be released on 10th November but that may not include the Stobart routes if last year was anything to go by when they weren't released until late December.
As far as the question of S2016 is concerned it's anyone's guess as to what will happen. The ATR42 is probably more suited to the level of demand during the winter on the CFR, RNS and GRQ routes. The Flybe S2016 timetable will be released on 10th November but that may not include the Stobart routes if last year was anything to go by when they weren't released until late December.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last night three Ezy is diverted to Stanstead due to foggy. This morning First three Ezy are being cancelled. I supposed the passengers are to transfers another Ezy or another's airlines at Stansted or Gatwick. It is shame unable to land at Sen due to runway issue.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it that it can't be done rather than it won't be done?
As for the 3 easyjet's I thought that maybe the passengers were being bused to Stansted seeing that all 3 aircraft are arriving back one hour late but it would appear that the aircraft are being flown out empty. Might have something to do that if the passengers were bused to Stansted that would have mean a bigger delay and the aircraft might miss the curfew tonight and get diverted again?
As for the 3 easyjet's I thought that maybe the passengers were being bused to Stansted seeing that all 3 aircraft are arriving back one hour late but it would appear that the aircraft are being flown out empty. Might have something to do that if the passengers were bused to Stansted that would have mean a bigger delay and the aircraft might miss the curfew tonight and get diverted again?
Updated 4 hours ago by easyJet Operations Control
We are sorry that we have had to cancel your flight today. This is due to your aircraft diverting into Stansted last night because of low visibility/fog . Unfortunately as the weather has not in improved today we are unable to re position your aircraft to Southend to operate your flight. There are now several options available to you. Our ground team in at the sales desk in Southend will be able to assist in looking for an alternative route to your destination, you can use our service on the easyJet web page under My easyJet to re book yourself to the next flight and any associated flights in the same booking free of charge or call our Customer Service Team who will be able to assist you over the phone. We would like to apologise for this disruption and any inconvenience to your travel plans today.
We are sorry that we have had to cancel your flight today. This is due to your aircraft diverting into Stansted last night because of low visibility/fog . Unfortunately as the weather has not in improved today we are unable to re position your aircraft to Southend to operate your flight. There are now several options available to you. Our ground team in at the sales desk in Southend will be able to assist in looking for an alternative route to your destination, you can use our service on the easyJet web page under My easyJet to re book yourself to the next flight and any associated flights in the same booking free of charge or call our Customer Service Team who will be able to assist you over the phone. We would like to apologise for this disruption and any inconvenience to your travel plans today.
Last edited by LTNman; 1st Nov 2015 at 08:41.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dubai
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Latest METAR
METAR: EGMC 010820Z 34004KT 300V360 0200 R24/0300 R06/0300 FG BKN001 06/05 Q1029
In can be done just needs some investment and an upgrade of facilities. Nothing is impossible especially if you can persuade the CAA with a damm good safety case !
METAR: EGMC 010820Z 34004KT 300V360 0200 R24/0300 R06/0300 FG BKN001 06/05 Q1029
In can be done just needs some investment and an upgrade of facilities. Nothing is impossible especially if you can persuade the CAA with a damm good safety case !
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dubai
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By using modern ILS systems that do not require the same safeguarding criteria as the old ones !. That with modern aircraft combined it can be done. I am not saying its easy but it can be done.
Dont forget all the required standards as in CAP168 were written when there were tridents and VC10's flying.
Dont forget all the required standards as in CAP168 were written when there were tridents and VC10's flying.
southern duel
I'm sorry but I believe that you are mistaken if you think anything can be done to upgrade the SEN runway from CAT 1 to CAT 2. It is physically impossible due to the runway configuration and the Obstacle Limitation Surfaces etc.. Stating that "nothing is impossible" is so easy but if you can point me in the direction of these reduced "safeguarding criteria" that would permit an upgrade I shall study them with great interest.
The CAT 1 operating minima were always going to be one of SEN's weaknesses in its appeal to operators so they must concentrate on any infrastructure shortcomings that they can improve upon to ensure they have the best possible offer to make to potential airline customers.
I'm sorry but I believe that you are mistaken if you think anything can be done to upgrade the SEN runway from CAT 1 to CAT 2. It is physically impossible due to the runway configuration and the Obstacle Limitation Surfaces etc.. Stating that "nothing is impossible" is so easy but if you can point me in the direction of these reduced "safeguarding criteria" that would permit an upgrade I shall study them with great interest.
The CAT 1 operating minima were always going to be one of SEN's weaknesses in its appeal to operators so they must concentrate on any infrastructure shortcomings that they can improve upon to ensure they have the best possible offer to make to potential airline customers.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dubai
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You must never have heard of the term "variations" that do not conform to CAP168 but are unique operating critera approved by the CAA and each variation is based on its own safety/risk case.
Like i said its difficult and not all cases will be approved it depends on the case, how it is written and what are the risks and how they are mitigated. Basically it comes down to an experienced and knowledgeable person capable of writing it in the first place !!
have a look at a few Aerodrome manuals that are available on the web you will understand what I mean ! How else could you get Code F aircraft using Code D taxiways ?
Like i said its difficult and not all cases will be approved it depends on the case, how it is written and what are the risks and how they are mitigated. Basically it comes down to an experienced and knowledgeable person capable of writing it in the first place !!
have a look at a few Aerodrome manuals that are available on the web you will understand what I mean ! How else could you get Code F aircraft using Code D taxiways ?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dubai
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ILS technology is only used on runways.
A-SMGCS (Advanced Surface Movement Guidance Control System) is used by ATC for controlling aircraft in FOG on the ground when the controllers have no visual contact.
A-SMGCS (Advanced Surface Movement Guidance Control System) is used by ATC for controlling aircraft in FOG on the ground when the controllers have no visual contact.
southern duel
I'm certainly fully aware of variations which the CAA may permit from time to time when overall safety is enhanced by doing so. An example at SEN was their acceptance of the church obstruction when an ILS, plus other improvements, was installed on the extended runway 06 (now runway 05) in place of the previous SRA. I simply feel that they would never permit such extensive variations from the requirements that a CAT 2 ILS would necessitate. That would be of a different order completely in my view and not achievable.
You seem to be saying that you have the experience to try for it and I suggest you contact the Stobart COO, Jon Horne, at SEN and pitch for the task of writing the proposal.
I'm certainly fully aware of variations which the CAA may permit from time to time when overall safety is enhanced by doing so. An example at SEN was their acceptance of the church obstruction when an ILS, plus other improvements, was installed on the extended runway 06 (now runway 05) in place of the previous SRA. I simply feel that they would never permit such extensive variations from the requirements that a CAT 2 ILS would necessitate. That would be of a different order completely in my view and not achievable.
You seem to be saying that you have the experience to try for it and I suggest you contact the Stobart COO, Jon Horne, at SEN and pitch for the task of writing the proposal.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STANSTED & MANCHESTER
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Easyjet cancellations
If true and these flights were cancelled then this is very poor customer service by Easyjet, Southend to Stansted by coach is not that far and looking at the cancelled flights they were all holiday routes.
Easyjet should advice passengers at point of booking that Southend is poorly equipped operationally, to deal with standard UK weather issues and thus if you want a better chance of your flight departing to a long planned, payed for Holiday, taking into account a hotel is fully paid for at destination then you are better to book from London Gatwick, London Stansted or Luton.
Very poor Easyjet
Easyjet should advice passengers at point of booking that Southend is poorly equipped operationally, to deal with standard UK weather issues and thus if you want a better chance of your flight departing to a long planned, payed for Holiday, taking into account a hotel is fully paid for at destination then you are better to book from London Gatwick, London Stansted or Luton.
Very poor Easyjet